Geriatric_Maxillofacial_Trauma_Illustrated_PPT.pptx

lenkapriyadarshini6 1 views 27 slides Sep 17, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 27
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27

About This Presentation

maxillofacial trauma in geriatric population : choice of implant in mandibular fractures


Slide Content

Maxillofacial Trauma in the Geriatric Population Focus: Choice of Implant in Geriatric Mandibular Fractures Prepared using multicenter studies and Fonseca 4th Edition

Introduction Challenges: anatomical changes, comorbidities, delayed healing. Increasing incidence with aging population. Reference: Brucoli et al., 2020【22】

Definition Geriatric facial trauma: fractures in patients ≥70 years. Mandibular fractures common, especially in atrophic jaws. Reference: Fonseca, 2013【25】

Etiology & Prevalence Falls are leading cause (86.9% in >75 yrs). Other: MVAs, assaults, but much less frequent. Reference: Shumate et al., 2018【23】; Liu et al., 2019【24】

Epidemiology Mean age ~79.3 yrs (range 70–100). More females than males affected. Reference: Brucoli et al., 2020【22】

Common Fracture Sites MZO fractures most common. Mandibular fractures frequent, esp. in atrophic edentulous jaws. Reference: Brucoli et al., 2020【22】

Concomitant Injuries Orthopedic, intracranial, thoracic, ocular. Significant impact on treatment timing. Reference: Brucoli et al., 2020【22】

Clinical Features Pain, mobility, ecchymosis (extraoral & intraoral). Difficulty in mastication. Reference: Fonseca, 2013【25】

Diagnostic Imaging OPG, CT, 3D reconstruction are gold standard. Essential for planning implant placement. Reference: Fonseca, 2013【25】

General Considerations Frailty, comorbidities, anesthesia risk. Multidisciplinary care essential. Reference: Brucoli et al., 2020【22】

Non-surgical Management Observation, soft diet for high-risk anesthesia patients. Risk: malunion, nonunion. Reference: Fonseca, 2013【25】

Closed Reduction Gunning splints, modified dentures. Often poor alignment, complications common. Reference: Fonseca, 2013【25】

ORIF Principles AO principles: anatomic reduction + immediate function. Load-bearing osteosynthesis preferred. Reference: Fonseca, 2013【25】

External Fixation Temporary stabilization in selected cases. High complication rate (malunion, nonunion). Reference: Fonseca, 2013【25】

Atrophic Mandible Challenges Loss of bone height (≤7mm). High fracture risk even with minor trauma. Reference: Fonseca, 2013【25】

Surgical Approaches Transcutaneous: easier visualization. Submandibular, transoral: possible but challenging. Reference: Fonseca, 2013【25】

Biomechanics Load-sharing plates insufficient in atrophic mandible. Need for load-bearing fixation. Reference: Fonseca, 2013【25】

Implant Choice: General Principles Use load-bearing fixation. 2.4 mm locking reconstruction plate = gold standard. Reference: Fonseca, 2013【25】

2.4 mm Locking Plate Angle-to-angle span recommended. ≥3 screws each side of fracture. Reference: Fonseca, 2013【25】

Alternatives: 2.0 Locking System For non-atrophic edentulous mandibles (>20 mm height). Reference: Fonseca, 2013【25】

Templating & Bending Templates used to pre-shape plate. Perfect adaptation not always needed with locking plates. Reference: Fonseca, 2013【25】

Pitfalls Avoid small plates → risk of fracture & displacement. Smaller the jaw, larger the plate. Reference: Fonseca, 2013【25】

Bone Grafting Autogenous grafts (iliac crest/tibia). Bone marrow aspirate, BMP may help. Reference: Fonseca, 2013【25】

Post-operative Care Diet: liquid/semi-liquid as tolerated. Oral hygiene: chlorhexidine rinses, follow-up imaging. Reference: Fonseca, 2013【25】

Complications Malunion, nonunion, infection. Higher risk due to comorbidities & poor bone quality. Reference: Brucoli et al., 2020【22】

Multicenter Outcomes Half of patients had surgery delayed >72 hrs. Delay linked to concomitant injuries. Reference: Brucoli et al., 2020【22】

Take Home Message Elderly need individualized management. 2.4 mm locking reconstruction plate = standard. Balance function, comorbidities, quality of life. Reference: Brucoli et al., 2020【22】; Shumate et al., 2018【23】; Liu et al., 2019【24】; Fonseca, 2013【25】
Tags