Germ cell tumors

ganeshkumar7982 16,551 views 80 slides Nov 22, 2014
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 80
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80

About This Presentation

No description available for this slideshow.


Slide Content

GERM CELL TUMORS Ganesh Kumar M

Introduction Primary germ cell tumors (GCTs) arise by the malignant transformation of primordial germ cells Primary GCTs of testes constitute 95% of all testicular tumors Infrequently, GCTs arise from an extragonadal site

GERM CELL TUMORS IN MALES 90% are testicular in origin 10% are extragonadal : Mediastinal Retroperitoneal Intra-cranial(Pineal gland) Of the extragonadal sites, predominent site of occurrence is mediastinal

ETIOLOGY

Epidemiology Most commonly seen in the age group of 15-35 years Most common tumors in males in this age group Contributes to upto 10% of all cancer deaths Familial clustering has been observed, particularly among siblings

Risk Factors Cryptorchidism : Associated in 2% of cryptorchids Abdominal cryptorchids more likely to develop GCTs than inguinal cryptorchids Klinefelter’s Syndrome: Testicular atrophy, gynecomastia , 47XXY karyotype Increased likelihood of developing mediastinal GCT( upto 50 times normal) but not testicular tumors

Risk Factors(contd.) Familial predisposition: Strong familial predisposition in testicular GCT The relative risk of development of these tumors in fathers and sons of patients with testicular germ cell tumors is 4 times higher than normal, and is 8 to 10 times higher between brothers

Classification(in males) Seminatous GCT Seminoma Spermatocytic seminoma Non- seminomatous GCT(NSGCT) Embryonal carcinoma Yolk sac( endodermal sinus) tumor Choriocarcinoma Teratoma : mature immature with malignant transformation

Classification(in females)(WHO) Dysgerminoma Endodermal sinus tumor Embryonal carcinoma Polyembryoma Choriocarcinoma Immature teratoma Mature dermoid cyst with malignant transformation Monodermal and highly specialized Struma ovarii Carcinoid Struma ovarii and carcinoid Others Mixed forms

ITGCN Intra Tubular Germ Cell Neoplasm Considered as carcinoma-in-situ phase of GCT This phase precedes all adult cases of testicular GCT, frequently present in retroperitoneal presentations, but rarely in mediastinal presentations Cytologically , the ITGCN preceding both seminoma and nonseminoma is identical

SEMINOMA Accounts for approximately 50% of GCTs Most frequently appears in the fourth decade of life The typical or classic form consists of large-cell sheets with abundant cytoplasm, and round, hyperchromatic nuclei with prominent nucleoli; frequently associated with a lymphocytic infiltrate

Variants of Seminoma Atypical: lymphocytic infiltration absent; necrosis more common in the tumor mass; higher nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio Spermatocytic : rare variant; seen in older men; not associated with ITGCN; minimal metastatic potential

NSGCT Represent approx. 50% of all GCTs Most frequently present in third decade of life Most tumors show mixed histo -pathological cell types; consisting of two or more cell lines(including Seminoma )

NSGCT: Embryonal Carcinoma Most undifferentiated type of NSGCT Histopath : Epithelioid cells arranged in the form of nests or tubulo -glandular structures or as sheets Necrosis and hemorrhage are frequently observed in the tumor

NSGCT: Choriocarcinoma By definition, consists of both syncytiotrophoblasts and cytotrophoblasts Show high levels of hCG Usually associated with widespread hematogenous metastases Might result in a severe complication if hemorrhage occurs spontaneously at a metastatic site

NSGCT: Yolk Sac Tumor Mimics the yolk sac of an embryo Produces alpha-fetoprotein Pure yolk sac component is uncommon in adult testes, but accounts for significant percentage in primary mediastinal GCTs

NSGCT: Teratoma Composed of somatic cell types from two or more germ layers (ectoderm, mesoderm, or endoderm) Derived from a totipotential , malignant precursor ( embryonal carcinoma or yolk sac tumor)

Usually are solid or cystic in appearance Refered to as dermoid cysts if unilocular Teratomas contain elements from all three germ cell layers, with a predominance of the ectodermal component

Ectodermal component: skin, hair, sweat glands, sebaceous glands, and teeth Mesodermal component: fat, smooth muscle, bone, and cartilage Endodermal component: Respiratory and intestinal epithelium

NSGCT: Teratoma (contd.) Immature teratoma - partial somatic differentiation of these ectodermal , mesodermal or endodermal components; similar to that seen in a fetus Mature and immature teratomas are both histologically benign Teratoma with malignant transformation is a form of teratoma in which an immature or mature component histologically resembles a non-GCT somatic cancer ( leukemias , sarcomas, carcinoma)

Serum Tumor Markers α - FetoProtein ( α FP): A glycoprotein of 591 amino acids encoded by AFP gene on short arm of chromosome 4(4p25 ) Major fetal plasma protein produced by yolk sac and fetal liver Serum t1/2 : 5 - 7 days Normal range in adults: < 5.4 ng / mL

Serum Tumor Markers: α FP(contd.) Serum levels elevated in: NSGCT Hepatocellular carcinoma Omphalocele Ataxia Telangectasia Serum levels reduced in: Down syndrome

Serum Tumor Markers(contd.) Human Chorionic Gonadotropin A glycoprotein produced by the syncytiotrophoblast It is made up of α and β subunits α hCG - is identical to the subunit of LH, FSH, and TSH molecular weight of α hCG - is 18,000, and that of β hCG - is 28,000 Serum half-life: 36 – 72 hrs

Serum Tumor Markers: β hCG (contd.) Immunoassay techniques are used to quantify the presence of β subunit of the molecule Diagnosis and monitoring treatment response in germ cell tumors Also used in: Pregnancy tests Gestational trophoblastic diseases Diagnosis and post-treatment care of ectopic pregnancy As a component of ‘Triple Test ’

Serum Tumor Markers(contd.) Lactate dehydrogenase Increases in the serum concentration of LDH are a reflection of tumor burden, growth rate, and cellular proliferation Usually the first serum marker to show a rising trend

LDH(contd.) Comparison of value from one lab to another is possible by using ratios of the detected level to the upper limit of normal for the individual assay Increased serum LDH concentrations are observed in approx. 60% of NSGCT patients with advanced disease and up to 80% of patients with advanced seminoma But less specific compared to the other two seum markers

Risk Stratification: Seminoma Good Risk: Any hCG Any LDH Non-pulmonary Visceral Metastases absent Intermediate Risk: Any hCG Any LDH Non-pulmonary Visceral Metastases present Poor Risk: Not defined

Risk Stratification: NSGCT Good Risk: AFP < 1000 hCG < 5000 LDH < 1.5ULN NPVM absent Gonadal or retroperitoneal primary tumor Intermediate Risk: AFP: 1000 – 10000 hCG : 5000 – 50000 LDH 1.5 – 10ULN NPVM absent Gonadal or retroperitoneal primary tumor

Risk Stratification: NSGCT(contd.) Poor Risk: Mediastinal - primary site Extra pulmonary visceral mets + nt ( brain,liver,etc ) AFP > 10,000 ng / mL hCG > 50,000 mIU / mL LDH > 10ULN

TNM Classification: T Staging pTX Primary tumor cannot be assessed (if no radical orchiectomy has been performed, TX is used) pT0 No evidence of primary tumor (e.g., histologic scar in testis) pTis Intratubular germ cell neoplasia (carcinoma in situ) pT1 Tumor limited to the testis and epididymis without vascular/lymphatic invasion. Tumor may invade into the tunica albuginea but not the tunica vaginalis pT2 Tumor limited to the testis and epididymis with vascular/lymphatic invasion or tumor extending through the tunica albuginea with involvement of the tunica vaginalis pT3 Tumor invades the spermatic cord with or without vascular/lymphatic invasion pT4 Tumor invades the scrotum with or without vascular/lymphatic invasion

TNM Classification: N staging Nx Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed N0 No regional lymph node metastasis N1 Metastasis with a lymph node mass ≤2 cm in greatest dimension; or multiple lymph nodes, none >2 cm in greatest dimension N2 Metastasis with a lymph node mass >2 cm but not >5 cm in greatest dimension; or multiple lymph nodes, any one mass >2 cm but not >5 cm in greatest dimension N3 Metastasis with a lymph node mass >5 cm in greatest dimension

TNM Classification: M Staging Mx Distant metastasis cannot be assessed M0 No distant metastasis M1a Nonregional nodal or pulmonary metastases M1b Distant metastasis other than to nonregional lymph nodes and lungs

TNM Classification: ‘S’ Staging Stage LDH hCG AFP S1 <1.5xN <5000 <1000 S2 1.5-10xN 5000 – 50000 1000 – 10000 S3 >10xN >50000 >10000

Stage Grouping T N M S Stage I IA pT1 N0 M0 S0 IB pT2 – 4 N0 M0 S0 IS Any pT / pTx N0 M0 S1 – 3 Stage II IIA Any pT / pTx N1 M0 S0 – 1 IIB Any pT / pTx N2 M0 S0 – 1 IIC Any pT / pTx N3 M0 S0 – 1 Stage III IIIA Any pT / pTx Any N M1a S0 – 1 IIIB Any pT / pTx N1 - 3 M0 S2 Any pT / pTx Any N M1a S2 IIIC Any pT / pTx N1 – 3 M0 S3 Any pT / pTx Any N M1a S3 Any pT / pTx Any N M1b Any S

Anatomical Considerations in Staging The initial route of metastasis in seminomas is through lymphatic spread to RPLNs In non- semonomas initial route of metastasis is through hematogeneous route

Anatomical Considerations in Staging(contd.) The primary landing zones Lymphatic crossover Ipsilateral distribution Inguinal node involvement Cephalad spread

Diagnosis Testicular tumours usually present with a painless unilateral scrotal mass Approx. 10% present with dull scrotal ache, acute pain (thought to be due to haemorrhage ) A small group present with RP metastases or a disseminated disease, backache , lethargy & other systemic features

Management of Seminoma Surveillance: Preferred option in compliant patients avoid risk of 2nd tumours avoid risk of toxic effects of chemotherapy Adjuvant chemotherapy Adjuvant radiotherapy

Management of NSGCT Requires a multimodality approach including: Surveillance RPLND Chemotherapy Radiotherapy

Role of Imaging modalities Imaging is largely used to confirm the presence of the disease and for the assessment of its extent Various imaging modalities that are used in diagnosis and management of GCTs are: Ultrasound CT MRI PET/CT

Role of imaging modalities: Ultrasound Scrotal Ultrasound used for imaging in the initial diagnosis of testicular GCTs Certain types of GCT present with characteristic findings on ultrasound

Ultrasound: Seminoma : well-defined, homogenous, hypoechoic compared to surrounding parenchyma Embryonal cell tumor: less homogenous and well-defined in comparison with seminoma Teratoma : Characteristically of mixed echogenecity ; more likely to contain cystic spaces and calcifications

Scrotal Ultrasound: Seminoma

Scrotal Ultrasound: Teratoma

Ultrasound(contd.) Assessment of retroperitoneal and pelvic nodes not as reliable as compared to CT or MRI Upto 17% of small volume disease may be missed But can be useful in the assessment of solid intra-abdominal organs, e.g. Liver As a guide for needle placement during biopsy of suspicious lesions

Role of Imaging modalities: CT CT is used in staging of GCT as cross-sectional imaging of both mediastinum and abdomen is necessary in staging of the disease Useful method in assessing metastatic disease in thorax, abdomen and pelvis Ability of HRCT to produce thinner sections helps in increasing the sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection

CT(contd.) Drawbacks: Inability of routine diagnostic CT in detecting and assessing small volume lymphadenopathy and viable tumor in normal volume lymph nodes Post-chemo/radiation imaging fails to identify viable tissue effectively as the anatomical details are hindered with post therapy fibrosis

CT(contd.) Unable to identify small volume disease in normal sized nodes in upto 30% of patients with GCTs Anatomical imaging modality like CT increases chances of false negative as upper limit of lymph nodes size is yet to be defined

Role of Imaging modalities: MRI Better soft tissue contrast compared to USG and CT More accurate in determining and defining retroperitoneal lymph nodes Detection of CNS, musculo -skeletal and hepatic metastases

MRI(contd.) Demonstration of IVC tumor invasion Demonstration of vascular anatomy prior to RPLN surgery As an alternative in patients in whom IV contrast cannot be given and in CT with equivocal findings

MRI(contd.) Drawbacks: Less accurate in demonstrating lung metastases Similar to CT, cannot identify residual viable tumor after chemotherapy

Role of imaging modalities: PET/CT 18F – FDG PET/CT is the main nuclear imaging modality used in the management of GCTs Being a hybrid imaging modality, carries the benefit of defining the tumor and metastases anatomically as well as in terms of identifying viable tumor foci

18F-FDG PET/CT(contd.) Surveillance is one of the options proposed in the management of stage I seminomatous and NS GCT when there is only a low risk of progression More precise predictive factors of occult metastases CT and MRI for GCT detection at diagnosis may be flawed since GCT cells may be present in normal sized lymph nodes

18F-FDG PET/CT in initial staging FDG-PET is a potentially useful diagnostic tool for initial staging in patients with GCTs FDG PET has been found capable of detecting metastatic disease at diagnosis that is not identifiable by other imaging modalities, with a PPV of 100% and NPV of 76 – 91%( Hain SF et al, EJNM 2000 May) However, FDG PET cannot identify mature teratomas

FDG PET/CT in evaluation of treatment response In GCTs the prognostic relevance of the rate of decline of serum AFP and beta-HCG for patients with nonseminomatous GCT represents an easy tool in the therapeutic management of these patients However, FDG-PET can be used as an additional useful biomarker for treatment evaluation in poor prognosis GCT patients

48 year Male, Diagnosed Lt Testis GCT- 1994. Underwent Sx and Chemotherapy – 1994 Had retroperitoneal LNs recurrence –had 2 Sx 1996 and 2003 Increased AFP in 2007 – CT – 1.5 cm Rp LN FNAC- Necrosis/GCT- Rx Chemo – AFP –ve Follow-up PET-CT and AFP

Rakesh Kumar, AIIMS Date Size (cm) SUV AFP 17.06.08 1.0 3.2 6.43 25.08.08 1.0 1.3 6.37 08.12.08 1.2 2.9 6.96 19.05.09 1.7 8.1 9.26 11.08.09 1.9 9.4 20.1 3 Cycles of Chemotherapy Given

FDG PET/CT in evaluation of post – chemotherapy residual disease Residual masses remain in 30% - 40% of patients after completion of chemotherapy despite normalized tumor markers PET/CT can be used effectively as a diagnostic tool in follow-up of post-chemotherapy patients to detect any relapses

FDG PET/CT in evaluation of post – chemotherapy residual disease

21 year Male, NSGCT anterior Mediastinum, Post chemotherapy, Tumor Markers- Negative

FDG PET-CT Germ Cell Tumor - Pre Rx

FDG PET-CT Germ Cell Tumor - Post Rx

Role of FDG PET/CT in decision making The optimal management of residual masses remains a controversial matter, with the two main options being surgery and surveillance Resection of residuals may be technically demanding and connected with increased morbidity;

Decision-making(contd.) Complications of postchemotherapy RPLND are higher than for primary RPLND, ranging from 7% to 30% and include wound infection small bowel obstruction chylous ascites renovascular injury neurologic injuries Therefore, it is reserved only for patients with a high risk of viable tumor

Decision-making(contd.) De Santis et al(J Clin Oncol 2001) found FDG-PET to be highly specific for residuals > 3 cm They showed that FDG-PET is the best predictor of viable neoplastic tissue in postchemotherapy seminoma residuals and can be used as a standard tool for clinical decision-making in this patient group They also showed that patients with residual lesions, even >3 cm, can safely undergo mere surveillance, provided that FDG-PET is negative

FDG PET/CT Drawbacks: High sensitivity but low specificity False-positive results for 18F-FDG PET during or shortly after chemotherapy, mainly due to an inflammatory process 18F-FDG is not a tumor specific agent; metabolic marker Teratomatous primary histology might be a contributing factor for the higher rate of false-negative 18F-FDG PET findings in nonseminomas

PET/CT: Other radiopharmaceuticals Apart from 18F – FDG, 18F – FLT( Fluorothymidine ), a cell proliferation marker, has also been used in assessment of metastatic germ cell tumors( Pfannenberg et al, JNM 2010) Thymidine kinase I (TK1) activity is thought to be proportional to cellular proliferation and DNA synthesis by the salvage pathway. Hence cells which proliferate at a more rapid rate tend to take up 18F – FLT more avidly

Once in the cell, FLT is a substrate for thymidine kinase I (TK1) and is phosphorylated but is not incorporated into DNA. Phosphorylated FLT cannot exit the cell. FLT is not a substrate for thymidine phosphorylase and so is not significantly degraded in vivo and is retained in the cells

18F - FLT Advantages: marker of cellular proliferation more cancer-specific tracer with only low uptake in inflammatory tissue; hence lesser possibility of false positive

The study by Pfannenberg et al included 11 patients At the end of the study, 18F - FLT showed lower sensitivity than 18F – FDG with bulky metastases taking up lower amount of 18F – FLT as compared to 18F – FDG

Possible explanations for lesser uptake: Competition Active transport(Warburg effect) Uptake period

CONCLUSION Germ Cell tumors are diverse group of malignancies that require a multi-modality approach in their management As they carry a high cure rate of upto 95% when treated effectively, their management and follow-up involves use of multiple imaging modalities and serological marker evaluation

Conclusion(contd.) 18F – FDG PET/CT continues to be the primary nuclear imaging modality Plays a crucial role in the following aspects of management of GCT: Staging Early prediction of response to chemotherapy Post-treatment follow-up to detect relapses Decision-making

THANK YOU