GERM CELL TUMOURS OF
THE TESTIS
UROLOGY UNIT
UNTH
8/8/07
Case Summary
By Dr. S. N. Okeke
Biodata
•Name: Mr. A.P
•Age: 36yrs
•Sex: Male
•Marital Status: Single
•Occupation: Civil servant
•Address: Delta State
Presenting Complaint
•Recurrent ® inguinal mass x 10 months.
HPC
•Was seen at SOP on 15/03/07 with the above
complaint
•Born with absent ® testis in the hemiscrotum.
•Associated small lump in the ® groin.
•He never sought medical attention till 4yrs
prior to presentation when the lump started
increasing in size.
Cont’d
•2yrs later he had ® groin exploration.
•No histology was done.
•The surgical wound healed satisfactorily.
•However 10months after surgery, a new growth
appeared at the surgical site.
•The growth increased in size.
•Became painful 2wks afterwards, with radiation to the
lower back.
•No trauma to the lump.
•No pain in any other part of the body.
Cont’d
•There was no obvious change in the size of
the contralateral well descended testis.
•No abdominal swelling. No chronic cough.
•He had lost about 10kg in the preceding
3months.
•No change in bowel habit.
•No urinary symptoms
•The rest of the history was not contributory.
On Examination
•Young man. No obvious distress. Afebrile.
Not pale. Anicteric. No peripheral lymph
adenopathy. No pedal oedema.
•Vital signs: stable
•Chest: Clear.
Abdomen
•Flat. Moved with respiration.
•A surgical scar at the ® groin
•An ovoid mass was deep to the scar.
4x4cm. Hard. Non tender. With definite
margins. Not attached to skin. Not attached
to underlying muscle.
•DRE: Essentially normal
Ext. Genitalia
•Hypoplastic ® hemiscrotum
•Absent ® testis.
•Well developed undescended left testis of
adequate volume.
•No hypospadias.
•No chordee
Diagnosis
•Recurrent ® testicular tumour in an
undescended testis
Investigations
•FBC. S/E/U/C: normal
•CXR-PA view: normal
•Abdominopelvic u/s scan:
-Retroperitoneal masses,the largest, about
the size of his kidney 7x5cm
-Ectopic (pelvic) ® kidney
•CT scan: Not done
•AFP & Beta-hCG: normal
On 23/04/07
•He had excision biopsy of the ® groin mass.
•Histology: Seminoma – Classic variant
•Diagnosis: seminoma (classic variant) stage
IIB (at least)
•He was worked up for Cytotoxic therapy by the oncology
unit.
•One week ago, he had 1
st
course of :
IV Cisplatin 20mg/sqm (35mg). for 5days.
Tab Etoposide 120mg/sqm (200mg) for 5days.
He had no untoward effects.
Next course is to follow in 3weeks.
He is to have a total of 6 courses.
After the complete dose of chemoRx, he will be reassessed
for residual disease. Radiotherapy is to follow.
Thank you.
SURGICAL ANATOMY
OF THE
TESTIS
BY
Dr Okezie Mbadiwe
•Ovoid,firm,intrascrotal
•5 by 2.5 by 2.5cm
•20g
•Tunica albuginea
•Tunica vaginalis
•Epididymis
COVERINGS OF THE TESTIS
•Blood supply: Testicular aa
Minimal Anastomosis with Ductal and Cremasteric aa
•Venous Drainage
Panpiniform plexus
Left testicular vein: Lt. Renal vein
Right testicular: IVC
•Lymphatic drainage
Para-aortic nodes (L2)
Connections with mediastinal and Cervical nodes
•Nerve: Sympathetic (T10)
DESCENT OF THE TESTIS
•Genital ridge: Germ cells from yolk sac
•Gubernaculum testis
•Processus vaginalis
THANK YOU
PATHOLOGY
BY
DR. I.I. NNABUGWU
INTRODUCTION
•Testicular cancer is the most common
malignancy in young men 15-35yrs.
•One of the most curable solid neoplasms
applying multimodal therapy of
malignancies.
•Germ cells: Pluripotent
•Germ cell tumours: constitute 90-95% of all
primary testicular cancers.
Epidemiology
•Incidence: 3.7/100,000 American Whites
0.9/100,000 American Blacks
0.1/100,000 Nigeria. Magoha (1995)
•Age: 0-10yrs: mainly yolksac tumours
20-40yrs: mainly seminoma
•Race: scandinavian countries, USA & UK, Africa &Asia
•Genetics: No obvious genetic abnormality identified yet.
•Right tumours slightly more than left tumours
•Bilaterality: 2-3% of cases
Similar or different histology
Simultaneously or successively.
Classification.
•6 major attempts since 1940.
•WHO (1998) classification:
Precursor lesions: Ca. in situ
Tumours of one histologic type (pure form)
1.Seminoma. 2.Embryonal Ca
3.Yolk sac tumour 4.Polyembryoma
5.Trophoblastic tumours
6.Teratoma: Mature teratoma, Dermoid cyst,
Immature teratoma,teratocarcinoma
Mixed tumours
Clinical Classification
•Seminoma
•Non seminoma
Seminomas
•Classic: 82-85% of seminoma,
•Spermatocytic: 2-12%
•Anaplastic: 5-10%
•Age range: 20-40yrs
•Rare in adolescents and infants
•5-10% produce beta-hCH(syncytiotrophoblast)
•Commonest histology in Undescended testis
Yolk sac Tumour
•Most common testis tumour of infants
•Produces AFP
•a.k.a endodermal sinus tumour
•Adenocarcinoma of infantile testis
Predisposing Factors
•Undescended testis: may be due to
-Gonadal dysgenesis
-Abnormal Germ cell morphology
-Endocrine dysfunction
-Elevated temperature
-Impaired blood supply
•Increased risk of cancer (3-14X general
population)
Cont’d
•7-10% of testicular GCT occur in undescent.
•5-10% of patients with undescent develop
cancer in contralateral well descended testis.
•Orchidopexy does not prevent carcinogenesis
•Ectopic testis is not a predisposing condition.
Other Predisposing Conditions
•Trauma
•Atrophy
•Hormone administration (e.g) DES and
pregnancy
Natural History
•All germ cell tumours are malignant or
potentially so.
•Following malignant transformation
-CIS
-Invasive Ca
-Lymphatic spread
-Haematogenous spread
•Spread is predictable except for chorioCa.
Cont’d
•Rapid growth with (doubling time 10-30days
for NSGCT)
•Bleeding or Necrosis
•Spontaneous regression is extremely rare if
ever.
Staging TNMS
•According to AJCC &UICC
•pTis: Intratubular ca. in situ
•pTo: No tumour identified
•pTx: Tumour cannot be assessed
•pT1: Lim. to testis/epid. No vasc/lymph. involv.
•pT2: Lim. To testis/epid. Vasc./lymph. involv. Or
invading tunica vaginalis
•pT3: Invades spermatic cord +/- vasc/lym. invas.
•pT4: Scrotal invas. +/- vasc./lymph. invas.
Nodal status
•Nx: Cannot be assessed
•N0: No regional lymph node
•N1: Single or multiple nodes 2cm or less.
•N2: Single or mult. nodes >2cm & <(=)5cm
•N3: Node(s) > 5cm.
Distant mets.
•M0: No evidence
•M1: Non regional nodal or Pulm. Mets.
•M2: Non pulm. visceral mets.
INCIDENTAL DX
Asymptomatic
Discovered during inv. for other reasons e.g.
infertility, undescended testis
FXS OF HORMONAL
MANIFESTATIONS
A. SYMPTOMS
Breast enlargement – effect of tumour hCG secretion
B. SIGN
Gynaecomastia
FXS OF LOCALIZED DX
A. SYMPTOMS
Scrotal/Testicular swelling : usu. painless; occ.
painful
B. SIGNS
Testicular mass
Consistency
Homogenous - Seminoma
Inhomogenous - NSGCT
Non-tender usu.
Intra-scrotal
Hydrocele – associated wth it occ.
FEATURES OF METASTATIC DX
A. SYMPTOMS
Loss of appetite (anorexia)
Weakness (anaemia)
Wt. loss (asthenia)
Yellowness of eyes (jaundice)
Bone pain/swelling & bone # (spontaneous/trauma)
Abd. pain & swelling
Cough , chest pain , SOB
B. SIGNS
LYMPHADENOPATHY
Left supraclavicular
Inguinal
CHEST
Fxs of pleural effusion & pulmonary pathologies
ABD
Hepatomegaly & ascites
Para-aortic LNE
MSK
Bone swellings & tenderness , # evidence
CNS
Cerebral mets - Altered consciousness
Spinal mets - motor & sensory system dysfxn
INVESTIGATIONS
To :
Assist in diagnosis
Check for complications & stage the dx
Plan tx modalities
IMAGING STUDIES
Testicular USS
Abd/pelvic USS
CXR
Skeletal survey
Radioisotope bone scan
CT Scan/MRI
Brain
Chest
Abdomen
Scrotal
PET
OUTLINE
Factors determining tx modalities
Modalities of tx
Tx of CIS of the testis
Fertility in pxs wth GCT
Basis of sensitivity of GCT to DNA
damaging agents
Conclusion
TX OF GCT OF THE TESTIS
Tx depends on the ff factors :
Histological type of the tumour
Seminoma GCT
Non-seminomatous GCT
Stage of the dx
TNM
Boden & Gibb
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre
Royal Masden Hospital
Clinical
Low stage dx (T1 - T3 & N1 - N2)
Advanced stage dx (T4/N3/M1)
Prediction of metastatic potential (MP)
A. NSGCT
Vascular/lymphatic invasion
Extent of primary tumour (T-stage)
Embryonal Ca : 30 – 40 % of tumour vol.
Absence of yolk sac tumour
N/B :
Low risk metastatic potential - Surveillance
High risk metastatic potential - Option of either :
RPLND or
Chemotherapy
B. Seminomas
Predictors of MP for lower stage SGCT
Tumour size
Vascular & lymphatic invasion
Elevated Beta hCG
Prognostic staging for metastatic GCT
Good prognosis
Intermediate prognosis
Poor prognosis
TREATMENT
Multimodal approach
Platinium based chemotherapy
Impt. implications of predictable pathways of LN
drainage
30 – 40 % of pxs wth stage 1 NSGCT have
occult metastasis
MODALITIES OF TX
Surgery
Radical Inguinal orchidectomy +/-
RPLND
SURVEILLANCE PRINCIPLES IN
STAGE 1TC
Strong commitment of both pt &
physician
Various protocols have been
developed :
1
st
yr – Pt seen @ mthly intervals
2
nd
yr – Pt seen @ 2 mthly intervals
3
rd
yr – Pt seen @ 3 mthly interval
Years 4 to 7 – Pt seen @ 6 mthly
intervals
for :
O/E
CT Scan abdomen/pelvis
CXR
Tumour markers
SURVEILLANCE OF STAGE 1 SEMINOMA
Post-tx options are :
RT
Surveillance
Adjuvant RT remains current tx of choice
Surveillance/RT ~ 100% cure in stage 1
seminoma post-orchidectomy irrespective of
approach
SURVEILLANCE OF STAGE 1 NSGCT
Ultimate survival appears less c.f. RPLND
Despite this either is advocated
Surveillance appropriate for :
Clinical stage 1 wthout relapse risk
factor
Surveillance protocol motivated pts
Pts understanding risk of non-
compliance to follow- up schedule
ADJUVANT TX POST-RAD.
ING. ORCHIDECTOMY
RPLND
RPLND – I :
Confined to pts wth
only clinically stage I
dx confirmed intra-op
Surgical Technique
Template
RPLND – II
Stage IIA or IIB dx
Clinically demonstrable or
Visible @ surgery
Relapse usu. Outside peritoneum
LAPAROSCOPIC RPLND : Currently only for staging
RPLND – III
Resection of residual dx
Indicated in pts who failed primary tx
Performed both for Seminoma & NSGCT
ADJUVANT RT
SEMINOMA
Low Stage
RT std adjuvant tx
Sensitive to low dose radiation
2,500 - 3,500 cGy
Given over 3 wks
To peri-aortic + ipsilat. Inguino-pelvic LN
95% five yr survival
Advanced Stage
Sometimes used for residual dx after chemotx
Advanced Stage
Combination chemotherapy
BVP proved effective
~ 90% dx free in 4 yrs
NSGCT
Low Stage
N/B : Primary chemotherapy
Survival for 2 cycles of BEP ~ 95 – 100%
No randomised studies against RPLND
Long term effects on young adults unclear
NSGCT
Higher doses (4,000 – 5,000 cGy)
Long term morbidity
N/B: NSGCT are sensitive to chemotherapy
Falling out of favour as 1
st
line tx
ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY
SEMINOMA
Low Stage
Efficacy comparable to adjuvant RT, wth single
agent – Carboplatin
Pt quality of life – same
May gain wider acceptance in the future
Pulmonary – Bleomycin
Pneumonitis
Pulmonary fibrosis
Second malignancy :
Both 2
nd
GCT + Non-GCT
Fertility
Oligospermia
Azoospermia
N/B : Adjuvant chemotherapy can also be used in
low stage dx
Advanced Stage
A. Good Risk Pt
TX GOALS
Maintain high cure rates
Reduce tx related toxicity
Generally receive
4 cycles of EP or
3 cycles of BEP
N/B : Bleomycin is essential in good risk if
only 3 cycles of chemotx are given
80 - 90% dx free rates
B. Poor Risk Pt
5 yr survival – 48%
Recently high dose chemotx wth
autologous bone marrow
transplant (ABMT) or
Peripheral stem cell support
4 cycles of BEP + 2 cycles of Etoposide
+ Carboplatin + ABMT
SALVAGE FOR RELAPSED TC
SALVAGE CHEMOTHERAPY
Current std is wth Ifosfamide based regimen as
1
st
line e.g. VIP, BEPI
PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR SALVAGE
CHEMOTX
Favourable
Prior complete response to Cisplatin based regimen
Testis as primary site
Unfavourable
Initial incomplete response to Cisplatin based regimen
Primary mediastinal site
SALVAGE SURGERY
Aggressive surgery may offer a reasonable
alternative
SALVAGE RT
RT + high dose chemotherapeutic regimens wth
ABMT
TX OF CIS OF THE TESTIS
CIS progresses to invasive dx
TX OPTIONS
Orchidectomy
RT
Chemotx
Observation
N/B : Low dose radiation is currently being investigated
FERTILITY IN PTS WTH TESTIS CA
Young adult men affected, hence fertility a concern
Defective spermatogenesis in 25% of pts @
presentation
50% hypofertile post-
orchidectomy prior to adjuvant tx
Adjuvant tx further impairs
fertility
50% returns to normal sperm
count @ 2yrs ff chemotx
25% remain azoospermic
Only 35% achieve paternity ff
chemotx
76% paternity ff RPLND – I
Cryo-preservation of semen
b/4 chemotx
Assisted reproductive
techniques (ART) e.g. ICSI
BASIS OF SENSITIVITY OF TC TO
DNA - DAMAGING
AGENTS
When equivalent freq. of strand breaks are
produced the testicular cell lines die more
readily
Damaged DNA leads to increase P53
P53 increase transcription of Waf-1 &
Mdm-2 protein
Waf-1 a potent inhibitor of cyclin-
dependent kinase which causes cell cycle
arrest @ G1
Over-expressed myc, myb or EZF, and
elevated P53 may lead to apoptosis
GCT cells have higher levels of apoptosis
promoting proteins - Bax and lower levels
of suppressor of apoptosis – Bcl – 2
Bax:Bcl-2 ratio determines response to
cell damage for either apoptosis or repair
? P53 up-regulates Bax & down-regulates
Bcl-2
PREVENTION
People should be encouraged to do
regular self-examination of the
testis esp. in the high risk group
Monitor tumour markers for
testicular tumour
CONCLUSION
At present there are a no. challenges facing
physicians responsible for the care of pts
wth GCT
Ongoing devt. in the field of molecular
biology are likely to enhance our
understanding of the aetiology &
pathogenesis of GCT in the future, and
hopefully the prevention of these
fascinating tumours in the new millenium