GERM CELL TUMOURS OF THE TESTIS by Nwabueze.ppt

SomtoNwabueze2 22 views 83 slides Sep 19, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 83
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83

About This Presentation

GERM CELL TUMOURS OF THE TESTIS by Nwabueze


Slide Content

GERM CELL TUMOURS OF
THE TESTIS
UROLOGY UNIT
UNTH
8/8/07

Case Summary
By Dr. S. N. Okeke

Biodata
•Name: Mr. A.P
•Age: 36yrs
•Sex: Male
•Marital Status: Single
•Occupation: Civil servant
•Address: Delta State

Presenting Complaint
•Recurrent ® inguinal mass x 10 months.

HPC
•Was seen at SOP on 15/03/07 with the above
complaint
•Born with absent ® testis in the hemiscrotum.
•Associated small lump in the ® groin.
•He never sought medical attention till 4yrs
prior to presentation when the lump started
increasing in size.

Cont’d
•2yrs later he had ® groin exploration.
•No histology was done.
•The surgical wound healed satisfactorily.
•However 10months after surgery, a new growth
appeared at the surgical site.
•The growth increased in size.
•Became painful 2wks afterwards, with radiation to the
lower back.
•No trauma to the lump.
•No pain in any other part of the body.

Cont’d
•There was no obvious change in the size of
the contralateral well descended testis.
•No abdominal swelling. No chronic cough.
•He had lost about 10kg in the preceding
3months.
•No change in bowel habit.
•No urinary symptoms

•The rest of the history was not contributory.

On Examination
•Young man. No obvious distress. Afebrile.
Not pale. Anicteric. No peripheral lymph
adenopathy. No pedal oedema.
•Vital signs: stable
•Chest: Clear.

Abdomen
•Flat. Moved with respiration.
•A surgical scar at the ® groin
•An ovoid mass was deep to the scar.
4x4cm. Hard. Non tender. With definite
margins. Not attached to skin. Not attached
to underlying muscle.
•DRE: Essentially normal

Ext. Genitalia
•Hypoplastic ® hemiscrotum
•Absent ® testis.
•Well developed undescended left testis of
adequate volume.
•No hypospadias.
•No chordee

Diagnosis
•Recurrent ® testicular tumour in an
undescended testis

Investigations
•FBC. S/E/U/C: normal
•CXR-PA view: normal
•Abdominopelvic u/s scan:
-Retroperitoneal masses,the largest, about
the size of his kidney 7x5cm
-Ectopic (pelvic) ® kidney
•CT scan: Not done
•AFP & Beta-hCG: normal

On 23/04/07
•He had excision biopsy of the ® groin mass.
•Histology: Seminoma – Classic variant
•Diagnosis: seminoma (classic variant) stage
IIB (at least)

•He was worked up for Cytotoxic therapy by the oncology
unit.
•One week ago, he had 1
st
course of :
IV Cisplatin 20mg/sqm (35mg). for 5days.
Tab Etoposide 120mg/sqm (200mg) for 5days.
He had no untoward effects.
Next course is to follow in 3weeks.
He is to have a total of 6 courses.
After the complete dose of chemoRx, he will be reassessed
for residual disease. Radiotherapy is to follow.
Thank you.

SURGICAL ANATOMY
OF THE
TESTIS
BY
Dr Okezie Mbadiwe

•Ovoid,firm,intrascrotal
•5 by 2.5 by 2.5cm
•20g
•Tunica albuginea
•Tunica vaginalis
•Epididymis

COVERINGS OF THE TESTIS

•Blood supply: Testicular aa
Minimal Anastomosis with Ductal and Cremasteric aa
•Venous Drainage
Panpiniform plexus
Left testicular vein: Lt. Renal vein
Right testicular: IVC
•Lymphatic drainage
Para-aortic nodes (L2)
Connections with mediastinal and Cervical nodes
•Nerve: Sympathetic (T10)

STRUCTURE
•T. Albuginea
•Mediastinum testis
•200 – 300 lobules
•Each lobule: 1 – 4 tubules
(Semniferous tubules)
•Rete testis
•Supporting cells (sertoli)
•Interstitial cells (Leydig)

DESCENT OF THE TESTIS
•Genital ridge: Germ cells from yolk sac
•Gubernaculum testis
•Processus vaginalis

THANK YOU

PATHOLOGY
BY
DR. I.I. NNABUGWU

INTRODUCTION
•Testicular cancer is the most common
malignancy in young men 15-35yrs.
•One of the most curable solid neoplasms
applying multimodal therapy of
malignancies.
•Germ cells: Pluripotent
•Germ cell tumours: constitute 90-95% of all
primary testicular cancers.

Epidemiology
•Incidence: 3.7/100,000 American Whites
0.9/100,000 American Blacks
0.1/100,000 Nigeria. Magoha (1995)
•Age: 0-10yrs: mainly yolksac tumours
20-40yrs: mainly seminoma
•Race: scandinavian countries, USA & UK, Africa &Asia
•Genetics: No obvious genetic abnormality identified yet.
•Right tumours slightly more than left tumours
•Bilaterality: 2-3% of cases
Similar or different histology
Simultaneously or successively.

Classification.
•6 major attempts since 1940.
•WHO (1998) classification:
Precursor lesions: Ca. in situ
Tumours of one histologic type (pure form)
1.Seminoma. 2.Embryonal Ca
3.Yolk sac tumour 4.Polyembryoma
5.Trophoblastic tumours
6.Teratoma: Mature teratoma, Dermoid cyst,
Immature teratoma,teratocarcinoma
Mixed tumours

Clinical Classification
•Seminoma
•Non seminoma

Seminomas
•Classic: 82-85% of seminoma,
•Spermatocytic: 2-12%
•Anaplastic: 5-10%
•Age range: 20-40yrs
•Rare in adolescents and infants
•5-10% produce beta-hCH(syncytiotrophoblast)
•Commonest histology in Undescended testis

Yolk sac Tumour
•Most common testis tumour of infants
•Produces AFP
•a.k.a endodermal sinus tumour
•Adenocarcinoma of infantile testis

Predisposing Factors
•Undescended testis: may be due to
-Gonadal dysgenesis
-Abnormal Germ cell morphology
-Endocrine dysfunction
-Elevated temperature
-Impaired blood supply
•Increased risk of cancer (3-14X general
population)

Cont’d
•7-10% of testicular GCT occur in undescent.
•5-10% of patients with undescent develop
cancer in contralateral well descended testis.
•Orchidopexy does not prevent carcinogenesis
•Ectopic testis is not a predisposing condition.

Other Predisposing Conditions
•Trauma
•Atrophy
•Hormone administration (e.g) DES and
pregnancy

Natural History
•All germ cell tumours are malignant or
potentially so.
•Following malignant transformation
-CIS
-Invasive Ca
-Lymphatic spread
-Haematogenous spread
•Spread is predictable except for chorioCa.

Cont’d
•Rapid growth with (doubling time 10-30days
for NSGCT)
•Bleeding or Necrosis
•Spontaneous regression is extremely rare if
ever.

Biochemical substances secreted
•AFP: Yolksac tumour, Embryonal Ca,
Teratocarcinoma.
•Beta-hCG: ChorioCa, Embryonal Ca
•Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH)
•Placental Alkaline phosphatase
•Human chorionic somatomammotropin.

Staging TNMS
•According to AJCC &UICC
•pTis: Intratubular ca. in situ
•pTo: No tumour identified
•pTx: Tumour cannot be assessed
•pT1: Lim. to testis/epid. No vasc/lymph. involv.
•pT2: Lim. To testis/epid. Vasc./lymph. involv. Or
invading tunica vaginalis
•pT3: Invades spermatic cord +/- vasc/lym. invas.
•pT4: Scrotal invas. +/- vasc./lymph. invas.

Nodal status
•Nx: Cannot be assessed
•N0: No regional lymph node
•N1: Single or multiple nodes 2cm or less.
•N2: Single or mult. nodes >2cm & <(=)5cm
•N3: Node(s) > 5cm.

Distant mets.
•M0: No evidence
•M1: Non regional nodal or Pulm. Mets.
•M2: Non pulm. visceral mets.

Serum Tumour Markers
LDH hCG(mIU/ml) AFP(ng/ml)
S0 N/< N/< N/<
S1 <1.5xN <5000 <1000
S2 1.5-10xN 5000-50,000 1000-10,000
S3 >10xN >50,000 >10,000

Staging Cont’d
•Clinically: stage O: pTIS
stage I: Confined to scrotum
stage II: Regional lymph node.
stage III: Distant metastasis

Prognostic factors
•Tumour burden
•Number of metastatic sites
•Level of tumour markers hCG, AFP & LDH

Conclusion
•Thank you

CLINICAL FEATURES &
INVESTIGATIONS
BY
DR. A.D. OKOH

CLINICAL FEATURES
SUBDIVISIONS
1. Incidental dx
2. Hormonal manifestations
3. Localized dx
4. Metastatic dx

INCIDENTAL DX
Asymptomatic
Discovered during inv. for other reasons e.g.
infertility, undescended testis
FXS OF HORMONAL
MANIFESTATIONS
A. SYMPTOMS
Breast enlargement – effect of tumour hCG secretion

B. SIGN
Gynaecomastia

FXS OF LOCALIZED DX
A. SYMPTOMS
Scrotal/Testicular swelling : usu. painless; occ.
painful
B. SIGNS
Testicular mass
 Consistency
Homogenous - Seminoma
Inhomogenous - NSGCT
 Non-tender usu.
 Intra-scrotal
 Hydrocele – associated wth it occ.

FEATURES OF METASTATIC DX
A. SYMPTOMS
Loss of appetite (anorexia)
Weakness (anaemia)
Wt. loss (asthenia)
Yellowness of eyes (jaundice)
Bone pain/swelling & bone # (spontaneous/trauma)
Abd. pain & swelling
Cough , chest pain , SOB

B. SIGNS
LYMPHADENOPATHY
Left supraclavicular
Inguinal
CHEST
Fxs of pleural effusion & pulmonary pathologies
ABD
Hepatomegaly & ascites
Para-aortic LNE
MSK
Bone swellings & tenderness , # evidence
CNS
Cerebral mets - Altered consciousness
Spinal mets - motor & sensory system dysfxn

INVESTIGATIONS
To :
Assist in diagnosis
Check for complications & stage the dx
Plan tx modalities
IMAGING STUDIES
Testicular USS
Abd/pelvic USS
CXR

Skeletal survey
Radioisotope bone scan
CT Scan/MRI
 Brain
 Chest
 Abdomen
 Scrotal
PET

TUMOUR MARKERS
Alpha-fetoprotein
Beta subunit hCG
Lactate dehydrogenase
Placental ALP (PLAP)
Gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT)
OTHERS
FBC + ESR
SEUCr
LFT
Mantoux test

DIFFERENTIAL
DIAGNOSIS
Epididymitis
Hydrocele
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Spermatocele
Testicular torsion
Varicocele

TREATMENT
BY
DR. B.S. MAKAMA

OUTLINE
Factors determining tx modalities
Modalities of tx
Tx of CIS of the testis
Fertility in pxs wth GCT
Basis of sensitivity of GCT to DNA
damaging agents
Conclusion

TX OF GCT OF THE TESTIS
Tx depends on the ff factors :
 Histological type of the tumour
 Seminoma GCT
 Non-seminomatous GCT
 Stage of the dx
 TNM
 Boden & Gibb
 Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre
 Royal Masden Hospital
 Clinical
Low stage dx (T1 - T3 & N1 - N2)
Advanced stage dx (T4/N3/M1)

 Prediction of metastatic potential (MP)
A. NSGCT
 Vascular/lymphatic invasion
 Extent of primary tumour (T-stage)
 Embryonal Ca : 30 – 40 % of tumour vol.
 Absence of yolk sac tumour
N/B :
 Low risk metastatic potential - Surveillance
 High risk metastatic potential - Option of either :
RPLND or
Chemotherapy

B. Seminomas
Predictors of MP for lower stage SGCT
 Tumour size
 Vascular & lymphatic invasion
 Elevated Beta hCG
 Prognostic staging for metastatic GCT
 Good prognosis
 Intermediate prognosis
 Poor prognosis

TREATMENT
Multimodal approach
Platinium based chemotherapy
Impt. implications of predictable pathways of LN
drainage
30 – 40 % of pxs wth stage 1 NSGCT have
occult metastasis
MODALITIES OF TX
 Surgery
 Radical Inguinal orchidectomy +/-
 RPLND

 Adjuvant Radiotherapy (RT)
 Adjuvant Chemotherapy
SURGERY
Radical orchidectomy : including clinically
advanced dx
POST-RADICAL ORCHIDECTOMY TX
MODALITIES :
Surveillance
RPLND
RT
Chemotherapy

SURVEILLANCE PRINCIPLES IN
STAGE 1TC
Strong commitment of both pt &
physician
 Various protocols have been
developed :
1
st
yr – Pt seen @ mthly intervals
2
nd
yr – Pt seen @ 2 mthly intervals
3
rd
yr – Pt seen @ 3 mthly interval

Years 4 to 7 – Pt seen @ 6 mthly
intervals
for :
 O/E
 CT Scan abdomen/pelvis
 CXR
 Tumour markers

SURVEILLANCE OF STAGE 1 SEMINOMA
Post-tx options are :
RT
Surveillance
Adjuvant RT remains current tx of choice
 Surveillance/RT ~ 100% cure in stage 1
seminoma post-orchidectomy irrespective of
approach
SURVEILLANCE OF STAGE 1 NSGCT
 Ultimate survival appears less c.f. RPLND
 Despite this either is advocated


Surveillance appropriate for :
 Clinical stage 1 wthout relapse risk
factor
 Surveillance protocol motivated pts
 Pts understanding risk of non-
compliance to follow- up schedule

ADJUVANT TX POST-RAD.
ING. ORCHIDECTOMY

RPLND
 RPLND – I :

Confined to pts wth
only clinically stage I
dx confirmed intra-op
Surgical Technique
 Template

Nerve sparing

Survival ~ 100%
 Relapse outside
retroperitoneum
 Salvaged by
chemotherapy


RPLND – II
 Stage IIA or IIB dx
 Clinically demonstrable or
 Visible @ surgery
 Relapse usu. Outside peritoneum
LAPAROSCOPIC RPLND : Currently only for staging

RPLND – III

Resection of residual dx
 Indicated in pts who failed primary tx
 Performed both for Seminoma & NSGCT

ADJUVANT RT
SEMINOMA
 Low Stage
 RT std adjuvant tx
 Sensitive to low dose radiation
 2,500 - 3,500 cGy
 Given over 3 wks
 To peri-aortic + ipsilat. Inguino-pelvic LN
 95% five yr survival
 Advanced Stage
 Sometimes used for residual dx after chemotx

 Advanced Stage
 Combination chemotherapy
 BVP proved effective
 ~ 90% dx free in 4 yrs
NSGCT
 Low Stage
N/B : Primary chemotherapy
 Survival for 2 cycles of BEP ~ 95 – 100%
 No randomised studies against RPLND
 Long term effects on young adults unclear

NSGCT
 Higher doses (4,000 – 5,000 cGy)
 Long term morbidity
N/B: NSGCT are sensitive to chemotherapy
 Falling out of favour as 1
st
line tx
ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY
SEMINOMA
 Low Stage
 Efficacy comparable to adjuvant RT, wth single
agent – Carboplatin
 Pt quality of life – same
 May gain wider acceptance in the future

CHRONIC TOXICITY
6 categories :
 Nephrotoxicity – Cisplatin
 CVS – Bleomycin +/- Vinblastine
Raynaud’s phenomenom
Occlusive vasc. dx
 Neurotoxicity – Cisplatin + Vinblastine
 Chronic periph. neuropathy
 Impaired auditory fxn

 Pulmonary – Bleomycin
 Pneumonitis
 Pulmonary fibrosis
Second malignancy :
 Both 2
nd
GCT + Non-GCT
 Fertility
 Oligospermia
 Azoospermia
N/B : Adjuvant chemotherapy can also be used in
low stage dx

Advanced Stage
A. Good Risk Pt
TX GOALS
 Maintain high cure rates
 Reduce tx related toxicity
Generally receive
 4 cycles of EP or
 3 cycles of BEP
N/B : Bleomycin is essential in good risk if
only 3 cycles of chemotx are given
 80 - 90% dx free rates

B. Poor Risk Pt
 5 yr survival – 48%
 Recently high dose chemotx wth
autologous bone marrow
transplant (ABMT) or
 Peripheral stem cell support
 4 cycles of BEP + 2 cycles of Etoposide
+ Carboplatin + ABMT

SALVAGE FOR RELAPSED TC
SALVAGE CHEMOTHERAPY
Current std is wth Ifosfamide based regimen as
1
st
line e.g. VIP, BEPI
 PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR SALVAGE
CHEMOTX
 Favourable
 Prior complete response to Cisplatin based regimen
 Testis as primary site
 Unfavourable
 Initial incomplete response to Cisplatin based regimen
 Primary mediastinal site

SALVAGE SURGERY
Aggressive surgery may offer a reasonable
alternative
SALVAGE RT
RT + high dose chemotherapeutic regimens wth
ABMT

TX OF CIS OF THE TESTIS
CIS progresses to invasive dx
TX OPTIONS
 Orchidectomy
 RT
 Chemotx
 Observation
N/B : Low dose radiation is currently being investigated
FERTILITY IN PTS WTH TESTIS CA
 Young adult men affected, hence fertility a concern
 Defective spermatogenesis in 25% of pts @
presentation


50% hypofertile post-
orchidectomy prior to adjuvant tx
Adjuvant tx further impairs
fertility
50% returns to normal sperm
count @ 2yrs ff chemotx
25% remain azoospermic

Only 35% achieve paternity ff
chemotx
 76% paternity ff RPLND – I
 Cryo-preservation of semen
b/4 chemotx
 Assisted reproductive
techniques (ART) e.g. ICSI

BASIS OF SENSITIVITY OF TC TO
DNA - DAMAGING
AGENTS
 When equivalent freq. of strand breaks are
produced the testicular cell lines die more
readily
 Damaged DNA leads to increase P53
 P53 increase transcription of Waf-1 &
Mdm-2 protein
 Waf-1 a potent inhibitor of cyclin-
dependent kinase which causes cell cycle
arrest @ G1

Over-expressed myc, myb or EZF, and
elevated P53 may lead to apoptosis
 GCT cells have higher levels of apoptosis
promoting proteins - Bax and lower levels
of suppressor of apoptosis – Bcl – 2
 Bax:Bcl-2 ratio determines response to
cell damage for either apoptosis or repair
 ? P53 up-regulates Bax & down-regulates
Bcl-2

PREVENTION

People should be encouraged to do
regular self-examination of the
testis esp. in the high risk group
 Monitor tumour markers for
testicular tumour

CONCLUSION
At present there are a no. challenges facing
physicians responsible for the care of pts
wth GCT
Ongoing devt. in the field of molecular
biology are likely to enhance our
understanding of the aetiology &
pathogenesis of GCT in the future, and
hopefully the prevention of these
fascinating tumours in the new millenium

THANK YOU & GOD BLESS !