Hepatorenal Syndrome. Defination, types, Diagnostic criteria

ibtihajalamchowdhury 162 views 35 slides Jun 28, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 35
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35

About This Presentation

Hepatorenal Syndrome.
defination , types, pathophysiology , ICA old and new criteria , prognosis, treatment


Slide Content

Hepatorenal Syndrome Dr. umme hosna taiaba Phase a resident Department of nephrology

Introduction Renal dysfunction is a severe complication of advanced cirrhosis. Traditionally, defined as a serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dl Pre-renal, renal, post-renal. Patients with cirrhosis may develop a specific type of renal dysfunction called hepatorenal syndrome ( HRS )

HRS is one of the potential causes of AKI in patients with acute or chronic liver disease. HRS functional type of RF occurs Haemodynamic alterations Reduced renal perfusion Overactivity of the vasoconstrictor

Types of HRS HRS-1 involves a rapid reduction in renal function, defined as Doubling of the serum creatinine to a level greater than 2.5 mg/dl Or, 50% reduction of the 24 h creatinine clearance to a level lower than 20 ml/min in less than 2 weeks. HRS-2 is characterised by renal dysfunction which does not progress rapidly, mainly associated with refractory ascites

HRS occurs in 20% at 1 year and 40% at 5 years in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. HRS occurs in 25 to 30% in patients with acute liver disease. HRS occurs in 30% patients with SBP or other infection, 25% with severe alcoholic hepatitis, and 10% who require serial LVP

Pathophysiology Portal HTN Splanchnic vasodilation Effective arterial blood volume Reduced cardiac output Reduced renal perfusion Overactivity of vasoconstrictor( RAS,SNS) Renal vasoconstriction

RISK factors Refractory ascites Dilutional hyponatremia Low MABP( <80mmhg) High plasma renin activity Decrease cardiac index

Precipitating factors Extra-hepatic Bacterial infection (mainly) Gastrointestinal haemorrhage , LVP without albumin administration, Excessive response to diuretics Hepatic Alcohol, Drugs, Flare of viral hepatitis.

Scr in cirrhosis is affected (1) decreased formation of creatinine secondary to muscle wasting (2) increased renal tubular secretion of creatinine (3) the increased volume of distribution in cirrhosis that may dilute sCr (4) interference with assays for sCr by elevated bilirubin UO is affected (a) frequently oliguric with avid sodium retention, despite a relatively normal GFR (B) they may have an increased UO because of diuretics (C) on a regular ward, urine collection is often inaccurate

2015 ICA Diagnostic Criteria for HRS Cirrhosis with ascites Diagnosis of AKI according to international club of ascites- aki criteria No or insufficient response in 48 hr after diuretic withdrawal and adequate volume expansion with iv albumin Absence of shock No evidence of recent use of Nephrotoxic agents Absence of intrinsic renal disease

ICA New Definitions of AKI in Patients with Cirrhosis

Baseline sCr level Value obtained in the previous 3 months can be used as baseline Patients with multiple values in previous 3 months the value closest to the admission can be used Patients without a previous sCr determination, the admission value should be used

AKI Increase in sCr ≥50% from the last available baseline value of outpatient sCr within 3 months Or Absolute increase in sCr ≥0.3 mg/dl within 48 h

Staging of AKI

Progression of AKI Progression Progress to a higher stage Need for RRT Regression Regress to a lower stage

Response to treatment

Differential Diagnosis In cirrhotic patients with ascites, the most common causes of acute renal failure are: Pre-renal (37%), Acute tubular necrosis(42%) HRS is around (20%) Post-renal failure (0.3%)

Differentiate Between HRS Vs ATN is Challenging

Prevention of HRS Avoidance of intravascular volume depletion Overuse of diuretics, Diarrhoea by lactulose, GI bleeding, LVP without albumin Judicious management of Nephrotoxic agents ACEI ARBs, NSAIDs, Antibiotics

Prompt diagnosis and treatment of infections SBP, Sepsis SBP prophylaxis Measures to prevent variceal bleeding ( e.G. , NSBB, band ligation) Pentoxifylline for severe alcohol-associated hepatitis

TREATMENT OF HRS General Medical therapy TIPS LT RRT MARS Emerging therapy

General Discontinuation of all nephrotoxic agents ACEIs, ARBs, NSAIDs, Diuretics Antibiotics for infections

Medical therapy IV albumin Bolus :1 g/kg/day on presentation (max.100 g daily). Continue : 20-60 g daily as required Target : maintain CVP 10-15 cm H2O Role of albumin Maintain cardiac output. Improve effecive circulatory volume Improve cardiac contractility. If co decrease terlipressin worsen systemic vasoconstriction.

Vasoconstrictor (In addition to albumin) Terlipressin Dose : I/V bolus – 1mg/4-6h to max. 2mg/4h I/V continuous – 2mg/day to max. 12mg/day Response : Scr decrease 25% after 3days, if not increase the dose. Hrs-1 complete response 55% , recurrence <20% . Hrs-2 response rate higher but, recurrence common. That’s why HRS-NAKI not consider indication for terlipressin even in patient on waiting list for LT. ( Rodriguez E, et al, LT 2015)

Duration : Until scr reach within 0.3mg/dl of pt baseline scr. If no/partial response discontinue within 2weeks. Side effects : Persistent diarrhea Abdominal ischemia Peripheral ischemia Angina pectoris, Circulatory overload

Midodrine and octreotide — initialy 2.5-5 mg orally 3 times daily to a max. Dose of 15 mg 3 times daily + octreotide at 100 μg s/c 3 times daily to max. 200 μg s/c 3 times daily, Target : MAP 15 mm hg Norepinephrine —0.1-0.7 μg /kg/min as an IV infusion.

Liver Transplant (LT) LT is the only therapeutic modality that potentially reverse both liver dysfunction and HRS. Rates of postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality are higher in patients transplanted with HRS than in those transplanted without HRS

Renal replacement therapy (RRT) RRT does not improve survival in Hepatorenal syndrome. Indication Unresponsive to drug treatment Volume overload Uremia Electrolyte imbalance Bridge to transplantation Short term mortality and ineligible for transplantation.

Prognosis The prognosis for people with liver failure is much worse if they develop HRS. In fact, 50% of people die within 2 weeks of diagnosis and 80% of people die within 3 months of diagnosis A liver transplant improves the survival rate for individuals with either type of HRS

Take Home Message Use diagnostic criteria Must rule out other cause of AKI Record baseline sCr to detect HRS at admission Mostly precipitated by systemic inflammation (SBP, other infection) Standard medical therapy is vasoconstrictor plus albumin Only curative therapy is LT