Caspar Netscher, "The Chaff Cutter, Woman and Child", c1659, Philadelphia Museum of Art.
Working with a sprung clamp the trough was filled with straw and with the operator’s left hand holding
the curved handle of the dwarf fork, the tines embedded in the bundle, the operator pushed it forward
under the raised clamp to an inch or so past the cutting edge. Then with his left foot on the treadle, his
right hand holding the knife, he pressed the treadle down compacting the straw, raised the knife to a
high position and brought it down and across the face of the cutting edge slicing the protruding straw
into half inch (13 mm) long pieces. The foot was taken off the treadle, releasing the straw and the fork
used to push the bundle forward again to repeat the process. The operator sometimes stood with his
right foot on a small stool to apply more downward pressure on the treadle with his left foot. For two
man working, often a man and a boy, some boxes were equipped with a additional but smaller chaff fork
with only three tines situated and secured at the feed end. The assistant loaded the straw and moved it
along with this fork to the operator who continued as before. A stable riddle or baiting sieve was usually
placed below the cutting end to catch the cut chaff.
It required considerable dexterity to master the feed, treadle and cutting actions. In the hands of a
skilled person, however, it was said that between fifteen and twenty cuts could be made every minute
and that a man could produce forty bushels of chaff per day. But the implement could be unforgiving in
the hands of an inexperienced worker and there is little doubt that during its history its misuse caused
some personal injury. This was especially true of the earliest models which, like the portable version,
had no forks or clamps and were hand fed to the cutting edge. This is probably why farmhands in Kent
nicknamed it the 'Monkey Box' or 'Monkey Jumper'. In some places it was better known as a 'Chaff
Horse' or 'Cutter'. Originally, however, it was referred to as a 'Cutting Box' or a 'Chaff Engine' after the
earlier custom of naming anything remotely mechanical an 'Engine'.
In the early days some enterprising labourers and part-time thatchers learnt to use small portable chaff
boxes which they carried on their backs visiting town and country stables offering a chaff cutting service
for an agreed rate. The practice spread and it was not long before men were being paid comparatively
good wages, inviting Arthur Young in 1804 to comment that they "usually made much greater earnings
than the common pay per diem". In mid-18th century Hertfordshire the fee was said to be "one penny
per double bushel" but later reports put the amount at one penny per bushel cut. For an
"extraordinarily fine cut", Midland men received only three farthings for a heaped bushel (William
Marshall 1790). Being portable, the boxes were lightly constructed, about half the normal size and for
the most part were equipped only with a swivel knife of appropriate length. Consequently, they lacked
the safety features and other refinements found on later barn models. Some time afterwards an
improved version was introduced. As the demand for cut chaff increased, farmers found it more