Water Culture by Jeff Edwards Hydroponics, now commonly defined as the soilless growth of plants, was originally simply referred to as “water culture,” with its root foundations in simple observations by early progressive thinkers and tinkerers. The progress of water culture, like many scientific discoveries and their evolution to commercial application, came in fits and starts. Major discoveries and realizations were followed by extended periods of seeming disinterest. Hanging Gardens of Semiramis , Babylon Many written histories of hydroponic plant cultivation methods mention the ancient Hanging Gardens of Babylon, the first written record of which dates to about 290 BC. Penned by Berossus , a Babylonian writer, priest, and astronomer, we only know of Berossus ’ writings through quotes by later authors. Five primary authors, including Berossus , are responsible for what we know of the Hanging Gardens today. Their accounting’s were all written at a later time, based on now lost, previously written account’s by others. Modern research questions whether the gardens were in Babylon at all, yet the premise that the gardens would in some way qualify as “hydroponic” is doubtful, based on observations by these early writers. Diodorus Siculus , writing between 60 and 30 BC, referenced the 4th century BC texts, Ctesias of Cnidus, for his description of the gardens. After detailing their construction, he includes the following passage, “…on all this again earth had been piled to a depth sufficient for the roots of the largest trees; and the ground, when leveled off, was thickly planted with trees of every kind…” Progress came in fits and starts, with major discoveries followed by extended periods of seeming disinterest. Quintus Curtius Rufus, writing in the 1st century AD, references writings of Cleitarchus , a 4th-century BC historian for Alexander the Great, who also described the “…deep layer of earth placed upon it and water used for irrigating it.” Philo of Byzantium, the author who identifies what we accept today as the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World, writing sometime around the 4th or 5th centuries AD, mentions that “…much deep soil is piled on, and then broad-leaved and especially garden trees of many varieties are planted.” Based on these accounts alone, it seems doubtful that the Hanging Gardens of Babylon could in any way be considered soilless. In all fairness, the irrigation systems required to bring water to plantings of the reported scale, described in the form of aqueducts and water lifts, are similar in concept to irrigation methods employed today in modern hydroponic systems. Another oft mentioned comparison to modern hydroponics in the old world are the “floating gardens” built by the Aztecs in the 14th century AD. Arriving in the Valley of Mexico, the Aztec people found a landlocked swamp with five large lakes surrounded by volcanic mountains. For some reason, they chose to settle in swampland surrounding Lake Texcoco , and decided to build their capital city on a small island in the lake. Lacking any extra land for growth, the people started building what were essentially rectangular islands, constructed of soil, compost, and sludge from the lake bed. Contrary to popular belief, these islands, or “ chinampas ”, didn’t float at all, but were rather attached to the lakebed using willow tree cuttings and a variety of materials including stones, poles, reeds, vines, and rope. Chinampas were incredibly fertile and irrigation was unnecessary since water wicked up from the lake. As many as 7 crops could be harvested in a single year due to the unique methods of composting and mulching developed by the Aztec farmers of the time. However, based on their method of construction it’s clear that the Aztec chinampas , like the Hanging Gardens of Babylon, cannot be classified as hydroponic either.