Registros Geofísicos Convencionales HRLA Ejemplos M. en C. Zenteno Jimenez Jose Roberto
Radial response of the array laterolog compared to HLLd and HLLs from HALS: borehole-corrected apparent resistivities in a thick bed as a function of the invasion radius. Rt = 10 Ohm-m, Rxo =1 Ohm-m, Dh=8 in and Rm = 0.1 Ohm-m.
Thin-bed response of HRLA tool (top) compared to HALS (middle) and DLL (bottom) in uninvaded formation. Dh=8" and Rm=0.1 Ohm-m
Response to thin beds with invasion, showing the added radial discrimination of the HRLA tool (top) compared to HALS (middle) and DLL (bottom). Radius of invasion in the resistive beds: Ri =15 in, Dh=8 in and Rm=0.1 Ohm-m
Borehole effect when the tool is centered.
Borehole effect when the tool is decentralized with 1 in stand-off.
Field log showing comparison of the HRLA resolution with the DLL.
Comparison of HRLA and HALS data, showing reduced shoulder-bed effect and improved characterization of invasion which lead to a better (1D) inverted Rt
Groningen effect visible on the dual laterolog is absent from the HRLA response in the middle track
Horizontal well, comparison of HRLA with DLL.
Imaging-inversion example from the Middle East.
Corrección por el diámetro de pozo algunas curvas resistivas