HUMAN VALUES AND ETHICS PPT.pphdhfhdhfhfjdhtx

Jdhdhf

1. Exploring Scientific Thinking: The Roles of I n d u c t i v e a n d D e d u c t i v e Reasoning in Methodology R.SIVA PRASAD NAYAK 710721103006

2. In this presentation, we will explore scientific thinking and the critical roles of inductive and deductive reasoning . Understanding these methodologies is essential for effective research and analysis, guiding scientists in forming hypotheses and drawing conclusions.

3. W h a t i s I n d u c t i v e R e a s o n i n g ? Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations. It is a bottom- up approach where patterns are identified, leading to broader theories. This reasoning is essential in forming hypotheses based on experimental data.

4. For example, let’s say you go to a cafe every day for a month, and every day, the same person comes at exactly 11 am and orders a cappuccino. The specific observation is that this person has come to the cafe at the same time and ordered the same thing every day during the period observed. A general conclusion drawn from these premises could be that this person always comes to the cafe at the same time and orders the same thing. While  inductive  reasoning can be useful, it’s prone to being flawed. That’s because conclusions drawn using  induction  go beyond the information contained in the premises. An  inductive  argument may be highly  probable , but even if all the observations are accurate, it can lead to incorrect conclusions.

5. W h at i s D e d u c ti v e R e as o n i n g ? Deductive reasoning is the process of drawing specific conclusions from general principles or theories. It follows a top-down approach, where premises lead to a logical conclusion. This method is crucial for testing hypotheses in scientific research.

6. For example:
Chickens are birds; all birds lay eggs; therefore, chickens lay eggs.
Another way to think of it: if something is true of a general class (birds), then it is true of the members of the class (chickens).

7. Comparison of Reasoning Types While inductive reasoning builds theories from observations, deductive reasoning tests theories against observations. Both methodologies complement each other, enhancing the robustness of scientific inquiry and ensuring balanced research outcomes.

8. Inductive  and  deductive  are commonly used in the context of logic, reasoning, and science. Scientists use both  inductive  and  deductive  reasoning as part of the  scientific method .  The difference involves whether the reasoning moves from the general to the specific or from the specific to the general.  Comparison of Reasoning Types

9. Applications in Research Inductive and deductive reasoning are applied in various scientific fields. Inductive reasoning helps in generating new theories, while deductive reasoning is vital for validating existing theories through experimentation and observation.

10. Conclusion In conclusion, both inductive and deductive reasoning play vital roles in scientific thinking . Understanding their differences and applications enhances our ability to conduct thorough research and develop sound scientific theories.

11. Thanks