INSET PPT.pptx itgiylugiyfdyhvjygkygulytiiyy

shadowplaysxd21 7 views 35 slides Sep 03, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 35
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35

About This Presentation

nbhgfytdtugjkb


Slide Content

Strengthening Learning Condition for Early Literacy " "

The phrasal modal verb be going to should not be confused with the progressive form of the verb go. The president is going to sign the new tariff rules soon. The president is going to the conference room.

To avoid a redundancy of similar forms, it is better to avoid using these two together. -We are going to go jogging. We are going to jog. We will go jogging. Be going to often appears with the word omitted, such as: -A buzzer and a blinking light located at the exit door will indicate which passenger group is to start boarding. -I was to leave when we heard someone knocking on the door.

The form be to followed by the main verb however, may also appear as short variants of other constructions, making it ambiguous. It is better to use the full form: The doctor was to separate the conjoined twins. was going to was expected to was supposed to As mentioned above, most grammar books classify dare and need as modal verbs. These are distinguished from the main verbs dare and need even if their meanings are the same. Their syntactic restrictions constrain the same

This study treats the verbs and need as catenative verbs, verbs which may take an embedded verbal clause introduced by the particle to much like want and prefer. These are basically transitive verbs: The grocer dared something. The patient need something. The grocer dared to cheat on his taxes. The patient needed to be isolated.

Improving Teachers Competencies in Planning, Assessing, and Implementing through Innovative Program " "

INSTRUCTIONAL ALIGNMENT

INSTRUCTIONAL ALIGNMENT

INSTRUCTIONAL PLANNING

INSTRUCTIONAL PLANNING

INSTRUCTIONAL IMPLEMENTATION

TEACHER COMPETENCE

TEACHING COMPETENCE

LEVELS OF PEDAGOGICAL COMPETENCY

TEACHER INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICES AND PROCESSES SYSTEM (TIPPS)

TEACHER PROBLEM…….Teacher’s Competencies

1.TEACHER FEEDBACK….(Kim et al., 2019)

2.REFLECTIVE PRACTICE (Kim et al., 2019)

CONCLUSIONS

BACKGROUND

TEACHER’S COMPETENCIES=STUDENTS’ LEARNING

FINDINGS ( Somprach et., 2012)

RECOMMENDATIONS ( Somprach et., 2012)

IN SUMMARY………