Intracorneal ring-segments-by-femtosecond-tunnel-creation

AmrMounir4 2,345 views 49 slides Jan 04, 2017
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 49
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49

About This Presentation

This presentation describes indications of intrastromal corneal rings implantation in keratoconus cases and how they are beneficial even in advanced cases.


Slide Content

Intracorneal Ring Segments By
Femtosecond Tunnel Creation
BY
Dr. Amr Mounir
Lecturer of ophthalmology
Sohag university

Keratoconus is a
progressive,
noninflammatory,
bilateral (but usually
asymmetric) ectatic
corneal disease.
Introduction

Treatment modalities
include hard contact
lens, corneal collagen
crosslinking,
Intracorneal ring
segments and
Keratoplasty

Intracorneal Rings

Mechanism of action of rings

Types of Rings

Methods of implantation of rings

- Precise Depth
- Precise Incision site creation
- Easier than manual
- Avoid complications of manual tunnel creation e,g:
Anterior or Posterior corneal perforations ,
epithelial defects, infectious keratitis, asymmetric
segment placement, corneal stromal oedema
around the incision, extension of the incision
towards the central visual axis or the limbus and
persistent incisional gapping
Advantages of Femtosecond Tunnel
Creation

High errors.
Mean Keratometry > 48 Ds
K Max > 50 Ds
BCVA < 6/30
High patient motivation
Ideal patient for rings

Our provisional Experience
in Sohag

Rings we use

Parameters which guide us
- Refraction
- Pachymetry
- Steepest K axis
- Cone site
- Nomogram

Non central cones.
High cylinder.
High difference between K1, K2.
Thickness at insertion site >400 um
Kerarings

Non of treatment options is satisfactory for the patient.
The disease is progressive by its nature.
Follow up is mandatory.
Combination of treatment options can be done.
Keratoplasty can be a final destiny even with treatment.
Rings mostly will be followed by glasses.
Don't judge on improvement of V\A without correction.
Financial aspect should be taken into consideration.
Rings results are unpredictable



Rules in treatment by rings

Nomogram for Kerarings

Tunnel creation by Femtosecond laser

Kerarings Ring implantation

Pre and post Kerarings Pentacam

About 250 eyes
had been
operated with
Keraringes
implantation by
Intralase
technology
Our provisional
experience in Sohag
Femtocenter

We ask ourselves very important
question

What are factors that affect
the results of ring
implantation ????

Age as a guideline

A 23 ys female with bil. Keratoconus Rt. Eye is advanced
more than Lt. eye.
Preoperative refraction of Rt. eye : -6.00 Ds -3.50 Dc
UNCVA : 4/60
BCVA : 6/30

Postoperative refraction of Rt. eye : -2.50
Ds -1.50 Dc
UNCVA : 6/30
BCVA : 6/18

Symmetry of Bowtie as a guideline

A 37 ys male with bil. Keratoconus Rt. Eye is
advanced more than Lt. eye.
Preoperative refraction of Rt. eye : -4.25 Ds
-7.00 Dc
UNCVA : 3/60
BCVA : 6/38

Postoperative refraction of Rt. eye : +1.00
Ds -1.0 Dc
UNCVA : 6/38
BCVA : 6/18

Corneal thickness as a guideline

A 17 ys male with RT. Advanced Keratoconus .
with thinnest location 348 um with max k: 60 D
Preoperative refraction of Rt. eye : -15.00 Ds
-8.00 Dc
UNCVA : 2/60
BCVA : 6/60

Postoperative refraction of Rt. eye
: -7.50 Ds – 5.00 Dc
UNCVA : 6/60
BCVA : 6/30

Rings in advanced cases

To delay corneal grafting.
To make the eye refractable.
To decrease coma aberrations.
N.B: Keratoplasty is still an option
Aim:

Thank you