Inverted Papilloma and Other Benign Sino-Nasal Tumors

854 views 83 slides Nov 30, 2023
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 83
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83

About This Presentation

Inverted Papilloma and Other Benign Sino-Nasal Tumors


Slide Content

Benign Sino-Nasal Tumors Dr. Adhishesh Kaul Moderator: Dr. Nagarathna H K Associate Professor

Introduction

Types of Tumor Epithelial Tumors Inverted Papilloma Vascular Tumors Hemangioma ( Cavernous and Capillary) Bony Tumors Osteoma Ossifying fibroma Mesenchymatous Tumors Glioma Myxoma Leiomyoma Schwannoma

Inverted Papilloma

History and Basics Other Names Ringertz tumor Transitional cell papilloma Schneiderian papilloma 2 nd most common benign sinonasal tumor Type: Nasal epithelial benign tumor Discovered By: Ward : 1854 Invasiveness discovered by: Ringertz : 1938 Incidence: ~0.6/1lac population

Characteristics: 1. Bone invasion and remodelling 2. Recurrence 3. ~10% incidence of SCC (synchronous > metachronous) Time for transformation: Mean 52 months, Range 6 – 180 months Features Most common site: lateral nasal wall> maxillary sinus > ethmoids Male: Female – 2-3:1 Age: 5 th – 6 th decade Architecture: Endophytic Molecular mutation: EGFR activations, TGF α

Clinical Presentation Unilateral nasal obstruction Watery rhinorrhea Epistaxis Epiphora/ Proptosis/ Diplopia/ Headache

Histopathology Epithelium is hyperplastic (5 - 30 cell layers in thickness) may be of squamous, transitional or respiratory type Transmigrating neutrophils and neutrophilic microabscesses may be seen Stroma may have edema or chronic inflammation Seromucinous gland in the lamina propria is commonly decreased or absent

Staging (Krouse staging) T1: confined to nose without sinus extension T2: Involves OMC/ medial maxillary sinus/ ethmoids T3: Involving other areas of maxillary sinus/ sphenoid and/or frontal sinus T4: Extranasal / Extrasinus extension

Staging (Cannady Staging)

Diagnostic Workup Nasal Endoscopy CT/MRI Biopsy

Nasal Endoscopy Pale, polypoid lesion with a papillary appearance Lesion protrudes from the middle meatus

Small red bumps (granular mulberry appearance) Has undulations Firmer than polyp More vascular than polyp Not smooth like – polyp

Imaging Target AIM: extent and three-dimensional configuration of the lesion and to disclose its relationship with surrounding structures Methods: MRI with gadolinium enhancement CT

CT Scan

MRI Scan

Etiology – Various Theories Viral Infection Inflammation Environmental exposure

Viral Infection : HPV 1 st reported in 1980 Correlation ranges from 0% - 100% Subtypes associated with IP: 6, 11, 16, 18 Pathogenesis: HPV induces promoting agent in pathogenesis of papilloma, which leads to gene alteration (p53) resulting in development of IP

Chronic Inflammation IP is end stage of chronic inflammatory condition NOT A TRUE NEOPLASM HPE shows more inflammatory cells in IP compared to other sino -nasal papillomas

Environmental exposure Dietmer et al. 1996, case – control study 47 cases and 47 controls, found higher degree of occupational exposure to smoke, dust, aerosol Sham et a. 2010, case – control study 50 cases and 150 controls found outdoor and industrial exposure were associated with IP

Recurrence – Factors Location of attachment Completeness of resection in primary surgical resection Increased chance of recurrence in revision cases: 18.1% vs 4.1% complicated by scar tissue, absence of bony landmarks, residual disease

Rate of recurrence on basis of site of tumor location

Rate of recurrence on basis of Surgical Technique Meta-analysis comparing contemporary endoscopic (1992–2004) versus external approaches (1970–1995) demonstrated an improved recurrence rate in the endoscopic group (12% vs. 20%, respectively).

Other Risk Factors for Recurrence Tobacco usage Histological parameters hyperkeratosis hyperplasia mitotic index IHC markers

Treatment Goals Resection of tumor including tumor base Removal of bone/ burring the base NO NON-SURGICAL TREATMENT MODALITY Radiotherapy: Incase of malignant transformation Incompletely resectable tumors Multiple recurrent tumors

Surgical Approaches Transnasal approach (without endoscopes) Open approach (Radical Surgery) – Try to get around the tumor Medial Maxillectomy + Lateral Rhinotomy + Sublabial degloving Endoscopic

Open approaches Advantages Possibility of en -bloc resection Access areas with difficult endoscopic instrumentation Anterior maxillary sinus Region of Nasolacrimal duct superior and lateral frontal sinus

Anterior Maxillary Sinus Residual tumor in lateral frontal sinus

Drawbacks of Open Approaches Cosmetic CSF Leak Orbital Injury enophthalmos, ectropion, diplopia, orbital hemorrhage, rarely blindness Lacrimal Injuries epiphora, dacryocystitis, Mucocele Bleeding

Endoscopic approach advantages Improved precision for resection of involved areas Realization that site of attachment may be small and other structures can be spared Greatly improved visualization to determine site of attachment before resection is complete Improved follow up in office to detect and resect recurrences early

Contraindications for endoscopic approach massive involvement of the mucosa of the frontal sinus and/ or of a supraorbital cell transorbital extension concomitant presence of a malignancy that involves critical areas presence of significant scarring and anatomic distortion from previous surgery

Types of Endoscopic Approach Type 1: IP involving middle meatus, ethmoid, superior meatus, sphenoid sinus, or a combination of these structures; even lesions that protrude into the maxillary sinus without direct involvement of the mucosa are amenable to this approach

Type 2: which corresponds to an endoscopic medial maxillectomy, is indicated for tumors that originate within the naso -ethmoid complex and secondarily extend into the maxillary sinus or for primary maxillary lesions that do not involve the anterior and lateral walls of the sinus. The nasolacrimal duct can be included in the specimen to increase the exposure of the anterior part of the maxillary sinus.

Type 3: (endonasal denker / Sturman-Canfield operation) entails removal of the medial portion of the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus to enable access to all the antrum walls. It is therefore recommended for inverted papillomas that extensively involve the anterior compartment of the maxillary sinus

Endoscopic Medial Maxillectomy Resection of the lateral wall, including the inferior turbinate and nasolacrimal duct (NLD)

Drawbacks of EMM Empty nose syndrome Decreased efficiency of nasal heating and humidification in CT-based computational fluid dynamic Impaired stimulation of trigeminal cold receptors, involved in perception of nasal patency ( eg , the TRPM8 receptor) in the mucosa by mucosal cooling

Complications Bleeding Most common: Greater Palatine artery Management/ Prevention: Locate and bipolarize Low threshold for SPA ligation Bipolarize posterior end of anterior IT remanent Epiphora Management/ Prevention: Do divide cleanly , Do not leave bone fragments around lacrimal duct Parasthesia Palatal/ Teeth/ Infraorbital skin

Modifications of EMM Partial medial maxillectomy Inferior turbinate preservation NLD preservation Pre-Lacrimal Approach

Prelacrimal Approach (Endoscopic Modified Medial Maxillectomy) Access similar to that of EMM along with anterior maxillary sinus visualization Preservation of nasal morphology

Surgical Queries How to decide what resection to do? Physical examination Imaging What approach to use? Tumor base access Surgeon preference

Challenges – Frontal Sinus IP Incidence: 1 – 16% Approach: Recurrence: 22.4% ( Walgama et al 2012) Approach Location of IP Modified Lothrop Inferomedial Osteoplastic Flap Lateral, superior wall

Lothrop Procedure Traditional Procedure : first described in 1914, uses a combined external and transnasal approach to resect the median frontal sinus floor, superior nasal septum, and intersinus septum to drain the frontal sinus.  Modified Lothrop : Also known as draf III Remove entire sinus floor, including AS septum

Osteoplastic Flap

Challenges – Sphenoid Sinus IP Attachment over Optic Nerve, Carotid Artery - 4.76times greater risk of recurrence Intracranial Extension Orbital involvement

Invasion Intracranial : 17 patients studied by Wright, with 49.2 years of mean age, 60% had recurrent disease, with commonest side of invasion from frontal sinus and cribriform plate Orbital : 10 patients studied by Elner , with mean age 62 years, 100% with malignant transformation, 80% orbital exenteration, 30% intracranial extension

Prognostic Markers Increased risk of recurrence if involvement of sphenoid sinus, frontal sinus or maxillary sinus walls other than medial or extrasinus extension Major cause of recurrence is incomplete resection Risk of malignant transformation is ~9% in inverted papilloma (range: 5 - 15%) 

Endoscopic rate of recurrence ~ 12% Open procedure rate of recurrence ~18% Involvement of maxillary sinus floor and lateral recess required additional sublabial approach

Endoscopic Surveillance for Early Detection On posterior part of medial orbital wall

Indications for EMM Impaired Mucociliary function CF/ Wegeners disease/ Prior Caldwell-Luc with impaired mucocilary clearance Postoperative obstruction of normal ostium Osseo neogenesis in normal ostium from surgery/ prior orbital decompression of normal ostium Access in difficult airways Odontogenic infection/ Foreign bodies/ AC polyp with attachment in anterior or lateral wall Destroyed medial wall extensive mucocele with destruction of medial wall/ allergic fungal sinusitis

Osteoma

Benign, slow growing, osteoblastic lesion Incidence: 1% of population undergoing radiographs, 3% of population undergoing CT for Sinus symptoms Age: 2 nd to 5 th decade of life Male preponderance Site: Frontal > Ethmoid > Maxillary sinus > Sphenoids

Gross appearance: hard, white, multilobulated mass, Types: Ivory : lobulated, made of compact dense bone, and contains a minimal amount of fibrous tissue without evidence of haversian ducts . Mature : spongy, mature bone with bony trabeculae divided by a conspicuous amount of fibrous tissue; the lesion contains fibroblasts in different stages of maturation and a great number of collagen fibers, and the connective tissue may often contain distended thin-walled vessels. Mixed

Theories for development Embryogenic Theory : osteoma develops at the junction between the embryonic cartilaginous ethmoid and the membranous frontal bone Traumatic Theory : development of osteoma with a previous trauma Infective Theory : local inflammation may alter adjacent bone metabolism by activating osteogenesis

Imaging: CT Scan: Shows features of cortical bone, tapering to ground glass appearance in periphery Management: 1. Wait and watch in case asymptomatic 2. Excision: in case producing symptoms because of Obstruction of sinus clearance Compression on orbital structures/ optic nerve encroaching anterior skull base causing CSF leak, pneumocele , etc

Lobular Capillary Hemangioma

Rapidly growing lesion characterized by proliferation of capillaries arranged in lobules, separated by loose connective tissue stroma, infiltrated by inflammatory cells. Age: 10 years – 72 years No gender predisposition Etiology: Trauma, hormonal influences, viral oncogenes, microscopic arteriovenous malformations, angiogenic growth factors

DNE: red to purple mass, <1cm, associated with epistaxis CT: unilateral mass with soft tissue density MRI: T2: Hyperintensity T1: Hypointensity CE: vivid enhancement Definitive diagnosis: Histological examination Management: Endoscopic radical resection

Fibrous Dysplasia

It is a genetical developmental anomaly of the bone-forming mesenchyme with a defect in osteoblastic differentiation and maturation, leading to replacement of normal bony tissue by fibrous tissue of variable cellularity and immature woven bone. Fibrous dysplasia, lacks capsule and has presence of more immature bone without osteoblastic activity. Psammomatoid ossifying fibroma, is a variant, with numerous small ossicles in stroma, resembling psammoma bodies.

Types: Monostotic Polyostotic Disseminated Presentation: Pain and pressure symptoms Compress optic nerve/ orbit

CT Scan: associated with degree of mineralization of the tissue Early – High density of fiberous tissue, Lesion: Radiolucent to lytic appearance Late – Ground glass to sclerotic appearance MRI: T1 – Hypointense T2 – Variable CE - non homogeneous enhancement

Management: Resection to relieve symptoms Resection: Partial vs Radical Medical Management: Bisphosphonates – inhibit osteoclastic activity

Ossifying Fibroma

Occurrence: 3 rd and 4 th decade of life Race: more common in black women Psammomatoid variant affects young men more commonly with aggressive local behavior Presents as SOL in nasal cavity on endoscopy CT: well defined, multiloculated lesion, bordered by peripheral eggshell-like dense rim MRI: T2: Hyperintense T1: central part : intermediately intense to hyperintense outer shell : hypointense

Management: Radical resection i /v/o high rate of relapse, with local destruction and invasion of adjacent structures

Schwannoma

Neurogenic tumor arising from schwann cells of sheath of myelinated nerves Age: 6 years to 78 years No sex predisposition Origin: V2 and V3, Sympathetic fibers of carotid plexus Parasympathetic fibers of pterygopalatine ganglion

Well delineated, unencapsulated globular, firm to rubbery, yellow – tan mass polypoid mass filling the left nasal cavity with network of capillaries on the surface of the lesion, suggesting a diagnosis of hypervascularized tumor.

HPE: cellular Antoni A areas with Verocay bodies and hypocellular myxoid Antoni B areas IHC: S 100 protein

Imaging CT: Non diagnostic MRI: shows histologic features of lesion lesions with a prevalent Antoni A component have an intermediate signal on both T1- and T2-weighted predominant Antoni B pattern, which is related to a loose myxoid stroma, hyperintensity is observed on T2-weighted images Management: Radical surgery

References Scott Brown Ed 6-8 Jatin P Shah Cummings Mohan Bansal Hazarika AIIMS ENT Global ENT Outreach Sydney ENT Clinic: Prof Richard Harvey Seattle science foundation Pathology outlines