Investigating the Psychological Effects of Virtual Reality (www.kiu.ac.ug)

publication11 0 views 6 slides Sep 29, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 6
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6

About This Presentation

Virtual Reality (VR) has transformed human–computer interaction by enabling users to experience
immersive, interactive digital environments that simulate real-world or imagined scenarios. This paper
examines the multifaceted psychological effects of VR, emphasizing both its therapeutic potential...


Slide Content

EEJOURNALS OPEN ACCESS
21







Investigating the Psychological Effects of Virtual
Reality
Nambi Namusisi H.
School of Natural and Applied Sciences Kampala International University Uganda
ABSTRACT
Virtual Reality (VR) has transformed human–computer interaction by enabling users to experience
immersive, interactive digital environments that simulate real-world or imagined scenarios. This paper
examines the multifaceted psychological effects of VR, emphasizing both its therapeutic potential and
ethical concerns. Through historical analysis, theoretical grounding, and empirical methodologies, the
study examines how immersive and non-immersive VR technologies influence perception, cognition,
emotion, and behavior. Case studies illustrate VR’s application in mental health therapy, pain
management, and behavioral change while also revealing risks such as desensitization, addiction, and
distortion of reality. The research underscores the importance of responsible development and ethical use
of VR systems, advocating for interdisciplinary collaboration in future investigations. As VR continues to
evolve, a balanced understanding of its psychological implications is essential to harness its benefits while
minimizing harm.
Keywords: Virtual Reality (VR), Psychological Effects, Immersion, Presence, VR Therapy, Cognitive
Impact, Ethical Considerations, Simulation.
INTRODUCTION
Virtual reality (VR) is an advanced human–computer interaction technique that allows users to perceive,
explore, and manipulate synthetic environments in real time. The psychological effects of VR are
significant, increasing the sensation of “presence” and having a greater impact than traditional media. It's
crucial to consider both VR’s positive potential and its limitations in clinical and nonclinical applications.
As VR experiences grow accessible, new psychological issues emerge, necessitating careful evaluation. VR
enables users to immerse themselves in simulated situations, leading to clinical applications in areas like
pain management, phobia treatment, stroke rehabilitation, PTSD, and behavioral research.
Understanding the general psychological effects of VR is essential for determining its appropriateness in
various settings, particularly concerning the concept of immersion, which also highlights potential
negative aspects. While VR systems became commercially available in the early 1990s, it wasn't until the
successful launch of the Oculus Rift in 2016, along with other high-quality systems, that interest surged
regarding the effects of VR technology and its broader applications [1, 2].
Historical Context of Virtual Reality
The concept of Virtual Reality (VR) has historically entailed the use of interactive three-dimensional
computer environments to provide users with the perception of being physically present in a non-physical
world. Although many consider VR to be a relatively new concept, it is more appropriately defined as a
long-standing ideology subject to continuous transformation and evolving iterations depending on
technological advancements. The notion of a three-dimensional, synthetic environment is widely
regarded as a critical and initial component of the contemporary Virtual Reality paradigm, often reflected
in more popular understandings of the term. Prior to the emergence of 3D computer environments in the
1960s, VR referred to a broad class of techniques and concepts for artificially creating the sensation of
being present in alternate worlds such as role playing, psychodrama, hypnosis, meditation, cognitive-
behavioral therapies, psychochemotherapies, and tension-relaxation exercises. Virtual Reality also
EURASIAN EXPERIMENT JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING
(EEJE) ISSN: 2992-409X
@EEJE PUBLICATIONS Volume 5 Issue 1 2025

EEJOURNALS OPEN ACCESS
22

comprises ritual activities such as dance, drama, epics, myths, and art, designed to support intrapsychic
processes. Beyond mental health intervention and cultural immersion, these virtual realities were
employed in rituals of brainwashing, thought control, neurolinguistic programming, and mass marketing.
The historical trajectory consequently traces a path from broad perceptual illusions and psychological
experiences to interactive three-dimensional computer environments granting a sense of physical
immersion and place despite the absence of such physicality [3, 4].
Theoretical Frameworks
Research on the psychological effects of virtual reality (VR) often derives from investigative attempts to
interact with and perturb the simulated worlds created by computer graphics models and other
multidimensional input devices. Such investigations focus on whether the experiences, described as
“virtual reality (VR),” induce states and effects profoundly different from those produced by television,
movies, or computers. The intensity of these experiences is thought to open a field for research into the
psychological and psychophysiological effects of VR. An understanding of VR and its psychological
impact emerges from an interdisciplinary perspective, thereby enabling the knowledge base and insights
developed by researchers from a variety of disciplines to come into play. VR simulations can be extremely
powerful as experiential learning devices that is, situations that challenge previously held beliefs and
attitudes and, by doing so, provide an opportunity for enhancement. Consequently, dramatic changes in
attitude can occur over the course of a short VR intervention and point to transformative change, an idea
inspired by work in psychology, education, and communications [5, 6].
Types of Virtual Reality
The two principal forms of virtual reality (VR) are immersive and non-immersive VR. Immersive VR
chiefly relies on a head-mounted display to fully envelop an individual within a digitally simulated
environment, replacing the natural backdrop with a sensory-correlated artificial one. A participant can
freely navigate a digitally constructed environment using a head-mounted display or CAVE-like
projection systems, while an avatar freely moving within a 3D social network exemplifies a composite
virtual environment. The availability of sensory stimuli closely related to events and phenomena within
the virtual environment creates a sense of reality referred to as {presence}. Researchers have constructed
composite virtual environments from multimedia collections of both digitized and computer-generated
materials while attempting to formulate a methodology that supports the rapid deployment of these
large-scale settings. These frameworks notwithstanding, the delivery 1 of flexible and accessible
composite virtual environments still remains an elusive challenge that extends well beyond current visual
frameworks and requires additional sensory stimuli. An emerging alternative called non-immersive VR
combines real-world videos, computer graphics, and feature-based content retrieval; the resultant content
is then projected onto a large, high-resolution display with the addition of spatially oriented sound and
tactile feedback to aid in participant navigation of the composite virtual environment. Non-immersion
enables a viewer to maintain visual and audio contact with the surrounding real world, unencumbered by
a head-mounted display or headphones [7, 8].
Methodologies for Research
Within the context of a broader and more comprehensive discussion regarding the psychological effects
that are induced by the rapidly advancing field of virtual reality (VR), this section specifically focuses on
the various research methods and applied techniques currently in use. Virtual reality (VR) provides a
unique and interactive platform for the induction of various psychological phenomena, such as the sense
of presence or Game Transfer Phenomena, which significantly enhance both the efficiency of existing
research methods and the broader range of cases that can be addressed in comparison to conventional
methods used in traditional psychological studies. Accordingly, the paper conducts a thorough assessment
of the diverse methodologies and tools that have been implemented for the purpose of analyzing the
psychological effects that are intrinsically connected to VR experiences. It also engages in a detailed
discussion of the rationale behind the careful selection of reference studies that are cited for the
subsequent review. The response encompasses a wide-ranging overview of commonly used approaches,
which include both quantitative and qualitative traditions that are prevalent in VR research. Particular
emphasis is given to the specific procedures that are applied within the present paper, illustrating the
intricate details of the research design and methodology employed to explore the fascinating intersection
of psychology and virtual reality [9, 10].
Psychological Effects of VR
Virtual reality often induces profound psychological changes that can significantly alter an individual's
perception and emotional state. The user’s ability to deeply explore and interact with the virtual
environment can completely thwart habitual inattentiveness to the anomalies found within virtual

EEJOURNALS OPEN ACCESS
23

representation, leading to a unique experience. Users of VR systems frequently display a wide range of
psychological responses that are closely aligned with their subjective beliefs regarding the reality of the
events transpiring within the medium. Some individuals suspend their disbelief completely, responding to
events as though they were genuinely occurring in their immediate reality. Others may partially suspend
their unbelief, consciously or unconsciously categorizing the presented environment as artificial, yet still
exhibiting responses that appear involuntary to the unfolding events in the medium. Still others
completely reject this premise altogether, categorizing the experience as entirely fictional and thus
denying the wide range of responses that are theoretically available. The determination of VR’s
psychological effects on users remains a perplexing and open research problem, as it continually evolves
with advances in technology and user experience [11, 12].
Therapeutic Applications of VR
Virtual reality (VR) significantly enhances healthcare as a complementary tool, primarily aiming to
improve traditional psychotherapies and promote individual growth. In therapeutic contexts, VR
immerses patients in scenarios that are too risky or expensive to recreate physically. Treatments use
various strategies; for example, simulation therapy gradually exposes individuals to anxiety-inducing
stimuli, minimizing phobic reactions over time. Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy vividly presents
addictive substances and criminal environments to confront behavioral issues through repeated sessions.
Moreover, serious games are integrated into rehabilitation programs, enriching them with stimulus-
reaction exercises in immersive environments. Cognitive-behavioral therapies mimic real psychological
interactions within tailored virtual platforms, aiming to enhance social skills, cognitive flexibility, and
self-esteem. Additionally, VR connects exercise with engaging game components, encouraging sports
practitioners and fitness lovers. By facilitating exploration in stimulating virtual realms, it enhances
training and increases motivation for physical activities [13, 14].
Risks and Ethical Considerations
Immersive experiences in virtual reality (VR) have become increasingly accessible to a broad audience and
have then led to a growing concern for the psychological effects of these experiences. When a VR system
succeeds to replace sensory inputs with synthetic alternatives, the brain can be tricked by the computer
and enter an off-line mode which can profoundly alter higher cognitive functions. Because VR is mainly
used as a form of entertainment, this means that an immersive fiction can cause psychological changes as
intense as those experienced under the influence of powerful psychotropic substances. Potential
psychological dangers can be emphasized by the fact that our understanding of when these transitions
happen is quite limited and experimental protocols will have to be adapted. Research on the risks
associated with VR systems remains very limited. However, it is known that immersive VR can be used as
a torture device to simulate a wide range of traumatic situations. Because of the near certainty that the
brain stores these events as actual memories, the use of these systems for unethical purposes deserves
special attention. A similar concern applies to certain categories of computer games which appear to be
already contributing to an increase of antisocial behaviour among young people. Additionally, recent
evidence suggests that because of their high level of realism, immersive VR experiences present an
increased potential for biases to be introduced in the behaviour of the participants located in a virtual
environment. This can jeopardise the validity of remote user studies and their usefulness for the design of
future VR systems [15, 16].
Future Directions in VR Research
The psychological effects of virtual reality (VR) are remarkably far-reaching and complex; numerous
unexplored avenues continue to remain open for investigation. Because of this complexity, it is therefore
crucial to adopt a multi-disciplinary strategy for future psychological investigations, particularly given
the many disparate coherent and incoherent phenomena that have emerged in this field. VR presents a
variety of ethical challenges; some of these challenges are analogous to those encountered in clinical and
forensic psychology, which raises important considerations for researchers and practitioners alike.
Individual studies should also persist in their efforts to investigate empirical yet unique cases, such as
those that possess a poignant structure or provoke a unique demand effect. As VR is now firmly
established as a major component of the national research agenda, a successful programme requires not
only concerted research efforts but also concerted theorising and robust collaboration among various
disciplines [17, 18].
Case Studies
Case studies provide valuable insights into the diverse psychological responses elicited by immersive
virtual reality (VR) engagements across various fields. An investigation of sexual interest in androphilic
and gynephilic men demonstrated that high-immersive VR amplifies stimulus realism and subjective

EEJOURNALS OPEN ACCESS
24

sexual attractiveness. Objective measures of sexual interest in fully immersive VR environments proved
as valid as those obtained from conventional desktop systems, and animating virtual characters in the
environment is expected to further enhance realism and ecological validity. An eclectic, integrative
psychotherapeutic application of VR technology produced increased positive affect, satisfaction, and
perceived credibility in safe-place imagery, episodic recall of childhood and adult homes, and guided
wilderness imagery tasks. The VR condition also yielded heightened presence and vividness relative to 2-
D and mental imagery formats. A study exploring intimate partner violence from the perspective of a
victim found that embodying the abused woman in either first- or third-person perspective within a
photorealistic virtual environment significantly influenced social cognition and mediated the frequency
and intensity of PTSD symptoms associated with the violent event. These case studies illustrate the
profound psychological changes induced by immersive experiences, highlighting VR’s potential to shape
perception, cognition, emotion, and social behaviour [19, 20].
Comparative Analysis with Traditional Therapies VR
Comparisons between immersive VR and traditional therapeutic methods reveal that immersive VR not
only facilitates stronger emotional engagement but also encourages a deeper connection to the
therapeutic process, which is critical for effective trauma resolution. Conventional approaches often
employ episodic recall and mental imagery techniques, which are processes that typically rely on third-
person perspectives, or they may occur in the absence of direct sensory stimuli. In contrast, VR offers
vivid, egocentric experiences that evoke more robust affective responses by immersing patients in
environments that closely resemble their own lived experiences. Initial trials of VR integrative therapy
(VRIT) have confirmed its remarkable capability to enhance mental health and well-being, thereby
supporting the notion that VR’s immersive environment optimally engages and optimizes the
mechanisms underlying emotional processing [21, 22].
Impact on Social Interactions
Empirical research highlights VR's transformative impact on social interactions. Avatars reflect users,
presenting personal traits and realistic appearances. Users react to VR stimuli like real-life experiences,
generating authentic emotions. Behaviors in VR parallel those in real settings. The perceived social
presence enables users to interpret others' spatial awareness and intentions, making personal space
violations distressing. VR’s immersive nature fosters feelings of presence linked to psychological benefits
such as relatedness, self-expansion, and enjoyment. Users seek social connections and wellbeing through
VR, especially during physical distancing; the sense of co-presence alleviates loneliness. However, absent
nonverbal cues hinder communication, causing uncertainty in intimate interactions. Nonetheless, users
adapt, relying on verbal content and tone for understanding. Group synchrony enhances interaction,
particularly among familiar individuals, strengthening existing bonds. The ongoing social presence aids
in comprehending vocal information while allowing for simultaneous expression, promoting humanoid
interactions. VR encourages spontaneity in communication and responses, significantly enhancing
psychological benefits from engagement. Users express increased comfort and social connectedness in
conversations with virtual partners versus traditional displays. Thus, social or spatial presence is vital for
psychological rewards of connection and enjoyment. Immersive social VR platforms may provide social
benefits during crises and may enhance users’ wellbeing, especially with added social features and support
[23, 24].
Cultural Implications of VR
Conceptions of virtual reality (VR) frequently serve as grounds for various forms of cooperation or
potential conflict within the self as well as between the self and others, revealing intricate relationships
and interactions. VR applications have a broad scope, encompassing an array of mental health
interventions such as role playing, psychodrama, hypnosis, meditation, cognitive-behavioral therapies,
and various ritualized practices, which can include dance, drama, myths, and other artistic expressions.
The ongoing discourse around VR brings together both critics and proponents, who associate this
evolving technology with a diverse range of cultural practices, spanning from therapeutic endeavors
aimed at healing to mass marketing activities that seek to engage a wider audience. Various modes of
online communication, such as email and the World Wide Web, are increasingly perceived as extensions
of earlier forms of communication rather than as direct conduits to Ultimate Reality be it Objectivism,
Subjectivism, or pursuits of ultimate transcendent states. Consequently, the cultural implications of VR
reflect a kaleidoscope of ongoing social and psychological dynamics, rather than simply being
manifestations of groundbreaking or unprecedented technical innovation that stand apart from existing
practices. Through these lenses, the exploration of VR invites both critical analysis and innovative
thinking about its role in our lives [25, 26].

EEJOURNALS OPEN ACCESS
25

CONCLUSION
Virtual Reality stands at the crossroads of technological innovation and psychological exploration,
offering profound opportunities to reshape how individuals interact with digital environments. Its
psychological effects, both beneficial and detrimental, warrant careful scrutiny. While VR has shown
great promise in therapeutic contexts such as exposure therapy, rehabilitation, and cognitive training. It
also presents emerging ethical challenges related to immersion, memory manipulation, and behavioral
conditioning. The immersive power of VR can significantly influence users’ thoughts, emotions, and social
behaviors, making it a powerful tool in both clinical and nonclinical settings. However, the risks of
misuse, overexposure, and psychological side effects necessitate rigorous ethical standards and empirical
oversight. Going forward, multidisciplinary research must remain vigilant and proactive to ensure that
VR technology enhances well-being without compromising psychological integrity or societal norms.
REFERENCES
1. Shehu A. CONSUMER ADOPTION OF VIRTUAL REALITY TECHNOLOGIES. ETC: A
Review of General Semantics. 2022 Jan 1;79(2).
2. Frewen P, Mistry D, Zhu J, Kielt T, Wekerle C, Lanius RA, Jetly R. Proof of concept of an
eclectic, integrative therapeutic approach to mental health and well-being through virtual reality
technology. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020 Jun 5;11:858.
3. Korkut EH, Surer E. Visualization in virtual reality: a systematic review. Virtual Reality. 2023
Jun;27(2):1447-80.
4. Pramanik S. Immersive innovations: Exploring the use of virtual and augmented reality in
educational institutions. InDevelopments and Future Trends in Transnational Higher Education
Leadership 2024 (pp. 229-243). IGI Global. [HTML]
5. Georgiou Y, Tsivitanidou O, Ioannou A. Learning experience design with immersive virtual
reality in physics education. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2021
Dec;69(6):3051-80. researchgate.net
6. Martin F, Borup J. Online learner engagement: Conceptual definitions, research themes, and
supportive practices. Educational Psychologist. 2022 Jul 3;57(3):162-77.
7. Hao J, He Z, Yu X, Remis A. Comparison of immersive and non-immersive virtual reality for
upper extremity functional recovery in patients with stroke: a systematic review and network
meta-analysis. Neurological Sciences. 2023 Aug;44(8):2679-97.
8. Kumari S, Bahuguna R, Garg N, Yeluri R. Immersive and non-immersive virtual reality
distraction on pain perception to intraoral injections. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry.
2021 Dec 1;45(6):389-94. jocpd.com
9. Vlahovic S, Suznjevic M, Skorin-Kapov L. A survey of challenges and methods for Quality of
Experience assessment of interactive VR applications. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces.
2022 Sep;16(3):257-91.
10. Kelly NJ, Hallam J, Bignell S. Using interpretative phenomenological analysis to gain a
qualitative understanding of presence in virtual reality. Virtual Reality. 2023 Jun;27(2):1173-85.
11. Bell IH, Pot-Kolder R, Rizzo A, Rus-Calafell M, Cardi V, Cella M, Ward T, Riches S, Reinoso M,
Thompson A, Alvarez-Jimenez M. Advances in the use of virtual reality to treat mental health
conditions. Nature Reviews Psychology. 2024 Aug;3(8):552-67. researchgate.net
12. Somarathna R, Bednarz T, Mohammadi G. Virtual reality for emotion elicitation–a review. IEEE
Transactions on Affective Computing. 2022 Jun 9;14(4):2626-45. [PDF]
13. Le Roy B, Martin-Krumm C, Poupon C, Richieri R, Malbos E, Barthélémy F, Guedj E,
Trousselard M. Virtual exercise in medicine: a proof of concept in a healthy population. JMIR
Formative Research. 2024 Jan 22;8:e45637.
14. Park MJ, Kim DJ, Lee U, Na EJ, Jeon HJ. A literature overview of virtual reality (VR) in
treatment of psychiatric disorders: recent advances and limitations. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2019
Jul 19;10:505.
15. Raj P, Rauniyar S, Sapkale B. Psychedelic drugs or hallucinogens: Exploring their medicinal
potential. Cureus. 2023 Nov 13;15(11).
16. Sharma K, Aswal HS, Chauhan R, Rawat R, Gupta R. Neuroscience of virtual reality. In2024
International Conference on Intelligent and Innovative Technologies in Computing, Electrical
and Electronics (IITCEE) 2024 Jan 24 (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
17. Wade AR, McCall C, Karapanagiotidis T, Schofield G, Preston C, Hartley T, Kaestner M,
Horner A, Maloney RT, Smallwood J, Jefferies E. A neuroscientific approach to exploring
fundamental questions in VR. Journal of Imaging and Science. 2018 Jan 28.

EEJOURNALS OPEN ACCESS
26

18. Fromberger P, Meyer S, Kempf C, Jordan K, Müller JL. Virtual viewing time: the relationship
between presence and sexual interest in androphilic and gynephilic men. PloS one. 2015 May
18;10(5):e0127156.
19. Rodriguez G. Virtual Reality Approaches to Trauma‐Based Mental Healthcare. Mental Health
Virtual Reality: The Power of Immersive Worlds. 2025 Jan 24:193-206.
20. Rock AJ, Beischel J, Cott CC. Psi vs. survival: A qualitative investigation of mediums’
phenomenology comparing psychic readings and ostensible communication with the deceased.
Transpersonal Psychology Review. 2008 Jan 1;13(2):76-89.
21. Patel NJ. Creating safe environments for children: prevention of trauma in the Extended Verse.
Empathic Computing. 2025 Feb 17;1(1):0003-.
22. Moustafa F, Steed A. A longitudinal study of small group interaction in social virtual reality.
InProceedings of the 24th ACM symposium on virtual reality software and technology 2018
Nov 28 (pp. 1-10).
23. Barreda-Ángeles M, Hartmann T. Psychological benefits of using social virtual reality platforms
during the covid-19 pandemic: The role of social and spatial presence. Computers in Human
Behavior. 2022 Feb 1;127:107047.
24. Sinha N. Introducing gamification for advancing current mental healthcare and treatment
practices. InIoT in healthcare and ambient assisted living 2021 Jan 5 (pp. 223-241). Singapore:
Springer Singapore.
25. Ma W, Li Z, Li T, Zheng Y, Wang L. P‐4.35: Application of Virtual Reality Technology in the
Diagnosis and Treatment of Psychological Disorders: An Electroencephalography (EEG)‐Based
Approach. InSID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers 2024 Apr (Vol. 55, pp. 882-886).
researchgate.net


CITE AS: Nambi Namusisi H. (2025). Investigating the
Psychological Effects of Virtual Reality . EURASIAN
EXPERIMENT JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING , 5(1):21-26.