Definition of Thrombocytopenia Platelet count <150,000/ μ L Often found incidentally or during bleeding/bruising work-up Immune-mediated processes are the most common causes in children
ITP Most common cause of isolated thrombocytopenia in children Peak age: 2–5 years Sudden bruising, petechiae, or mucosal bleeding Often post-viral or post-vaccine, but many cases idiopathic Primary ITP: No associated systemic disease Secondary ITP: Associated with SLE, HIV, CVID, ALPS, drugs By Duration: Newly diagnosed: <3 months Persistent: 3–12 months Chronic: >12 months
Pathogenesis Autoantibodies (IgG) against GP IIb/IIIa, Ib /IX, etc. Antibody-coated platelets → macrophage clearance (mainly spleen) Antibodies may also impair megakaryocyte function Involvement of T-cell cytotoxicity and immune dysregulation (Tregs/B-cells)
Epidemiology Annual incidence: 1–6.4/100,000 children Underdiagnosed due to asymptomatic or mild cases Peak: 2–5 years , minor secondary peak in adolescence
Clinical Presentation Healthy-appearing child with: Sudden petechiae, purpura, bruising ± mucosal bleeding (epistaxis, oral, GU, GI) Often preceded by viral illness or MMR vaccination Systemic signs absent (no fever, bone pain, hepatosplenomegaly)
Bleeding Severity Most have mild mucocutaneous bleeding 40% have mucosal bleeding Serious bleeding: ~3% Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH): <1% High risk if platelets <10,000/ μ L
Diagnostic evaluation CBC with differential Peripheral blood smear Reticulocyte count Direct antiglobulin test Immunoglobulin levels Further tests if atypical findings
Diagnostic Criteria Platelets <100,000/ μ L Normal CBC, normal smear No systemic symptoms Diagnosis of exclusion Note: Antiplatelet antibody testing not helpful (low sensitivity/specificity)
Management Observation for mild/no bleeding Treat if: Platelets <10,000/ μ L Mucosal or life-threatening bleeding First-line: IVIG, anti-D (if Rh+), or steroids Reserve platelet transfusions for emergencies
Severe Bleeding Management Platelet transfusions: 10–30 mL/kg bolus IVIG + Steroids ± anti-D Add TPO-RA (romiplostim) to sustain counts Consider ICU admission for ICH or GI hemorrhage
Disease Course 80–90% recover in 3–6 months 10–20% → chronic ITP (>12 months) Risk factors for chronicity: Older age No preceding infection Less severe thrombocytopenia at diagnosis Insidious onset
Chronic ITP: Management Avoid contact sports, NSAIDs Monitor labs and menstrual bleeding First-line: IVIG, steroids If recurrent/severe: TPO-RAs preferred Rituximab if autoimmune-associated Splenectomy rare (reserved, due to lifelong risks)
Prognosis 30% spontaneous remission by 2 years 50% remission by 5 years Severe bleeding <10% over 5 years Younger age = better prognosis
Bleeding in Children 02
Approach to Pediatric Bleeding Begin with a focused history Follow with targeted physical exam Order baseline labs based on findings Use structured tools like bleeding assessment scores
Focused History Onset and frequency of bleeding Triggering events (trauma, surgery, dental work) Type of bleeding: mucosal vs deep tissue Past medical history, meds, supplements Family history of bleeding disorders Possible child abuse in unexplained bruising
Bleeding Assessment Tools ISTH Bleeding Assessment Tool (BAT) Score ≥3 → further evaluation needed Helps quantify symptoms and guide testing Use when the history is unclear or symptoms vague
Child Abuse Considerations Pattern and location of bruises inconsistent with history Multiple stages of healing Delay in seeking care Consider abuse in any atypical bruising without coagulopathy
Initial Lab Work-Up CBC + Platelet count Peripheral smear Prothrombin time (PT) Activated partial thromboplastin time ( aPTT ) Fibrinogen Von Willebrand panel : VWF antigen VWF activity Factor VIII level
Diagnostic Approach Use initial lab results to narrow causes Algorithm-based evaluation is recommended Examples: ↓ Platelets: consider ITP, leukemia, DIC Normal platelets + ↑PT/ aPTT : consider factor deficiencies Normal PT/ aPTT + mucosal bleeding: think VWD
Further Testing Based on initial findings, consider: Coagulation factor assays (VIII, IX, XI, XIII) Platelet function testing (e.g., aggregation studies) Antiphospholipid antibodies Thrombin time (TT), factor XIII activity Fibrinolysis evaluation (e.g., D-dimer, euglobulin clot lysis time)
Child Abuse 03
Definition Injury inflicted upon a child by a caregiver or parent Legal and cultural definitions may vary Key: Inflicted , not accidental trauma
Epidemiology Thousands of injuries and deaths annually worldwide High risk of repeated harm if not intervened Early recognition = lifesaving Most common in children under 5 years
Approach to Suspected Abuse Keep abuse in differential diagnosis of any unexplained injury Carefully assess: History : inconsistency, delay in care Physical exam : patterned injuries, fractures Involve child protection teams when possible Report any suspicion to child services
Risk Factors (Contextual, Not Diagnostic) Young age Household history of abuse Family stress, poverty, isolation Caregiver mental illness or substance use Race or socioeconomic status should NOT be used to guide suspicion
Red Flag History for Abuse Injury inconsistent with developmental stage Vague or changing history Delay in seeking medical attention Recurrent injuries with no clear cause Explanation not matching injury severity
Red Flag History for Abuse
Red Flag Physical Exam Findings Bruises in non-mobile infants Patterned or clustered bruises Burns (e.g., immersion, cigarette) Retinal hemorrhages Multiple fractures in various healing stages Genital or perianal injuries
When to Pursue Full Work-Up Presence of any red flag history or exam finding Use institutional abuse protocol (lab + imaging) Refer to child protection team or abuse specialist Transfer if specialized services are not available
Screening Recommendations ED/urgent care: Routine screening for <5 years recommended Increases detection Reduces missed cases Use validated tools Requires institutional commitment and team collaboration
Primary Care Limitations Universal screening not yet supported by evidence Rely on clinical vigilance + family dynamics assessment Incorporate abuse awareness into developmental visits