ITP Bleeding Case Powerpoint Presentation

LizCh17 0 views 44 slides Oct 02, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 44
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44

About This Presentation

ITP BleedingCase Powerpoint Presentation


Slide Content

Pediatrics ITP, Bleeding, and Child abuse

Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) 01

Definition of Thrombocytopenia Platelet count <150,000/ μ L Often found incidentally or during bleeding/bruising work-up Immune-mediated processes are the most common causes in children

ITP Most common cause of  isolated thrombocytopenia  in children Peak age:  2–5 years Sudden bruising, petechiae, or mucosal bleeding Often post-viral or post-vaccine, but many cases idiopathic Primary ITP:  No associated systemic disease Secondary ITP:  Associated with SLE, HIV, CVID, ALPS, drugs By Duration: Newly diagnosed: <3 months Persistent: 3–12 months Chronic: >12 months

Pathogenesis Autoantibodies (IgG) against GP IIb/IIIa, Ib /IX, etc. Antibody-coated platelets → macrophage clearance (mainly spleen) Antibodies may also impair megakaryocyte function Involvement of  T-cell cytotoxicity  and  immune dysregulation (Tregs/B-cells)

Epidemiology Annual incidence:  1–6.4/100,000 children Underdiagnosed due to asymptomatic or mild cases Peak:  2–5 years , minor secondary peak in adolescence

Clinical Presentation Healthy-appearing child with: Sudden petechiae, purpura, bruising ± mucosal bleeding (epistaxis, oral, GU, GI) Often preceded by viral illness or MMR vaccination Systemic signs absent  (no fever, bone pain, hepatosplenomegaly)

Bleeding Severity Most have mild mucocutaneous bleeding 40% have mucosal bleeding Serious bleeding: ~3% Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH): <1% High risk if platelets <10,000/ μ L

Diagnostic evaluation CBC with differential Peripheral blood smear Reticulocyte count Direct antiglobulin test Immunoglobulin levels Further tests if atypical findings

Diagnostic Criteria Platelets <100,000/ μ L Normal CBC, normal smear No systemic symptoms Diagnosis of exclusion Note:  Antiplatelet antibody testing not helpful (low sensitivity/specificity)

Differential Diagnosis Malignancies (ALL, lymphoma) Infections (EBV, HIV, CMV) Autoimmune diseases (SLE) Bone marrow failure syndromes DIC, TTP, HUS Drug-induced thrombocytopenia Inherited thrombocytopenia

Management Observation for mild/no bleeding Treat if: Platelets <10,000/ μ L Mucosal or life-threatening bleeding First-line: IVIG, anti-D (if Rh+), or steroids Reserve platelet transfusions for emergencies

Severe Bleeding Management Platelet transfusions:  10–30 mL/kg bolus IVIG + Steroids ± anti-D Add  TPO-RA (romiplostim)  to sustain counts Consider ICU admission for ICH or GI hemorrhage

Disease Course 80–90% recover in 3–6 months 10–20% → chronic ITP (>12 months) Risk factors for chronicity: Older age No preceding infection Less severe thrombocytopenia at diagnosis Insidious onset

Chronic ITP: Management Avoid contact sports, NSAIDs Monitor labs and menstrual bleeding First-line: IVIG, steroids If recurrent/severe: TPO-RAs preferred Rituximab  if autoimmune-associated Splenectomy  rare (reserved, due to lifelong risks)

Prognosis 30% spontaneous remission by 2 years 50% remission by 5 years Severe bleeding <10% over 5 years Younger age = better prognosis

Bleeding in Children 02

Approach to Pediatric Bleeding Begin with a  focused history Follow with  targeted physical exam Order  baseline labs  based on findings Use structured tools like  bleeding assessment scores

Focused History Onset and frequency of bleeding Triggering events (trauma, surgery, dental work) Type of bleeding: mucosal vs deep tissue Past medical history, meds, supplements Family history  of bleeding disorders Possible  child abuse  in unexplained bruising

Bleeding Assessment Tools ISTH Bleeding Assessment Tool (BAT) Score ≥3 → further evaluation needed Helps quantify symptoms and guide testing Use when the history is unclear or symptoms vague

Child Abuse Considerations Pattern and location of bruises inconsistent with history Multiple stages of healing Delay in seeking care Consider abuse in any atypical bruising without coagulopathy

Initial Lab Work-Up CBC + Platelet count Peripheral smear Prothrombin time (PT) Activated partial thromboplastin time ( aPTT ) Fibrinogen Von Willebrand panel : VWF antigen VWF activity Factor VIII level

Diagnostic Approach Use initial lab results to narrow causes Algorithm-based evaluation is recommended Examples: ↓ Platelets: consider ITP, leukemia, DIC Normal platelets + ↑PT/ aPTT : consider factor deficiencies Normal PT/ aPTT + mucosal bleeding: think VWD

Further Testing Based on initial findings, consider: Coagulation factor assays (VIII, IX, XI, XIII) Platelet function testing (e.g., aggregation studies) Antiphospholipid antibodies Thrombin time (TT), factor XIII activity Fibrinolysis evaluation (e.g., D-dimer, euglobulin clot lysis time)

Child Abuse 03

Definition Injury inflicted upon a child by a caregiver or parent Legal and cultural definitions may vary Key:  Inflicted , not accidental trauma

Epidemiology Thousands of injuries and deaths annually worldwide High risk of repeated harm if not intervened Early recognition = lifesaving Most common in  children under 5 years

Approach to Suspected Abuse Keep abuse in  differential diagnosis  of any unexplained injury Carefully assess: History : inconsistency, delay in care Physical exam : patterned injuries, fractures Involve  child protection teams  when possible Report  any suspicion to child services

Risk Factors (Contextual, Not Diagnostic) Young age Household history of abuse Family stress, poverty, isolation Caregiver mental illness or substance use Race or socioeconomic status  should NOT  be used to guide suspicion

Red Flag History for Abuse Injury inconsistent with developmental stage Vague or changing history Delay in seeking medical attention Recurrent injuries with no clear cause Explanation not matching injury severity

Red Flag History for Abuse

Red Flag Physical Exam Findings Bruises in non-mobile infants Patterned or clustered bruises Burns (e.g., immersion, cigarette) Retinal hemorrhages Multiple fractures in various healing stages Genital or perianal injuries

When to Pursue Full Work-Up Presence of any red flag history or exam finding Use institutional abuse protocol (lab + imaging) Refer to child protection team or abuse specialist Transfer if specialized services are not available

Screening Recommendations ED/urgent care:  Routine screening for <5 years recommended Increases detection Reduces missed cases Use  validated tools Requires institutional commitment and team collaboration

Primary Care Limitations Universal screening not yet supported by evidence Rely on clinical vigilance + family dynamics assessment Incorporate abuse awareness into developmental visits

Thank You!
Tags