Jadad scale-how to write it in your manuscript.pptx

Jadad scale-how to write it in your manuscript.pptx

1. Jadad scale-how to write it in your manuscript 1. In material and methods : The Jadad scale, which scores randomization, double blinding, and withdrawal, was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the trials .(references) Scores range from 0-3 (low quality or high risk of bias) to 4-5 (high quality or low risk of bias).

2. Jadad scale-how to write it in your manuscript In results: Risk For Bias Within Studies With respect to the quality assessment of the included studies, seven 7 studies showed a low risk for bias and 3 studies2 showed a high risk for bias. The scores are summarized in Table 2.

3. Delphi Scale (1998)

4. Combination between Jadad and Delphi scales

5. Combination between Jadad and Delphi scales In material and methods The Delphi List and Jadad Scale are the most valid quality assessment scales.23,25 Therefore, in the present study, both criteria lists were used. These scores were combined, which means that only studies with a Jadad score of 4-5 and a Delphi score of 6-9 were assessed to be of “high quality.” Studies with a Jadad score of 0-3 or a Delphi score 0-5 were considered to be of “low quality.”

6. A common classification scheme for bias Type of bias Description Relevant domains in the Collaboration’s ‘Risk of bias’ tool Selection bias. Systematic differences between baseline characteristics of the groups that are compared. Sequence generation. Allocation concealment. Performance bias. Systematic differences between groups in the care that is provided, or in exposure to factors other than the interventions of interest. Blinding of participants and personnel. Other potential threats to validity. Detection bias. Systematic differences between groups in how outcomes are determined. Blinding of outcome assessment. Other potential threats to validity. Attrition bias. Systematic differences between groups in withdrawals from a study. Incomplete outcome data Reporting bias. Systematic differences between reported and unreported findings. Selective outcome reporting.