JUVENILE NASOPHARYNGEAL ANGIOFIBROMA Surgical approaches & newer treatment options

5,550 views 66 slides Nov 25, 2017
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 66
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66

About This Presentation

Detail description of pathology & management of JNA.


Slide Content

JNA : SURGICAL APPROACHES & NEWER
TREATMENT OPTIONS
DR UTKAL MISHRA
AIIMS, BHOPAL

JUVENILE NASOPHARYNGEAL ANGIOFIBROMA
Most common benign tumorof nasopharynx.
Seen almost exclusively in AdolescentMalesof 10-20 years
It is encapsulated , slow-growing,vasculartumor
Although benign it is locally aggressive and has a high recurrence
rate

EPIDEMIOLOGY
Accounts for 0.05 to 0.5% of all head & neck tumours.
Intracranial extension found in 20 %cases.
Incidence –1/6000
Harmaet alto 1/50,000
Hondousaet al
In India incidence is increasing.

PATHOLOGY
Gross : -Sessile, Firm, Lobulated, Pink –Red in colour
Histology : -
1.Encapsulated, composed of vascular tissue & fibrous stroma.
2.Vessels are thin-walled, endothelium lined with no muscle or elastic coat.

THEORIES OF ORIGIN
Ringertztheory: JNA always arose from the periosteumof the skull base.
Bensch& Ewing (1941): Origin from embryonincfibro cartilage between the basiocciputand basisphenoid.
Brunner (1942): Origin from conjoined pharyngobasilarand buccopharyngealfascia.
Marten (1948): Tumorsresulted from deficiency of androgens or over activity of estrogens
Sternberg(1954): Hamartoma
Osborn (1959): Hamartomatousorigin
Girgis& Fahmy(1973): They considered JNA to be a paraganglionoma.
Mild & Mauristheory: Origin from midline erectile tissue/ androgen dependent hamartoma

SITE OF ORIGIN
Most common site -Superior Margin Of SphenopalatineForamen
Pterygoidwedge
Vidians canal
Basisphenoid

EXTRANASOPHARYNGEAL ANGIOFIBROMA
Do not originate from the area around the sphenopalatineforamen.
Common in older Females
Less vascular
Commonest site –Maxillary sinus
Other sites –Ethmoid sinus, Inferior Turbinates, Frontal Recess, Tonsil, RMT

MOLECULAR ANALYSIS
Androgen receptors -75%
VEGF–80%
Progesterone receptors
SOMATOSTATIN Receptor (SSTR 2)
IGF II
APC gene -25 times more frequent in FAP patients
ß catenin
CD 34
Loss of expression of GSTM 1

CLINICAL FEATURES
Commonest Symptom -Profuse, Unprovoked,Recurrentand Spontaneous
Epistaxis.
Progressive nasal obstruction and denasalspeech
Conductive hearing loss and otitismedia with effusion.
Mass in the nasopharynx, Palatal Bulge
Broadening of Nasal Bridge, Proptosis, Swelling of Cheek

EXAMINATION OF NOSE
Smooth Reddish Lobulatedmass filling the nasal cavity & choana at times.
Accumulations of secretions anterior to mass –CHOANAL BANKING EFFECT
DNS to contralatertalside may be present.

SPREAD OF JNA
Sphenopalatine
foramen
Pterygopalatine
fossa
Infratemporal
fossa
Inferior orbital fissure
Orbit
Maxillary sinus
Cheek
Sphenoid sinus
Middle Cranial
fossa
Pituitary
Cavernous sinus
Nasal
cavity
Nasopharyn
x

SIGNIFICANCE OF PTERYGOID WEDGE
It is defined as the anterior junction of the medial & lateral pterygoidplates.
Involvement of pterygoidwedge is found in 99% cases.
Pterygoidwedge is the Epicenter of tumour.
Most common site of residual & recurrent disease –pterygoidwedge (45%)
Most important step in JNA surgery to prevent recurrence -Drilling of pterygoidwedge

FISCHSTAGING
Courtesy : Scott Browns Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery 7
th
edition

RADKOWSKI STAGING
Courtesy : Scott Browns Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery 7
th
edition

OTHER STAGING SYSTEMS
Andrews staging
Chandlier’sstaging
Session’s staging
Onercistaging
Tondonstaging

DIAGNOSIS
BIOPSY CONTRAINDICATED
Investigation of choice –Contrast Enhanced CT scan
MRI –Intracranial extension, Orbit, Infratemporalfossa
Carotid Angiography with Embolization

HOLMAN MILLER SIGN

HONDOUSA SIGN
HONDOUSA SIGN –Widening of gap between ramusof
mandible & maxillary body

RAM HARAN SIGN
RAM HARAN SIGN –Quadrilateral appearance of pterygoidwedge

CHOP STICK SIGN
CHOP STICK SIGN–Post op appearance of medial & lateral pterygoidplates as
two separate sticks due to drilling & removal of pterygoidwedge.

MRI
Characteristic –Salt & Pepper appearance due to flow voids
It aids in differentiation of tumourin –Orbit , Cavernous sinus , Middle cranial fossa , Infratemporal
region

MRI

DIGITAL SUBSTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY
Commonest feeding vessel –Internal Maxillary Artery
In large tumours–
1.Ascending Pharyngeal Artery
2.ContralateralECA branches
3.ICA branches -Ophthalmic, Meningo-hypophyseal, Vidian Artery

EMBOLIZATION
Planned 24-48 hrs before surgery to avoid revascularization.
No anesthesia required for cooperative patients
Done under DSA guidance.

DISADVANTAGE
Advantage –Reduction in blood loss, Less operative time, Improved visualisationof tumourmargins
Disadvantage –
1.Neurological complications, -Stroke, Cranial N. palsy, Blindness
2.Recurrence
3.Friable
4.Obscure tumourfront in cracks & crevices.

TYPES
2 types –
1.TRANSARTERIAL EMBOLIZATION WITH PVA
2.DIRECT PERCUTANEOUS EMBOLIZATION WITH ONYX–
Advantage: Solidifies slowly & infiltrates small vessels with excellent penetration of parenchyma

TREATMENT MODALITIES
Surgery –Treatment of choice
Radiotherapy
Hormonal therapy
Chemotherapy

PRINCIPLES OF JNASURGERY
Analyze the coronal CT thoroughly & plan the approach.
Adequate tumourexposure.
Don’t touch the tumouruntil feeding vessels are controlled.
Drilling of pterygoidwedge is must.

ANAESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS
TIVA –Ramifentanyl+ Propofol
Controlled hypotension by Nitroglycerine infusion
Maintain MAP → 60 –70 mm Hg
Positioning –Reverse Trendelenberg position

SURGICAL
APPROACHES
ENDOSCOPIC
APPROACH
OPEN
APPROACH

TREATMENT

ENDOSCOPIC APPROACH
INDICATIONS -
Fisch1& II tumours
FischIII tumourswith limited medial invasion of infratemporalfossa

BINOSTRIL 4 HANDED SURGERY
1 stdescribed by –MAYet al in 1990.
Posterior septectomydone as 1
st
step.
Requires 2 surgeons
Surgeon 1 –Holds endoscope at 11 o clock position + Irrigation
Surgeon 2 –Suction same nostril + Instruments opposite nostril

ENDOSCOPIC ENDONASALTECHNIQUE
Nose is prepared with 4% Cocaine & adrenaline 1:10,000
Resection of anterior end of middle turbinate
Anterior ethmoidectomy + Removal of medial wall of maxillary sinus
Removal of posterior wall of maxillary antrum to achieve complete lateral exposure of tumor
LigatingSPA + DPA
Dissection continues till rostrum of sphenoid
Tumor is peeled inferiorly
Drilling of basisphenoid & pterygoidwedge to remove residual tumour.

MODIFIED DENKERS APPROACH

THE FOUR-PORT BRADOOTECHNIQUE
4 ports –
(A) The ipsilateral nostril.
(B) The contralateralnostril after doing a posterior septectomy.
(C) An antralwindow in the canine fossa.
(D) An incision of one inch in the gingivobuccalsulcus adjacent to the last molar.
Advantage–Avoids removal of frontonasalprocess of maxilla

POST OP MANAGEMENT
Merocelpack removed after 48 hrs.
Saline irrigation started after pack removal
Endoscopic cleaning of nose every weekly until crusting subsides.
CECTdone after 36 hrs to rule out residual disease.

FOLLOW UP
Endoscopic examination of nose every 3 months
Routine CECT every year for at least 3 years

OPEN APPROACHES
1.Transpalatine
2.Transpalatine+ Sublabial(Sardana’sapproach)
3.Lateral rhinotomywith medial maxillectomy
4.Midfacialdeglovingapproach
5.Transmaxillary(Le Fort I) approach
6.Maxillary swing approach or facial translocation approach (Wei’s operation)
7.Infratemporalfossa approach
8.Intracranial–extracranialapproach

WILSONS TRANSPALATAL APPROACH
Indication-For tumourrestricted to nasopharynx
Advantage–Excellent cosmesis
Disadvantage–Limited exposure, Palatal fistula

WILSONS TRANSPALATAL APPROACH

LATERAL RHINOTOMY + MEDIAL MAXILLECTOMY
Suited for growth in nasal cavity extending to maxillary sinus, pterygopalatine
fossa, medial part of infratemporalfossa.
Advantage –Wide exposure, Feeding vessels easily controlled
Disadvantage –Scar, Bleeding

LATERAL RHINOTOMY + MEDIAL MAXILLECTOMY

MIDFACIALDEGLOVINGAPPROACH
4 INCISIONS –
1.Sublabialincision 3rd molar
2.Transfixationincision
3.Intercartilagenousincision
4.Circumvestibularincision
Commonest complication –Vestibular stenosis, InfraorbitalN.
Injury

LE FORT 1 OSTEOTOMY
Wide access to Nasopharynx, Maxillary sinus, Sphenoid
sinus
Complication –Malocclusion, Necrosis of maxilla

MAXILLARY SWING OR FACIAL TRANSLOCATION ( WEI’S)

HEMOSTASIS IN JNA
Reverse trendelenbergposition with 20
0
head elevation –Improves venous drainage from brain.
Direct pressure
Ligaclips
Bipolar forceps
Warm saline irrigation 40
0
c
1:1000 topical adrenaline
Surgicel
Floseal–Bovine Collagen + Human Thrombin

MANAGEMENT OF ICAINJURY
Don’t panic Don’t pack
Use 2 suctions
1 –2 cm
3
muscle harvested from thigh or abdomen
Crushed & placed over bleeding point for atleast3-5 min. → Activates platelet fibrin plug
Reinforce with surgicel
If still not controlled → Endovascular intervention by angiography team

TRIGEMINO-CARDIAC REFLEX
Characterized by –
1.Bradycardia/ Asystole
2.Hypotension
3.Apnea
4.Gastric Hypermotility
Incidence –4 %
Cause –Manipulation of PPF, ITF, NP Mucosa
To prevent –4% Xylocainepack in PPF , ITF
If occurs –Stop all manipulation, IV Crystalloids, wait for 10-15 min

EARLY POST OP
Nasal Crusting
Orbital hematoma
Infraorbitalnerve paraesthesia

LATE COMPLICATIONS
Alarcollapse –Modified denkersdue to drilling of pyriformaperture
Vestibular stenosis
Fistula of palate
Caroticocavernousfistula
Recurrence

RECURRENCE
Defined as subsequent tumourafter negative immediate post op scan at 36 hours
Incidence –32 %
Factors responsible-
1.Extensive Disease
2.Young Age
3.Pre op Embolization
4.InexpriencedSurgeon
MOST IMPORTANT STEP TO PREVENT RECURRENCE –Drilling the cancellousbone of pterygoidwedge

INDICATIONS
Extensive primary disease with intracranial extension
Unresectable residual disease
Medically unfit

TYPES
Megavoltage EBRT
IMRT
GAMMA KNIFE & CYBER KNIFE

DOSE
3000 to 5500 cGyin 15–18 fractions is delivered in 3–3.5 weeks.
Tumour regression is very slow (over 2-3 year).
Tumorregression by radiation vasculitisand occlusion of vessels by perivascularfibrosis.

COMPLICATIONS
Occular–Cataract, Glaucoma, Endophthalmitis, Optic N. Atrophy
Cranial N. Palsy
Pan Hypopituitarism
Temporal lobe necrosis
Malignant transformation of JNA
Xerostomia, Hyposmia, Crusting

HORMONAL THERAPY
Flutamide-10mg/kg/day in 3 divided doses x 6 weeks –44%tumourshrinkage
Diethylstilbestrol –5 mg TID
Bevacizumab–MabagainstVEGF
Sirolimus/ Rapamycin

CHEMOTHERAPY
Doxorubicin
Dacarbazine
Vincristine
Dactinomycin
Cyclophophamide
Cisplatine

THANK
YOU