KNEE ANKLE FOOT ORTHOSIS.pptx

6,627 views 64 slides Nov 29, 2022
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 64
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64

About This Presentation

KAFOO


Slide Content

KNEE ANKLE FOOT ORTHOSIS (KAFO)

WHY KAFO? Excessive movement at the knee

INTRODUCTION DEFINITION: As the name suggests, a KAFO is a device that controls the movements of the knee and ankle joints, and holds the foot in a desired posture.

Qn. compared to FOs and AFOs, why is it seen that energy expenditues using KAFO is much higher than when using FOs and AFOs? Ans: This is due to compensatory movements that must be made in order to swing the limb.

KAFO TYPES

So far there are three(3) TYPES of the KAFO: depending on the materials CONVETIONAL KAFO THERMOPLASTIC KAFO and THERMOSETTING KAFO .

THE CONVETIONAL KAFO

Has a metal frame (double upright) that is attached to a shoe via a stirrup system Metal cuff bands covered with leather to hold the thigh and cuff Typically, a pair of orthotic ankle joints is used to connect the stirrup to the distal metal upright, and a pair of the orthotic knee joints connect the distal and proximal metal uprights

advantages Easily to wear Very strong Easily adjusted - Can be repaired locally Most durable - Cooler than plastic - Materials available locally

disadvantages Heavy Patient cannot easily change the shoe Cannot wear the device without shoe Few contact points reduce control Small points of contact means that forces are concentrated on the small areas and thus pressures are high - Shoe must be modified - Difficult to clean - Less cosmetic

INDICATIONS - Insensate skin (not absolute) - Oedema(-for patient with uncontrolled or fluctuating edema ) - Patient preference When maximum strength and durability are needed For patient with significant obesity

CONTRAINDICATIONS - Strong corrective forces needed - Patient works in wet / muddy environment - Patient concerned about cosmesis

THERMOPLASTIC KAFO

This is the shell KAFO,in which the shell is vacuum over the positive modal of the patient limb. Distal molded shell,which fits over the foot ankle and lower leg, this is basically an AFO section with a proximal anterior strap(usually velcro) closure NOW,depending on the patient’s needs,this distal component may be either a solid ankle or articulating design( ie , AFO with or without joint)

The proximal molded shell encases the thigh from the greater tronchanter to just above the femoral condyles and typically has a pair of anterior straps(again usually velcro) for closure. - These two molded sections can made from plastic or laminated materials. •metal uprights with knee joints and side bars(made of stainless steel, aluminiun) connect the proximal and distal shells.

advantages Lighter weight Interchangeability of shoes Greater cosmetic Large forces are distributed and hence reduced pressure on the patient limb - Close fitting / cosmesis - Good control of movement - Plastic easy to adjust - Easy to clean

disadvantages Hot and sweaty Hot and sweaty - More time spent in manufacture - Requires workshop to repair - Materials must be imported

indications When energy expenditure makes weight of the orthosis an issue When intimate /total contact fit is needed to make maximum control of the limb Strong corrective forces needed - Patient works in wet / muddy environment - Patient preference - Patient concerned about cosmesis - Patient doesn’t wear shoes

contraindications Obese patient Patient with fluctuating odema - Insensate skin (not absolute) - Oedema - Scarring in contact or high pressure areas

THERMOSETTING KAFO

INDICATIONS - Patient has weight fluctuations - Patient preference

CONTRAINDICATIONS - Insensate skin( not absolute) - Oedema - Scarring in contact areas

ADVANTAGES - Can use normal shoes - Close fitting - Good control of movement - Thigh section cooler

DISADVANTAGES - More steps in manufacture - Requires workshop to repair

KAFO DESIGNS These depend upon the need of the patient ISCHIAL WEIGHT BEARING KAFO ANTERIOR SHELL KAFO POSTERIOR SHELL KAFO

ISCHIAL WEIGHT BEARING KAFO NOTE: When a patient cannot bear weight through the skeletal structure of the leg because of pain, fracture or weakness an Ischial Weight Bearing KAFO can be made. The orthoses can be either conventional or using shells, and uses similar modifications to a TF socket.  

INDICATIONS - hip, knee or ankle pain / damage - non healed fracture in lower limb

CONTRAINDICATIONS - hip dislocation - if weight relief is not required

ADVANTAGES - can take weight through suitable structure - quadrilateral proximal area helps to control rotation

DISADVANTAGES - very large orthosis - less sitting comfort

Anterior Shell INDICATIONS - knee collapse - posterior scarring - PCL laxity CONTRAINDICATION - knee hyperextension - ACL laxity - anterior scarring  

ADVANTAGES - sitting comfort DISAVANTAGES   - difficult to don - pressure on bone area (tibia)

Posterior Shell Indications - knee hyperextension - ACL laxity anterior scarring Contraindications - knee collapse - posterior scarring - PCL laxity  

Advantages - easy to don - all pressures on soft tissue Disadvantages - discomfort when sitting

Each design has advantages and disadvantages, indications and contraindications, and these must be carefully considered when developing the prescription.  

KAFO Components DISTAL COMPONENT (which is an AFO section) KNEE COMPONENT (Knee joints) PROXIMAL COMPONENT (thigh section)

DISTAL COMPONENT AFO section The choice of AFO design within the KAFO should follow the principles already learned. The control of the foot and ankle must be achieved to provide the patient with a stable base of support. One key point to bear in mind is that ankle position has a direct relationship to knee and hip position in standing and gait. If the AFO is dorsi-flexed it will encourage knee and hip flexion. If the AFO is plantarflexed it will encourage knee extension .   The positioning of the ankle and tibial angulation is very important. The ideal position is to have a line from the Greater Trochanter fall between the navicular and malleolus in midstance .  

KNEE COMPONENT Knee joints One of the key components of a KAFO is the knee joint. As in prosthetics there are many designs and variations, but can be divided into broad categories 1.Single Axis Free motion 2. Polycentric Free motion

SINGLE AXIS FREE MOTION A A

The joint is very simple and allows free movement in the sagittal plane. Most joints have a stop at 180° (full extension) and a good range of flexion. This type of joint would be used in patients who require control of coronal plane movement, or in cases of knee hyperextension, but not control of knee flexion .  

Polycentric Free motion A

The joint has two axes, and thus attempts to mimic the movement of the tibiofemoral joint. This type of joint is used as above .  

Posterior Offset joint A

The posterior offset joint, as the name suggests, has the axis of the joint placed posterior of the line of the uprights. The idea is to move the joints posterior to the GRF, and in this way create stability. For this to work some of the patients body weight must pass through the device. This type of joint is used mostly for patients who have some weakness of knee extensors (at least Grade 3) and good hip extensors

indications - knee M-L instability - knee hyperextension - older patients (improve stability) - knee extensors > Gd 3+ - hip extensors > Gd 4  

contraindication - knee extensors < Gd 3+ - hip extensors < Gd4

advantages - normal swing phase - simple and easy - lightweight - little maintenance

disadvantages - may collapse on inclines - not safe on uneven ground - requires some weight bearing through KAFO structure

DROP LOCK A

This type of joint offers a simple locking mechanism, but one that offers a positive lock of knee movement. The joint is single axis and is locked when a ring of metal drops down over the joint, blocking all movement. The lock is easy to operate, as when the patient stands and the uprights are straightened gravity pulls the ring down and into place. In some cases the ring is assisted to drop by the use of a spring. To unlock the knee the patient has to lift the ring and flex the knee. This requires that the patient has good hand function.

Indications - knee A-P instability - knee M-L instability - knee hyperextension - knee extensors < Gd 3 - hip extensors < Gd 3  

Contraindications - poor hand function - knee extensors > Gd 3+ - hip extensors > Gd 3  

Advantages - Complete control of knee - low maintenance Disadvantages - Patient must lift locks - knee must be fully extended to engage locks - Can “rattle” - Can “jam”

BAIL LOCK A

This type of lock uses a mechanical block within the joint to prevent motion. The block is operated by a lever which sticks out from the posterior side of the joint. These levers are often welded to a metal ring around the posterior aspect of the brace, so that both locks can be operated with one hand, or by knocking the ring against a chair.

Indications - knee A-P instability - knee M-L instability - knee hyperextension - knee extensors < Gd 3 - hip extensors < Gd 3 - poor hand function        

contraindications - knee extensors > Gd 3+ - hip extensors > Gd 3  

advantages - Complete control of knee - One handed operation possible   disadvantag es - knee must be fully extended to engage locks - Can “rattle” - can be unlocked with bump to posterior. - bulky / reduced cosmesis

Advanced knee joints The joints described above are very simple and rely upon basic mechanisms. There has been a lot of money spent on developing better orthotic knee joints. This research has been ongoing for many years. One of the goals of this research has been to develop joints that have stance and/or swing phase controls. However there is very little available that is reliable and affordable. The biggest problem is that orthotic joints must be thin and small so they don’t affect cosmesis. So the control mechanisms have to be very small. These small parts then have to take large forces, and are prone to failure.  

Overview - http://www.oandp.com/news The following are some recent attempts at better orthotic knee joints. Look at them on the internet. /jmcorner/2002-05/1.asp - http://www.stancecontrol.com/ Pendulum lock - http://www.spsco.com/press/10-30-02c.html - http://www.oandp.com/edge/issues/articles/2002-07_14.asp UTX - http://www.rslsteeper.co.uk (search for “UTX swing”) - http://www.beckerorthopedic.com/utx/utx.htm Load Response Knee - http://www.beckerorthopedic.com/knee/load_response.htm Extension assist - http://www.beckerorthopedic.com/knee/g_knee.htm

ALIGNMENT

Function To control motion around the knee joint: describe which motion is being controlled To offload a joint To prevent deformity To increase stability
Tags