Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis 2.0.pptx

patriciapomar3 70 views 38 slides Oct 12, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 38
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38

About This Presentation

syphilis


Slide Content

Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis Patricia Antonette E. Pomar, RMT NRL-SLH/SACCL

Objectives Short introduction of Syphilis Stages of Syphilis Infection Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis Traditional vs. Reverse Algorithm for Syphilis Screening Algorithm used in NRL-SLH / SACCL Interpretation of result and follow up

Genus Treponema Etiologic agent: Treponema pallidum helically coiled, cork-screw shaped Obligate parasite Transmission Sexual Trans-placental Percutaneous following contact with infectious lesions Blood Transfusion Treponema pallidum on Darkfield Microscopy

Genus Treponema pallidum subspecies causes Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum Venereal syphilis Treponema pallidum subsp. pertenue Yaws Treponema pallidum subsp. endemicum Endemic syphilis / Bejel Treponema pallidum subsp. carateum Pinta

Stages of Syphilis Infection Primary Secondary Latent Tertiary Development of primary lesion or ‘CHANCRE” at the site of inoculation Secondary lesions, most commonly mucocutaneous Host suppresses infection, but no lesions are clinically apparent Approximately 30% of untreated patients progress to the tertiary stage within 1 to 20 years Painless May persist from weeks to months Only evidence is a positive serologic test Rare because of the widespread availability and use of antibiotics Highly infectious Clinical manifestations: -Rash (75%–100%) -Lymphadenopathy (50%–86%) -Malaise -Mucous patches (6%–30%) - Condylomata lata (10%–20%) -Alopecia (5%) -Liver and kidney involvement can occur -Splenomegaly is occasionally present May occur between primary and secondary stages, between secondary relapses, and after secondary stage Manifestations - Gummatous lesions -Cardiovascular syphilis Heals within 3-6 weeks Categories: Early latent: <1 year duration Late latent:  1 year duration Serologic test may not be positive in early primary syphilis Serologic test are usually highest in titer

Primary Syphilis Source : CDC/ NCHSTP/ Division of STD Prevention /STD Clinical Slides

Secondary Syphilis Generalized rash Condylomata lata

Secondary Syphilis Nickel / Dime Lesions Alopecia

Tertiary Syphilis Serpiginous Gummata of Forearm Ulcerating Gumma

Late Syphilis—Cardiovascular 11 Source : CDC/ NCHSTP/ Division of STD Prevention, STD Clinical Slides

Neurosyphilis Occurs when T. pallidum invades the central nervous system (CNS) May occur at any stage of syphilis Can be asymptomatic Early neurosyphilis occurs a few months to a few years after infection Clinical manifestations can include acute syphilitic meningitis, meningovascular syphilis, and ocular involvement Neurologic involvement can occur decades after infection and is rarely seen Clinical manifestations can include general paresis, tabes dorsalis, and ocular involvement Ocular involvement can occur in early or late neurosyphilis. Spirochetes in Neural Tissue

Congenital Syphilis Occurs when T. pallidum is transmitted from a pregnant woman to her fetus May lead to stillbirth, neonatal death, and infant disorders such as deafness, neurologic impairment, and bone deformities Transmission can occur during any stage of syphilis; risk is much higher during primary and secondary syphilis Fetal infection can occur during any trimester of pregnancy Wide spectrum of severity exists; only severe cases are clinically apparent at birth Early lesions (most common): Infants <2 years old; usually inflammatory Late lesions: Children >2 years old; tend to be immunologic and destructive

Congenital Syphilis Mucous Patches Perforation of Palate

Laboratory Diagnosis

Detection by microscopy - lesions or node aspirates are used as sample Dark-field Microscopy Direct fluorescent antibody assay b. Serologic Tests - Non Treponemal - Treponemal c. Other Tests - EIA (Enzyme immunoassay) - Polymerase chain reaction

Detection by microscopy Dark-field Microscopy

Detection by microscopy Direct fluorescent antibody assay

NON TREPONEMAL TREPONEMAL 1. Microscopic - VDRL (Venereal Disease Research Laboratory) - USR (Unheated Serum Reagin test) 2. Macroscopic - RPR (Rapid Plasma Reagin) - TRUST (Toluidine Red Unheated Serum Test - RST (Reagin Screen Test) 1. TP-PA (Treponema pallidum particle agglutination) test 2. TP-HA (Treponema pallidum hemagglutination) test 3. FTA-ABS (Fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption) test detects specific antibodies in serum to Treponema pallidum b. Serologic Tests

NON TREPONEMAL TESTS (Screening) Principles T. pallidum infection leads to the production of reagin Reagin – Antibodies to substances released from cells damaged by T. pallidum Reagin reacts with cardiolipin Cardiolipin – a phospholipid component of certain eukaryotic and prokaryotic membranes Not specific for T. pallidum Titers usually correlate with disease activity and results are reported quantitatively (can be tittered) May be reactive for life, referred to as “serofast”

NON TREPONEMAL Advantages Disadvantages Rapid and inexpensive Easy to perform and can be done in clinic or office Quantitative Used to follow response to therapy Can be used to evaluate possible reinfection May be insensitive in certain stages False-positive reactions may occur Prozone effect may cause a false-negative reaction (rare)

NON TREPONEMAL TESTS RAPID PLASMA REAGIN (RPR) SERUM VENEREAL DISEASE RESEARCH LABORATORY (VDRL) CEREBROSPINAL FLUID Cardiolipin Charcoal Reagin Serum or CSF

NON TREPONEMAL TESTS

NON TREPONEMAL TESTS

TREPONEMAL TESTS Specific for T. pallidum Measure antibody (IgM & IgG) directed against T. pallidum antigens by particulate agglutination (TP-PA) or immunofluorescence (FTA-abs) May remain positive after treatment More sensitive and specific than non- trep . tests More expensive and labor intensive Can not quantitate…not useful for following response to treatment

TREPONEMAL TESTS ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES High Specificity Possibly higher sensitivity during early and late syphilis stages compared to non-treponemal tests Newer Methods Objective result interpretation Automation option High throughput High reproducibility/ precision Remain positive despite treatment Cannot be used to monitor response to therapy Conventional Methods Subjective interpretation requiring technician expertise to read Newer Methods Expensive instrumentation Higher cost/test

Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA)

TP – Particle Agglutination (TPPA) TP – Hemagglutination (TPHA)

Interpretation of Results Possible Explanation Treponemal Tests (TP-PA/ FTA-ADS) Non- Treponemal tests (RPR/ VDRL) Syphilis - recent or previous Yaws or pinta + + No syphilis False positive – + Consistent with previously treated or untreated Syphilis Yaws, Pinta , Bejel + – No s yphilis Syphilis in incubation period – –

Syphilis Screening Algorithms: Traditional versus Reverse Screening

Traditional Algorithm Non-treponemal test (e.g., RPR) Treponemal test (e.g., FTA) Negative for syphilis Non-reactive Non-reactive Syphilis Negative for syphilis Reactive Reactive

Traditional Algorithm ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES Results show good correlation with disease status Rapid, inexpensive screening method Excellent option for laboratory with small throughput Recommended by the CDC Manual (RPR) and subjective interpretation Screening method is non-specific and may lead to false-positive results Not suitable for high throughput laboratories Potentially lower sensitivity for detecting early syphilis and late/latent disease

Reverse Algorithm Treponemal test ( eg , EIA) Non-Treponemal test (eg, RPR) Negative for syphilis Non-reactive Non-reactive Syphilis Second Treponemal Test (e.g., TP-PA) Reactive Reactive Non-reactive Reactive Evaluation Required* Negative for syphilis

Reverse Algorithm ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES Objective interpretation of results Results from EIA or MFI can be interfaced with LIS Specific screening test for anti- T. pallidum antibodies Potentially increased detection of patients with early syphilis Higher cost/sample Higher assay complexity Increased detection of patients with screen (+), RPR (-) results

Test Algorithm used in NRL-SLH/SACCL Non-treponemal test (RPR) Non-Treponemal – Quantitative RPR Perform dilution Report as Non-reactive. Non-reactive Perform TPPA Perform TPPA & TPHA if Px is for abroad Reactive Presence of agglutinates Positive Presence of solid button Negative

Test Algorithm used in NRL-SLH/SACCL RPR TPHA TPPA RECOMMENDATION - - - Report + - - Recommend for confirmatory testing + + + Positive for T. pallidum + - + Repeat extraction / Repeat testing - + + Positive for T. pallidum

Follow Up Primary or secondary syphilis Reexamine at 6 and 12 months. Follow-up titers should be compared to the maximum or baseline nontreponemal titer obtained on day of treatment. Latent syphilis Reexamine at 6, 12, and 24 months. HIV-infected patients 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months for primary or secondary syphilis 6, 12, 18, and 24 months for latent syphilis Neurosyphilis Serologic testing as above Repeat CSF examination at 6-month intervals until normal

Thank you!
Tags