Land capability classification

43,303 views 25 slides Jul 14, 2019
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 25
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25

About This Presentation

A brief view on land capability classification


Slide Content

Land Capability Classification and Constraints in Application Speaker Shaheen Praveen Ph.D.(1 st Year), 2018-19 Soil Science &Agricultural Chemistry COA, IGKV Raipur, C.G.

INDEX Introduction Why do we use LCC When to use LCC Criteria of LCC Land capability classification Constraints in Applications of the Land Capability Classification Conclusion

Introduction Soil-Soil is porous, powdery and unconsolidated outer layer of the earth’s crust which is formed by weathering of minerals and decomposition of organic substances. Soil is dynamic, three dimensional (having length, breadth and depth) piece of landscape with a three phase (solid, liquid and gaseous) system. Land-Land is two dimensional body. Land is the solid part of the earth's surface. Our land is home to many unique plants and animals. The term 'land' includes all physical elements in the wealth of a nation bestowed by nature; such as climate, environment, fields, forests, minerals, mountains, lakes, streams, seas, and animals. To use our land wisely we have to understand soil. The solid surface of  Earth  that is not permanently covered by  water . Landscape-Landscape is three dimensional structure. A  landscape  is the visible features of an area of  land , its  landforms , and how they integrate with natural or man-made features. A landscape includes the physical elements of geophysically defined  landforms  such as (ice-capped)  mountains ,  hills ,  water bodies  such as  rivers ,  lakes , ponds and the  sea , living elements of  land cover  including indigenous  vegetation , human elements including different forms of  land use , buildings, and  structures , and transitory elements such as  lighting  and  weather  conditions. Combining both their physical origins and the  cultural  overlay of human presence, often created over millennia, landscapes reflect a living synthesis of people and place that is vital to local and  national identity .

Capability Vs Suitability Capability:- Capability is viewed by some as the inherent capacity of land to perform at a given level for a general use. and Suitability:- Suitability as a statement of the adaptability of a given area for a specific kind of land use; others see capability as a classification of land primarily in relation to degradation hazards (FAO, 1976).

Land Capability Classification (LCC) “ Land capability classification is an exercise for interpretative, grouping and grading of soils according to their potentialities and limitations. It helps to organize significant soil factors for conservation (Stallings J. H, 1957).” It also gives detailed information regarding the productivity of different types of land.

Why do We Need Land Capability Classification? Land capability classification:-The first requisite to conservation of land is to fit the crop to the capabilities of the soil and the water availability. Lands are mainly used for agriculture, pastures and forestry. LCC forms the basis of all the watershed programmes. It was developed by the USDA(United State Department of Agriculture). LCC is based upon the degree or magnitude of problem/hazard recognized in the land.

According to Kalmalkar , R. J. (1950)- Improper selection of lands for agriculture uses and lack of management measures in accordance with its capabilities greatly deteriorate the soils.

When to Use Land Capability Classification? Identification of different groups of land suitable to different types of production and, Mapping of broad types of agricultural land suitability.

Criteria of Land Capability Classification

Criteria/ Factors Influencing Land Capability Classification Soil profile characteristics External feature of the land Climate factors Soil texture Effective soil depth Permeability and internal drainage Availability of nutrients S oil salinity S oil alkalinity, and Soil toxicity. Water logging S lope and erosion are the factors that determine land capability and limit the land for particular use only. Rainfall T emperature and Wind velocity are important components that determine land capability class.

LCC Classification Capability class, Capability subclass and Capability unit

Capability Class Broadly, It is classified into two groups: 1)Arable land classes (Cultivable) 2)Non-arable land (Non Cultivable) In arable land frequent disturbance of soil occur e.g. Crop field. Forest and plantation are the example of non-arable land.

Arable Land Class I (Dark green) ➢ Best suitable for all agricultural crops and free from hazards. ➢ Deep soil depth and high fertility. ➢ Not affected by any appreciable erosion, wetness , salinity etc.

CLASS II (Pale green) ➢ These lands have moderate soil depth, light or heavy texture, gentle slope and moderate soil fertility etc. ➢ Suitable for permanent cultivation with some soil and water conservation practices. Class III (Yellow) ➢ Various conservation measures like contour bunding, graded bunding, etc. are recommended. ➢ These lands are suitable for plants, provided that the plant cover should be maintained.

Class IV (Pink) ➢ Suitable only for occasional or limited cultivation because of unfavourable soil characteristics, slope, erosion, depth, drainage, adverse climate etc. ➢ Engineering measures are recommended here.

NON-ARABLE LAND Class V (Blue) ➢ These lands have the potential to become class I, but due to particular problem/hazard, they can’t fulfill the characteristics of class I. Class VI (Orange) ➢ These lands are suitable for horticultural crops like mango, coffee, guava, cashew nut, etc. ➢ Grazing should be regulated to preserve the plant cover.

Class VII (Red) ➢ These lands have severe limitations to use for grazing or forestry. ➢ Generally lands are droughty and swampy, having very steep slope, rough, stony or very severely eroded, infested with gullies. Class VIII (Purple/ Violet) ➢ Lands are very rough, not suitable for wood land or grazing.

LCC Sub-class The basis of sub class is to recognize the type of problem/hazard. The four types of hazards are:- E (erosion) W (water logging) S (soil related hazard) C (climate related hazard)

Capability Unit The capability unit is a subdivision of the capability subclasses depending on the management practices. For example, class IIIs (Soils have severe limitations that reduce the choice of plants, require special conservation practices, or both; Soil limitations within the rooting zone) could be due to excess gravel in the root zone or excess salts, i.e. the codes IIIs1 and IIIs2 could be assigned. The capability units are assigned for the individual applications, but they generally correspond to phases or soil groups in the national soil survey.

Constraints in Applications of the Land Capability Classification One constraint is that it can not deal at all with special crops, e.g. like cranberries. Adaptations of the method to local conditions are often made in the various applications to better fit the individual needs. The capability classification is an interpretive classification based on the effects of combinations of climate and permanent soil characteristics on: limitations affecting land use, risk of soil damage if mismanaged, needs for soil management and risk of crop failure. This opposed to soil classification, which is based directly on the soil characteristics.

The criteria on the presence of water on the surface or excess water in the soil, lack of water for adequate crop production, presence of stones, presence of soluble salts or exchangeable sodium, or both, or hazard of overflow are not considered as permanent limitations to use in the classification where the removal of these limitations is feasible. Within a class there might be different soils but with the same degree of limitations in soil use for agricultural purposes or hazards to the soil, when it is used. If the land unit consists of more than one capability class the land unit is given the lowest class. There is no crop productivity rating, i.e. class IV (see below) can be more productive than class I, but also more fragile.

Continued… Profitability is not determined. A single moderately high level of management is assumed. Factors such as distance to market, conditions of roads and location of fields are not included.

Conclusion LCC makes easier to classify different types of land into specific class based on their potentialities . Suitable land utilization

References Birhan A, Assefa A (2017) Land use/land cover changes and their environmental implications in the Gelana sub-watershed of northern highlands of Ethiopia. Environ Syst Res 6(7):1–12. Biswas S, Pani P (2015) Estimation of soil erosion using RUSLE and GIS techniques: a case study of Barakar River basin, Jharkhand, India. Model Earth Syst Environ 1:42 Congalton R, Green K (1999) Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: Principles and practices. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton. Diress T, Moe S, Vedeld P, Ermias A (2010) Land-use/cover dynamics in northern Afar rangelands, Ethiopia. Agr Ecosyst Environ 139:174–180. Dutta S (2016) Soil erosion, sediment yield and sedimentation of reservoir: a review. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:123. Ebrahim E, Mohamed A (2017) Land use/cover dynamics and its drivers in Gelda catchment, Lake Tana watershed, Ethiopia. Environ Syst Res 6(4):1–13. Fonji S, Taff G (2014) Using satellite data to monitor land-use land-cover change in North-eastern Latvia. Springer Plus 3(61):1–15. Gad A (2015) Land capability classification of some western desert Oases, Egypt, using remote sensing and GIS. Egypt J Remote Sensing Space Sci 18:S9-S18. Hurni H, Kebede T, Gete Z (2005) The implications of changes in population, land use, and land management for surface runoff in the Upper Nile Basin area of Ethiopia. Mt Res Dev 25(2):147–154. Keshtkar H, Voigt W (2016) A spatiotemporal analysis of landscape change using an integrated Markov chain and cellular automata models. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:10.

Thank You
Tags