●if such an order is passed by a Revenue Officer subordinate to the Assistant
Commissioner, whether or not invested or delegated with the powers of the Assistant
Commissioner or the Deputy Commissioner, to the Assistant Commissioner
●if such an order is passed by the Assistant Commissioner whether or not invested with the
powers of the Deputy Commissioner, to the Deputy Commissioner;
●if such an order is passed by the Deputy Commissioner, to the Tribunal;
●if such an order is passed by the Regional Commissioner, to the Tribunal.
●if such an order is passed by a Survey Officer below the rank of an Assistant Director of
Land Records or Assistant Director for Settlement, to the Assistant Director of Land
Records or Assistant Director for Settlement, as the case may be;
●if such an order is passed by a Survey Officer of the rank of an Assistant Director of Land
Records or Assistant Director for Settlement, to the Joint Director of Land Records or
Joint Director for Settlement, as the case may be;
●if such an order is passed by the Joint Director of Land Records or Joint Director for
Settlement, to the Director of Survey, Settlement and Land Records;
●if such an order is passed by the Director of Survey, Settlement and Land Records, to the
Tribunal.
Case law
1. The case ofHole Honnur Mandal Panchayat vs. KATinvolves a dispute over the filing of
an appeal against an order made by a Tahsildar under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.
The 5th Respondent filed an appeal directly to the Deputy Commissioner instead of the Assistant
Commissioner, which was the appropriate forum. The Deputy Commissioner held that the appeal
should have been filed with the Assistant Commissioner and directed the Appellant to approach
the appropriate forum. However, the 5th Respondent appealed to the Tribunal, which disposed of
the appeal on merits, observing that the appeal to the wrong forum was only a technical defect.
The High Court, upon considering the matter, held that the Tribunal was wrong in disposing of
the appeal on merits and that it was a clear case of jurisdictional excess. The High Court allowed
the Writ Petition and confirmed the order of the Deputy Commissioner.
Downloaded by MOHAMMED ABDUL REHMA (
[email protected])
lOMoARcPSD|36394783