laudon management information system 17edition pptch04.pptx

IgoFebrianto1 132 views 38 slides Oct 03, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 38
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38

About This Presentation

MIS


Slide Content

Management Inf o rmation Sys t ems: Manag i ng the Dig i tal Firm Se v enteenth Edi t ion Cha p ter 4 E t hi c al and Social I s s ues in In f ormation S y stems Cop y ri g h t © 202 2, 2020 , 201 8 P earson E d u c a t io n , I n c. A ll R i g h t s R es e r v ed

Learning O b jectives 4.1 Wha t ethi c al , s o cia l , an d pol i tica l is s ue s ar e raise d by i n format i on sys t ems? W h at s p e c i f ic p r i n c i p l e s f o r c o n d u c t c a n be u s ed t o g u i d e eth i cal de c i s io n s? W h y do c o n t e mp o r a ry i n f o rma t i o n s ys t ems t e c h n o l o g y a n d 4.2 4.3 t h e Int e rn e t po s e c ha l l e ng e s to the pr o te c ti o n of i nd i vidu a l p riva c y and i nte l le c tual prop e rty? 4.4 How h a ve i n f o rma t i o n s ys t ems a c c o un t ab i l i t y , l i a b i l i t y , and the How wi l l M I S help my car e er? a f f e c t e d l a ws f or e s t a b l i s h i ng q u a l ity of everyday l i fe? 4.5 C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

V ideo Cases • • • Case C a se Case 1: 2 : 3: What N et N eutral i ty Means for Y ou F ac e b o ok a n d Goo g le Pr i vac y : W h at Pr i vac y ? U n i ted States v . T er r orism: D ata M i n i n g for T errorists a nd I n n oc e nts • Ins t ruc t i o nal V i d eo: V iktor M aye r - Sc h ön b erger on t h e R ight to B e Forgot t en C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Y our M o bi l e Pho n e: B ig Best Fr i end ( 1 of 2 ) Brothe r ’ s • Problem – Opp o rtunities from new tech n ology – W eak legal en v ironment Solu t ions • – – – – – – D e velop lo c ation data str a tegy and p r i v a c y poli c ies Colle c t, sell and anal y ze In t e r net of Things Smartphones Loc a t i on databases SDKs mobile phone location data C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Y our Mo b i l e Ph o ne: Big Best Fr i end ( 2 of 2 ) Brot h e r ’ s • • Mob i le l o cati o n t r ack i ng systems Demonst r ates how techno l og i cal d o u b l e - e d g e d s w ord i n nov a tions can be a • Ill u st r ates costs how I T sys t ems create consumer be n efits and C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

What Ethical, Social, Issues are Raised by Syste m s? ( 1 of 2 ) and Po l itical I nformation • Re c ent ca s es of fa i led eth i cal judgment in busine s s – V ol k s w agen AG, W ells Far g o, Gen e r a l Motor s , T a k ata C o r p o r ation – In man y , information systems u s ed to bu r y de c isio n s from public s c rutiny E t hi c s – Prin c iples of rig h t and w r ong that individuals, acting as free mor a l agents, use to make choi c es to guide the i r behav i ors • C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

What Ethical, Social, Issues are Raised by Syste m s? ( 2 of 2 ) and Po l itical I nformation • In f or m ation syste m s raise new ethical qu e stions bec a use they create opp o r t un i ties fo r : – Intense soc i al ch a n g e, threaten i ng e x ist i ng d i stributi o ns of p o w e r , mone y , rights, N e w o p p o r t u n iti e s for crime New ki n ds of crimes and obl i gati o ns • • C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

A Mo d el for Thi n king About Social, and Political Issues Ethical, • • Soc i ety as a calm po n d I T as rock drop p ed in pon d , creati n g rip p l e s situatio n s not covered by old rules of n e w • Soc i al and po l itical i n stitu t i o ns cann o t respond overni g ht these r i p p l es — it may take ye a rs t o d e ve l op eti q u e t t e, e x pectatio n s, l a ws to – R e qu i res un d ers t an d i n g of e thics t o make choic e s l e ga l ly gray a r eas in C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Fi g ure 4 .1 T he R elations h ip Between Eth i cal, Soc i al, and Pol i tical Society Issues in an I nformation C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Five M o ral D imensio n s Inf o rmation Age of the • • • • • In f or m ation rights and ob l i g ations Property rig h ts and ob l i g ations Acco u ntabi l ity and System q ua l ity Qua l ity of l ife cont r ol C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Key T echnol o gy T rends That Eth i cal Issues Raise • • • • • Computing pow e r do u b l es Data s t orage costs rap i d l y Data ana l ysis adv a nces Networking adv a nces every 18 dec l i n e months Mob i le d e vi c e gro w th impact C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Advances i n T echn i ques D a ta Analysis • Profil i ng – C o mbin i ng data f r om multi p le sources to create doss i ers of d etai l ed i n fo r ma t i o n on i n d i vi d u a ls N o n o bv i o u s rel a tio n sh i p a w aren e ss ( N O R A ) • – C o mbin i ng data f r om multi p le sources to fi n d obscure h i dd e n conn e ctions that might help i d entify crimina l s or ter r orists C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Fi g ure 4 .2 Non o bvio u s A wareness ( N O R A) Relationsh i p C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Basic Co n cepts: Responsibi l it y , Accountabil i t y , and Liabi l ity • R e s p on s ibili t y – A c c ept i ng the poten t ial co s ts, dut i es, and obliga t ions Ac c ountability – Me c hani s ms for identi f y i ng re s ponsible pa r ties Liability for deci s ions • • – Permits individuals ( a nd firms) to r e c o ver damag e s done to them D u e p r o c e s s La w s a r e w e l l - k n o w n and und e r s to o d, with an ability to app e al to high e r autho r it i es C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d •

Eth i cal Analysis • F i v e - step proc e ss for eth i cal a n a l ys i s 1. 2. Identify a n d cl e arly describe the f acts D e fine the co n fli c t or d i l e mma a n d i d e n tify order val u es i n volv e d the h i g h e r - 3. 4. 5. Identify Ident i fy Identify the the the stakeho l ders o p tio n s that y ou can reas o n a b l y take potential conse q ue n ces of y o ur o ptions C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Cand i date Et h ical Pri n cip l es (1 of 2) • Gol d en R u le – Do unto others as you w o u l d have t hem do unto you • I m manu e l K a nt ’ s C a tegor i cal – If an action is not right for right f or any o ne S l i p pery S l ope Ru l e I m p e rative e veryone to take, it is not • – If an action cannot take at a l l be taken r ep e atedl y , it is not ri g ht to C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Candidate Eth i cal Principles (2 of 2 ) • Uti l itar i an Pri n c i ple – T a k e t h e a c t i o n t h at Ri s k A v ers i on Pri n c i ple – T a k e t h e a c t i o n t h at c o st a c h i e ves t h e h i g her or gr e at e r value • p ro d u c es the l e a s t ha r m or po t en t i a l • Ethi c al “ No Free Lun c h ” Rule – As s ume th a t virt u a l ly a l l tang i b l e a nd i n ta n g i b l e o b j e c ts are own e d by s o meone un l e s s there is a s pe c if i c de c l a rat i on otherwi s e C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Professional Codes of Conduct • Pro m u l gated by assoc i ations of professio n a l s – – – American Medical Ass o ci a tion ( A M A) Am e rican B a r A s soc i ati o n ( A B A) Ass o ci a tion for C omputing Machin e ry ( A C M) • Promis e s by profess i o n s to regu l ate themse l ves in the ge n eral i n te r est o f soc i ety C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Rea l - W orld Ethical Dilemmas • • One set of i nteres t s pit t ed ag a i n st an o ther E x amples – Monitoring employ e es: R i ght of c o mpany t o ma x imize productiv i ty of w orkers versus workers’ desire to Internet for s h ort p e rson a l tasks Fac e bo o k provid e s useful se r vices for u sers b u t monitors user behav i or and sells i n fo r ma t i o n t o a d vertisers a n d a p p d e ve l o p ers u se – C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Information R ig h ts: Privacy a n d Freedom in the Internet Age ( 1 of 3 ) • Privacy – Cla i m of i nd i vidu a ls to b e l e ft a l on e , free fr o m s u rvei l l a n c e o r i n ter f er e n c e from ot h er i nd i vidu a l s , o r ga n i z at i on s , or s t at e ; c l aim to be ab l e to co n trol inf o r m ati o n abo u t y our s elf In t he Un i ted Stat e s, pr i vacy pr o te c ted by: • – – – F i r s t Amendment (fre e dom of s pe e ch a n d a s s o c i a ti o n) Fo u rth Amendment (u n re a s o na b le s e ar c h a nd s e i z ur e ) Add i ti o nal fe d er a l s t at u es (e. g ., Priva c y Act of 19 7 4) C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Inf o rmation Ri g hts: Privacy and Freedom in the Internet Age ( 2 of 3 ) • Fa i r i n fo r m ation practices – S e t of princ i p l es gov e rning the c o l l e ction and use i n forma t i o n of  B a sis of most U.S. and E u ropean privacy l a ws – U s ed to drive cha n g e s in privacy l e g i sl a tion    C O P P A G r am m - Le a ch - B l i l ey Act H I P A A C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Information R ig h ts: Privacy a n d Freedom in the Inter n et Age ( 3 of 3 ) • F T C F I P p r i n ci p l e s – – – – – N o tice/aware n ess (co r e princ i p l e) C h o i ce/co n se n t (core Acc e ss/par t ic i pati o n S e curity E n fo r cement princ i p l e) C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

EU General Data Protection Regulation ( G D P R) • • R e qui r es una m bigu o us explicit inform e d c o n s ent of c u stomer E U mem b er natio n s c an n ot tra n s fer pe r s on a l data to c ou n tries with o ut si m ilar p r i v a c y p r otection Applies a c r o ss all E U c o untries to any firms ope r ating in E U or p r o c e s s i ng data on E U citiz e ns or r e si d ents – S t r e ngthens rig h t to be forgotten • Pri v a c y Shield: All c o untries p r o c e s s i ng E U data R requireme n ts H e avy f ine s : 4% of glob a l daily r e venue mu s t c o nform to G D P • C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Internet Chal l enges to Privacy (1 of 2) • Coo k ies – Id e nt i fy br o ws e r and tr a ck vis i ts to s i te W eb be a c o ns (web bu g s) – T iny grap h i c s e m bed d ed in e -mails and w e b pag e s – Moni t or who i s read i ng email mes s age or vis i ti n g s i te Spyware – Surr e pt i ti o u s ly i n s t a l l e d on u s e r ’ s compu t er – May tra n smit u s e r ’ s keyst r o k es or d i s p l a y unwan t ed ads Google servi c es and b ehavioral targe t ing • • • C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Internet Chal l enges to Privacy ( 2 of 2 ) • T h e U n ited i n fo r m ation Op t - out v s. States a l l o ws b u si n ess e s to g a ther t rans a ction and use this for o ther ma r keting purposes. o p t - in m od e l • • Onli n e i n dustry pro m otes s e l f - regu l ation over l e g i sl a tion. p r iv a cy – – – C o mpl e x /ambi g u o u s priv a cy statements Op t - out models sel e cted over op t - in Onli n e “ sea l s ” of p rivacy princ i p l es C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Figure 4.3 H o w C o okies Identi f y W eb V is i tors 1. The W eb s er v er reads the u s er ' s W eb bro w s er and deter m i nes the op e rati n g s y s tem, br o w s er n a m e, v er s i on n u m b e r , Int e rn e t a d dr e s s , a n d o th e r i nf o rm a t i o n . The s er v er tra n s m i ts a t i ny text f i l e w i th u s er i d e nt i f i c at i on i nf o rm a t i on c a l l ed a c o o k i e, w h i c h t h e u s er's br o w s er re c e i v es a n d s tor e s on the u s er's c o m p u te r . W hen the u s er returns to the W eb s i te, the s er v er requ e s ts the c onte n ts of any c oo k i e i t d e p o s i ted pr e v i o u s l y i n t h e u s er's c o m p u te r . The W eb s er v er re a ds the c o o k i e, i d e nt i f i es the v i s i to r , a n d c a l l s up d a ta on the u s e r . C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d 2. 3. 4.

T echnical Sol u tions • S o l u tio n s i n cl u d e : – – – Email encryption A n onymity tools A n ti - spy w are too l s • Ove r a l l, t echn i cal sol u tions have fail e d to p rotect u sers f r om b e i n g t r ack e d f r om o n e – Brows e r featu r es  “Private” brows i ng  “Do not track” optio n s site to a n other C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Property Rights: I ntellectual Property • Intel l ectu a l prop e r t y – T an g i b le and intang i b l e products i n d i vi d ua l s or c o rpora t i o ns of the m i nd created by • Protec t ed in four main ways: – – – – C o pyright P a tents T rademarks T rade s e crets C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Challenges to Intellectual Property Rights • D i g i tal m ed i a d i f fe r ent f r om phys i cal m ed i a – – – – – E a se E a se E a se of of of repl i cation t r ansmiss i on a l te r ation (networks, Internet) C o mpactn e ss D i f ficulti e s in estab l is h i n g un i qu e ness • D i g i tal Mil l e n n i um C o pyri g ht Act ( D M C A) C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Compute r -R e lated Liabi l ity Problems • • If sof t ware fails, who is respons i b l e? If seen as part of a mach i ne that i n j ures or ha r m s, sof t ware producer and operator m ay be l i ab l e If seen as simi l ar to b ook, di f ficult t o ho l d author/pub l is h er respons i b l e If se e n as a serv i ce, w o u l d this be simi l ar to tel e p h o n e syste m s not be i ng l i ab l e for t r ansmit t ed m essag e s? • • C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Interactive Session: Management: The Boeing 737 MAX Crashes • C l ass d i scussi o n – Wh a t is the p r oblem de s c r ibed in t his c a s e ? W ould you c o n s ider an eth i cal dilem m a? Why or why not? D e s c ribe the r o le of manag e men t , o r gani z ation, and tech n ology factors in t he Boeing 737 MAX safety p r oblem s . T ow hat ex t ent w a s manag e ment r e s p on s ible? Is the s o lution p r ovided by Boeing adequ a te? E x plain your an s w e r . Wh a t steps c o uld Boeing and the F AA ha v e taken to p r event this problem from oc c ur r in g ? it – – – C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

System Qua l ity: D ata Q ual i ty a nd System Errors • What i s an acceptabl e , techno l og i cally feasib l e l e vel system q u a l i ty? – F l a w l e ss sof t w a re is econ o mica l ly unfeas i b l e T h ree pri n ci p al so u rces of p o o r system p e r f ormance of • – – – S o f t w a re bugs, er r ors H a rdware or fac i l i ty fail u res P o or input data qua l ity ( m ost com m on source of bus i ness system fail u re) C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Qua l ity of Life: E q uit y , Acc e ss, Boundaries ( 1 of 3 ) • • • • • • Neg a tive soci a l conse q ue n ces of systems B i g T ech: c o ncentrating econ o m ic and po l itical pow e r R a p i d i ty of ch a n g e: redu c ed resp o nse time to compet i tion M a i ntain i ng bo u nd a ries: fa m i l y , Dependenc e an d vulne r ability Computer cri m e and ab u se work, and l e is u re C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Qua l ity of Life: E q uit y , Boundaries ( 2 of 3 ) Acc e ss, • Computer cr i me and abu s e – – – – Comput e r c r ime Comput e r ab u se Spam CAN-S P AM Act of 20 3 • E m pl o y ment – T ri c k l e -down te c hn o l o gy – Ree n g i ne e ri n g j o b l o s s C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Qua l ity of Life: E q uit y , Acc e ss, Boundaries ( 3 of 3 ) • Eq u ity and access – The dig i tal d i vi d e Hea l th risks • – – – – R e petitive st r ess i n j ury ( R S I) C a rpal tunn e l syn d rome ( C T S) C o mputer vision syndrome ( C V S) T ec h n o stress C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Int e r a c t ive Se s sion: T e c h n olog y : Do S m ar t p h o n es Harm C h ildren? Ma y be, Not. Ma y be • C l ass d i scussi o n – Identify the prob l em describ e d in this case s t ud y . In w h at sense is i t a n eth i cal d i l e mma? C o mpare the r esearch find i ngs ap p roving or – d i sapprov i ng of smar t ph o ne use among chi l dren teen a g e rs. S h ou l d res t rictions be p l aced on ch i l d re n ’ s and teenag e r s ’ sma r tphone use? Why or w h y not? and – C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

How W ill M I S Help My Ca r ee r ? • • • • • T h e O r g a n i zati o n: P i n n ac l e A i r F o rce B a se Pos i tion Descripti o n: Job Re q u i rements In t erview Q uesti o ns Jun i or privacy an a lyst Author T i p s C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d

Copy r ight C o p yri g h t © 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 1 8 P e ars o n E d u ca t ion, I n c. A ll R i g h t s R e se r v e d T h is w ork is pro t ected by Uni t ed States co p y rig h t la w s and is pro v ided solely f o r t h e use of ins t ruct o rs in teachi n g t h eir c o urses a n d assessi n g s t u d e n t learni n g. Disse m i n a t i o n or sale of any part of t h is w ork (i n clu d ing on t h e W orld W ide W eb) w ill des t roy t h e in t egri t y of t h e w ork and is n o t permi t te d . T h e w ork and ma t eria l s from it sh o uld ne v er be m ade a v ailable to st u de n ts except by ins t ruct o rs usi n g t h e accom p an y ing text in t h eir classes. A ll recipien t s of t h is w ork are expected to abi d e by t h ese restri c ti o ns and to h o n o r t h e in t en d ed pe d ag o gical p u rposes and t h e nee d s of o t her ins t ruct o rs w ho rely on t h ese ma t eria l s.
Tags