CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 2
Outline
Pass Transistors
DC Response
Logic Levels and Noise Margins
Transient Response
RC Delay Models
Delay Estimation
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 3
Pass Transistors
We have assumed source is grounded
What if source > 0?
–e.g. pass transistor passing V
DD
V
g = V
DD
–If V
s > V
DD-V
t, V
gs < V
t
–Hence transistor would turn itself off
nMOS pass transistors pull no higher than V
DD-V
tn
–Called a degraded “1”
–Approach degraded value slowly (low I
ds)
pMOS pass transistors pull no lower than V
tp
Transmission gates are needed to pass both 0 and 1
V
DD
V
DD
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 4
Pass Transistor Ckts
VDD
VDD
Vs = VDD-Vtn
VSS
Vs = |Vtp|
VDD
VDD-VtnVDD-Vtn
VDD-Vtn
VDD
VDD VDD VDD
VDD
VDD-Vtn
VDD-2Vtn
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 5
DC Response
DC Response: V
out vs. V
in for a gate
Ex: Inverter
–When V
in = 0 -> V
out = V
DD
–When V
in = V
DD -> V
out = 0
–In between, V
out depends on
transistor size and current
–By KCL, must settle such that
I
dsn = |I
dsp|
–We could solve equations
–But graphical solution gives more insight
I
dsn
I
dsp
V
out
V
DD
V
in
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 6
Transistor Operation
Current depends on region of transistor behavior
For what V
in and V
out are nMOS and pMOS in
–Cutoff?
–Linear?
–Saturation?
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 7
nMOS Operation
Cutoff Linear Saturated
V
gsn
< V
tn
V
in
< V
tn
V
gsn
> V
tn
V
in
> V
tn
V
dsn
< V
gsn
– V
tn
V
out
< V
in
- V
tn
V
gsn
> V
tn
V
in
> V
tn
V
dsn
> V
gsn
– V
tn
V
out
> V
in
- V
tn
I
dsn
I
dsp
V
out
V
DD
V
in
V
gsn = V
in
V
dsn = V
out
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 8
pMOS Operation
Cutoff Linear Saturated
V
gsp
> V
tp
V
in
> V
DD
+ V
tp
V
gsp
< V
tp
V
in
< V
DD
+ V
tp
V
dsp
> V
gsp
– V
tp
V
out
> V
in
- V
tp
V
gsp
< V
tp
V
in
< V
DD
+ V
tp
V
dsp
< V
gsp
– V
tp
V
out
< V
in
- V
tp
I
dsn
I
dsp
V
out
V
DD
V
in
V
gsp = V
in
- V
DD
V
dsp = V
out
- V
DD
V
tp < 0
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 9
I-V Characteristics
Make pMOS is wider than nMOS such that
n
=
p
Vgsn5
Vgsn4
Vgsn3
Vgsn2
Vgsn1
Vgsp5
Vgsp4
Vgsp3
Vgsp2
Vgsp1
VDD
-VDD
Vdsn
-Vdsp
-Idsp
Idsn
0
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 10
Current vs. V
out
, V
in
V
in5
V
in4
V
in3
V
in2
V
in1
V
in0
V
in1
V
in2
V
in3
V
in4
I
dsn
, |I
dsp
|
V
out
V
DD
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 11
Load Line Analysis
V
in5
V
in4
V
in3
V
in2
V
in1
V
in0
V
in1
V
in2
V
in3
V
in4
I
dsn
, |I
dsp
|
V
out
V
DD
For a given V
in
:
–Plot I
dsn, I
dsp vs. V
out
–V
out must be where |currents| are equal in
I
dsn
I
dsp
V
out
V
DD
V
in
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 12
Load Line Analysis
V
in = 0
V
in0
V
in0
I
dsn
, |I
dsp
|
V
out
V
DD
V
in1
V
in1I
dsn
, |I
dsp
|
V
out
V
DD
V
in2
V
in2
I
dsn
, |I
dsp
|
V
out
V
DD
V
in3
V
in3
I
dsn
, |I
dsp
|
V
out
V
DD
V
in4
V
in4
I
dsn
, |I
dsp
|
V
out
V
DD
Vin5
Idsn, |Idsp|
Vout
VDD
V
in5
V
in4
V
in3
V
in2
V
in1
V
in0
V
in1
V
in2
V
in3
V
in4
V
out
V
DD
V
in
= 00.2V
DD
0.4V
DD
0.6V
DD
0.8V
DD
V
DD
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 13
DC Transfer Curve
Transcribe points onto V
in
vs. V
out
plot
V
in5
V
in4
V
in3
V
in2
V
in1
V
in0
V
in1
V
in2
V
in3
V
in4
V
out
V
DD
C
V
out
0
V
in
V
DD
V
DD
A B
D
E
V
tn
V
DD
/2 V
DD
+V
tp
V
in0
V
in1
V
in2
V
in3
V
in4V
in5
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 14
Operating Regions
Revisit transistor operating regions
C
V
out
0
V
in
V
DD
V
DD
A B
D
E
V
tn
V
DD
/2 V
DD
+V
tp
Region nMOS pMOS
A Cutoff Linear
B SaturationLinear
C SaturationSaturation
D Linear Saturation
E Linear Cutoff
Vout
VDD
Vin
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 15
Beta Ratio
If
p
/
n
1, switching point will move from V
DD
/2
Called skewed gate
Other gates: collapse into equivalent inverter
V
out
0
V
in
V
DD
V
DD
0.5
1
2
10
p
n
0.1
p
n
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 16
Noise Margins
How much noise can a gate input see before it does
not recognize the input?
Indeterminate
Region
NM
L
NM
H
Input CharacteristicsOutput Characteristics
V
OH
V
DD
V
OL
GND
V
IH
V
IL
Logical High
Input Range
Logical Low
Input Range
Logical High
Output Range
Logical Low
Output Range
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 17
V
DD
V
in
V
out
V
OH
V
DD
V
OL
V
IL
V
IH
V
tn
Unity Gain Points
Slope = -1
V
DD
-
|V
tp
|
p
/
n
> 1
V
in
V
out
0
Logic Levels
To maximize noise margins, select logic levels at
–unity gain point of DC transfer characteristic
V
DD
V
in
V
out
V
DD
p
/
n
> 1
V
in
V
out
0
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 18
Transient Response
DC analysis tells us V
out
if V
in
is constant
Transient analysis tells us V
out(t) if V
in(t) changes
–Requires solving differential equations
Input is usually considered to be a step or ramp
–From 0 to V
DD
or vice versa
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 19
Inverter Step Response
Ex: find step response of inverter driving load cap
0
0
( )
()
()
(
(
)
)
DD
DD
loa
d
ou
i
d
t
o
n
ut sn
V
V
u t t V
t t
V t
V
d
dt C
t
I t
0
2
2
0
(
2
)
( )
( )
DD t DD t
DD
out
out
out ot D t
n
u
ds
D t
I
t t
V V V V
V
V
V t
V V t
t
VV V
V
out
(t)
V
in
(t)
t
0
t
V
in
(t)
V
out
(t)
C
load
I
dsn
(t)
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 20
Delay Definitions
t
pdr: rising propagation delay
–From input to rising output
crossing V
DD
/2
t
pdf
: falling propagation delay
–From input to falling output
crossing V
DD/2
t
pd: average propagation delay
–t
pd = (t
pdr + t
pdf)/2
t
r: rise time
–From output crossing 0.2 V
DD
to 0.8 V
DD
t
f: fall time
–From output crossing 0.8 V
DD
to 0.2 V
DD
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 21
Delay Definitions
t
cdr
: rising contamination delay
–From input to rising output crossing V
DD/2
t
cdf: falling contamination delay
–From input to falling output crossing V
DD/2
t
cd: average contamination delay
–t
pd
= (t
cdr
+ t
cdf
)/2
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 22
Simulated Inverter Delay
Solving differential equations by hand is too hard
SPICE simulator solves the equations numerically
–Uses more accurate I-V models too!
But simulations take time to write, may hide insight
(V)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
t(s)
0.0 200p 400p 600p 800p 1n
t
pdf
= 66ps t
pdr
= 83ps
V
in
V
out
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 23
Delay Estimation
We would like to be able to easily estimate delay
–Not as accurate as simulation
–But easier to ask “What if?”
The step response usually looks like a 1
st
order RC
response with a decaying exponential.
Use RC delay models to estimate delay
–C = total capacitance on output node
–Use effective resistance R
–So that t
pd = RC
Characterize transistors by finding their effective R
–Depends on average current as gate switches
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 24
Effective Resistance
Shockley models have limited value
–Not accurate enough for modern transistors
–Too complicated for much hand analysis
Simplification: treat transistor as resistor
–Replace I
ds(V
ds, V
gs) with effective resistance R
•I
ds
= V
ds
/R
–R averaged across switching of digital gate
Too inaccurate to predict current at any given time
–But good enough to predict RC delay
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 25
RC Delay Model
Use equivalent circuits for MOS transistors
–Ideal switch + capacitance and ON resistance
–Unit nMOS has resistance R, capacitance C
–Unit pMOS has resistance 2R, capacitance C
Capacitance proportional to width
Resistance inversely proportional to width
kg
s
d
g
s
d
kC
kC
kC
R/k
kg
s
d
g
s
d
kC
kC
kC
2R/k
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 26
RC Values
Capacitance
–C = C
g
= C
s
= C
d
= 2 fF/m of gate width in 0.6 m
–Gradually decline to 1 fF/m in 65 nm
Resistance
–R 10 K•m in 0.6 m process
–Improves with shorter channel lengths
–1.25 K•m in 65 nm process
Unit transistors
–May refer to minimum contacted device (4/2 )
–Or maybe 1 m wide device
–Doesn’t matter as long as you are consistent
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 27
Inverter Delay Estimate
Estimate the delay of a fanout-of-1 inverter
C
C
R
2C
2C
R
2
1
A
Y
C
2C
C
2C
C
2C
R
Y
2
1
d = 6RC
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 28
Delay Model Comparison
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 29
Example: 3-input NAND
Sketch a 3-input NAND with transistor widths chosen to
achieve effective rise and fall resistances equal to a unit
inverter (R).
3
3
3
2 2 2
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 31
Elmore Delay
ON transistors look like resistors
Pullup or pulldown network modeled as RC ladder
Elmore delay of RC ladder
R
1
R
2
R
3
R
N
C
1
C
2
C
3
C
N
nodes
1 1 1 2 2 1 2
... ...
pd i to source i
i
N N
t R C
RC R R C R R R C
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 32
Example: 3-input NAND
Estimate worst-case rising and falling delay of 3-input NAND
driving h identical gates.
9C
3C
3C3
3
3
222
5hC
Y
n2
n1
h copies
9 5
pdr
t h RC
3 3 3 3 3 3
3 3 9 5
12 5
R R R R R R
pdf
t C C h C
h RC
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 33
Delay Components
Delay has two parts
–Parasitic delay
•9 or 12 RC
•Independent of load
–Effort delay
•5h RC
•Proportional to load capacitance
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 34
Contamination Delay
Best-case (contamination) delay can be substantially less than
propagation delay.
Ex: If all three inputs fall simultaneously
5
9 5 3
3 3
cdr
R
t h C h RC
9C
3C
3C3
3
3
222
5hC
Y
n2
n1
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 35
7C
3C
3C
3
3
3
222
3C
2C2C
3C3C
Isolated
Contacted
Diffusion
Merged
Uncontacted
Diffusion
Shared
Contacted
Diffusion
Diffusion Capacitance
We assumed contacted diffusion on every s / d.
Good layout minimizes diffusion area
Ex: NAND3 layout shares one diffusion contact
–Reduces output capacitance by 2C
–Merged uncontacted diffusion might help too
CMOS VLSI DesignCMOS VLSI Design
4th Ed.
5: DC and Transient Response 36
Layout Comparison
Which layout is better?
A
V
DD
GND
B
Y
A
V
DD
GND
B
Y