Advanced Philosophy & Sociology of Education –Semester1, Assignment-1
A Reflective thoughts on Betrand Russel –an educationist
Closely related to the advances made in contemporary thought in the fields of logic and
mathematical philosophy are the increasingly important strides made in semantics and the
philosophy of language. Russell has played a prominent and pivotal part in this advance,
although he is not in accord with some of the lengths to which the analytic philosophers have
gone. He has stressed the importance of recognizing language relations other than merely that
of subject-predicate and the sharp distinction between the ‘is’ of predication and the ‘is’ of
identity. He has been a pioneer in analysing the meaning of meaning. As suchwhatever he has
added to the philosophy of language has been of greatmoment.
a) Metaphysics (Reality)-Parental Branch of Knowledge:-(quest for truth or reality)
And
b) Epistemology (Knowledge)- Heart & Centre of Philosophy:-
(knowledge, awareness, the reality)
There are two sorts of knowledge: knowledge of things, and knowledgeof truths.
According to Russell, we shall be concerned exclusively with knowledge of things, of
which in turn we shall have to distinguish two kinds. Knowledge of things, when it is of
the kind we call knowledge by acquaintance, is essentially simpler than any knowledge
of truths, and logically independent of knowledge of truths, though it would be rash to
assume that human beings ever, in fact, have acquaintance with things without at the
same time knowing some truth about them. Knowledge of things by description, on the
contrary, always involves, as we shall find in the course of the present chapter, some
knowledge of truths as its source and ground. But first of all we must make clear what we
mean by ‘acquaintance’ and what we mean by ‘description’. We shall say that we have
acquaintance with anything of which we are directly aware, without the intermediary of
any process of inference or any knowledgeof truths.
Theory of knowledge is rendered difficult by the fact that it involves psychology, logic,
and the physical sciences, with the result that confusionsbetween different points of view
are a constant danger. This danger is particularly acute in connection with the problem of
our present chapter, which is that of determining the premises of our knowledge from an
epistemological point of view. And there is a further source of confusion in the fact that,
as already noted, theory of knowledge itself may be conceived in two different ways.
c) Axiology(Values)- Truth, beauty or goodness:-(Values of human beings)
Man is a part of Nature, not something contrasted with Nature. His thoughtsand his
bodily movements follow the same laws that describe the motionsof stars and atoms. The
physical world is large compared with Man—largerthan it was thought to be in Dante’s
time, but not as large as it seemeda hundred years ago. Both upward and downward, both
in the large andin the small, science seem to be reaching limits. It is thought that
theuniverse is of finite extent in space, and that light could travel round itin a few
hundred millions of years. It is thought matter consists of electronsand protons, which are
of finite size and of which there are only a finitenumber in the world. Probably their
changes are not continuous, as usedto be thought, but proceed by jerks, which are never
smaller than a certainminimum jerk. The laws of these changes can apparently be
summedup in a small number of very general principles, which determine the past and