MALIGNANT BONE TUMOURS Radiology presentation

AryaPrasad5 31 views 127 slides Mar 09, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 127
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83
Slide 84
84
Slide 85
85
Slide 86
86
Slide 87
87
Slide 88
88
Slide 89
89
Slide 90
90
Slide 91
91
Slide 92
92
Slide 93
93
Slide 94
94
Slide 95
95
Slide 96
96
Slide 97
97
Slide 98
98
Slide 99
99
Slide 100
100
Slide 101
101
Slide 102
102
Slide 103
103
Slide 104
104
Slide 105
105
Slide 106
106
Slide 107
107
Slide 108
108
Slide 109
109
Slide 110
110
Slide 111
111
Slide 112
112
Slide 113
113
Slide 114
114
Slide 115
115
Slide 116
116
Slide 117
117
Slide 118
118
Slide 119
119
Slide 120
120
Slide 121
121
Slide 122
122
Slide 123
123
Slide 124
124
Slide 125
125
Slide 126
126
Slide 127
127

About This Presentation

Malignant bone tumors


Slide Content

MALIGNANT BONE TUMOURS
DR. ARUN KUNCHERIA JOSEPH

Systematic approach

OSTEOSARCOMAS

Osteosarcomas
●2nd most common primary bone tumor aftermultiple myeloma
●Male predominance
●Serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) may be raised

Location
●metadiaphysis of tubular bones in the appendicular skeleton.
Common sites include:
●femur: MC
●tibia
●humerus
●fibula
●innominate bone (i.e. os coxae)
●mandible (gnathic osteosarcoma)
●maxilla
●vertebrae

Primary osteosarcoma:
●in young patients (10-20 years)
●with 75% taking place before the age of 20 because the growth
centers of the bone are more active during adolescence
Secondary osteosarcoma:
●occurs in the elderly
●usually secondary to malignant degeneration ofPaget disease,
extensivebone infarcts, post-radiotherapy for other
conditions,osteochondroma, andosteoblastoma

SUBTYPES
●intramedullary:~80%
○conventional high-grade: most common and discussed in this article
○telangiectatic osteosarcoma
○low-grade osteosarcoma
●surface or juxtacortical:~10-15%
○intracortical osteosarcoma
○parosteal osteosarcoma
○periosteal osteosarcoma
●extraskeletal:~5%
○extraskeletal osteosarcoma

Associations
●Paget disease of bone
●irradiation
●fibrous dysplasia(more common in the polyostotic form)
●Mazabraud syndrome(rare)

CONVENTIONAL HIGH -GRADE
OSTEOSARCOMA

Plain radiograph
Typical appearances of conventional high-grade osteosarcoma include:
●medullary and cortical bone destruction
●wide zone of transition,permeativeor moth-eaten appearance
●aggressiveperiosteal reaction
○sunbursttype
○Codman triangle
○lamellated (onion skin) reaction: less frequently seen
●soft-tissue mass
●tumor matrix ossification/calcification
○variable:reflects a combination of the amount of tumor bone production,
calcified matrix, and osteoid
○ill-defined "fluffy" or "cloud-like" compared to therings and arcsof chondroid
lesions

An ill-defined sclerotic area affecting the metaphysis of distal
fibula with an aggressive periosteal reaction (sunburst type).
This lesion involves the adjacent posterior aspect of the tibia
and the calcaneum inferiorly.
It is associated with a moderately large soft tissue swelling.

The distal half of the femur is occupied and expanded with a heterogeneous mass with
areas of bone formation. Posterior the periosteum is elevated (Codman's triangle).

The role of CT
●in assisting biopsy and staging.
●CT adds little to plain radiography and MRI in the direct
assessment of the tumor.
●The exception to this rule is predominantly lytic lesions in
which small amounts of mineralized material may be
inapparent on both plain film and MRI.

MRI
●Preoperative evaluation and staging of osteosarcoma
●To determine accurate local staging and assessment for limb-
sparing resection, particularly for evaluation of intraosseous
tumor extension and soft-tissue involvement.
●Evaluation of the growth plate -up to 75-88% of metaphyseal
tumors do cross the growth plate into the epiphysis

MRI
○soft tissue non-mineralized component: iso in T1 & hyper in T2
○mineralized/ossified components: low signal intensity in T1 & T2
○peritumoral edema: intermediate signal intensity
○scattered regions of hemorrhage will have a variable signal
○enhancement: solid components enhance

●T1 -Low signal , with small high signal foci likely hemorrhage
●T2 -heterogenous signal
●STIR -hyper
●Enhancement ( + ).
●There is associated cortical destruction, extraosseous soft
tissue extension, periosteal infiltration and marrow edema and
microinvasion of the adjacent area of distal femur.

T1

T2 FS, STIR

At bone scintigraphy, marked uptake of radiotracer is seen on blood flow, blood pool, and
delayed images
In evaluating for distant metastases (Both osseous and extraosseous metastatic disease)

Differential considerations include:
●Osteomyelitis
●other tumors
○metastatic lesion to bone
○Ewing sarcoma
○aneurysmal bone cyst
When the lesion is at the posteromedial distal femur consider:
●cortical desmoid

On MR images, joint involvement is
suggested when
●the hyaline cartilage is penetrated or
●more commonly when tumor extends through the capsule,
(such as into the suprapatellar bursa anteriorly or posteriorly
to encompass the cruciate ligaments )
●Fat-suppressed T1 + C -for delineating extension of tumor
into the joint
Enhancing synovium may mimic tumor spread.
Although invasion of the joint is unlikely in the absence of an
effusion, the presence of an effusion does not allow an accurate
prediction of intraarticular invasion.

Skip metastases
●Foci of tumor within the marrow of the affected
bone that are distinctly separate from the primary
lesion
Importance
●For defining the extent of disease
●Prognostical significance since the decrement in 5-
year survival for patients with skip metastases is
similar to that for patients with distant metastatic
disease.

Skip metastases are best identified with MR imaging, and
a study of the entire length of an affected bone should be
performed at the time of primary evaluation

Telangiectatic Osteosarcoma
●is an uncommon histopathologic subtype
●The term Malignant bone aneurysmis to describe a
hemorrhagic, poorly ossified telangiectatic osteosarcoma.
●Characterized by a malignant osteoid-forming sarcoma of
bone with large blood-filled vascular channels.

●Geographic bone destruction with a wide zone of
transition
●Marked aneurysmal expansion of bone is frequent
●Metaphyseal lesions often extend into the epiphysis
●Aggressive periosteal reaction, cortical destruction,
associated soft-tissue mass, and pathologic fracture

The cystic consistency of telangiectatic osteosarcoma is
reflected by its radiologic appearance.
●Bone scintigraphy -peripheral increased radionuclide
uptake with central photopenia (donut sign).
●CT -attenuation of the central portion of the lesion is often
lower than that of muscle
●This central region also shows hyperintense signal on
T2W . At MR imaging, hemorrhage is frequently observed
as areas of high signal intensity
●Fluid-fluid levels may be seen on CT or MR

Expansile and mostly cystic extraosseous mass with
multiple fluid levels

Radiologic differential diagnoses
●ABC
●giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone
●metastases

DIFFERENCES B/W
Telangiectatic Osteosarcoma
●Nodular septal thickening with viable tissue
showing enhancement
●Osteoid matrix mineralization in a soft-tissue
mass
●Cortical destruction and infiltrative margins -
aggressive growth pattern
Aneurysmal bone cyst
●Only an enhancing thin peripheral rim
and septa without nodularity or
osteoid matrix mineralization.
●The pattern of growth in ABC -less
aggressive, with expansile remodeling
and a well-defined encapsulated
margin

Telangiectatic OS GCT
●located at the end of the bone, close
to the subchondral bone
●is a solid mass
●Metaphyseal lesion
●Entirely cystic appearance

Treatment
●is similar to that of conventional
●Chemotherapy followed by
wide surgical resection / limb salvage or amputation

Low-Grade Intraosseous Osteosarcoma
●Within the medullary canal of the distal femur and proximal tibia
●The lesion may show well-defined margins, a sclerotic rim, prominent internal
trabecubation, and diffuse sclerosis, and it may cause expansile remodeling of
bone -simulate a benign process
●Prognosis is substantially better than that for patients with conventional OS
●Aggressive features such as cortical or medullary bone destruction and an
extraosseous mass suggest the malignant nature, even if it is focal and subtle

The most common radiographic
appearance
●Well-defined margins
●Expansile lytic bone destruction with coarsely thick or thin
incomplete trabeculation
●A dense sclerotic pattern is less common
●Cortical disruption and soft-tissue extension
●Expansile remodeling of bone

Differential radiologic diagnoses
Benign fibro-osseous lesions
●fibrous dysplasia
●nonossifying fibroma
●desmoplastic fibroma
●The presence of aggressive imaging features such as cortical destruction,
soft-tissue extension, and periosteal reaction is a helpful clue for
differentiation of low-grade central OS from the above benign lesions

Small Cell Osteosarcoma
●The pathologic characteristics of this tumor are similar to
those of Ewing sarcoma: Both lesions are composed of small
round blue cells
●Predominantly permeative
●lytic medullary lesion
●cortical breakthrough
●aggressive periosteal reaction,

Osteosarcomatosis
●also known as multifocal osteosarcoma or multiple sclerotic
osteosarcoma
●represent rapidly progressive metastatic disease
●Younger, skeletally immatune patients -have rapidly
appearing, usually symmetric, sclerotic lesions
●Older patients -fewer, asymmetric sclerotic lesions.

●Ill-defined margins
●Aggressive periosteal reaction
●Cortical disruption
●Adjacent soft-tissue extension
●Although lesions usually contain cloudlike osteoid, purely lytic
dominant lesions may be seen.
●In contrast to the dominant lesions, the secondary foci are often
smaller, more sclerotic, and better defined and lack periosteal
reaction or cortical destruction

Juxtacortical or surface OS
●Refers to OS originating from the surface of bone.
●It is primarily associated with the periosteum, with variable
medullary canal involvement.
SUBTYPES
●Parosteal
●Periosteal
●High-grade surface OS

Parosteal OS
●MC type of juxtacortical OS
●Metaphysesof long bones
●Posterior aspect of the distal femur is the most frequent site
●Parosteal OS originates from the outer fibrous layer of the
periosteum

●Lobulated and exophytic mass with central dense ossification
adjacent to the bone
●A cleavage plane seen separating the tumor and adjacent
normal cortex (THE STRING SIGN). This cleavage plane
corresponds histologically to the periosteum interposed
between the cortex and the tumor mass

●Dedifferentiation correlates radiographically with increased
lysis and the presence of a soft-tissue mass without
ossification

Differential diagnosis
benign entities such as
●osteochondroma,
●myositis ossificans,
●periosteal chondroma
malignant entities such as
●fibrous malignancy
●periosteal chondrosarcoma
●other subtypes of juxtacortical OS

D/D
Parosteal OS
●Lacks corticomedullary
continuity
●The cartilage cap -
irregular, incomplete, and
thick
Osteochondroma
●corticomedullary continuity
●The cartilage cap -high
signal on T2-weighted /PD
(high water content)
●The cartilage cap -Smooth,
continuous, and relatively
thin cartilage cap

Parosteal OS
●The ossification pattern -
Radiographic inverse of that seen in
myositis ossificans
( with the densest ossification in the
center of the lesion and the least
radiopaque bone at the periphery)
Myositis ossificans
●The ossification pattern -Gradual
ossification of the lesion from the
periphery toward the center of the
mass
●Prominent surrounding edema

Periosteal OS
●2
nd
MC type of juxtacortical OS
●along the diaphyses of long bones
●most commonly the tibia
●Periosteal OS arises from the inner, germinative layer of
periosteum

Common radiographic findings
●soft-tissue mass with periosteal reaction -Periosteal reaction
extends perpendicularly from the inner cortex to the outer
margin of the tumor
●cortical erosion
●cortical thickening

XRAY
●Lesion in the femoral diaphysis with a
Codman triangle with perpendicular
periosteal reaction

CT & MR
●The predominantly chondroid matrix -results in a lesion that is
low in attenuation on CT images
●Hyperintense on T2-weighted MR images with smaller foci of
low signal intensity representing calcified matrix or hair-on-
end periosteal reaction.

Difference b/w
Parosteal OS
●densely ossified juxtacortical mass
that lies outside the cortex
●occurs in metaphyses
Periosteal OS
●More lytic in appearance, causing
cortical erosion and periosteal
reaction
●occurs in diaphyses

High-Grade Surface Osteosarcoma
●2nd and 3rd decades of life
●the diaphyses and metaphyses of long bones
●the femur being the most common site

Radiographic findings
●dense ossification and periosteal reaction
●Cortical erosion and thickening
●surrounds the femur circumferentially and invades the medullary canal
focally

D/D
●parosteal OS
●periosteal OS
●conventional OS.

Similarity & difference B/W
Periosteal OS
●both can occur in diaphyses and
cause periosteal reaction and bone
destruction.
●medullary invasion is less common
High-grade surface OS
●involves the entire circumference of
the cortex and is more likely to show
medullary invasion

EWING SARCOMAS

Ewing sarcomas
●are the 2nd most common malignant primary bone tumors of
childhood afterosteosarcoma
●Typically arising from medullary cavity with invasion of the
Haversian system.
●They usually present as moth-eaten destructive permeative
lucent lesions in the shaft of long bones with large soft tissue
component without osteoid matrix and typical onion skin
periostitis

●10 -20 years of age
●M > F

C/F
●local pain
●Pathological fractures also occur.
●Systemic symptoms including fever may be present. ESR is
also elevated.

Ewing sarcoma family of tumors(ESFT)
●Ewing sarcoma (small round blue cell tumorwith regular
sized primitive appearing cells)
●Soft tissue tumorspPNET
●Askin tumor
●Neuroepithelioma

Location -tumor is almost always metadiaphyseal
or diaphyseal
●lower limb
○femur most common
●pelvis
●upper limb
●spine and ribs
○sacrococcygeal region most common

Plain radiograph and CT
●have clearly aggressive appearance.
Common findings include:
●Wide zone of transition
●Permeative bone destruction
●Laminated (onion skin) periosteal reaction
●Sclerosis may be present
They occasionally demonstrate other appearances, includingCodman
triangles, spiculated (sunburst) or thick periosteal reaction and even
bone expansion or cystic components.
●Soft tissue calcification is uncommon

Permeative lytic bone lesion in the distal fibular diaphysis with aggressive hair-on-
end periosteal reaction and Codman triangles

MRI
●T1:low to intermediate signal
●T1 C+ (Gd):heterogeneous but prominent enhancement
●T2:heterogeneously high signal, may see hair on end low
signal striations

Nuclear medicine
Ewing sarcomas demonstrate increased uptake on both
●Gallium
67
-citrate and
●all three phases of the Technetium
99
m methylene
diphosphonate bone scans.

Mid-diaphyseal left humeral lesion which has a permeative
appearance andlamellated periosteal reaction.

Multiple intramedullary bone lesions involving both
femora and the pelvis bilaterally
.
T2W FS

T1W FS + C

The right iliac bone demonstrates
●ill-defined lytic lesion
●a wide zone of transition
●The medial part of the
acetabular cortex is
poorly seen, potentially
representing extension
into the joint.

Large areas of focal cortical destruction and continuity between the medullary and
soft-tissue components are common

CHONDROSARCOMAS

Chondrosarcomas
●4
th
and 5
th
decades
●M>F
●3
rd
MC malignant tumour
Typical features
●ring-and-arc chondroid matrix mineralization
●lytic pattern
●deep endosteal scalloping
●soft-tissue extension

C/F
●pain
●pathological fracture
●palpable lump or local mass effect
●Hyperglycemiacan occur as aparaneoplastic syndrome.

TYPES
Chondrosarcomas are either
●Primary-arisingde novo
●Secondary -arise from a pre-existent cartilaginous mass

Primary
●conventional intramedullary chondrosarcoma(or central
chondrosarcoma) : low, intermediate or high grade
●juxtacortical chondrosarcoma : low, intermediate or high grade
●clear cell chondrosarcoma
●myxoid chondrosarcoma
●mesenchymal chondrosarcoma
●extraskeletal chondrosarcoma
●dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma

Secondary
●osteochondroma
○solitary osteochondroma
○hereditary multiple exostoses
●enchondroma
○solitary enchondroma
○Ollier disease
○Maffucci syndrome

Locations
●long bones: 45% (the reason is that the cartilage is more abundant in the long,
tubular bones)
●pelvis
●ribs
●spine
●scapula
●sternum
●head and neck
●craniofacial
●hands and feet

Depending on their osseous location
●Central -intramedullary
●Peripheral / Juxtacortical (periosteal) lesions

Numerous categories (incorporating both location
and histologic characteristics)
●Conventional intramedullary
●Clear cell
●Juxtacortical
●Myxoid
●Mesenchymal
●Extraskeletal
●Dedifferentiated

Plain radiograph
●lytic
●intralesional calcifications: ~70% (rings and arcs calcification orpopcorn
calcification)
●endosteal scalloping
●moth-eaten appearance orpermeative appearancein higher grade tumors
●cortical remodelling, thickening andperiosteal reactionare also useful in
distinguishing between an enchondroma and low-grade chondrosarcoma

Solitary, expansile, lytic lesion in the right
middle finger metacarpal head.
Minor cortical breach in its inferior medial
aspect.
No periosteal reaction.

Typicalring and arc
calcification

An intramedullary lesion is noted with associated
endosteal scalloping and chondral calcification.

CT
●Matrix calcification
●Endosteal scalloping
●Cortical breach
●Soft tissue mass: tumor cellularity, and therefore density,
increases with increased grade of the tumor
●Heterogenous contrast enhancement

MRI
●T1:low to intermediate signal
●T2:high intensity in non-mineralized/calcified portions
●Gradient :blooming of mineralized/calcified portions
●T1 C+ (Gd)-heterogeneous moderate to intense contrast
enhancement.
○enhancement can be septal and peripheral rim-like corresponding to
fibrovascular septation between lobules of hyaline cartilage

Low T1, bright T2
and STIR signal
STIR

Nuclear medicine
●Typically chondrosarcomas demonstrate increased uptake
onbone scan
●This is useful in helping to distinguish a low-grade
chondrosarcoma from an enchondroma as the latter has
increased uptake in ~20% of cases, and usually to a lesser
degree

MULTIPLE MYELOMA

Multiple myeloma
●Most commonprimary malignant bone neoplasmin adults.
●It arises from red marrow due to monoclonal proliferation of
plasma cells
●Manifests in a wide range of radiographic abnormalities.

Four main patterns are recognized:
●Disseminated form: multiple well-defined "punched out" lytic
lesions
●Disseminated form: diffuse skeletal osteopenia
●Solitaryplasmacytoma: a single large/expansile lesion most
commonly in a vertebral body or in the pelvis
●Osteosclerosing myeloma

Clinical presentation
can be recalled with the mnemonicCRAB:
●Calcium elevation
●Renal insufficiency related to multiple myeloma
●Anemia
●Bone abnormalities including lytic lesions and osteopenia

MR imaging patterns of multiple myeloma
infiltration
These include
●Normal marrow
●A micronodular pattern (also termed variegated or salt-and-
pepper)
●A focal pattern
●A diffuse pattern

Durie and Salmon Plus System for Staging of
Multiple Myeloma

Radiographic features
●numerous, well-circumscribed, lytic bone lesions
○punched out lucencies (Raindrop skull )
○endosteal scalloping
●generalized osteopenia (less common)
○often associated withvertebral compression fractures / vertebra
plana

Multiple foci ofendosteal scallopingwithin this long bone, consistent
with lytic myelomatous lesions

Xray
Askeletal surveyis essential
Bilateral AP and PA projections of
●Femur, pelvis, spine and skull
●Hands
●Forearms
●Humerus
●Feet
●Leg

MRI
Five patterns have been described:
●normalbone marrowsignal
●diffuse involvement
●focal involvement
●combined diffuse and focal involvement
●variegated ("salt and pepper")

MRI
●T1 -low signal
●T2 withfat-suppression -high signal
○infiltration of the ribs is probably best appreciated on T2 images
with fat suppression, appearing bright -‘white ribs sign’
●T1 C+ (Gd) –
■type 4 curve -asteep wash-inof contrast medium, due to the
high vascularization, followed by anearly wash-out

●Sclerosis is usually seen only with treatment or fracture
○Bone scans may typically be negative and many hotareas on scan may be
healing fractures
○Solitary plasmacytoma produces “soap-bubbly” expansile, septated lesion,
when characteristic

Diff b/w
MM
●Vertebral body is the MC site
●Involve mandible, distal axial skeleton
●May have normal appearance in bone
scan
METS
●more commonly affect the vertebral
pedicles rather than vertebral bodies
●Rare
●extensive bony metastases rarely
have a normal appearance in bone
scan

Oil-droplet appearance.
●Metastases are generally
fewer in number and of
different sizes and shapes.

D/D:
●mets and disuse osteoporosis

METASTASIS

METASTASIS
●Most common malignancy in bone.
●Must be considered in the differential diagnosis of any bone
lesion in a patient > 40 years.
●May present as well-defined osteolytic, ill-defined osteolytic
and also as sclerotic bone lesion.
●Majority of osteolytic metastases

LOCATION
●vertebrae
○especially the posterior vertebral body, extending into the pedicles
○pelvis
●proximalfemur
●proximalhumerus
●skull

General rule
●Unlike primary bone tumors, metastases incite no or only
limitedperiosteal reaction.
●The occasional exception to this general rule
includesprostate cancer, some gastrointestinal
malignancies,retinoblastomaandneuroblastoma.

Lytic bone metastases( more common)
●thyroid cancer
●renal cell cancer
●adrenal gland carcinomaandpheochromocytoma
●uterine carcinoma
●gastrointestinal carcinomas
●Wilms tumor
●Ewing sarcoma
●melanoma
●hepatocellular carcinoma
●squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
●lung cancer

●Two geographical areas of osteolytic mets
involving left iliac bone with gross thinning of
bony cortex and cortical breach.

Scleroticorblasticbone metastases
●prostate carcinoma(most common)
●breast carcinoma(may bemixed)
●transitional cell carcinoma (TCC)
●carcinoid
●medulloblastoma
●neuroblastoma
●mucinous adenocarcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract (e.g.colon carcinoma,gastric carcinoma)
●lymphoma
●small cell lung cancer
●post-treatment appearance of any lytic metastasis
●pulmonary adenocarcinoma
●medullary thyroid carcinoma

Osteoblastic mets from Ca Prostate

sclerotic metastasesfrom neuroblastoma

Mixed lytic and sclerotic bone
metastases
●breast carcinoma
●lung carcinoma
●carcinoma of the cervix
●testicular tumors
●prostate carcinoma: typically sclerotic but 15% are mixed
●ganglioneuroblastoma

Mixed lytic and sclerotic vertebral
metastatic lesions

Bone scans
●are the most sensitive routine imaging modality to identify
both sclerotic and lytic lesions

●Main differential ismultiple myeloma.

OSSEOUS LYMPHOMA

Primary bone lymphoma
●“lymphoma presenting in an osseous site with no evidence of
disease elsewhere for at least 6 months after diagnosis

●Lytic-Destructive Pattern -MC
●Blastic-Sclerotic Pattern -rare in primary bone lymphoma
compared with metastatic bone lymphoma
●Subtle or “Near-Normal” Findings

Lytic permeative pattern
After irradiation and combination
chemotherapy shows sclerotic
changes

Radiographic features
●solitary lytic lesion near the end of a long bone
●permeative or moth-eaten pattern of destruction
●aggressive periosteal reaction

MR Imaging Characteristics
1.Bone Marrow Replacement
●T1 -are the best for demonstrating marrow changes ( as T1-
weighted images reveal areas of low signal intensity within the
marrow).
●On T2 -these areas generally appear bright.
●Peritumoral edema & reactive marrow changes-hyper on T2
.
●However, if fibrosis is present -it may show low signal
intensity
●PC -areas of enhancement within the lesion.

2. Soft-Tissue Involvement
●Cortical break with soft tissue masses on MR images.
●Extensive marrow disease and surrounding soft-tissue
masses but without extensive cortical destruction has also
been reported .
(One explanation for this finding is the spread of tumor cells from
the marrow through small vascular channels that run through the
cortex into the surrounding soft tissue )

3. Cortical Erosion
●Both MR imaging and CT demonstrate cortical erosion,
although the former permits early detection

T1W T2W
Analysis of the biopsy specimen revealed primary Hodgkin
lymphoma of the bone.

THANK YOU …
Tags