MANAGEMENT VS GOVERNANCE AND SOME TOOLS TO MEASURE PERFORMANCE.pptx

some "secular" tools we can use in Christian Ministry context; an open learning material developed thru conversations with fellow PKs

1. AND WHAT DO THESE MEAN IN THE CONTEXT OF CHURCH LEADERSHIP proposed discussion material by JOEL WAYNE A. GANIBE Governance Consultant for Official Development Assistance for multilateral/bilateral funded projects in Asia Comparing Management, Governance, and Mentorship

2. Learning objective Designed for: Synchronous/asynchronous learning material Self-learning/facilitated Explore concepts and tools from other disciplines to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of church workers

3. think, pair & share CHURCH: institution or organization ? HOOK QUESTION INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNIQUE: Pair up with someone and come to a consensus, then share to group

4. Alin man sa dalawa ay pareho itong nangangailangan ng disiplina na pwede nating isakay sa kategorya ng GOVERNANCE o kaya naman ay MANAGEMENT ... Kung hihiram tayo ng mga termino sa mga larangan na yan , magandang linawin natin base sa konteksto : Church leaders need basic grounding on these disciplines as stewards/shepherds of the flock to be able mentors to local members/committees CHURCH: institution or organization ?

5. As an institution: The church often represents a long-standing, established system of beliefs, practices, and traditions. It can have a formal structure , hierarchy, and set of rules. As an organization: The church can also be seen as a social group or association with a shared purpose. It may have specific goals, activities, and a membership base. Ultimately, the distinction between institution and organization may depend on the specific context and perspective. In some cases, the church might be emphasized as a timeless institution ; in others, it might be viewed as a dynamic organization adapting to changing times. KEYWORDS TO PONDER: timeless / dynamic organization/ search and link to “ learning organization ”; relate to church history (from movement to institutional formation) INPUT

6. [In the Philippines, churches and religious organizations are often registered as non-stock, non-profit corporations with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This registration is crucial for the church's legal recognition and functioning as a corporate entity. Failing to renew SEC registration can have significant legal and operational consequences for a church.] DO CHURCHES NEED TO REGISTER AS AN INSTITUTION? ACTIVITY: GOOGLE IF YOUR CHURCH QUALIFIES FOR TAX EXCEPTION AS A RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION. Discovery/foot on the ground/earth realities https://taxacctgcenter.ph/income-tax-exemption-religious-institution-church-philippines/ https://philippinechurchaccounting.blogspot.com/2013/09/churches-and-corporation-code-of.html https://www.respicio.ph/commentaries/consequences-of-failing-to-renew-sec-registration-for-churches-in-the-philippines https://pcec.org.ph/?page_id=7

7. WHICH DISCIPLINE DO WE DRAW FROM? GOVERNANCE OR MANAGEMENT AND WHAT DO THESE MEAN IN THE CONTEXT OF CHURCH LEADERSHIP Point of Inquiry

8. MANAGEMENT Definition: The process of organizing and coordinating resources to achieve organizational goals. Focus: Task accomplishment, efficiency, and resource allocation. Role: Overseeing operations, making decisions, and ensuring accountability. GOVERNANCE Definition: The system of rules, practices, and processes by which an organization is directed and controlled. Focus: Ensuring accountability, transparency, and ethical behavior. Role: Setting policies, making strategic decisions, and overseeing the organization's overall direction. MENTORSHIP Definition: A relationship in which a more experienced person (mentor) provides guidance, coaching, and support to a less experienced person (mentee). Focus: Personal and professional development, knowledge transfer, and relationship building. Role: Providing advice, guidance, and support to help mentees reach their full potential. MANAGEMENT, GOVERNANCE, AND MENTORSHIP: are interrelated concepts often used in organizational and leadership contexts , but they have distinct meanings and roles:

9. Feature MANAGEMENT GOVERNANCE MENTORSHIP FOCUS Task accomplishment and efficiency Accountability, transparency, and ethical behavior Personal and professional development ROLE Overseeing operations, making decisions Setting policies, making strategic decisions Providing guidance and support RELATIONSHIP Hierarchical (superior-subordinate) Institutional (organization-stakeholders) One-on-one (mentor-mentee) Into the MATRIX (visual organizer)

10. Saan diyan papasok ang “ PERFORMANCE ” ? task accomplishment ba at resource allocation ng " management "; or accountability, transparency, and ethical behavior ng " governance "? KEYWORDS: relationship/ more experienced/ focus/ objectives MANAGEMENT DEFINITION: The process of organizing and coordinating resources to achieve organizational goals. FOCUS: Task accomplishment , efficiency, and resource allocation. Role: Overseeing operations, making decisions, and ensuring accountability. GOVERNANCE Definition: The system of rules, practices, and processes by which an organization is directed and controlled. Focus: Ensuring accountability, transparency, and ethical behavior. Role: Setting policies, making strategic decisions, and overseeing the organization's overall direction. Activity: Draw a venn diagram to illustrate your understanding?

11. For religious organizations, governance is generally more appropriate than management . While both terms involve leadership and organization: governance focuses on the overall direction, policies, and accountability of the organization. It ensures that the organization is operating following its mission, values, and legal requirements. Management , on the other hand, typically refers to the day-to-day operations and administration of the organization. While management is important, governance provides the overarching framework and ensures that the organization is accountable to its stakeholders, including members, donors, and the community. Therefore, governance is a more suitable term for religious organizations as it emphasizes the importance of ethical leadership, transparency, and accountability in fulfilling their spiritual and community-oriented mission. ACTIVITY: FIND SCRIPTURAL REFERENCES ON GOVERNANCE

12. Saan naman papasok ang " discipleship " at ano ang distinction nila ng " mentorship "? Often used interchangeably, they have distinct nuances. While both involve a relationship between a more experienced person and a less experienced one, their focuses and objectives differ. Discovery

13. Feature MENTORSHIP DISCIPLESHIP Focus Personal and professional development Spiritual growth and moral development Relationship Formal or informal, often within a similar field Spiritual or religious connection Goals Career advancement, skill acquisition Spiritual enlightenment, adherence to beliefs QUESTIONS: W HICH MODEL REQUIRES MORE INVESTMENTS (EMOTIONAL/PSYCHOLOGICAL,/TECHNICAL RESOURCES INCLUDING PHYSICAL EFFORTS)? Can pastors disciple without mentoring? Is discipleship a “self-driven” enterprise or is it rooted with a “ discipler ”? Discovery

14. Source (scan to link): FOR MORE EXPLORATION: Discovery: where and when to use

15. KRA vs KPA vs KRI vs KPI : A Breakdown TOOLS Key Result Areas (KRAs), Key Performance Areas (KPAs), Key Results Indicators (KRIs), and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are often used interchangeably, but they have distinct meanings: Discovery The tools presented here are primarily governance tools

16. Term DEFINITION PURPOSE KRA Key Result Area Identifies broad areas of focus KPA Key Performance Area Provides a more granular breakdown KRI Key Result Indicator Measures progress towards KRAs and KPAs KPI Key Performance Indicator Same as KRI While management tools like performance reviews and project management techniques can also be used to assess performance, they may not capture the broader aspects of governance, such as ethical behavior, transparency, and compliance with regulations While management tools can also be used to measure performance and effectiveness , governance tools are specifically designed to assess the overall direction, accountability, and ethical behavior of an organization. KRAs and KPAs are often used in governance frameworks to define the strategic direction and priorities of an organization. KRIs are used to measure progress towards achieving these goals and ensure accountability.

17. sample application of tool to a church context KRA (Key Result Areas) represent the broad goals or objectives of the religious institution. KPA (Key Performance Areas) are more specific areas Within the KRAs that need to be addressed. KRI (Key Results Indicators) are quantifiable metrics that measure progress towards achieving the KPAs and KRAs. Spiritual Growth and Development Member engagement and participation Attendance rate at religious services Growth in spiritual knowledge Completion rate of spiritual growth programs   Community Engagement and Outreach Service to others and social justice initiatives Number of volunteer hours per member Participation in community outreach programs Percentage of members involved in outreach activities   Financial Sustainability Fundraising and donations Total donations received per member Endowment funds Growth rate of endowment funds   Adherence to Religious Doctrine and Practices Observance of religious rituals and traditions Adherence rate to religious laws and regulations Ethical leadership and governance Positive feedback from members on leadership ethics   Ethical Leadership and Governance Transparency and accountability Number of complaints or grievances received Effective leadership and decision-making Satisfaction rate among members with leadership This provides a clear and measurable way to track progress toward the overall goal of spiritual growth. Discovery: Under the KRA of " Spiritual Growth and Development ," the KPA of " Member engagement and participation " is measured by the KRI of " Attendance rate at religious services ."

18. KRA KPA Quantitative KRI Qualitative KRI Discipleship Spiritual Growth Attendance rate at religious services Depth of understanding of biblical principles Biblical Knowledge Completion rate of Bible studies Quality of spiritual reflections and insights Community Engagement Number of volunteer hours per disciple Positive feedback from community members Personal Holiness Adherence to ethical standards and values Demonstrated commitment to prayer and meditation Leadership Development Participation in leadership training programs Ability to effectively lead and mentor others Program Effectiveness Retention rate Testimonials from participants Program Effectiveness Completion rate Feedback surveys Spiritual Depth N/A Personal interviews, reflective essays, group discussions Discipleship is a term often used in religious contexts to describe the process of following and learning from a spiritual leader or teacher. Measuring the effectiveness of a discipleship prog ram can be challenging due to its inherently personal and spiritual nature. However, both quantitative and qualitative Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) can provide valuable insights.

19. UY BAGO YAN ETO MAGAGAMIT KO ETO MEJO KAILANGAN PA DAGDAG KAALAMAN ASSESSMENT FILL OUT THE “LEARNING BOARD” AND SHARE TO GROUP

20. Quantitative KPIs of DISCIPLESHIP: Retention Rate: This KPI measures the percentage of individuals who remain active and engaged in the discipleship program over a specified period. A high retention rate indicates sustained interest and commitment. Completion Rate: This metric tracks the percentage of individuals who successfully complete the entire discipleship program. It can help assess the program’s design and its ability to guide participants through to the end. Growth in Spiritual Knowledge: This involves assessing the increase in participants' understanding of spiritual concepts and teachings, often measured through quizzes, tests, or self-assessment surveys. Growth in Spiritual Practice: This measures the increase in participants' engagement in spiritual practices such as prayer, meditation, or service. Tracking attendance at religious services or participation in community service projects can provide data for this KPI. Growth in Community Involvement: This KPI focuses on the increase in participants' involvement in the religious community or congregation, which can be measured by attendance records, volunteer hours, or participation in community events. Qualitative KPIs: Testimonies: Collecting testimonials from participants can provide personal insights into their spiritual growth and transformation. These stories can highlight the program's impact on individual lives. Feedback Surveys: Regular feedback from participants regarding their satisfaction with the discipleship program can help identify areas of strength and opportunities for improvement. Surveys can include questions about the program’s content, structure, and overall effectiveness. Observations: Direct observations of participants' behavior and attitudes by program leaders or mentors can offer qualitative data on their spiritual growth. Changes in behavior, increased empathy, and a greater sense of purpose are indicators of progress. Spiritual Depth: Assessing the depth and quality of participants' spiritual understanding and experiences can be more subjective. This might involve personal interviews, reflective essays, or group discussions aimed at exploring participants' spiritual journeys. Selecting the appropriate KPIs depends on the goals and objectives of the discipleship program. It’s crucial to choose metrics that are relevant, measurable, and aligned with the overall mission. Combining both quantitative and qualitative data can provide a comprehensive picture of the program’s effectiveness and areas for enhancement. Discipleship can be considered both a KRA and a KPA, depending on the context. As a KRA: Discipleship can be the overarching goal or objective of a religious organization, serving as the primary focus of its activities. As a KPA: Discipleship can be a specific area within a broader KRA, such as "Spiritual Growth and Development." In many cases, discipleship is a fundamental aspect of a religious organization's mission, making it a core KRA. However, within the context of discipleship, specific areas like spiritual growth, biblical knowledge, and community engagement can be considered KPAs. Ultimately, the decision of whether to categorize discipleship as a KRA or a KPA depends on the specific goals and structure of the organization.