Mandibular fracture- diagnosis

sourabhchakraborty86 640 views 78 slides Jun 10, 2021
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 78
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78

About This Presentation

Mandibular fracture


Slide Content

MANDIBULAR FRACTURES

Classification

DIAGNOSIS Patient History Clinical Examination Radiographic examination

Patient History Type of trauma- Magnitude and direction of the force Change in occlusion Paresthesia or anesthesia of the lip and chin.

Clinical Examination – Extra oral Indirect signs Swelling Ecchymosis Erythema Abrasion Laceration Facial deformity Paraesthesia or anaesthesia on one or both side of mandible – inferior alveolar nerve injury Step deformity, crepitus, bone tenderness Inablity to occlude teeth

Clinical Examination – Intra oral Coleman’s sign: lingual haemotoma Buccal and lingual sulci – echymosis Step defect in occlusion or alveolus– laceration of overlying mucos and gingival tear. Change of occlusion Mobility Pain, tenderness or limitation in movement

Area specific clinical features Fracture at angle Step deformity at last molar tooth Premature dental contact – inablity to close mouth – anterior open bite Unilateral – bilateral angle fracture Ipsilateral – unilateral angle fracture Trismus Retrognathic occlusion and flattened appearance on both surface

Fracture of Body Slight displacement – derangement of occlusion Flattened appearance on lateral side Impingement of airways – mylohyoid, digastric or omohyoid pull the fragments posteriorly

Fracture of symphysis and parasymphysis Missed – when occlusion is not disturbed Only lingual haematoma (Coleman sign) and bone tenderness is the sign Posterior openbite Posterior crossbite – midline symphysis fracture Retruded chin Severe concussion, loss of tongue control and obstruction of airway

Radiographic examination Periapical view Non-displaced linear fracture of body Alveolar process Dental trauma Occlusal view Medial and lateral position of body fracture Anterior posterior displacement of symphysis

Panoramic radiographs Most informative Advantages Visualize entire mandible Low dose of radiation Patient education is easy Short time(3-4 min) and can be taken closed mouth. Disadvantages Patient to be upright – impractical for severely traumatized patient Difficult to appreciate: Buccolingual bone displacement or medial condylar displacement Final details are lacking

Reverse Towne’s radiograph Ideal for showing lateral or medial condylar displacement Lateral oblique view Fracture of ramus Angle and posterior body

Posterior-anterior view Medial or lateral displacement of fracture of ramus, angle, condyle, body and symphysis. Midline or symphyseal fracture well visualised

CT scan 3D reconstruction helps understanding degree of displacement as well as reveal fractures not evident in OPG.

CBCT or medical CT scans Lesser radiation exposure Better imaging quality Higher sensitivity in identification of fractures Decreased interpretation error Possible in the non ambulatory patient

Radiographic Evaluation Ideally need 2 radiographic views of the fracture that are oriented 90’ from one another to properly work up fractures Panoramic and Towne’s CT axial and coronal cuts Single view can lead to misdiagnosis and complications with treatment.

TREATMENT PLANNING

Sequence of Fracture Repair In 50% patients - more than 1 mandibular fracture. Least displaced mandibular fracture is treated first. The reduction of a tooth-bearing fragment performed first enhance the accuracy of reduction decrease the length of surgery facilitate restoration of the preinjury occlusion result in fewer complications.

Treatment objectives Obtain stable occlusion. Establish a full range of mandibular excursive movements. Minimize deviation of the mandible. Produce a pain-free articular apparatus at rest and during function. Avoid internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint Avoid the long-term complication of growth disturbance

TREATMENT OPTIONS closed Reduction

Closed reduction: indications Favourable fracture Grossly comminuted fracture Severely atrophic mandible Lack of soft tissue overlying fracture site Children – developing dentition Infected fracture Condylar fracture: non displaced

Intermaxillary mandibular fixation Indications Favourable fractures. Healthy dentition with sufficient teeth to obtain a stable occlusion Comminuted fractures with multiple small bone fragments that could become displaced with periodontal stripping Patient is compliant and is amenable to immobilization of the jaw for 2 to 6 weeks

Erich arch bars using circum-dental wires. Occlusion Interarch wires or elastics

Advantages Ease of application Low cost Minimize the distraction of bone at the healing site Maintain intact periosteum over bone Restore normal occlusion Disadvantages: Increase surgical time Require a second procedure to remove the arch bars Only semirigid fixation Risk to surgeon from penetration injuries caused by circumdental and IMF wires Promote poor oral hygiene Pain from loose circumdental wires Delayed healing due to loose IMF wires

IMF Self-tapping screws Placed in sound bone in the anterior and posterior vestibular regions Provide a bone anchor for elastics or wires for IMF when establishing and/or maintaining the patient’s occlusion

Indications: Pediatric patients with developing tooth buds and lack of dental anchorage. Circum-mandibular wires placed proximal and distal to the fracture and, and then secured to the maxillary skeletal fixation with connector wires. 4 to 6- weeks of stabilization. Minimally displaced mandibular fractures in the tooth-bearing area

Advantages Ease of application Decrease in surgical time Low risk of inadvertent skin puncture Stable anchorage promoting realignment of the occlusion Do not loosen with time Promote better oral hygiene Suitable when dentition has been heavily restored with crown and bridge restorations Easy to remove Disadvantages: Risk of tooth-root damage Cannot be used to splint dental alveolar fractures or stabilize loose teeth Maxilla needs to be intact Soft-tissue burying of screw heads in the anterior vestibule Require sound bone stock clear of tooth roots Orthodontic movement of teeth or cracking of enamel where it crosses the incisal tip

Contraindications to IMF include: Noncompliant patient Alcoholic patient Seizure disorders Severe pulmonary dysfunction Intellectual disability Psychosis Poor nutrition Pregnancy Patient with multiple system injuries

External fixation Rarely used. Nonhealing infected body fracture that requires stabilization. Temporary stabilization before definitive fixation

Treatment options Open reduction

Open reduction: Indication Complex facial fracture Unfavourable fracture: symphysis, body or angle Displaced bilateral condylar fracture Delayed presentation Malunited mandibular fractures Edentulous mandibular or maxilla Medically compromised patient – severe seizure disorder, psychiatric or neurologic problem

Open reduction Controlled reduction R igid fixation. No maxillomandibular fixation, and allows return to early function

Approaches for Open reduction Sypmhysis and parasymphysis : intra-oral vestibular approach

Stepwise incision through the mucosa first, followed by the incision through the muscles and the periosteum. Two-layer wound closure for muscle and mucosa .

Intra-oral- transbuccal incision For body and angle fracture of mandible. Medial to buccal fat pad and lateral to temporalis muscle.

Extra-oral submandibular – Risdon incision For body and angle fracture of mandible. Also known as Transcervical access of the submandibular standard approach.

Sharp dissection stepwise through skin, platysma, and superficial cervical fascia. Ligation of the facial vein and/or artery. The bone surface is reached in a layer underneath the superior cervical fascia.

Internal fixation Healing time is directly related to the size of the gap between bone and interfragment motion. Two goals of rigid internal fixation are to stabilize bone fragments to minimize movement To have smallest gap possible between fracture margins

Miniplates along the lines of osteosynthesis

For a body fracture, Champy’s technique places a single plate in the zone of tension. In symphysis 2 plates are used, separated by 4 to 5 mm, to neutralize the moments of torsion. Bend the plates so they lie passively on bone before monocortical screws. When there is lack of bony contact following fracture reduction because of bone loss or there is significant comminution- rigid plates along inferior border of mandible using bicortical screws.

If the plate is not passively adapted to the underlying bone the engaging of the screw will create pressure that displaces the fracture, resulting in a poor reduction and malocclusion. the bone underlying the plate can resorb and the fixation can become loose before adequate fracture healing. Locking plates and screws

Lag screws Body fracture in a sagittal plane with splitting of the buccal and lingual cortices, 2 or 3 lag screws Counteract moments of torsion in the symphysis

Transosseous wiring Several weeks of postoperative inter- maxillary fixation Higher incidence of post treatment infection.

MANAGEMENT OF FRACTURES OF THE EDENTULOUS MANDIBLE Less than 1% to 5% of all mandibular fractures. Greatest alveolar bone resorption - body. Most common site of fracture

Treatment of choice Clinician’s prior experience

Closed reduction options Isolated mandibular fixation using the patient’s complete lower denture with circum- mandibular wires to stabilize the fracture Customized gunning splints External pin fixation

Complications

Hemorrhage Soft tissue damage Floor of mouth and neck spaces

Facial nerve injury Palsy/ paralysis

Infection Fractures involving tooth-bearing Preoperative and perioperative Incidence of infection in patients with compound fractures mandible - 50%. Tobacco and alcohol use are risk factors.

Avascular necrosis, osteitis, osteomyelitis Periosteal and medullary blood supply

Temporomandibular joint ankylosis Stiffness, pain, limitation in movement Aseptic necrosis of articular surfaces. Bony proliferation and scarring Fibro-osseus ankylosis Management: Replacement of condylar head with costal chondral graft/ alloplastic TM joint replacement

Nonunion of the Mandible Incidence 2%–32%. Most common site- body. Predisposing factors Multiple fracture sites Delayed treatment Inadequate reduction Inadequate fixation Noncompliance of the patient (premature release of IMF, poor oral hygiene) Alcohol or drug abuse (poor nutrition) Systemic disease (diabetes) Misdiagnosis

Treatment of non union: Stabilization of the mandible with either internal or external rigid fixation, with a bone graft if a bony defect has developed.

Neurosensory changes Prevalence of postinjury/pretreatment inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury- 5.7% to 58.5%. The prevalence of IAN neurosensory deficit after fracture treatment- 0.4% to 91.3% Risk factors for worsening A fracture displaced 5 mm or greater – 6x A normal preoperative neurosensory score – 25x Open reduction/internal fixation – 40x
Tags