Marker free transgenic strategy

6,455 views 31 slides May 19, 2019
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 31
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31

About This Presentation

marker free transgenic strategy


Slide Content

Presentation
on
Marker free transgenic
development strategies
Presented by
Biswajit Sahoo
Ph.D. 1
st
year

TRANSGENIC PLANT
Plants that have been genetically engineered,
an approach that uses recombinant DNA techniques
to create plants with new characteristics.

Also known as Genetically Modified Organism (GMO).

Plant developed after successful gene transfer

Have stably integrated foreign gene

MARKER GENES
 Monitoring and detection of plant transformation systems in
order to know DNA successfully transferred in recipient cells
or not.
 A set of genes introduced along with the target gene into the
plasmid.
Known as Marker genes.
Antibiotic and herbicide resistance genes successfully used as
marker genes.
Allow the transformed cell to tolerate the antibiotic or
herbicide and regenerate into plants while the untransformed
ones get killed.

Need for Marker Free Trans-genics
 Marker genes generally have little agronomic
value after selection events.
 Retention of the marker gene in the genome
may be problematic.
In situations requiring more transformations
into cultivars the presence of a particular
marker gene in a transgenic plant - use of the
same marker in subsequent transformation.
Use of a different marker system is required
for each transformation round or event.
For public acceptance of trans-genics, keeping
in mind ecological and food safety.
Marker free trans-genics should be developed.

MARKER FREE TRANSGENIC
The generation of transgenic plants
by the elimination of the
“problematic” selectable marker
genes from the genome of the
transgenic plants or avoiding the use
of selectable marker genes in the
beginning of transformation by a
marker-free vector.

Controversy and disadvantages
related to SMG
1. Food safety , effect on natural ecosystem.
2. Gene flow into non-GM crops, human and animal
bacteria, wild and weedy relatives.
3. Inability for gene stacking in already transformed
plant with same SMG.

OUR AIM
To eliminate selectable marker gene.
To avoid use of toxic selectable marker
gene.

(a)Physical diagram of two T-DNA region showing gene of interest (GOI) and marker gene.
(b) Transformed calli having GOI and marker gene.
(c) T0 plant having GOI and marker gene.
(d) Two T1 plants one with GOI and another with marker gene.

MAT SYSTEM
A positive selection system
Unique as it uses morphological changes caused by
oncogene [ipt gene] or rhizogene (the rol gene) of A.
Tumefaciens which control the endogenous levels of plant
hormones and the cell responses to PGR as the selection
marker.
A chosen GOI is placed adjacent to a multigenic element
flanked by RS recombination sites. A copy of the selectable
ipt gene from A.tumefaciens is inserted between these sites.

Together with the R recombinase gene , entire
assembly is situated within a T-DNA element for the
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.
Neither antibiotic- nor herbicide-resistance genes
are necessary as a selection marker. In addition, it
allows for repeated transformation of genes of
interest in a plant (Sugita et al. 2000).
 Principle of MAT uses oncogene (ipt) for selection of
transgenic plants and a SSR system.

SITE SPECIFIC RECOMBINATION (SSR)
SYSTEM
In this approach, SMG is flanked with direct repeats of
recognition sites for a site specific recombinase, which allows
the enzyme to excise the marker gene from the plant genome
by enzyme mediated site specific recombination.
A common feature of the system is that after a first round of
transformation, transgenic plants are produced that contain
the respective recombinase and the sequence to be
eliminated between two directly oriented recognition sites.
After expression of the single chain recombinase, the
recombination reaction is initiated resulting in transgenic
plants devoid of the selectable marker.

Site‐specific recombination‐mediated
marker deletion

(a) The T-DNA region showing Cre gene followed by the transcribed mRNA and Cre protein
expression. (b) T-DNA region showing GOI and marker gene merged between loxP sites. (c)
Resulting transgenic plants showing excision of marker gene.
Narendra Tuteja et al., 2012

Transposon‐based marker methods
The maize Ac/Ds transposable element system has been used
to create novel T-DNA vectors for separating genes that are
linked together on the same T-DNA after insertion into
plants.
 Once integrated into the plant genome, the expression of
the Ac transposase within the T-DNA can induce the
transposition of the GOI from the T-DNA to another
chromosomal location.
 This results in the separation of the gene of interest from
the T-DNA and SMG.

Transposon‐based marker methods

Conclusion and future prospects

The removal of marker gene from the transgenic plants supports
multiple transformation cycles for transgene pyramiding.
It is clear that several viable methods for the removal of unwanted
marker genes already exist.
 It seems highly likely that continued work in this area will soon
remove the question of publicly unacceptable marker genes.
At present there is no commercialization of markerfree transgenic
crop.
But development of marker free transgenics would further increase
the crop improvement programme.

Thank you…………..
For your attention………….
Tags