MBA Case Study Presentation Organization Theory & Decision - Parth Gajjar

photography0902 258 views 23 slides May 01, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 23
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23

About This Presentation

This document delves into the realm of organizational decision-making through a specific lens: the Nifty Fifty. This group of prominent Indian companies during the 1990s stock market boom serves as a springboard for examining how businesses navigate critical choices.

The research focuses on two key...


Slide Content

Anurag Sinha : 2023008 Darsh Patel : 2023016 Haily Shah : 2023024 Harsh Dave : 2023025 Kanish Vaghela : 2023032 Manishkumar Dohre : 2023040 Submitted By : Group – 8 | Section - A Parth Gajjar : 2023048 Ronakdeep Bhatia : 2023056 Smitkumar Parmar : 2023064 Vedant Kansara : 2023072 Organizational Theory and Design ( OB-503) NIFTY-FIFTY COMPANIES & CASE STUDIES Submitted To : Prof. Shubhasheesh Bhattacharya

List of Companies Nifty Fifty Companies : Hero Moto Cop Reliance Industrial Limited Case Studies explaining Organizational Decision Making Nokia Flipkart - Myntra JSAW REPL

Hero MotoCorp Ltd. Type : Public Industry : Automotive Founded On : 19 January 1984 (34 yrs ) Headquarters : New Delhi, India Products : Motorcycles & Scooters. Employee Size : 10,000+ (2021) Vision : “ Be the future of mobility ” Mission : Create | Collaborate | Inspire

Hero’s Organizational Structure : Current Board of Directors (BODs) B.S Dhanoa Camillie Tang Jagmohan Singh Raju Pradeep Dinodia Rajnish Kumar Suman Kant Munjal Tinal Trikha Current COs & Leaders of Organization Arun Jaura : CTO Mike Clarke : COO & CHRO Niranjan Gupta : CEO & CFO Ranjivjit Singh : CGO Pawan Munjal : Chairman Sanjay Bhan : Head of Global Business B.O.D President / Vice President Different COs & GM Various Functional Managers Different Org. Departments

Enormous Brand Equity Dominant Brand Image Terrific Distribution Vast Variety Sponsorship Poor Gender Diversification Customer Dissatisfaction Declining Assistance Development in AI Preferences of Customers Changing Technology  Strong Competition  Public Transportation Bargain Power of Buyers

Reliance Industry Limited Mission : To create a better future for India, by providing affordable and high-quality products and services to millions of people. Vision : To be the most admired company in India also globally, and one of the most respected companies in the world. Group : Reliance Group Founder : Sh Dhirubhai Ambani Founded On : 1958, Maharashtra Headquarters : RCP, Mumbai Products : Crude Oil, Natural Gas, Petrochemical, Petroleum, Polyester, Textiles, Retails, Telecom

History of RIL 1958-80 : Reliance Commercial Corporation - spices and polyester yarn (Vimal) and offered IPO, Opening up of Reliance Textile Limited in Maharashtra 1981-2000 : RG Changed to RIL, Opened HMD and turned to the overseas capital markets and started selling petroleum product in B2B & B2C markets, Commissioned mega refinery complex at JMD (Milestone) 2001 Onwards : Reliance Petroleum was merged with reliance industry limited and become largest company in terms of financial parameter. RIL purchased majority stake in IPCL Reliance Retails Reliance JIO Reliance BP Reliance Capital

Organogram of RIL Reliance’s multi-divisional structure: Oil and gas Petrochemicals Retail Technology Telecommunications Refining and marketing

How Big is Reliance Industry Limited Total Assets : 17,13,506 Cr (US $210 Billion) Total Equity : 8,21,153 Cr (US $100 Billion) Number Of Employee : 3,42,982 Tax Paid : 20,713 Cr Business – B2B and B2C

Case Study – 1 : NOKIA Nokia Corp (Nokia) is a communications and information technology company.  Between 1996 - 2001, Nokia’s turnover increased fivefold, from €6.5 billion to €31 billion.  Nokia was operating almost in 140 countries with more than 55000 employees. It was the golden time of Nokia.  When Steve Jobs launched the first iPhone in 2007, the whole equation of mobile phones changed.  Google was able to identify that and created Android. Unfortunately, Nokia was ignorant and was too confident about its hardware. 

In 2010 Nokia launched the “iPhone killer” but failed to match the competition. The quality of Nokia's high-end phones continues to decline. In just six years, the market value of Nokia declined by about 90%. Nokia's decline accelerates by 2011 and was acquired by Microsoft in 2013.  Microsoft-Nokia merging didn’t turn out to be a fruitful decision for Nokia. The company consistently failed to upgrade its operating system to a suitable standard. Finally, the company shut down completely.

Comeback 2017 & 2023 Reigniting and fulfilling feature phone demand Smartphones The rapid expansion of retail presence Nokia is not only for “Old Generation

CASE STUDY – 2 : FLIPKART & MYNTRA Flipkart is an e-Commerce company founded in the year 2007, by Mr. Sachin Bansal and Binny Bansal. Flipkart focused only on books, and soon as it expanded, it started offering other products like electronic goods. Cash on delivery creates trust in the mind of Indian customers who are always feared of making payments online.

The merger happened in 2014 & with this allowed Flipkart to venture into the fashion space. 9000+ pin codes that cover more than 100 cities. Myntra lost money : A controversial App-only decision, and excessive focus on private-label brands. Myntra revenue rises 45% to Rs 3,501 crore , losses widen 40% (2022). Flipkart grew from a hierarchically flat start-up to a Matrix structure. Myntra was very successful in the fashion industry and due to its competitive edge over Amazon. The acquisition of Myntra made Flipkart a leader in the fashion industry.

Organizational Structure :

CASE STUDY – 3 : JINDAL SAW LTD GROUP

JSW has been in business with Jindal Saw Ltd. (JSAW) for a very long time. Currently, JSAW has put JSW in a fix, as they want raw materials urgently. Kumar, the senior customer relationship manager, has 2 options for mode of transportation to choose from: rakes (rail route), which is faster but expensive, and barges (sea route) which is slower but cheaper, almost 22% lesser cost than rakes. The cost is not a priority for Kumar, he is more interested in maintaining the relationship with JSAW by providing them with the goods in order to keep the production running. The availability of rakes cannot be confirmed until the next day, i.e. 24 hours , while the availability of barges can be confirmed quickly, the barges are an entirely new avenue for JSW, while they are comfortable and competent with rakes as their medium of transportation.

Also, the port is nearer to the JSAW's manufacturing unit than the railway station, which would decrease the time of transportation marginally. According to our consensus, JSW should confirm the availability of barges, and send the raw materials immediately.  On the other hand, if they don't get the availability of barges, they have no other option than to wait for the confirmation on rakes. Reason being barged would be giving confirmation immediately, hence quick decisions can be taken regarding mode of transportation. And all the needful can be done regarding the supply. Talking about the relationship between both companies, even though JSW fail s to supply the goods in due time it won’t affect the relationship between both companies. Assuming the JSAW company would be competent enough to understand the situation and support JSW for the same.

CASE STUDY – 4 : RAJWANT ENGINEERING LTD.

THE Ethical Dilemma…… Rajwant Engg Ltd (REPL), a small-scale company owned by H.S. Sokhi , was in business with ClientCo , for around 2 decades. ClientCo's new procurement manager, R.K. Gupta, met with Sokhi and asked him to either give huge discounts to ClientCo or give him a bribe so that the association can continue. This is where REPL faces an ethical dilemma, if they give in to Gupta's demands, they would face dire financial crises, leading to employee layoffs and retrenchment. Or else they would have to face legal actions if the contract is not honored.

Business runs on ethics and goodwill, the image of the company depends on how the company has its relations with its customer. REPL should give discounts to ClientCo , this would solve the situation in both ways, breach of contract won’t happen and even they would survive the current market situation, eliminating the option of dissolving of the firm. Alongside they should start looking for new customers so that they can shift to the new customers and sever ties with ClientCo . This will help them distribute their overall business into smaller percentages. This would eventually reduce the risk of facing such problems in the future for the company. Our Solution

Thank you