Misconception of Edgar Dale's Cone of Experiences

About the Misinterpretation of the Cone of Experience

1. For the Record:
The Misinterpretation of
Edgar Dale’s
Cone of Experience
Tony Betrus
Al Januszewski
SUNY Potsdam

2. The Authentic
Cone
•1946, 1st Edition of
Audiovisual Methods in
Teaching
•1954, 2nd Edition of
Audiovisual Methods in
Teaching
•1969, 3rd Edition of
Audiovisual Methods in
Teaching

3. Possible Misconceptions about the Cone
1
Perhaps the Cone of Experience has already helped
to remind you of some important ideas about
communication, learning, and concept development.
But like all reminders, the Cone carries the dangers of
oversimplification... [do] not mistake the Cone device
for an exact rank-order of learning processes. You will
understand that the Cone classifies instructional
messages only in terms of greater or lesser
concreteness and abstractness.
1
From Dale, 1969, p. 128

4. Possible Misconceptions about the Cone
2
QDoes the Cone device mean that all teaching and
learning must move systematically from base to
pinnacle?
AEmphatically no. As we have noted, young children
use many simple abstractions-verbal symbols. Before
entering school they have mastered the meanings of
at least 2500 words, or verbal symbols, each one of
which is an abstraction. The fact that something is an
abstraction does not necessarily make it difficult to
understand. Actually, there are wide variations in
degree of difficulty.
2
From Dale, 1969, p. 128

5. Possible Misconceptions about the Cone
3
QCan we overemphasize the amount of direct
experience that is required to learn a new concept?
AYes, this is a danger. Perhaps the new abstraction
can be mastered with less firsthand experience than
you might think necessary. Indeed, too much reliance
on concrete experience may actually obstruct the
process of meaningful generalization. Certainly a
mathematician could not develop a system of higher
mathematics by counting on his fingers.
3
From Dale, 1969, p. 130

6. Possible Misconceptions about the Cone
4
QAre the upper levels of the Cone for the older student
and the lower ones for the child?
AIt is true that the older a person is, the more abstract
his concepts are likely to be. We can explain this
developmental change by a greater physical
maturation, greater opportunity for vivid experiences,
and (in certain circumstances) greater motivation for
learning. But an older student does not live
exclusively in the world of his abstract concepts, just
as a child does not live only through the impressions
his senses give him. The shuttling process, in fact,
continues not only through the learning of a particular
concept, but throughout all life. And this interaction is
an indication of the nature and complexity of concepts
themselves. (continued on next slide)
4
From Dale, 1969, p. 130

7. Possible Misconceptions about the Cone
5
5
From Dale, 1969, p. 132
QAre the upper levels of the Cone for the older student
and the lower ones for the child?
A (Continued from previous slide)Instructional materials
at all levels of the Cone can help us to extend the web
of relationships that our concepts involve. Even the
most advanced student, therefore, can deepen his
understanding of concepts and his enjoyment of life by
participating in experiences all along our Cone. … the
Cone of Experience stands for activities that are
available, in varying degrees, to learners in all age
groups.

8. Possible Misconceptions about the Cone
6
6
From Dale, 1969, p. 132
QDoes the Cone of Experience overemphasize instructional
devices (the media of communication) at the expense of subject
matter (the message to be communicated)?
AActually, use of the Cone may lead to an enhancement of our
subject matter presentations. Indeed, the Cone may help us to
choose the instructional materials that are most appropriate for
the particular topic we wish to teach. The Cone can help us to
understand these relationships between media and the
messages they convey. It suggests, in fact, that various
instructional materials differ in the degree of sensory
experience they are able to provide. Our selection of
instructional materials, therefore, will depend on the amount of
sensory experience we wish to provide for a particular topic of
our lesson. And the Cone can help us "place" a teaching
method; it can help us select the way of communicating most
suited to the experience we wish to convey.

9. Possible Misconceptions about the Cone
7
Conclusions
7
From Dale, 1969, p. 133
Our understanding of the Cone of Experience, moreover, will
remind us of a fundamental principle for our teaching: We do
not use any one medium of communication in isolation. Rather,
we use many instructional materials to help the student
conceptualize his experience so that he can deal with it
effectively. The Cone suggests that concept development can
proceed from experiences with any specific instructional
material. It often follows, then, that the more numerous and
varied the media we employ, the richer and more secure will be
the concepts we develop. Well-chosen instructional materials
of various kinds can provide a variety of experiences that
enhance the learning of a given subject for any student at any
given point in his continuing development.

10. Possible Misconceptions about the Cone
8
Conclusions
8
From Dale, 1969, p. 134
We conclude, then, that the Cone of Experience is
visual model, a pictorial device that may help you to
think critically about the ways in which concepts are
developed. Indeed, you may now be able to apply
your ideas about the relationships of interesting,
meaningful experiences and abstract, highly symbolic
representations.

11. So What’s The Problem?
•Students brought to our classes handouts of
“alternative” Cones of Learning with different
names for levels in the Cone.
•Internet Searches revealed “Interesting”
percentages applied to the Cone.
•They all looked “kind of the same.”
•Did they know something we (and Dale) didn’t???
•The following slides show examples of various
Cones we have encountered:

12. #1. Computer Strategies, LLC
http://www.compstrategies.com/staffdevelopment/4cueadlearn/sld002.htm
10/25/1999
San Leandro, California
Reference: Wiman and Meirhenry, 1960.

13. #2. http://www.hishelpinschool.com/learning/Bloom.html
•At the next level, we find that we are reaching the
place where activity and application make our use of
information "real" to us. Bruce Nyland in the 1950’s
studied what kinds of information people remember
the most and for the longest period of time. He
concluded that when students "do the real thing,"
"simulate" the real thing, or teach others what they
have learned, the retention rate is about 90% of what
was taught.
•Note: Bruce Nyland died in 1998 at the age of 62. He
was 14 years old in 1950 and 23 in 1959.

14. •#3. Crystal Kuykendall,
Ed.D, J.D.
•The Mid-Atlantic Equity Center, School of
Education, The American University
•Improving Black
Student Achievement
By Enhancing
Student's Self Image
•http://www.nwrel.org/cnors
e/booklets/achieve/table6.h
tml

15. #4. Office for Distributed & Distance Learning, FSU
http://www.fsu.edu/~ids/fac2002/Edgar%20Dale.htm
•Lower levels of the cone involve the student as a participant and encourage active learning.
•Lower levels include more stimuli and are richer with regard to natural feedback -the consequences of an action.
•Higher levels compress information and provide more data faster for those able to process it.
•Pictures are remembered (recalled) better than verbal propositions.
•Pictures aid in recalling information that has been associated with them
•Upper levels of the cone need more instructional support than lower levels.

16. #5 Wallace Library Online / Distance Learning Services,
RITMarianne Bhueler 2000
http://wally.rit.edu/information/CUNY2000/sld008.htm
No Reference Given

17. #6. Oakland Unified School District Technology
Learning Center
http://tlc.ousd.k12.ca.us/tlc/sitetech/agendas/documents_81202/Dale's%20Cone.pdf

18. #7. Pal V. Rao, Ph.D., CDP
Dean of Library Services
Central Missouri State University
Presented at AECT99
Presentation Title: “How Can Media Managers Influence
Faculty to Use More IT?“
http://library.cmsu.edu/dean/aect99/sld006.htm

19. #8. Dr. Mary C. Rainey, University of Akron
Course: 603 Family: Middle and Later Years
http://gozips.uakron.edu/~mrainey/603les~1.htm
DALE'S CONE OF EXPERIENCE
People Generally Remember ?**
10% of what they read. Read Verbal Receiving
20% of what they hear. Hear Words
30% of what they see. Watch still picture
Watch moving picture Visual
Watch exhibit Receiving
50% of what they
hear and see. Watch demonstration
70% of what Do a site visit.
they say or Do a dramatic presentation. Hearing,
write. Saying,
Seeing &
90% of what Simulate a real experience. Doing
they say Do the real thing.
as they
do a
thing.
?** ?**
Wiman and Meirhenry. (1969) contains reference to Edgar Dales's "Cone of Experience."
**Question marks refer to the unknown.

20. •http://ohioline.osu.edu/4h-fact/0018.html
•The Edgar Dale Cone of Experience summarizes how
learners retain information. A person remembers 10% of
what they read, 20% of what they heard, 30% of what they
seen and 50% of what is seen and heard.
•This is the first only “cone” reference when searching the
OSU site for “Edgar Dale.”
•Ohio State is the Home of the Edgar Dale Media Center.
#9.

21. Studies have shown that how information is presenteddetermines the
retention level of the information. The Cone of Learning Theory, explains the
likelihood of retaining information, based on the method of delivery.
When simply spoken to in a presentation we retain 30% of what is said. If
this information is also presented in a visual format, our retention level of this
information increases to 50%. When we also actively receive and participate
in the presentation, retention increases to 70%. Finally, retention is
maximized to 90% when we practice what we've learned.
Source: Dale and Nyland, 1985.
#10. Why Choose Talk Tools? It Works
http://www.talktools.com/whychoose/works.html

22. #11. Online, Inc., a Division of Information
Today Inc. Wilton, Connecticut
•http://www.econtentmag.net/r19/2002/delancie8_02.html
A similar endorsement is voiced by Matthew Gale, who handles strategic
product marketing for Web and interactive solutions at Discreet, the San
Francisco maker of content creation solutions for video, animation, and 3D. He
describes streaming media as "another way to communicate experiences,
knowledge, ideas, messages, and stories. This medium allows companies to
deliver compelling multimedia information across vast distances—in real time or
near real time—to implementers, influencers, and decision-makers. Companies
can richly communicate custom messages to all the key stakeholders while
improving workforce knowledge and productivity."
As evidence of streamed multimedia's efficiency, Gale cites "classic
research" published byWiman and Mierhenry in 1969. "The study found
that people remember 10% of what they read, 20% of what they hear, 30%
of what they see, and 50% of what they hear and see."

23. #12. Dr. James M. Marshall
•http://www.ciconline.org/uploads/CIC_REPORT.pdf
From pp. 15-16
Researchers posit that explanations in words and pictures, as opposed to
words or pictures, make for increased comprehension (Mayer, 2001) for
the learner. Dale’s “Cone of Experience” (1946, 1996) provides
evidence of these phenomena. Dale’s research suggested that increasing
the modalities by which content was presented could increase retention
rates. Wiman and Mierhenry (1969) extended Dale’s concept to
conclude that people will generally remember
•10 percent of what they read
•20 percent of what they hear
•30 percent of what they see
•50 percent of what they hear and see

24. #13. Why Use Active Learning?
http://www.acu.edu/cte/activelearning/whyuseal2.htm
•Brought to you by the Active Learning
Online teamat
•the ACU Adams Center for Teaching
Excellence
•ACU Box 29201 Abilene, TX 79699-9201

25. #14. The Initiative: Experiential
Learning Resources, Workshops, Ideas, Articles
•Spring/Summer 2002
•10% of what we hear.
•15% of what we see.
•20% of what we both see and hear.
•40% of what we discuss
•80% of what we experience directly or practice doing.
•90% of what we attempt to teach others
•Source: Brady (1989)

26. Let’s
Sum it
Up
•We Remember:
•5% Lecture
•10% What we read
•15% What we see
•20% Audio-Visual
•20% What we see and hear
•20% What we hear
•26% What we hear
•30% What we see
•30% Passive Verbal
•30% Demonstration
•40% What we discuss
•50% Visual Receiving
•50% See and hear
•50% Discussion Group
•70% Discuss with others
•70% Active Receiving and Participating
•70% Say
•70% Say and Write
•70% Say or Write
•70% Say as they talk
•75% Practice by Doing
•80% Experience Personally
•80% What we experience directly or practice doing
•90% Say as they do a thing
•90% Say and perform a task
•90% Teach to others/Immediate Use
•90% What we attempt to teach others
•95% of what we teach someone else
14 Sources:(and counting)
Wiman and Mierhenry, 1969
Wiman and Mierhenry, 1960
Glasser, 1990
Standard Oil of NY
Socony-Vacuum Oil Company
Dale and Nyland, 1985
Bruce Nyland, 2000
Bruce Nyland, 1950’s
Nyland/Dole, 1972
Dale Edgar
NTL Institute
James Stice, 1984 Seminar
Gustafson, 1985
Brady, 1989

27. Contact Information:
Tony Betrus [email protected]
Al Januszewski [email protected]
State University of New York at Potsdam
Department of Information and Communication Technology
Download the presentation, after November 18th, at:
http://www2.potsdam.edu/educ/betrusak/aect2002/dalescone.html