MIT-LL_Intro to radar systems_lecture 3_Propagation Effects v2.pdf

ssuserafafa7 9 views 25 slides Mar 05, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 25
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25

About This Presentation

Slides on EM propagation


Slide Content

Propagation-1
RJG 7/31/2008
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Introduction to Radar Systems
Propagation Effects

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-3
RJG 7/31/2008
Radar Block Diagram
Transmitter
Pulse
Compression
Recording
Receiver
Tracking &
Parameter
Estimation
Console /
Display
Antenna
Propagation
Medium
Propagation
Medium
Target
Cross
Section
Doppler
Processing
A / D
Waveform
Generator
Detection
Signal Processor
Main Computer
“The Soup”

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-4
RJG 7/31/2008
Radar Classes

Ground based

Sea based

Airborne
Nearly all radar systems operate through the
atmosphere and near the Earth’s surface
Nearly all radar systems operate through the
atmosphere and near the Earth’s surface
AEGIS
Patriot
AWACS
Courtesy of Raytheon. Used with permission.
Courtesy of U.S. Air Force.
Courtesy of U.S. Navy.

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-5
RJG 7/31/2008
Propagation Effects on Radar Performance

Atmospheric attenuation

Reflection off of Earth’s surface

Over-the-horizon diffraction

Atmospheric refraction
Radar beams can be attenuated, reflected and
bent by the environment
Radar beams can be attenuated, reflected and
bent by the environment

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-6
RJG 7/31/2008
What’s in the Soup?

Atmospheric parameters vary with altitude
– Air density and humidity
– Rain rate
– Fog/cloud water content
– Index of refraction

Atmospheric parameters vary with altitude
– Air density and humidity
– Rain rate
– Fog/cloud water content
– Index of refraction
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
02101-061

Earth’s surface
– Surface material (water vs land)
– Surface roughness (waves, mountains)
– Earth’s curvature

Earth’s surface
– Surface material (water vs land)
– Surface roughness (waves, mountains)
– Earth’s curvature

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-7
RJG 7/31/2008
Outline

Atmospheric attenuation

Reflection from the Earth’s surface

Over-the-horizon diffraction

Atmospheric refraction

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-8
RJG 7/31/2008
Atmospheric Attenuation at Sea Level
Radar power absorbed
by water vapor and
oxygen
Attenuation is a loss of
power characterized by L
in radar range equation
High frequencies are not well suited for long-range low-altitude surveillance
High frequencies are not well suited for long-range low-altitude surveillance
1
10
100
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
Radar Frequency (GHz)
Specific Attenuation (dB/km)
1
L
SC
X
W
Ka
Ku
10100100010000
Total 50 km 2-Way Attenuation (dB)
1/10 power left
1/10000000000 power left

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-9
RJG 7/31/2008
Attenuation in Rain and Fog
Radar performance at high frequencies is highly weather dependent
Radar performance at high frequencies is highly weather dependent
Figure by MIT OCW.

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-10
RJG 7/31/2008
Outline

Atmospheric attenuation

Reflection from the Earth’s surface

Over-the-horizon diffraction

Atmospheric refraction

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-11
RJG 7/31/2008
Interference Basics

Two waves can interfere constructively or destructively

Resulting field strength depends only on relative amplitude
and phase of the two waves

Radar voltage can range from 0-2 times single wave

Radar power is proportional to (voltage)
2
for 0-4 times the power

Interference operates both on outbound and return trips for 0-16
times the power
Destructive Interference
Constructive Interference
Wave 1 Wave2 Sum of Waves 1 + 2

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-12
RJG 7/31/2008
Propagation over a Plane Earth
Reflection from the Earth’s surface results in interference of the direct
radar signal with the signal reflected off of the surface
Surface reflection coefficient (
Γ

) determines relative signal amplitudes
Dependent on: surface material, roughness, polarization, frequency
Close to 1 for smooth ocean, close to 0 for rough land
Relative phase determined by path length difference and phase shift on
reflection
Dependent on: height, range and frequency
Radar
Direct path
Multipath
Target

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-13
RJG 7/31/2008
Multipath Alters Radar Detection Range

Multipath causes elevation coverage to be broken up into a lobed
structure

A target located at the maximum of a lobe will be detected as far as
twice the free-space detection range

At other angles the detection range will be less than free space and in a
null no echo signal will be received
Reflection
Coefficient
Γ=-1
Γ=-0.3
Γ=0
Target Range
Target Altitude
Radar Coverage

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-14
RJG 7/31/2008
Multipath is Frequency Dependent
Lobing density increases with increased radar frequency
Lobing density increases with increased radar frequency
Reflection
Coefficient
Γ=-1
Γ=-0.3
Range
Altitude
Range
Radar Coverage
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Frequency 1
2 x Frequency 1
x
x
1 lobe over
distance x :
2 lobes over
distance x :

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-15
RJG 7/31/2008
Outline

Atmospheric attenuation

Reflection from the Earth’s surface

Over-the-horizon diffraction

Atmospheric refraction

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-16
RJG 7/31/2008
Tsunami Diffracting
around Peninsula
Diffraction

Radar waves are diffracted around the curved Earth just as
ocean waves are bent by an obstacle

Web references for excellent water wave photographic
examples:
– http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b5/Water_diffraction.jpg
– http://yhspatriot.yorktown.arlington.k12.va.us/~ckaldahl/wave.gif

The ability of radar to propagate beyond the horizon depends
upon frequency and radar height
Courtesy of NOAA / PMEL / Center for Tsunami Research.
See animation at http://nctr.pm el.noaa.gov/animations/Aonae.all.mpg

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-17
RJG 7/31/2008
Propagation Over Round Earth

Interference region
– Located within line of sight radar

Diffraction region
– Below radar line of sight
– Signals are severely attenuated
Interference
Region
Tangent
Ray
Diffraction
Region
Earth
Radar

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-18
RJG 7/31/2008
Combined Diffraction and Multipath
vs Radar Frequency

Low altitude multipath detection: favors higher frequencies

Diffraction detection:

Favors lower frequencies

Is tough at any frequency
100 ft altitude
at 60 km
Geometric Horizon
X-Band
Lowest multipath lobe is plotted
100 ft altitude
60 dB L-band loss
80 dB X-band loss
L-Band

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-19
RJG 7/31/2008
Outline

Atmospheric attenuation

Reflection from the Earth’s surface

Over-the-horizon diffraction

Atmospheric refraction

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-20
RJG 7/31/2008
Refraction of Radar Beams
Radar rays bend downwards due to decreasing index of refraction of air with altitude
Same effect as refraction of light beam shining from water into air
Figure by MIT OCW.

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-21
RJG 7/31/2008
Earth’s Radius Modified to Account for
Refraction Effects
Atmospheric refraction is accounted for by replacing the actual Earth
radius a, in calculations, by an equivalent earth radius ka and
assuming straight line propagation
4/3 is a typical value for k
Average propagation is referred to as a “4/3 Earth”
Average propagation is referred to as a “4/3 Earth”
Figure by MIT OCW.

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-22
RJG 7/31/2008
Anomalous Propagation

Occurs when k not equal to 4/3

Categorized as: superrefraction, subrefraction and ducting
– Superrefraction extends the radar horizon
– Subrefraction limits the radar horizon
– Ducting traps radar energy near the Earth’s surface
4/3 Earth Radius4/3 Earth Radius
Subrefraction
Superrefraction
Ducting

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-23
RJG 7/31/2008
No Surface Duct
Surface Duct
Ducting Effects on Target Detection
Ducting extends low-altitude detection ranges but can
cause unexpected holes in radar coverage
Ducting extends low-altitude detection ranges but can cause unexpected holes in radar coverage
Target seen
Target not seen

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-24
RJG 7/31/2008
Ducted Clutter from New England
Ducting conditions can extend horizon to extreme ranges
Ducting conditions can extend horizon to extreme ranges
50 km range rings
PPI Display

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-25
RJG 7/31/2008
Radar Propagation Effects Summary
1
10
100
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
Radar Frequency (GHz)
Specific Attenuation (dB/km)
L
S
C
X
W
K
a
K
u
Atmospheric AttenuationMultipath and Diffraction
Multipath Reflection
Refraction (Ducting)
4/3 Earth Radius
Reflection
Coefficient
Γ=-1
Γ=-0.3
Γ= 0
Range
Altitude
Target seen
Target not seen
Geometric Horizon
X-Band
L-Band
60 dB L-band loss
80 dB X-band loss

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-26
RJG 7/31/2008
References

Skolnik, M., Introduction to Radar Systems, New York,
McGraw-Hill, 3
rd
Edition, 2001

Skolnik, M., Radar Handbook, New York, McGraw-Hill, 2
rd
Edition, 1990