GINGIVAL CLOSED CURETTAGE By definition a gingival curettage is the use of an
instrument (curett) against the gingival side of a
pocket in order to scrape and debridethe soft
tissue wall.
Its purpose is to remove chronically inflamed tissu e
elements and help maintain a state of periodontal
health.
Gingival curettage is for pocket reduction,
treatment of periodontal abscesses, presurgical
debridementand periodontal maintenance.
INDICATION ·Localized, mild to moderate periodontitis
·Shallow pocket depth
·When more extensive surgery is
contraindicated
·Treatment of isolated infrabonypockets
SUBGINGIVAL
CURETTAGE
BEFORE AND
FOUR WEEKS
AFTER
PROCEDURE
Advantage ·Minimum tissue loss
·Posibilityfor complete removal of infected crevicu lar
epithelium and underlying connective tissue
·Minimal discomfort to the patient
·Minimal hemorrhage
·Healing is often uneventful
Disadvantage ·Limited access can be obtained to deep or irregul ar
pockets
·Limited vision compare to flaps
MODIFIED WIDMAN FLAP Flap debridementsurgery isdefined:
as surgical debridementof the root
surface and the removal of granulation
tissue following the reflection of the soft
tissue flap.
The most commonly practiced technique is
based upon the 'modified Widmanflap'.
The original 'Widmanflap' was comprised of a
mucoperiostealflap.
The flap was elevated to expose 2-3 mm of the alveolar
bone.
The soft tissue collar incorporating the pocket epi thelium
and connective tissue was removed, the exposed root
surface scaled and the bone recontouredto re-establish
a 'physiologic' alveolar form.
The flap margins were placed at the level of the bo ny
crest to achieve optimal pocket reduction.
WIDMAN 1920 USA Widman I. The operative treatment ofpyorrhoe alveolaris . A new
surgical method. Brit Dent J 1920; 1:293.
NEUMANN 1919 GERMANY Neumann R. Die Alveolar-Pyorrhöe und ihre Behandlung.
1920. 3rd ed. Berlin: H. Meusser
The original 'Widmanflap' The main advantages of this technique as
compared to gingivectomy were claimed to be
less discomfort, since healing was by primary
intention and re-establishment of a 'physiologic'
bony contour at sites with angular bony defects.
The term modified Widmanflap
Exposure of the interproximalbone and elimination o f
infrabonydefects by osseous recontouringis not car ried
out.
When esthetic considerations are paramount,
intracrevicularincisions starting at the free gingi val margins
are used to minimize postsurgicalgingival shrinkage .
Vertical releasing incisions are usually not used
KIRKLAND 1931
Kirkland O. The suppurative periodontal pus pocket; its
treatment by the modified flap operation J Amer Dent Assoc 1 931; 18:1462-1470.
MODIFIED WIDMAN FLAP
Ramfjord SP, Nissle RR. The modified Widman flap. J
Periodontol 1974; 45:601-607.
Módosított Widman-lebeny
Ramfjordand Nissle1974-
modified Widman-flaptechnique
open curettage
aim : to remove BIOFILM , calculus and plaque retentive
subgingivalfactors
other name access flap surgery
No 11 No 12 No12 D No 15 No 15C
Sebészikkürett
INTERNAL
REVERSE
BEVELED INCISION
THE MODIFIED WIDMAN FLAP Purpose: to make access to the root surface
to obtain an intimate postoperative
adaptation of healthy collagenousconnective
tissue and normal epithelium to the root
surface.
No surgical pocket elimination and apical
displacement of the flap.
the aim of the modified Widman flap
surgery is
healing and reattachment of periodontal
pockets with minimum loss of periodontal
tissues during and after surgery
reduction of probing pocket depth by
shrinkage individually occurs.
The modified Widman flap
" open gingival curettage"
to obtain access to the root surface and an intimat e
postoperative adaptation of healthy collagenous con nective
tissue and normal epithelium to the root surface.
do not aim at surgical pocket elimination and apica l
displacement of the flap.
The modified Widman flap
to obtain access to the root surface and an intima te
postoperative adaptation of healthy collagenous con nective
tissue and normal epithelium to the root surface.
When esthetic considerations are paramount, intracr evicular
incisions starting at the free gingival margins are used to
minimize postsurgical gingival shrinkage.
Vertical releasing incisions are usually not used
Indications The MWF is indicated for the treatment of all types
of periodontitis and provides excellent result with
probing depths up to ca. 6 mm.
- Advantageous use of MWF will depend upon the
pathomorphologic situation on individual teeth and
at various periodontal sites.
- Possibility of establishing an intimate postopera tive
adaptation of healthy collagenous connective tissue
and normal epithelium.
- Minimal or no inflammation is present
Advantages
1. Root cleaning with direct vision
2. Protective of tissues, reparative
3. Healing by primary intention
4. Lack of pain or complications postoperatively
Procedure The flap surgery should not be initiated until one or
two months after completion of the hygienic phase o f
the periodontal therapy.
The
initial gingival incision
"internal reverse bevel incision" should be made with a knife
that can be directed parallel
to the long axis of the tooth.
Procedure The flap surgery should not be initiated until one or two months after completion of the hygienic phase o f the periodontal therapy.
The initial gingival incision
should be made with a knife
that can be directed parallel
to the long axis of the tooth.
VERY
CONSERVATIVE
SURGICAL
APPROACH
A
second incision
is made
around the neck of each
tooth from the bottom of
the pocket to the alveolar
crest.
Vertical gingival releasing incision usually is not
needed. A full thickness flap is elevated for only 1-2
mm from the alveolar crest as needed for access to
the root surfaces and the interproximal one.
The
third and final incision
is made with a
narrow interproximal knife. The buccal and/or
lingual flaps are deflected by a periosteal
elevator on top of the alveolar crest to dissect
free the collar of
gingival tissues, which is
been separated from the
buccal and lingual gingival
flaps and the teeth.
The separated collar of
gingival tissue is then
removed with curettes.
INTRACREVICULARIS METSZÉS
VERY
CONSERVATIVE
AND MINIMAL
INVASIVE FLAP
ELEVETION
TIGHT FLAP
ADAPTATION
Osteoplastica
osteotomia
osteotomy
baseline
Baselineradiograph
Preoperative pocket depth
Access flap surgery
EMD
applicationandsuturing
Postoperat
ive radiograph
The modified Widman flap
Exposure of the interproximal bone and elimination of
infrabony defects by osseous recontouring is not c arried out.
When esthetic considerations are paramount, intracr evicular
incisions starting at the free gingival margins are used to
minimize postsurgical gingival shrinkage.
Vertical releasing incisions are usually not used
Indications The MWF is indicated for the treatment of all types
of periodontitis and provides excellent result with
probing depths up to ca. 6 mm.
- Advantageous use of MWF will depend upon the
pathomorphologic situation on individual teeth and
at various periodontal sites.
- Possibility of establishing an intimate postopera tive
adaptation of healthy collagenous connective tissue
and normal epithelium.
- Minimal or no inflammation is present
Advantages
1. Root cleaning with direct vision
2. Protective of tissues, reparative
3. Healing by primary intention
4. Lack of pain or complications postoperatively