Modified widman flap

57,208 views 100 slides Aug 27, 2017
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 100
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83
Slide 84
84
Slide 85
85
Slide 86
86
Slide 87
87
Slide 88
88
Slide 89
89
Slide 90
90
Slide 91
91
Slide 92
92
Slide 93
93
Slide 94
94
Slide 95
95
Slide 96
96
Slide 97
97
Slide 98
98
Slide 99
99
Slide 100
100

About This Presentation

widman flap


Slide Content

MODIFIED WIDMAN
FLAP

GINGIVAL CLOSED CURETTAGE By definition a gingival curettage is the use of an
instrument (curett) against the gingival side of a
pocket in order to scrape and debridethe soft
tissue wall.
Its purpose is to remove chronically inflamed tissu e
elements and help maintain a state of periodontal
health.
Gingival curettage is for pocket reduction,
treatment of periodontal abscesses, presurgical
debridementand periodontal maintenance.

INDICATION ·Localized, mild to moderate periodontitis
·Shallow pocket depth
·When more extensive surgery is
contraindicated
·Treatment of isolated infrabonypockets

SUBGINGIVAL
CURETTAGE
BEFORE AND
FOUR WEEKS
AFTER
PROCEDURE

CONTRAINDICATION ·Advancedperiodontitis withdeeperinfrabonypockets
(treatmentrequiresexcellentvisionduringtheoperation)
·Acuteinfection(ANUG)
·Acutelession(periodontitis inpatientswithAIDS)
·Fibrousepithelialenlargement(phenytoinhyperplasia)
·Extensionofthebaseofthepocketapicaltomucogingival
junction

Advantage ·Minimum tissue loss
·Posibilityfor complete removal of infected crevicu lar
epithelium and underlying connective tissue
·Minimal discomfort to the patient
·Minimal hemorrhage
·Healing is often uneventful
Disadvantage ·Limited access can be obtained to deep or irregul ar
pockets
·Limited vision compare to flaps

MODIFIED WIDMAN FLAP Flap debridementsurgery isdefined:
as surgical debridementof the root
surface and the removal of granulation
tissue following the reflection of the soft
tissue flap.
The most commonly practiced technique is
based upon the 'modified Widmanflap'.

The original 'Widmanflap' was comprised of a
mucoperiostealflap.
The flap was elevated to expose 2-3 mm of the alveolar
bone.
The soft tissue collar incorporating the pocket epi thelium
and connective tissue was removed, the exposed root
surface scaled and the bone recontouredto re-establish
a 'physiologic' alveolar form.
The flap margins were placed at the level of the bo ny
crest to achieve optimal pocket reduction.
WIDMAN 1920 USA Widman I. The operative treatment ofpyorrhoe alveolaris . A new
surgical method. Brit Dent J 1920; 1:293.
NEUMANN 1919 GERMANY Neumann R. Die Alveolar-Pyorrhöe und ihre Behandlung.
1920. 3rd ed. Berlin: H. Meusser

The original 'Widmanflap' The main advantages of this technique as
compared to gingivectomy were claimed to be
less discomfort, since healing was by primary
intention and re-establishment of a 'physiologic'
bony contour at sites with angular bony defects.

The term modified Widmanflap
Exposure of the interproximalbone and elimination o f
infrabonydefects by osseous recontouringis not car ried
out.
When esthetic considerations are paramount,
intracrevicularincisions starting at the free gingi val margins
are used to minimize postsurgicalgingival shrinkage .
Vertical releasing incisions are usually not used
KIRKLAND 1931
Kirkland O. The suppurative periodontal pus pocket; its
treatment by the modified flap operation J Amer Dent Assoc 1 931; 18:1462-1470.
MODIFIED WIDMAN FLAP
Ramfjord SP, Nissle RR. The modified Widman flap. J
Periodontol 1974; 45:601-607.

„Módosított Widman-lebeny”
•Ramfjordand Nissle1974-
• modified Widman-flap”technique
•„open curettage”
• aim : • to remove BIOFILM , calculus and plaque retentive
subgingivalfactors
•
• other name „access flap surgery”

No 11 No 12 No12 D No 15 No 15C

• Sebészikkürett

INTERNAL
REVERSE
BEVELED INCISION

THE MODIFIED WIDMAN FLAP Purpose: •to make access to the root surface
•to obtain an intimate postoperative
adaptation of healthy collagenousconnective
tissue and normal epithelium to the root
surface.
No surgical pocket elimination and apical
displacement of the flap.

the aim of the modified Widman flap
surgery is

healing and reattachment of periodontal
pockets with minimum loss of periodontal
tissues during and after surgery
reduction of probing pocket depth by
shrinkage individually occurs.

The modified Widman flap

" open gingival curettage"
to obtain access to the root surface and an intimat e
postoperative adaptation of healthy collagenous con nective
tissue and normal epithelium to the root surface.
do not aim at surgical pocket elimination and apica l
displacement of the flap.

The modified Widman flap

to obtain access to the root surface and an intima te
postoperative adaptation of healthy collagenous con nective
tissue and normal epithelium to the root surface.
When esthetic considerations are paramount, intracr evicular
incisions starting at the free gingival margins are used to
minimize postsurgical gingival shrinkage.
Vertical releasing incisions are usually not used

Indications The MWF is indicated for the treatment of all types
of periodontitis and provides excellent result with
probing depths up to ca. 6 mm.
- Advantageous use of MWF will depend upon the
pathomorphologic situation on individual teeth and
at various periodontal sites.
- Possibility of establishing an intimate postopera tive
adaptation of healthy collagenous connective tissue
and normal epithelium.
- Minimal or no inflammation is present

Advantages
1. Root cleaning with direct vision
2. Protective of tissues, reparative
3. Healing by primary intention
4. Lack of pain or complications postoperatively

Procedure The flap surgery should not be initiated until one or
two months after completion of the hygienic phase o f
the periodontal therapy.
The
initial gingival incision
"internal reverse bevel incision" should be made with a knife
that can be directed parallel
to the long axis of the tooth.
Procedure The flap surgery should not be initiated until one or two months after completion of the hygienic phase o f the periodontal therapy.
The initial gingival incision
should be made with a knife
that can be directed parallel
to the long axis of the tooth.

VERY
CONSERVATIVE
SURGICAL
APPROACH

A
second incision
is made
around the neck of each
tooth from the bottom of
the pocket to the alveolar
crest.
Vertical gingival releasing incision usually is not
needed. A full thickness flap is elevated for only 1-2
mm from the alveolar crest as needed for access to
the root surfaces and the interproximal one.

The
third and final incision
is made with a
narrow interproximal knife. The buccal and/or
lingual flaps are deflected by a periosteal
elevator on top of the alveolar crest to dissect
free the collar of
gingival tissues, which is
been separated from the
buccal and lingual gingival
flaps and the teeth.
The separated collar of
gingival tissue is then
removed with curettes.

INTRACREVICULARIS METSZÉS

VERY
CONSERVATIVE
AND MINIMAL
INVASIVE FLAP
ELEVETION

TIGHT FLAP
ADAPTATION

Osteoplastica–
osteotomia

osteotomy

baseline

Baselineradiograph

Preoperative pocket depth

Access flap surgery

EMD 
applicationandsuturing

Postoperat
ive radiograph

The modified Widman flap


Exposure of the interproximal bone and elimination of
infrabony defects by osseous recontouring is not c arried out.

When esthetic considerations are paramount, intracr evicular
incisions starting at the free gingival margins are used to
minimize postsurgical gingival shrinkage.
Vertical releasing incisions are usually not used

Indications The MWF is indicated for the treatment of all types
of periodontitis and provides excellent result with
probing depths up to ca. 6 mm.
- Advantageous use of MWF will depend upon the
pathomorphologic situation on individual teeth and
at various periodontal sites.
- Possibility of establishing an intimate postopera tive
adaptation of healthy collagenous connective tissue
and normal epithelium.
- Minimal or no inflammation is present

Advantages
1. Root cleaning with direct vision
2. Protective of tissues, reparative
3. Healing by primary intention
4. Lack of pain or complications postoperatively

MODIFIED
WIDMAN FLAP
WITH PAPILLA
PRESERVATION
TECHNIQUE
PALATAL
INTERNAL BEVEL
INCISION

BASELINE

BASELINE

MODIFED WIDMAN FLAP

MODIFIED WF

1 év POSTOP.

(MWF)

Baseline

BaselineX-ray

Periodontalcharting
12
6
3 3
1 0,5 1
6
2,5
5
3 0,5 2
11
4 3 4
1 0 0
4,5
2 4
2 0 1
24 23 22 21 13 14
6
3
5
0 0 0
5 5 5 0 0 0
5 6 5 0 0 1
6
3 4
0 0 1
5
4 4
0 0 1
3 3 4
1 0 1
PD
G
R
Pal
5
2 3
1 1 1
4 2
5
2 2 1
5
3 4
3 3 2
6
2 4
1 0 2
6
2
5
1 2 1
3 1,5
6
1 1,5 1
PD
G
R
Bucc

Surgery

Removinggranulationtissueand
osteoplasty

3 monthscontrol

7 monthscontrol
23 22 21 11 12 13
3 2 4
2 1 2
3 2 3
3 2 1
4 1 2
2 1 3
3 2 3
2 1 2
4 2 4
2 1 2
2 2 4
1 1 1
PD
GR
Pal
3 2 3
2 5 2
3 1 3
4 5 4
4 2 2
2 1 3
2 2 3
3 2 2
3 1,5 3
2,5 3 2,5
2 1 3
2 4 2,5
PD
GR
Bucc

15 monthscontrol
23 22 21 11 12 13
3 2 2
2 1 2
2 2 3
3 1 2
3 2 2
1 1 2
3 2 3
1 1 1
4 2 3
2 1 1,5
4 1 3
1 1,5 1
PD
GR
Pal
3 2 3
1,5 1 1
3 2 4
2 4 1,5
4 1 3
3 1 2,5
3 2 3
2 2 2
4 1,5 3
2 3 2
3 1,5 3
2 4 2
PD
GR
Bucc


Chronicperiodontisi

1. Quadrant
Buccal
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
PD
6
4
6
4
1
4
4
1
4
5
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
2
GR
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Palatinal
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
PD
8
7
6
6
4
5
4
5
6
7
6
4
4
2
4
5
1
5
6
4
4
GR
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

2. Quadrant
Buccal
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
PD
3
2
3
2
2
5
3
1
2
3
2
3
2
6
7
5
2
5
6
5
6
GR
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
0
2
1
Palatinal
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
PD
5
1
5
7
7
7
4
2
5
5
2
4
4
2
5
3
3
4
3
5
5
GR
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1

3. Quadrant
Buccal
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
PD
4
2
4
4
2
4
7
3
3
5
2
3
3
1
5
7
2
6
6
4
5
GR
1
0
1
0
0
-1
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Lingual
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
PD
3
2
2
4
2
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
7
6
6
7
5
7
7
5
6
GR
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0

4. Quadrant
Buccal
48
47
46
45
44
43
42
41
PD
3
3
4
5
2
2
3
2
3
4
3
4
5
3
3
4
4
4
GR
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
Lingual
48
47
46
45
44
43
42
41
PD
6
6
7
6
7
5
5
5
5
4
4
3
5
2
3
2
1
2
GR
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
2
0
0
1
1
2
1
2
1

Buccal
17
16
15
14
PD
4
2
3
2
2
4
2
2
4
3
2
3
G
R
3
4
4
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
0
Palatinal
17
16
15
14
PD
8
7
6
6
4
4
3
4
4
5
6
4
G
R
0
0
1
1
1
1
3
2
3
3
2
0

1 yearcontrol
Buccal
17
16
15
14
PD
4
3
4
4
2
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
G
R
3
4
4
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
0
Palatinal
17
16
15
14
PD
5
5
4
4
3
4
3
3
4
3
4
4
GR
2
2
2
2
2
1
3
3
3
4
2
0

1,5 yearscontrol

3. Periodontalstatus (1,5 years)
Buccal
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
PD
4
3
4
4
2
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
2
3
3
2
3
GR
3
4
4
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
0
1
3
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
Palatinal
PD
5
5
4
4
3
4
3
3
4
3
4
4
4
2
4
4
2
4
4
3
4
GR
2
2
2
2
2
1
3
3
3
4
2
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
2
0
1
Buccal
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
PD
3
2
3
2
2
5
3
2
3
3
3
3
4
2
4
4
3
4
GR
1
0
1
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
2
2
4
3
Palatinal
PD
4
2
4
5
5
5
2
2
5
4
2
4
4
3
4
4
4
6
GR
1
0
1
1
1
2
2
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
2
2
1

Prosthodontic rehabilitácion

SEPARION OF
INTERDENTAL
PAPILLAE
Modified papailla
preservation technique

BUCCAL DISPLACEMENT
OF INTERDENTAL
PAPIALLAE POSTOPERATIVE
VIEW
Tags