MONOPHYSITISM BY JOSE PAUYA.pptx

Monophysitism HERESY

1. MONOPHYSITISM BY: SEM. JOSE PAUYA JR.

2. : Introduction Monophysitism is a Christological heresy that emerged in the 5th century. Monophysitism is the belief that Jesus Christ had only one nature, a divine nature, and that his human nature was absorbed or subsumed by his divine nature.

3. Meaning Monophysitism comes from the Greek words " monos " meaning "one" and " physis " meaning "nature." Monophysitism arose as a response to the Nestorian controversy, which centered around the nature of Christ.  

4. Proponents (Issue Before) Notable proponents of Monophysitism include Eutyches and Dioscorus . Monophysitism emerged as a reaction against Nestorianism , which emphasized the distinction between the divine and human natures of Christ.

5. Teaching of the Church The Church teaches that Jesus Christ has two natures, divine and human, united in one person without confusion, change, division, or separation. The Church condemns Monophysitism as a heresy because it denies the full humanity of Christ.

6. Answer of the Catholic Church in Defense The Catholic Church responded to Monophysitism by convening the Council of Chalcedon in 451, which affirmed the orthodox understanding of Christ's nature. The Church argued that Christ has two distinct natures, divine and human, which are united in one person without confusion or change.  

7. Conclusion Monophysitism is a Christological heresy that emerged in response to the Nestorian controversy. The Church teaches that Christ has two natures, divine and human, united in one person. Monophysitism serves as a reminder of the importance of understanding and affirming the full humanity and divinity of Christ.

8. Defense of the Church Today If Monophysitism were to happen today, how would the Church defend itself? The Church would likely rely on the teachings of the Council of Chalcedon and emphasize the importance of maintaining the orthodox understanding of Christ's nature . The Church could emphasize the scriptural basis for the two natures of Christ and engage in theological dialogue to address any misunderstandings or misconceptions.

9. Final thoughts on Monophysitism and its relevance in contemporary times : Monophysitism continues to be relevant today as a reminder of the ongoing need to uphold and defend the orthodox understanding of Christ's nature.