NRUS FPX 8008 Assessment 1 - Top My course.pdf

Its a capella DNP assessment 4 of class 8020, get complete samples.

1. NRUS FPX 8008 Assessment 1: Analyzing Person-
Centered Care with Scientific and Theoretical
Evidence
Capella University
NURS FPX 8008
Professor Name
Date: June 20, 2025









Need Help Completing Your Capella University DNP FlexPath in
Just One Billing Cycle?

Email Us: [email protected]
Visit Our Website: topmycourse.net
Get a FREE DNP Sample Here: https://topmycourse.net/nrus-fpx-
8008-assessment-1-analyzing-person-centered/

2. Analyzing Person-Centered Care
Evaluating Patient-Centered Care through Scientific and Theoretical
Perspectives
Person-centered care (PCC) represents a cornerstone of contemporary healthcare delivery by
emphasizing respect for patients’ values, preferences, and life contexts. Rather than positioning
patients as passive recipients, PCC actively engages them as collaborators in shaping treatment
goals and decision-making (Constand et al., 2021). This collaborative model enhances
autonomy, strengthens therapeutic relationships, and produces measurable improvements in
quality of care. Nurses are uniquely positioned to implement PCC by integrating both evidence-
based practices and caring theories, ensuring that patient needs are addressed holistically. The
following analysis examines scientific findings and theoretical frameworks that validate PCC’s
effectiveness in both measurable and experiential terms.
Identified Articles for Person-Centered Care
Quantitative Studies
Quantitative studies provide robust evidence on PCC’s impact across clinical and organizational
outcomes. Kim et al. (2020) demonstrated that structured PCC interventions significantly
reduced hospital-acquired complications. Similarly, O’Shea et al. (2022) reported higher
adherence rates to chronic disease management plans when patients were included in shared
decision-making. Patel et al. (2023) found that individualized care pathways improved continuity
of care and decreased emergency department utilization. In addition, Ruiz et al. (2021)
highlighted a direct correlation between PCC training for nurses and improved patient
satisfaction scores. Collectively, these findings confirm that PCC is not only ethically aligned but
also clinically and operationally beneficial.
Qualitative Studies
Qualitative research offers deeper insights into how patients perceive and experience PCC. For
instance, Alvarado et al. (2021) revealed that patients who felt actively involved in care
discussions reported higher trust and emotional security. Jameson and Kelly (2020) noted that
PCC practices fostered dignity and respect, particularly among vulnerable populations.
Furthermore, Lin et al. (2022) observed that PCC enhanced patient confidence in navigating
treatment options, while Cohen et al. (2023) documented how therapeutic communication
improved resilience among patients with long-term conditions. These studies emphasize the
humanistic and relational dimensions of PCC that extend beyond clinical outcomes.
Two Nursing Theories
Benner’s Novice to Expert Theory

3. Benner’s framework provides a practical lens for evaluating how nurses’ competence influences
PCC outcomes. The theory emphasizes the progression of nursing expertise and its effect on
patient care quality (Healy, 2024). For example, Kim et al. (2020) linked reductions in hospital
complications to PCC strategies implemented by highly skilled practitioners. Similarly, Ruiz et
al. (2021) showed that expert nurses were more adept at integrating patient preferences into
clinical decision-making. This demonstrates how professional growth directly enhances the
ability to deliver individualized, evidence-informed PCC.
Watson’s Theory of Human Caring
Watson’s Caring Science complements the empirical dimensions of PCC by emphasizing
compassion, empathy, and holistic well-being (Bagheri et al., 2023). The theory underlines the
importance of respecting human dignity and recognizing the patient as a whole person. Alvarado
et al. (2021) demonstrated how emotional connection in PCC practices improved trust, aligning
with Watson’s principles. Likewise, Jameson and Kelly (2020) found that patients valued the
humanistic aspects of care, such as being listened to and supported in their unique circumstances.
This theoretical perspective underscores PCC’s role in fostering both healing and human
flourishing.
Synopsis of Studies
Quantitative studies consistently highlight PCC’s measurable benefits, such as reduced
complications, fewer emergency visits, improved adherence, and increased patient satisfaction
(Kim et al., 2020; O’Shea et al., 2022; Patel et al., 2023; Ruiz et al., 2021). On the other hand,
qualitative research demonstrates its humanistic outcomes, including enhanced dignity, trust,
empowerment, and emotional well-being (Alvarado et al., 2021; Cohen et al., 2023; Jameson &
Kelly, 2020; Lin et al., 2022). Together, these findings establish PCC as both a clinically
effective and relationally enriching model.
Literature Synthesis
Synthesizing both streams of evidence reveals that PCC bridges measurable healthcare
improvements with humanistic values. Quantitative studies emphasize operational efficiencies
such as lower readmissions and improved adherence, while qualitative findings highlight
relational trust and empowerment. Taken together, PCC emerges as a dual-purpose model: one
that enhances system performance and safeguards patient dignity. This convergence of evidence
confirms PCC’s centrality in advancing sustainable, high-quality healthcare (Patel et al., 2023;
Cohen et al., 2023).
Relevance of Interprofessional Collaboration
Effective PCC relies heavily on interprofessional collaboration. By integrating the skills of
physicians, nurses, therapists, and social workers, care becomes both comprehensive and patient-
centered (Lin et al., 2022). Such collaboration ensures that treatment plans reflect multiple
perspectives while prioritizing patient goals. Moreover, interprofessional communication reduces

4. fragmentation of care, enhances trust, and supports continuity across care transitions (Cohen et
al., 2023). Ultimately, PCC combined with interprofessional practice offers a framework for
holistic, integrated, and evidence-based care delivery.
Conclusion
Person-centered care represents a paradigm shift in healthcare by redefining the role of the
patient as an empowered partner in the care process. Both quantitative and qualitative research
affirm PCC’s contributions to clinical effectiveness and emotional well-being. Nursing theories
such as Benner’s Novice to Expert model and Watson’s Human Caring theory provide valuable
frameworks to understand both the measurable and relational impacts of PCC. Furthermore,
interprofessional collaboration amplifies its benefits by ensuring holistic, coordinated, and
culturally sensitive care. Overall, PCC is a transformative model essential for advancing patient
safety, quality, and long-term well-being.
References
• Alvarado, M., Lopez, R., & Silva, J. (2021). Patient perceptions of shared decision-
making in chronic illness management. Journal of Patient Experience, 8(3), 45–53.
https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735211002983
• Bagheri, H., et al. (2023). Human caring in nursing practice: Applying Watson’s theory
in clinical settings. Heliyon, 9(7), e15795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15795
• Cohen, D., Patel, S., & Morgan, L. (2023). Communication and resilience: Patient
narratives on person-centered care. Qualitative Health Research, 33(4), 512–523.
https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323221138851
• Constand, M. K., MacDermid, J. C., Dal Bello-Haas, V., & Law, M. (2021). Patient-
centered care: A concept analysis. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 53(2), jrm00123.
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2777
• Healy, J. (2024). Evaluating nursing competence with Benner’s novice to expert
framework. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 56(1), 88–96.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12789
• Jameson, K., & Kelly, T. (2020). Dignity and respect in healthcare: Patient perspectives
on PCC. BMC Nursing, 19, 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-00490-8
• Kim, Y., Park, H., & Cho, S. (2020). Reducing hospital complications with patient-
centered care interventions. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 32(6), 401–
409. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaa067
• Lin, P., Carter, B., & Huang, S. (2022). Empowerment and confidence in PCC:
Qualitative findings from patient interviews. Nursing Inquiry, 29(3), e12467.
https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12467
• O’Shea, E., Byrne, M., & Casey, M. (2022). Shared decision-making and adherence in
chronic care. Patient Education and Counseling, 105(5), 1278–1285.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.12.004
• Patel, R., Kim, S., & Thomas, J. (2023). Individualized care pathways and continuity of
care in PCC models. Healthcare, 11(3), 555. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11030555

5. • Ruiz, A., Hernandez, P., & Clark, J. (2021). Nursing-led PCC and patient satisfaction
outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 36(4), 325–333.
https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000556









Need Help Completing Your Capella University DNP FlexPath in
Just One Billing Cycle?

Email Us: [email protected]
Visit Our Website: topmycourse.net
Get a FREE DNP Sample Here: https://topmycourse.net/nrus-fpx-
8008-assessment-1-analyzing-person-centered/