KirushanthSathiyanat1
0 views
1 slides
Oct 14, 2025
Slide 1 of 1
1
About This Presentation
Med case
Size: 319.72 KB
Language: en
Added: Oct 14, 2025
Slides: 1 pages
Slide Content
Pictures (If relevant)
Perceptions regarding traditional bone setting among patients with fractures in National
Hospital of Sri Lanka
K. Sathiyanathan1, I.S.U. Dias2, N. Tharmakulasingham1, C. Nawarathnam1
1 Postgraduate Institute of Medicine, University of Colombo,2 National Hospital of Sri Lanka
Background Results
Method
Conclusions and Recommendations
`
References
PP - 45
SLCEP Annual Academic Conference 2025
Manydevelopingcountries,especiallyinAsia,Africaand
SouthAmericahaveanintegratedapproachtomanagement
offractureswherebothtraditionalbonesetting(TBS)aswell
asconventionalcareco-exist.InSriLanka,traditionalbone
settingappearstobeapopularmodeoftreatmentof
fractures.
•Traditional bone setting (TBS) remains a widely relied-upon practice in Sri Lanka
for orthopedic care.
•Cultural beliefs, affordability, and accessibility are key reasons for continued TBS
use.
•Free public healthcare and advanced diagnostics are encouraging a gradual shift
toward orthodox medical care.
•Recommendations
•Standardize and regulate TBS through training programs and safety
guidelines.
•Promote collaboration between traditional and orthodox practitioners for
integrated, safer care.
Figure1: Frequency distribution of the study population by the
type of ailment•Design: Descriptive cross-sectional study
•Setting: Orthopaedic clinics, wards, and Accident Service Ward
at National Hospital of Sri Lanka (NHSL)
•Study Population: Patients with fractures/ orthopaedic ailments
treated at NHSL
•Inclusion Criteria:
•Receiving orthopaedic treatment at NHSL
•Resident of Sri Lanka
•Able to provide informed consent
•Exclusion Criteria:
•Major psychiatric disorders
•Cognitive impairment
•Sampling Method: Consecutive sampling
•Sample Size: 100 participants
•Data Collection Tool: Self-administered questionnaire
•Duration: 1 month
•Ethical Approval: NHSL Ethics Review Committee
•Analysis: IBM SPSS Statistics v30.0
1.YempabeT, EduseiA, Donkor P, BuunaaimA, Mock C:Factors affecting utilization
of traditional bonesetters in the Northern Region of Ghana. AfrJ EmergMed. 2021,
11:105-10.
2.Attanayake AMHS, De Silva UMGD, Jayaweera JAAS, Perera DL:Use of ayurveda
and Sri Lankan traditional medicine for healing shaft of humerus fracture
following nonunion. J Ayurveda IntegrMed. 2018, 9:217-20.
•Age Distribution: Majority (27%) were aged 60–69 years (Mean age: 52.67 years)
•Primary Reason for Seeking TBS: Chronic pain – 50% of respondents
•Main Motivators for Choosing TBS: Lower cost, Better accessibility
•Complications from TBS:
•Reported by 15% of respondents
•Most common complication: Exacerbation of pain (40%)
•Reason for Seeking Formal Healthcare: Sophisticated imaging availability (98%)
•Perceptions of TBS vs. Orthodox Care:
•50% were undecided about the skill level of traditional bone setters
•50% believed orthodox care is more effective for pain and wound
management
•65% believed orthodox care is not more expensive than TBS
VariablesFrequencyPercentage (%)
Reasons for choosing TBS over formal healthcare*
Cost22
Accessibility6666
Cultural beliefs6666
Recommendations from family/
friends5858
Previous positive experience1010
Fear of amputation11
Fear of surgery1818
Fear of hospitals22
Attitude of healthcare workers11
Use of Plaster of Paris (POP)22
Complications after TBS treatment (n=15)
Malunion213.33
Joint stiffness320
Exacerbation of pain640
Local sepsis426.67
Table1: Reasons for choosing formal healthcare by the study
population
*Multiple responses