Oregon Spotted Frog Stewardship Partnership in Thurston County, Washington

NACDconserve 12 views 15 slides Mar 04, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 15
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15

About This Presentation

Breakout session Tuesday, February 11 at 1:30 p.m.

Precision Farming with Smart Soil Insights: How Advanced Soil Profiling Enhances Farm Economics and Ecology

Traditional soil analysis is limited in scope and insight. Breakthroughs with in-field sensors and in-lab analytics provide a complete soil...


Slide Content

Oregon Spotted Frog Stewardship Partnership in Thurston County, Washington Kiana Sinner, Thurston Conservation District Cassie Doll, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Project Overview Partners Thurston Conservation District (TCD) Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife (WDFW) U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) Chehalis Basin Strategy Components Habitat Suitability Model Community Outreach & Engagement Social Science Research

A community dedicated to agricultural sustainability & habitat conservation Thurston County, Washington

Requires permanent water and shallow, seasonally inundated areas for breeding Impacted by habitat loss, non-native species, and hydrology changes Grazing is a cost-effective, sustainable management practice Oregon Spotted Frog ( Rana pretiosa , OSF)

Habitat Suitability Model Prioritizes parcels within the Black River watershed for OSF conservation Guides habitat enhancement, restoration, and potential translocation efforts

Model Structure Land Use Existing Agriculture Long-Term Agriculture Open Space Habitat OSF Critical Habitat Wetlands Tree Canopy Cover Adjacency to Priority Lands Permanently Conserved Lands Lands with a Conservation Agreement Species Presence OSF Occupancy Adjacency to Species Presence Within 1 km of OSF Occupancy Within 2 km of OSF Occupancy Within 5 km of OSF Occupancy

Model Structure Land Use 75 50 50 Habitat 150 50 100 Adjacency to Priority Lands 75 50 Species Presence 225 Adjacency to Species Presence 100 50 10

Example Parcel

Engaging with Landowners Better understand concerns, preferences, and barriers Build trust & inform program design We engaged and listened: Educational workshop Landowner survey Listening session

— What we Learned! 53% of participants are willing to participate Barriers to participation Loss of property value Concerns about regulation Government involvement Priorities and needs Stewardship & habitat enhancement Decision making authority Awareness & education Regulatory assurance

— What we Learned! Willingness is strongly driven by attitudes Trust in federal government is connected to attitudes Familiarity with OSF shapes positive attitudes

— What we Learned! Motivations and Barriers Regulatory and program clarity Implementation support A clear understanding of regulations Financial support is a secondary barrier

— — What we Learned! Collaborative Conservation Interest in working with non-regulatory agencies Need for increased decision making authority, respect, and communication

— Next Steps Continued partnership on landowner education & engagement opportunities Raising awareness, raises willingness Collaboration on the development of a Conservation Benefits Agreement Supporting landowners need for regulatory assurances Coordinated on-the-ground project implementation Partnering with landowners and each other to facilitate OSF conservation

Acknowledgments Thurston Conservation District: Mara Healy, Nora Carman-White, & Jae Townsend Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife: Max Lambert U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service: Riley Andrade, Nick George, & Alan Yanahan Aquatic Species Restoration Program Residents of Thurston County
Tags