Organizational Structure : Types and Classification

sanchitgangar 19,130 views 27 slides Jun 24, 2013
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 27
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27

About This Presentation

Staffing , Types of Organisation structure


Slide Content

Types and Types and
Classification Of Classification Of
Organizational Organizational
structuresstructures

Group members
•Dhruvin Modi (Group Leader)
•Saumya Kotiyan
•Prachi Biyala
•Hinal Goradia
•Priyanka Gholap
•Sneha Mishra

What is organization?
•Basically, an organization in its
simplest form ,is a person or group of
people intentionally organized to
accomplish an overall, common goal or
set of goals.

What is a structure?
ACC. TO KAST AND
ROSENZWEIG,
“STRUCTURE IS THE
ESTABLISHED PATTERN OF
RELATIONSHIPS AMONG THE
COMPONENT PARTS OF THE
ORGANIZATION.”

What is Organizational
structure?
•Organizational structure determines
the manner and extent to
which roles, power,
and responsibilities are delegated,
controlled, and coordinated, and
how information flows between levels
of management.
•An structure depends entirely on
the organization's objectives and
the strategy chosen to achieve them.

Types of organisation
›TRADITIONAL
STRUCTURE
1.LINE STRUCTURE


2.FUNCTIONAL
STRUCTURE
3.LINE & STAFF
STRUCTURE
›MODERN
STRUCTURE
1.PROJECT STRUCTURE
2.MATRIX STRUCTURE

Line Structure
Line Structure is the OLDEST and SIMPLEST
form of INTERNAL ORGANIZATION
STRUCTURE. It was first developed by the
ROMAN ARMY and the latter adopted by
ARMIES all over the world. Factory owners also
used LINE ORGANIZATION in its purest form
in the NINETEENTH CENTURY IN ENGLAND.
In LINE ORGANIZATION, top management has
complete control and the CHAIN of COMMAND
is clear and simple. MANAGEMENT has complete
control.

Advantages
SIMPLICITY
DISCIPLINE
ECONOMICAL
STRICT CONTROLS
FLEXIBILITY
HIGH MORAL

Disadvantages

Line and Staff Organization
ACCORDING TO LOUIS ALLEN,
“LINE REFERS TO THOSE
POSITIONS AND ELEMENTS OF AN ORGANIZATION,
WHICH HAVE THE RESPOSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY AND
ARE ACCOUNTABLE FOR ACCOMPLISHMENT OF PRIMARY
OBJECTIVES. STAFF ELEMENTS ARE THOSE WHICH
HAVE RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY FOR
PROVIDING ADVICE AND SERVICE TO THE LINE IN
ATTAINMENT OF OBJECTIVES.”

Advantages
 LESS BURDEN ON EXECUTIVES
SERVICES OF EXPERTS AVAILABLE
LIMITED TENSION ON LINE MANAGERS
BENEFITS OF SPECIALIZATION
TRAINING OPPURTUNITIES TO EMPLOYEES
 FLEXIBILITY

Limitations
DELAY IN DECISION-MAKING
BUCK PASSING AMONG EXECUTIVES
CONFLICTS BETWEEN LINE AND STAFF
EXECUTIVES
COSTLY ORGANIZATION
COMPLICATED IN OPERATION
DISCIPLINE IS AFFECTED

Reasons for conflicts between line
and staff
ARGUMENTS OF LINE
EXECUTIVES AGAINST
STAFF
DILUTION OF AUTHORITY
LACKS PRACTICAL KNOWLEDGE
LACKS HUMAN SKILLS
DOMINATION OF STAFF
MANAGERS
STRESS ON PAPERWO RK
ARGUMENTS OF STAFF
EXECUTIVES AGAINST
LINE
RESISTANCE TO NEW PLANS
AND IDEAS
INADEQUATE SUPPORT FROM
LINE EXECUTIVES
LIMITED COOPOERATION FROM
LINE EXECUTIVES
SUPPLY OF INADEQUATE
INFORMATION

Solutions for resolving the
conflicts
RELATIONSHIP SHOULD BE NOTED IN WRITING
CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF STAFF ROLE
FREQUENT MEETINGS
SELECTION OF COMPETENT STAFF
STAFF SHOULD BE TREATED AS TEAM MEMBERS OF
THE GROUP
QUICK SETTLEMENT OF CONFLICTS

Project Structure
THE TERM PROJECT REFERS TO A UNIQUE AND
COMPLEX CLUSTER OF ACTIVITIES TO BE COMPLETED
WITHIN FIXED TIME AND COST. THEY ARE DISSOLVED
ONCE THE GOAL IS ACHIEVED. EG- THE GOAL MAY BE
TO CONSTRUCT A NEW RAILWAY BRIDGE.
SPECIALISTS FROM DIFFERENT FUNCTIONAL
DEPARTMENTS ARE BROUGHT TOGETHER TO WORK IN
HARMONY. THE FUNCTIONAL DEPARTMENT MAY BE
PRODUCTION, ENGINEERING, QUALITY CONTROL,
PRODUCT ANALYSIS, ETC. WHEN THE PROJECT IS
COMPLETED, THESE SPECIALISTS RETURN TO THE
RESPECTED DEPARTMENTS

Uses
a)OBJECTIVES
b)TIME-BOUND
c)UNRELATED WITH DAILY ADMINISTRATIVE WORK
d)IN NEED OF SPECIALISED SKILLS
e)ITS TEMPORARY

Limitations
CONFLICTS IN APPROACH
LACKS CLARIFY OF ROLES
CONFLICTS BETWEEN DEPARTMENTS
UNCERATIN FUTURE
LACKS CLEARITY OF COMMANDS

Functional organizational
structure
• Employees are grouped together
according to their similar tasks, skills
or activities. Functional structures
are suitable for SMEs with high level
of specialization.
The decision making is centralized at
the top of the organization.

Benefits of functional
organizational structure
•Efficient use of resources;
•In-depth skill development;
•Clear career paths;
•Strategic decisions are made on
the top of the organization.

Disadvantages of
functional design
•Slow decision making
•Less innovative.
•Performance responsibility is unclear;
•Limited management training.
•Poor coordination across functions.

Matrix Organization
•Matrix Organization was introduced in USA in the early
1960's. It was used to solve management problems in the
Aerospace industry.
•Matrix Organization is a combination of two or more
organization structures. For example, Functional
Organization and Project Organization.
•The organization is divided into different functions, e.g.
Purchase, Production, R & D, etc. Each function has a
Functional (Departmental) Manager, e.g. Purchase
Manager, Production Manager, etc.
•The organization is also divided on the basis of projects
e.g. Project A, Project B, etc. Each project has a
Project Manager e.g. Project A Manager, Project B
Manager, etc.

•The employees has to work, under two authority
(bosses). The authority of functional manager flows
downwards while the authority of project manager flows
across (sideward). So the authority flows downwards and
across. Therefore, it is called “MATRIX
ORGANISATION”.

Matrix design
•It implements functional and divisional structures
simultaneously in each department.
•The worker in each department is being supervised by two
bosses at the same time.
•It is suitable for the following situations:
-Environmental pressure exists for a dual focus;
-Large amount of information needs to be processed;
-Innovations are performed
-Organization is working on several projects together.
-Efficiency is needed in the use of resources.

Strengths of matrix
design
•Provides flexibility;
•Encourages resource efficiency;
•Enhances skill development;
•Increase motivation and commitment;
•Helps top management in planning
process.

Weaknesses of matrix
design
•Creates dual authority confusion;
•Is time consuming;
•Generates high implementation cost;
•Requires interpersonal skill training;
•Spawns power struggle.

Thank You!!!