osseous resective surgery in periodontics by Dr.Suhani Goel
Size: 6.35 MB
Language: en
Added: Jan 31, 2019
Slides: 49 pages
Slide Content
DR.SUHANI GOEL
1.INTRODUCTION- NORMAL BONE
2.BONE LOSS IN PERIODONTAL DISEASE
3.PATHWAYS OF SPREAD OF INFLAMMATION
4. CLASSIFICATION OF OSSEOUS DEFECTS
5.TYPES OF RESECTIVE OSSEOUS SURGERIES
6.RATIONALE OF RESECTIVE OSSEOUS SURGERIES.
7.ADVANTAGES & DISADVANTAGES
8.INSTRUMENTS
9.STEPS OF RESECTIVE OSSEOUS SURGERY.
10.CONCLUSION
CONTENTS
The interproximal bone is more coronal in position than the labial or
lingual/palatal bone and pyramidal in form.
The form of the interdental bone is a function of the tooth form and the
embrasure width.
The position of the bony margin mimics the contours of the CEJ.this
scalloping is related to tooth and root form, as well as tooth position, within
the alveolus.
CHARACTERISTICS OF NORMAL BONE
BONY ARCHITECTURE
www.wikipedia.com
Alveolar bone is most dynamic and most unstable tissue of
the periodontium,which is constantly undergoing
remodelling..
Physiologic liability is maintained by a balance between
bone formation & resorption.
Chronic inflammation is the most common cause of bone
destruction in periodontal disease, as it results in extension of
inflammatory process to bone.
Extension of inflammatory process from marginal gingiva
into supporting periodontal tissue marks the transition from
gingivitis to periodontitis .
Extension of inflammation to supporting structures may be
modified by pathogenic potential of plaque or by resistance
of the host.
BONE LOSS IN PERIODONTAL DISEASE
Pathways of spread of inflammation to bone
Carranza’s clinical perodontology 10
th
edition
Periods of destruction:
Periodontal disease occurs in an episodic pattern with periods of
activity and periods of in activity.
Periods of destruction are characterized by loss of collagen of
alveolar bone with deepening of pocket.
Bone destruction caused by trauma from occlusion:
This may occur in the presence or absence of inflammation.
Periodontal disease alters the morphologic features of bone in
addition to reducing the bone height. An understanding of nature and
pathogenesis of these alterations is essential for effective diagnosis
and treatment.
Fenestrations and dehiscence's :
Isolated areas in which the root is denuded of
bone and root surface is covered by periosteum
and overlying gingiva are termed fenestration where
the marginal bone intact .
When the denuded areas extend through marginal
bone the defect is called dehiscence's.
Horizontal classification (based on furcation
involvement) (Glickman1953)
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Vertical classification
(Tarnow & Fletcher)
subclass A
subclass B
subclass C
Types of osseous defects
Circumferential defect ( moat)
Combined defect
Horizontal classification (Hamp’s 1975)
Class I Class II Class III
Vertical classification
Subclass A
Subclass B Subclass C
OSSEOUS SURGERY : may be defined as the procedure by
which changes in the alveolar bone can be accomplished
to rid of deformities induced by the periodontal disease
process or other related factors, such as exostosis & tooth
supraeruption.
ADDITIVE OSSEOUS SURGERY: includes procedures
directed at restoring the alveolar bone to its original level.
SUBTRACTIVE OSSEOUS SURGERY: is designed to
restore the form of preexisting alveolar bone to the level
existing at the time of surgery or slightly more apical to
this level.
TYPES OF OSSEOUS SURGERY
•Most predictable pocket reduction technique.
•The major rationale for osseous resective surgery is
centered to the view that discrepancies in level and
shapes of the bone and gingiva predispose patients to
the recurrence of pocket postsurgically.
•Reshape the marginal bone to resemble that of the
alveolar process undamaged by periodontal disease.
•Promote periodontal maintenance.
RATIONALE FOR OSSEOUS SURGERY
Indications:
1. Shallow intrabony defect around a tooth with sufficient
periodontal support
2. Existence of nonsupporting bone that could affect a
periodontal pocket or that hinders close adaptation of flap
like shelflke bone, bony protuberance,exostosis,crater &
thick alveolar bone around the intrabony defect.
RESECTIVE OSSEOUS SURGERY
3.Class I & II furcation involvement
4. Residual osseous defect remaining after regenerative
procedures.
5. Clinical crown requires lengthening before
restorative/prosthetic treatment.
6. Deep caries or crown fracture extending subgingivally or to
the alveolar bone.
ESTHETIC AREA
Hall’s Critical decision making in periodontology 2ndedition
Contraindications for osseous resection
1.A periodontal pocket of more than 8mm exists after
initial therapy.
2.The bottom of the osseous defect extends apically
against multiple-tooth root trunks.
3.The osseous defect is more than one half of the root
length from CEJ.
4.Advanced tooth mobility.
5.Position of the external oblique line is very close to the
osseous defect or root proximity.
•Reliable
•Short-term (8-12 weeks)
•Obtain gingival-alveolar bone morphology that
facilitates easy maintenance.
ADVANTAGES OF RESECTIVE
PROCEDURES
•Attachment loss
•Root exposure, compromising esthetics
•Hypersensitivity
•Root surface caries
•Possibility of phonetic impediment.
DISADVANTAGES OF RESECTIVE
PROCEDURES
OSTEOPLASTY: reshaping of the alveolar process to achieve
a more physiologic form without the removal of supporting bone.
OSTECTOMY: the removal of some alveolar bone, thus
changing the position of crestal bone on the root. It is done to
reshape deformities caused by periodontitis in the marginal &
interalveolar bone.
INSTRUMENTS
Burs
Chisels
Wikipedia.com
Steps:
1.Vertical grooving
2.Radicular blending
3.Flattening
interproximal bone
4.Gradualizing
marginal bone.
TECHNIQUE
www.periobasics.com last assessed on 5 sept,2018
VERTICAL GROOVING
Cohen’s Atlas of cosmetic and reconstructive periodontal surgery 2
nd
edition
Steps in Resective osseous surgery
Schluger,Yuodelis,Page and Johnsons’ PERIODONTAL DISEASES 2
nd
edition
MANAGEMENT OF CRATERS
Carranza’s clinical perodontology 10
th
edition
HEALING AFTER OSSEOUS
SURGERY
Caffese et al 1968
Recession
-Becker et al; 1988: 0.95-2.77mm after 1 yr
-Kaldahl et al 1988: 1.72 mm /yr
Probing Depth
- Bragger et al – 1.23 mm
SOFT TISSUE RESPONSE
•Selipsky 1976- o.6 mm
•Aeschlimann 1979 – 0.22 mm
•Moghadas & Stahl 1980- Avg. 0.06-0.22
mm
•Carnevale et al 1994 - 0.62-1.04 mm
AMOUNT OF BONE LOSS DURING
RESECTIVE OSSEOUS SURGERY
CONCLUSION
The results from osseous resective surgery are technique sensitive .
It has limited use in treating cases with very deep intrabony or
hemiseptal defects, which should be treated with a different surgical
approach.
If osseous resective surgery is used in advanced lesions, a
compromise in the amount of probing depth reduvction should be
expected.