pathophysiologysciencemdicineyeartesting

pathophysiology

1. CLINICAL PATHOPHYSIOLOGY SSC

2. AM’s group (~6) PM’s group (~6) One group (~12)

3. Presenters Question- Answer tacklers

4. Presenters Need to take active part in the presentation Talking through the slides ON THE DAY Could be in charge of a small section of the presentation such as introduction, clinical presentation, pathophysiology etc

5. Behind the scenes Research the topic In charge of a particular topic such as introduction, clinical presentation , pathophysiology etc Question-Answer tacklers Involve with formatting and graphics in the PPT

6. The presentation should be based on your cadaver Pathology found Variations of anatomy Normal anatomy If your cadaver is a ‘ no image ’ tagged body (BLUE TAG), you could share the images from your neighbour or use a google image (but referenced). Topics to prepare?

7. Where to start?

8. Where to start?

9. Choose a project manager (leader).

10. Brain storming

11. Allocate roles Speakers Creative Researcher Embryologist Clinical presentation Technical Treatment options

12. Communicate well

13. Attendance Compulsory for the whole session (9:00am -1:00pm) Within the group Between groups Assessing your TABLE mates Marking sheets will be made available on the learning central Collected on the day of respective presentation Assessing your BATCH mates Marking sheets will be given out on the day of presentation Collected on the day of respective presentation

14. On the day (26 th and 27 th Feb 09:00-01:00) Sitting in allocated spaces with your group The whole group will come to the front The scheduled time for the presentation will be pre released Answer questions from faculty and / from peers The ‘between group’ and the faculty’s marks will count Any group performing below average WILL FAIL Failed group will have to re-do the presentation on a different date

15. The file name should be saved by your table number for e.g. TABLE23.ppt. Please send in your presentations to [email protected] by 4pm on 25 th February 2015.

16. Content and preparation Aims and objectives made clear Material presented in a logical sequence Material presented, easily understood One slide should have the roles / contributions from each member of the team Presentation Skills Good voice projection Pace of presentation was appropriate Presentation kept within time limits Effective use of visual aids and imagination Did not rely on reading from notes Questions answered appropriately

17.   Grade Descriptors 1. Fail (<39%) (Unsatisfactory) Inadequate, irrelevant content, evident weaknesses in content and execution, evident errors/omissions. 2. Borderline (40-59%) (SC) Passable, basic relevant content evident, weaknesses in execution, errors/omissions. 3. Good (60-69%) (SC) Competent, reasoned, coherent, content very sound, few errors/omissions. 4. Excellent (>70%) (SC) Rigorous, methodical, analytical, content meets all the requirements of the work, accomplished, ambitious.

18. Any questions?