Pediatric Genetics & Genomics

CHCConnecticut 953 views 138 slides May 01, 2020
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 138
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83
Slide 84
84
Slide 85
85
Slide 86
86
Slide 87
87
Slide 88
88
Slide 89
89
Slide 90
90
Slide 91
91
Slide 92
92
Slide 93
93
Slide 94
94
Slide 95
95
Slide 96
96
Slide 97
97
Slide 98
98
Slide 99
99
Slide 100
100
Slide 101
101
Slide 102
102
Slide 103
103
Slide 104
104
Slide 105
105
Slide 106
106
Slide 107
107
Slide 108
108
Slide 109
109
Slide 110
110
Slide 111
111
Slide 112
112
Slide 113
113
Slide 114
114
Slide 115
115
Slide 116
116
Slide 117
117
Slide 118
118
Slide 119
119
Slide 120
120
Slide 121
121
Slide 122
122
Slide 123
123
Slide 124
124
Slide 125
125
Slide 126
126
Slide 127
127
Slide 128
128
Slide 129
129
Slide 130
130
Slide 131
131
Slide 132
132
Slide 133
133
Slide 134
134
Slide 135
135
Slide 136
136
Slide 137
137
Slide 138
138

About This Presentation

Lab Testing and Genetic & Metabolic Disease: Spotting the "Red Flags"

April 28, 2020


Slide Content

Pediatric Genetics and Genomics April 28, 2020 Lab Testing and Genetic & Metabolic Disease: Spotting the "Red Flags" 1 Leah Burke, MD University of Vermont Mark Korson, MD VMP Genetics, LLC

Get the Most Out of Your Experience Use the Q&A Button to submit questions during today’s session Recording and slides will be sent by email For further information, contact [email protected] 2

Founding year: 1972 Hubs/Locations: 15/210 Patients per year: 100,000 The Weitzman Institute is a program of 3

4 The Weitzman Institute works to improve primary care and its delivery to medically underserved and special populations through research , innovation , and the education and training of health professionals. 4 Genetics | 2/18/20 4

New England Regional Genetics Network The NERGN project is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant number UH7MC30778; New England Regional Genetics Network; total award amount: 1.5 million; 100% from governmental sources. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government. 5

CME Credits Available CME credits available to live webinar participants only A brief survey will be sent after this session to those who registered and attended this webinar CME certificate will be sent to participants who complete the survey American Academy Family Physicians (AAFP) CME Credit 6

Disclosures No Disclosures 7

Today’s Presenters Dr. Leah W. Burke, MD Dr. Mark Korson, MD 8

Goals Review the genetic and genomic testing modalities Identify the clinical and family history findings that raise a concern for a genetic disorder Review how simple biochemical tests that can determine the competence of human metabolism Describe a few findings on routine biochemical testing that can increase suspicion about an underlying metabolic disease

Genetic Testing: Screening vs. Diagnostic Testing done on a particular population Individuals are asymptomatic Not designed to diagnose, simply to identify individuals at a higher risk May lead to diagnostic tests Testing done on individuals Individuals often symptomatic Individuals may have had a positive screening test May lead to treatment options

Diagnostic Genetic Testing Karyotype FISH Image F luorescence I n S itu H ybridization Microarray Jax.com

Karyotype

Karyotype Compare the Karyotype to published Idiograms 2q34 2q10 2p24

Diagnostic Genetic Testing Karyotype FISH Image F luorescence I n S itu H ybridization Microarray Jax.com

FISH : Fluorescence in situ Hybridization

Diagnostic Genetic Testing Karyotype FISH Image F luorescence I n S itu H ybridization Microarray Jax.com

What’s in a name? A test by any other name… Microarray Chromosomal microarray Whole genome microarray Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) Array CGH Function is to determine copy number variants

Microarray Duplication in patient Deletion in patient Normal copy number

20 Karyotype Individual FISH test Microarray Can detect whole chromosome differences, translocations, and large deletions or duplications Only looks at specific areas for deletions or duplications Can detect very small duplications or deletions

What about sequencing? 21

Sanger Sequencing

A massively parallel sequencing technology in which millions of overlapping “reads” of DNA sequences are done simultaneously Creates an enormous amount of data to be analyzed Can detect single gene mutations including nonsense, missense, splice-site, and frame-shift mutations 23 Next Generation Sequencing

24

25

Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) Now being offered clinically Parallel sequencing of at least 98% of the coding sequences Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) Parallel sequencing of the coding and non-coding sequences Some conditions are caused by DNA changes outside the “gene” 26 Both are being considered in rapid testing of sick newborns in the NICU and other places

Lots of data…What happens next? 27

28 Variants of Uncertain Significance: The Dreaded VUS

With whole genome sequencing or whole exome sequencing, the chance of VUS is even greater than with microarray testing The reading of the variants can be different between different labs and over time 29 Variants of Uncertain Significance: The Dreaded VUS

So when should you refer for a genetics/metabolism evaluation? 30

REMEMBER THE RULE OF “TWO/TOO” (when asking questions) TOO tall TOO short TOO early TOO many TOO young TOO different TWO tumors TWO generations TWO in the family TWO birth defects

Let’s start with the Too’s TOO tall TOO short TOO early TOO many TOO young TOO different 32

Acromelic Mesomelic Rhizomelic

Too tall Cerebral gigantism ( Sotos syndrome) Marfan syndrome Beckwith- Weidemann syndrome Homocystinuria XYY males Other syndromes

Prenatal onset overgrowth Cerebral gigantism Dolichocephaly Frontal bossing, prognathism , pointed chin, downslating palpebral fissures High-arched palate Developmental delay, poor coordination, behavioral problems, autism, seizures Ventriculomegaly , absent corpus callosum, persistent cavum septum pellucidum Sotos syndrome

Marfan Syndrome Tall stature with long bone overgrowth Long narrow face High-arched palate Subluxation of lenses Spontaneous pneumothoraces Arachnodactyly Aortic root dilation and dissection Mitral regurgitation Scoliosis Pectus deformities Joint hypermobility Striae dystrophica Recurrent hernias Usually due to a FBN1 (fibrillin 1) mutation Also consider TGFBR1 and TGFBR2

Beckwith-Wiedemann LGA babies without maternal diabetes Macroglossia Hemi-hypertrophy Ear creases and or posterior pits Umbilical hernia or omphalocele Wilms tumor

Too short History of Growth deficiency Onset Prenatal – intrauterine growth retardation Postnatal Growth maturation Normal Delayed Proportional Proportions are normal Malproportion

Achondroplasia Short-limb dwarfism – rhizomelic shortening Macrocephaly with frontal bossing Midface hypoplasia Foramen magnum stenosis Upper airway obstruction Kyphosis and lumbar lordosis Trident hand Limited elbow extension Generalized joint hypermobility Bowing of legs Conductive hearing loss Delayed motor development Occasional hydrocephalus Mutations in FGFR3 gene (80% de novo)

Too many 46

Too many 47

Skin Manifestations: Subcutaneous Neurofibromas

Too different 49

Eyes Too close Normal Too wide Short Normal Long Upslanting Nl Downslanting Ears

Too different Developmental delay Autism 51

Initial Genetics Evaluation: First Tier Three generation family history Medical history for clues about birth/environmental causes Physical evaluation for signs of underlying syndromes Targeted testing for a specific syndrome Metabolic and/or mitochondrial testing if indicated Chromosomal microarray Fragile X DNA testing

Fragile X physical features Macrocephaly Long face with prominent jaw and long ears Joint hypermobility May not have any striking features

Fragile X Syndrome Caused by a change in the FMR1 gene located on the X chromosome A full mutation is expressed in 100% of males and 50% of females Intellectual disability is a major feature in affected males Must be tested for with a specific test that determines the repeat size

Initial Genetics Evaluation: First Tier Three generation family history Medical history for clues about birth/environmental causes Physical evaluation for signs of underlying syndromes Targeted testing for a specific syndrome Metabolic and/or mitochondrial testing if indicated Chromosomal microarray Fragile X DNA testing

Chromosomal Microarray An important part of the First Tier Numerous pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) have been identified in the etiology of autism Yield is thought to be about 10% Several “hot spots” or recurrent CNVs have been identified Often present in unaffected parents – variable penetrance

Case 18 month old girl referred to genetics for gross motor delays Additional features Small VSD Epicanthal folds and puffy eyelids Upturned nose and wide mouth Difficulty gaining weight Facial features reminiscent of Williams syndrome but didn’t completely fit Did the first tier of testing 57

Case Seen again at 5 ½ years and proposed doing exome sequencing Received approval from insurance, but parents decided to wait At 6 years of age, she was diagnosed with celiac disease Parents proceeded with testing A pathogenic variant was found in SETD5 58

SETD5 Associated with an autosomal dominant neurodevelopmental syndrome Found on the short arm of chromosome 3 Deletions in this area have been known to cause a neurodevelopmental syndrome 59

60 Rarechromo.org

REMEMBER THE RULE OF “TWO/TOO” (when asking questions) TOO tall TOO short TOO early TOO many TOO young TOO different TWO tumors TWO generations TWO in the family TWO birth defects

The Two’s 62

Chief complaint Family History, if available: Include 3 generations if available Designate how each person is related Include developmental history Do not limit to symptoms found in patient Include causes of death, esp. in early deaths Include miscarriages & early infant deaths Include consanguinity and ethnicity WHAT THE PCP SHOULD PROVIDE WITH THE REFERRAL

(35) Breast Cancer @ 63 died @ 67 - heart disease Breast Cancer @ 58 post-menopausal died at 63 - metastases Breast cancer @ 80 died @ 83 Irish, English, Scottish Irish, German (60) (87) (62) Prostate cancer 70’s (84) (62)

Russian Jewish (35) bre ca @ 42 died @ 48 bre ca @ 45 died @ 52 bil bre ca @ 45, 52 died @ 80

SC – s ome c oncerns re: diseases in family “Do you have any questions about diseases or conditions that run in your family?” R – r eproduction problems “Have there been any problems with pregnancy, infertility, or birth defects in your family?” E – e arly disease, death, or disability “Have any members of your family become sick or died at an early age?” E – e thnicity “How would you describe your ancestry?” OR “What countries do your families originate from? N – n on-genetic factors “Are there any other nonmedical conditions that run in your family?” FAMILY HISTORY SCREEN MNEMONIC

Let’s take a walk to the Chemistry Lab…

BASIC LAB TESTING: THE THEORY

Can help assess the competence of metabolism of: Protein Carbohydrates Fat BASIC LAB TESTING: THE THEORY

Can help assess the competence of metabolism of: Protein Carbohydrates Fat BASIC LAB TESTING: THE THEORY

- C - N - - - - ANATOMY OF AN AMINO ACID

- C - N - - - - UREA CYCLE

- C - - - ORGANIC ACID

AMINO ACIDS CHANGE Krebs cycle Urea cycle ORGANIC ACIDS NH 3 ATP ELECTRON TRANSPORT CHAIN PROTEIN DEGRADATION

AMINO ACIDS CHANGE Krebs cycle Urea cycle ORGANIC ACIDS NH 3 ATP ELECTRON TRANSPORT CHAIN PROTEIN DEGRADATION DEFECTS Organic acidemia Urea cycle disorder

AMINO ACIDS CHANGE Krebs cycle Urea cycle ORGANIC ACIDS NH 3 ATP ELECTRON TRANSPORT CHAIN PROTEIN DEGRADATION TESTING Organic acidemia Urea cycle disorder

AMINO ACIDS CHANGE Krebs cycle Urea cycle ORGANIC ACIDS NH 3 ATP ELECTRON TRANSPORT CHAIN PROTEIN DEGRADATION TESTING - Ammonia - Blood gases - Electrolytes - Anion gap Organic acidemia Urea cycle disorder

BLOOD GAS MEASUREMENT

BLOOD GAS MEASUREMENT Blood pH=7.4 Low pH  acidic High pH  alkalotic Blood HCO 3 =24 Low HCO 3  acidic High HCO 3  alkalotic

TACHYPNEA  A WAY TO BLOW OFF ACID H + + HCO 3 - H 2 CO 3 H 2 O + CO 2

TACHYPNEA  A WAY TO BLOW OFF ACID Blood pH=7.4 Low pH  acidic High pH  alkalotic Blood pCO 2 =40 Low pCO 2  rapid breathing High pCO 2  slower breathing Blood HCO 3 =24 Low HCO 3  acidic High HCO 3  alkalotic

BLOOD GAS MEASUREMENT

BLOOD GAS MEASUREMENT 1 ° METABOLIC ACIDOSIS

BLOOD GAS MEASUREMENT 1 ° METABOLIC ACIDOSIS

BLOOD GAS MEASUREMENT 1 ° METABOLIC ACIDOSIS 2° RESPIRATORY ALKALOSIS

BLOOD GAS MEASUREMENT 1 ° METABOLIC ACIDOSIS 2° RESPIRATORY ALKALOSIS

BLOOD GAS MEASUREMENT

BLOOD GAS MEASUREMENT 2° RESPIRATORY ALKALOSIS

BLOOD GAS MEASUREMENT 2° RESPIRATORY ALKALOSIS

BLOOD GAS MEASUREMENT 2° RESPIRATORY ALKALOSIS 1 ° METABOLIC ACIDOSIS

BLOOD GAS MEASUREMENT 1 ° RESPIRATORY ALKALOSIS 2 ° METABOLIC ACIDOSIS THIS SLIDE HAS BEEN UPDATED POST PRODUCTION. THE INFORMATION ON THIS SLIDE IS CORRECT. THE INFORMATION ON THE SLIDE SHOWN ON THE RECORDING IS INCORRECT AS POINTED OUT BY DR. KORSON

BLOOD GAS MEASUREMENT

A CASE OF VOMITING & LETHARGY A 10 month old girl presents to the ER with her second bout of vomiting and dehydration. The first resolved with IV fluids. She is now lethargic and tachypneic. Her blood gases show- pH=7.54, pCO 2 =16, HCO 3 =17. Electrolytes reveal Na=142, K=3.1, Cl=107, HCO 3 =18. Glucose measures 62 mg/dL.

QUESTION Which ONE of the following choices regarding the patient’s presentation is the most diagnostically helpful? The glucose level This is the second episode of vomiting/dehydration The respiratory alkalosis The metabolic acidosis The patient’s lethargy

QUESTION Which ONE of the following choices regarding the patient’s presentation is the most diagnostically helpful? The glucose level This is the second episode of vomiting/dehydration The respiratory alkalosis The metabolic acidosis The patient’s lethargy

RESPIRATORY ALKALOSIS Hyperventilation Medications/drugs Pain Fever Intracranial: Malformations Trauma Hyperammonemia Causes

THE ANION GAP Difference between measured anions and cations in the blood Definition Calculation Anion gap = Na - (Cl + HCO 3 ) Anion gap = 140 - (105 + 25) Anion gap = 10 Normal anion gap = 10-15

NON-ANION GAP ACIDOSIS Anion gap = Na - ( Cl + HCO 3 ) Anion gap = 140 - (115 + 10) Anion gap = 15  Bicarbonate loss (urine or stool) HIGH NORMAL LOW

ANION GAP ACIDOSIS Anion gap = Na - ( Cl + HCO 3 ) Anion gap = 140 - (105 + 10) Anion gap = 25  Anion accumulation NORMAL HIGH LOW

AMINO ACIDS CHANGE Krebs cycle Urea cycle ORGANIC ACIDS NH 3 ATP ELECTRON TRANSPORT CHAIN PROTEIN DEGRADATION DEFECTS: Ammonia Blood gases Electrolytes Anion gap Organic acidemia Urea cycle disorder

Can help assess the competence of metabolism of: Protein Carbohydrates Fat BASIC LAB TESTING: THE THEORY

CARBOHYDRATE ANABOLISM Krebs cycle ATP ELECTRON TRANSPORT CHAIN LACTATE PYRUVATE GLUCOSE GLYCOGEN GLYCOLYSIS

CARBOHYDRATE CATABOLISM LACTATE PYRUVATE GLUCOSE GLYCOGEN GLUCONEOGENESIS

CARBOHYDRATE CATABOLISM GLYCOGEN STORAGE DISEASE LACTATE PYRUVATE GLUCOSE GLUCONEOGENESIS GLYCOGEN

CARBOHYDRATE CATABOLISM DEFECTS IN GLUCO-NEOGENESIS LACTATE PYRUVATE GLUCOSE GLUCONEOGENESIS GLYCOGEN

CARBOHYDRATE CATABOLISM TESTING LACTATE PYRUVATE GLUCOSE GLUCONEOGENESIS GLYCOGEN

CARBOHYDRATE CATABOLISM TESTING - Glucose - Lactate LACTATE PYRUVATE GLUCOSE GLUCONEOGENESIS GLYCOGEN

Can help assess the competence of metabolism of: Protein Carbohydrates Fat BASIC LAB TESTING: THE THEORY

Krebs cycle ATP ELECTRON TRANSPORT CHAIN FATTY ACID CATABOLISM LIVER FATTY ACIDS KETONES ACETYL CoA Four-step oxidative cycle

Krebs cycle ATP ELECTRON TRANSPORT CHAIN FATTY ACID CATABOLISM PERIPHERY KETONES ACETYL CoA

Krebs cycle ATP ELECTRON TRANSPORT CHAIN FATTY ACID OXIDATION DEFECTS FATTY ACIDS KETONES ACETYL CoA Four-step oxidative cycle

Krebs cycle ATP ELECTRON TRANSPORT CHAIN FATTY ACID OXIDATION TESTING FATTY ACIDS KETONES ACETYL CoA Four-step oxidative cycle

Krebs cycle ATP ELECTRON TRANSPORT CHAIN FATTY ACID OXIDATION TESTING - Ketones FATTY ACIDS KETONES ACETYL CoA Four-step oxidative cycle

Aketosis or hypoketosis is always an abnormal response to hypoglycemia (or even very prolonged fasting) Exception – newborns HYPOGLYCEMIA

Routine laboratory testing can be a good indicator for assessing basic intermediary metabolism: Abnormalities might suggest an underlying acute metabolic disorder SUMMARY Blood gases Electrolytes, bicarb (anion gap) Ammonia Glucose Lactate Urinalysis

WHICH IS WHICH? Which set of lab results most likely correlates with diarrhea and which with a metabolic disorder? A CASE 1 – diarrhea CASE 2 – metabolic disorder B CASE 1 – metabolic disorder CASE 2 – diarrhea ANALYTE CASE 1 CASE 2 NORMALS Sodium 141 135 133–146 Potassium 5 5 3.7-5.9 Chloride 116 103 98-107 Bicarbonate 10 10 21-31 Anion gap 15 22 8-15 (without K)

WHICH IS WHICH? Which set of lab results most likely correlates with diarrhea and which with a metabolic disorder? A CASE 1 – diarrhea CASE 2 – metabolic disorder B CASE 1 – metabolic disorder CASE 2 – diarrhea ANALYTE CASE 1 CASE 2 NORMALS Sodium 141 135 133–146 Potassium 5 5 3.7-5.9 Chloride 116 103 98-107 Bicarbonate 10 10 21-31 Anion gap 15 22 8-15 (without K)

NON-ANION GAP ACIDOSIS Anion gap = Na - ( Cl + HCO 3 ) Anion gap = 140 - (115 + 10) Anion gap = 15  Bicarbonate loss (urine or stool) HIGH NORMAL LOW

ANION GAP ACIDOSIS Anion gap = Na - ( Cl + HCO 3 ) Anion gap = 140 - (105 + 10) Anion gap = 25  Anion accumulation NORMAL HIGH LOW

THE INFANT WITH LIVER DISEASE A 6-month old infant male, product of a healthy pregnancy/labor/delivery, was found to have a distended belly at 3 months. By that time, he had lost 1 kg of weight and was failing to thrive. He continues to feed every 3-4 hours day and night. The liver was noted to be enlarged at 5 months of age. He was evaluated in the ED shortly after that for fever and upper respiratory symptoms.

THE INFANT WITH LIVER DISEASE Lab tests: Glucose=39 mg/dL Mild metabolic acidosis: HCO 3 =15 ALT=118, AST=274 Other liver functions normal Lactate=3.6 mmol/L (NL<2.2) Urinalysis: pH=6.5 Based on these clinical/lab data, this patient has liver disease. Which other organ are you worried about? Brain Kidneys Distal extremities Heart Muscle

THE INFANT WITH LIVER DISEASE Lab tests: Glucose=39 mg/dL Mild metabolic acidosis: HCO 3 =15 ALT=118, AST=274 Other liver functions normal Lactate=3.6 mmol/L (NL<2.2) Urinalysis: pH=6.5 Based on these clinical/lab data, this patient has liver disease. Which other organ are you worried about? Brain Kidneys Distal extremities Heart Muscle

May be associated with: Pan-liver dysfunction Cholestasis Just hepatomegaly Often associated with renal tubular d ysfunction (renal Fanconi syndrome) METABOLIC LIVER DISEASE

A CASE OF HYPOGLYCEMIA A 2 ½ year old boy develops a cough and cold symptoms. His PCP diagnoses a pharyngitis; the patient takes only smaller volumes than usual. On the third day, he is pale and difficult to rouse. He is rushed to the ED and has a seizure in the car. His blood glucose measures 25 mg/dL. Blood gases – pH=7.29, pCO 2 =31, HCO 3 =15. Electrolytes measure Na=131, K=4.4, Cl=99. His urinalysis shows - pH=5.0, no glucose or protein, and 1+ ketones.

QUESTION Which ONE of the following choices regarding the patient’s presentation is the most diagnostically helpful? Hypoglycemia Metabolic acidosis Hypoglycemia with seizure Hypoglycemia with 1+ urine ketones Hypoglycemia, hyponatremia, with seizures

QUESTION Which ONE of the following choices regarding the patient’s presentation is the most diagnostically helpful? Hypoglycemia Metabolic acidosis Hypoglycemia with seizure Hypoglycemia with 1+ urine ketones Hypoglycemia, hyponatremia, with seizures

HYPOKETOTIC HYPOGLYCEMIA

HYPOKETOTIC HYPOGLYCEMIA FAT FATTY ACIDS KETONES HIGH Insulin State

HYPOKETOTIC HYPOGLYCEMIA HIGH Insulin State Insulin tumor Infant of DM mother Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome Iatrogenic

HYPOKETOTIC HYPOGLYCEMIA FAT FATTY ACIDS KETONES LOW Insulin State

HYPOKETOTIC HYPOGLYCEMIA LOW Insulin State Fatty acid oxidation defect Glycogen storage disease type I

Aketosis or hypoketosis is always an abnormal response to hypoglycemia (or even very prolonged fasting) Exception – newborns HYPOGLYCEMIA

THE CRITICALLY ILL INFANT A male is the 5th child of non-consanguineous parents following a normal pregnancy and delivery. Within 12 hours, he developed respiratory distress and lethargy, requiring intubation and ventilation. Blood gases showed: pH=7.21, pCO 2 =10, HCO 3 =4. Electrolytes: Na=137, K=4.9, Cl=105, measured HCO 3 =4. Glucose=44 mg/dL. The patient was dehydrated; lactate measured 21 mmol/L (NL<2.2) but persisted despite rehydration. Ammonia=105 μ mol/L. Urinalysis: ketones=3+.

QUESTION The most likely reason for the high lactic acid level in this patient is dehydration leading to poor perfusion? True False

QUESTION The most likely reason for the high lactic acid level in this patient is dehydration leading to poor perfusion? True False

THE CRITICALLY ILL INFANT A male is the 5th child of non-consanguineous parents following a normal pregnancy and delivery. Within 12 hours, he developed respiratory distress and lethargy, requiring intubation and ventilation. Blood gases showed: pH=7.21, pCO 2 =10, HCO 3 =4. Electrolytes: Na=137, K=4.9, Cl=105, measured HCO 3 =4. Glucose=44 mg/dL. The patient was dehydrated; lactate measured 21 mmol/L (NL<2.2) but persisted despite rehydration. Ammonia=105 μ mol/L. Urinalysis: ketones=3+.

Questions? Call Genetics! We like answering your questions! THANK YOU FOR PARTICIPATING TODAY.
Tags