Pigeonpea is unique among the pulses as its floral morphology allows partial cross-pollination.
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) in 1974 started breeding
hybrids using the natural out-crossing. As a first step a program was launched for breeding a male sterility
system that could be used in breeding hybrids; and a genetic male sterility (GMS) system, controlled by a
single recessive gene (ms1ms1), was identified (Reddy et al., 1978). This GMS was used to develop
hybrid technology to assess the extent of hybrid vigor and ability of out-crossing in seed production on
the male sterile plants. The first ever pigeonpea hybrid ICPH 8 performed very well in the multi-location
trials, coordinated trials, and in the farmers’ fields with mean standard heterosis of 25–35%, was released
in 1991 for cultivation (Saxena et al., 1992). This was followed by the release of five other GMS based
hybrids. Despite the yield advantages of 25–40%, these hybrids could not be commercialized due to seed
production difficulties (Saxena et al., 2006). This valuable experience indicated that in pigeonpea
sufficient heterosis is available and seed production issues can be tackled economically if the GMS
system could be replaced with cytoplasmic genic male sterility (CGMS) system.
Any hybrid technology that is based on CGMS system, works on three different plant genetic
systems and therefore it is popularly known as a “three line hybrid system.” This essentially includes
male-sterile (A- line); its maintainer (B- line), and restorer (R- line). This male sterility system was found
ideal for hybrid breeding and was designated as A4 CMS. The genetics of fertility restoration of
A4 cytoplasm was studied and two dominant genes were found controlling the fertility of the hybrids .
GTH1 is the world's first CMS (A2 cytoplasm) based hybrid developed at SDAU (Sardarkrushinagar
Dantiwada Agricultural University), S K Nagar, Gujarat in 2004. But, this hybrid failed to gain its
stakehold due to the problems associated with the stability of fertility restoration caused by high G x E
interactions. Thus, world's first commercial pigeonpea hybrid is ICPH 2671(A4) produced by crossing
ICPA 2043 with ICPR 2671 released in 2010 by the government of Madhya Pradesh which had 47%
yield advantage over national check Maruti. After the success of hybrid ICPH 2671 in Madhya Pradesh,
two more medium duration hybrids with high yield potential were released in India. In 2012, ICPH 2740
was released for cultivation in Andhra Pradesh (Saxena and Tikle, 2015); while the third hybrid ICPH
3762 was released in Odisha in 2014 (Saxena et al., 2014a).
Reference
1. Choudhary A.K., Sultana R., Pratap A., Nadarajan N. and Jha U.C. (2011) Breeding for abiotic
stresses in pigeonpea. J. Food Leg. 24: 165–174.
2. Gill LS, Hussaini SWH (1986) Cytological observations in Leguminosae from Southern Negeria,
Willdenowia,15, 521.
3. Kassa MT, Penmetsa RV, Carrasquilla-Garcia N, Sarma BK, Datta S, Upadhyaya HD, et al.
(2012) Genetic patterns of domestication in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) and wild
Cajanus relatives. PLoS One 7:e39563.
4. Mallikarjuna, N, KB Saxena, J Laxmi, RVarshney, S Srikanth and D Jadhav (2012). Differences
between Cajanus cajan and C. cajanifolius, the progenitor species of pigeonpea. Genetic
Resources and Crop Evolution 59: 411-417.
5. Mir, R. R., Saxena, R. K., Saxena, K. B., Upadhyaya, H. D., Kilian, A., Cook, D. R., &
Varshney, Rajeev. K. (2013). Whole‐genome scanning for mapping determinacy in pigeonpea
(Cajanus spp.). Plant Breeding, 132, 472–478
6. Naithani ST (1941) Cytological studies on Indian pulses. Part I: The somatic chromosomes and
the pro chromosomes of Cajanus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India
11:67–73.
7. Nene, Y.L. & V.K. Sheila, 1990. Pigeonpea: Geography and importance. In: Y.L. Nene, S.D.
Hall & V.K. Sheila (Eds.), The Pigeonpea, pp. 1–15. C.A.B. International.
8. Odeny DA (2007) The potential of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) in Africa. Natural
Resources Forum 31: 297–305.
9. Plukenet , L.1692 . Phytographia 3 , Table 213 , Figure 3 .