Plantar, babinski

18,252 views 94 slides Jul 23, 2018
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 94
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83
Slide 84
84
Slide 85
85
Slide 86
86
Slide 87
87
Slide 88
88
Slide 89
89
Slide 90
90
Slide 91
91
Slide 92
92
Slide 93
93
Slide 94
94

About This Presentation

Plantar reflex, Pathological babinski sign, Anatomy, Physiology, Types, Eliciting babinski, Variants, Mimickers, Forme-fruste, Puusepp's sign, Chaddock, Oppenheims, Gordon, Stansky, SchaeffersBrissauds,


Slide Content

PLANTAR REFLEX and Babinski sign Dhananjay gupta Dept. of neurology Ms Ramaiah medical college

Superficial/ cutaneous reflexes: Response to stimulation of skin/ mucous membrane d/b DTR : these are polysynaptic : slower response to stimulus : longer latency : fatigue easily : usually abolished in pyramidal lesions : U/L absence may be a sensitive indicator of CST lesion

Superficial/ cutaneous reflexes: Upper limbs Grasp reflex (C6-T1) Scapular Interscapular reflex Lower limbs Cremastric Scrotal/ dartos reflex Gluteal reflex (L4-S2) Plantar reflex Supf anal reflex Bulbocavernous reflex

Pathological ll reflexes: Dorsiflexion of toes Babinski group of signs Chaddock / oppenheims Plantar flexion of toes Plantar grasp Plantar muscle reflex Rossolimo sign

Pathological ll reflexes: Dorsiflexion of toes Babinski group of signs Chaddock / oppenheims Plantar flexion of toes Plantar grasp Plantar muscle reflex Rossolimo sign Miscellaneous Synkinetic movements – Strumpell’s sign Puusepps’s sign

PLANTAR REFLEX

The Virgin and Child with Two Angels, Andrea del Verrocchio : 1476-78

Joseph FranCois FElix Babinski:1896 Brief paper of 28 lines (his longest paper!!) ' reflexe cutane plantaire ' (cutaneous plantar reflex) in February 1896 Described the sign for the first time Remarkable observations about this reflex Absence in certain states, hemiplegia/ paraplegia

I have observed that in some patients.. Stimulation of the sole on the healthy side of a patient with hemiplegia or lower limb monoplegia caused withdrawal of the lower limb with flexion of the toes on the metatarsal bones. In contrast, the same stimulus applied to the sole on the affected side caused extension of the toes at the metatarso -phalangeal joints, even in patients who were unable to move their toes voluntarily. while flexion predominates in the last two or three toes, it is in the first one or two toes that extension is usually the most pronounced

Essentially two components Phenomene des arteils : dorsiflexion of the toes (1898) Signe de l’eventail : fanning response – abduction of toes (1903)

I had the opportunity to observe such a brief alteration in a child of mine subject to night terrors. As I was attempting to comfort her I ran my thumb lightly against the lateral aspect of her sole as one does and observed a definite Extensor response . As soon as the paroxysm was over the response reverted to flexor Similar responses were described in patient with Jaksonian fit and strychnine posioning

PHYSIOLOGY

Physiology: Polysynaptic reflex Normal defensive response to any painful stimulus UL are more under control of the brain LL show more of a reflex response Essentially a triple flexion response : Flexion of thigh on pelvis Of leg on the thigh Of the foot on the leg

1. Pre-requisites: Entire leg exposed (not only socks!) Patient should be supine, knee extended Explain the patient Stroking of sole should not generate anxiety/ fear/ tickling Limb should remain floppy

2. Stimulation: Stimulate the plantar surface of foot, on the lateral aspect Far lateral side In the distribution of the S1/ sural nerve Begin near the heel and Go upwards at a deliberate pace, not very briskly Stop short of MTP joint to turn medially But stop short of base of the great toe

3. Object for Stimulation: Applicator stick Reflex Hammer Thumb nail

3. Object for Stimulation: Babinski – Goose quill Henry Miller – Bentley key

4. Strength of Stimulation: Firm enough to cause a consistent response Light enough not to cause undue discomfort/ pain Strong enough so as not to cause a grasp reflex Gentle enough so as not to cause withdrawal *Eliciting a plantar reflex brings out the masochistic tendencies of the examining doctors **Every physician should undergo plantar stimulation in order to appreciate the discomfort

4. Strength of Stimulation: Strength of stimulus also depends upon the degree of response In patients with no response – progressively firmer stimulus may be requires In patients with strongly extensor response, only a touch of fingers may be enough Babinski : observed extensor response when the wind blew curtains across the feet of a spinal cord injury patient!

5. Normal response: Plantar flexion of the toes Inward curling of toes Plantar flexion of foot Triple flexion response Flexion of the TFL

6. BABINSKI response: Extension of great toe - MTP Fanning/ abduction of toes Dorsiflexion of ankle Flexion of knee/ hip Slight abduction of thigh Leading to withdrawal of leg

3 rules governing BABINSKI response: Upward movement of great toe is pathological only if a.w . contraction of EHL *The contraction of EHL can be seen/ felt on dorsum of foot **Great toe may move up without contraction of the EHL as a component of flexion reflex in general

3 rules governing BABINSKI response: Contraction of EHL is pathological only if it occurs in synchronously with reflex activity in other flexor muscles *The contraction of tensor fascia lata and the hamstrings **Can be seen/ felt at the lateral thigh

3 rules governing BABINSKI response: A true upgoing plantar response is reproducible, unlike the voluntary withdrawal of the toes *Ideally adapt the strength of stimulus to the patient **helpful to stroke the lateral aspect of foot than the plantar aspect ***stimulate the sole only partially rather than stroke fully till the ball of toe Volunatry withdrawal does not involve TFL FATIGUE of EXTENSOR plantar is extremely rare

Myths regarding BABINSKI response: Site of stimulus *A true Babinski can be elicited by stimulation anywhere on the leg **Though bet response is from the lateral aspect of foot ***Any stimulus is legitimate unless not applied distal to the ball of toe

Myths regarding BABINSKI response: The movement should be the ‘first’ *Not necessarily Sometimes a small voluntary action may precede the reflex Sometimes a small downward movement may precede the recruitment of great toe in the flexion synergy

Myths regarding BABINSKI response: In doubtful cases, fanning of toes is a useful measure *Fanning of toes is only for historical interest May also occur in normal individuals Undue attention should not be paid to this

Myths regarding BABINSKI response: 4. The movement of toe is quick *usually it is quick, flicking motion Though what is the definition of quick/ slow ?? Sometimes the upward movement may be slow, tonic – “THE MAJESTIC RISE OF THE GREAT TOE”

Neonate v/s adults: Entire reflex synergy is much more brisk, as a part of withdrawal to pain Toes are a part of this synergy Toes go up at the same time as the leg flexes As the child assumes upright posture, plantar becomes a postural reflex Anatomist : upgoing toe is extensor movement Physiologist : flexor movement

adults: As the pyramidal system matures, exerts more dominance over spinal neurons Toes are no longer a part of flexion reflex synergy Becomes a purely local cutaneous/ segmental response Mediated by short toe flexors Flexion may predominate in great or little toe depending on side stimulated Absence of flexion is not pathological, unless Marked difference between two sides

Why maximum movement at great toe: Anatomical structure of MT-P joints Little toes cannot just move up enough

Role of pyramidal tract/ supraspinal : Inhibit entire flexion synergy Inhibit participation of toe extensors Essential for normal ambulation Otherwise our legs and feet will have unnecessary flexion response just from stumbling over a pebble Pyramidal dysfunction – restores neonatal response First to emerge is Babinski, others may re-emerge depending on extensive disease

Pyrimidal dysfunction: ANATOMICAL Stroke Spinal cord lesions Myelitis Demyelinating disorders PHYSIOLOGICAL Metabolic Hypoglycemia Epiletic seizures

Pyrimidal dysfunction leading to bs : Loss of disinhibition Flexion synergy becomes brisker Great toe is recruited in this response Is almost always a.w . some degree of weakness of toe May only be in form of difficulty in performing rapid foot movements

Advantages of Babinski sign: Most reliable Dependable Consistent signs Good inter-observer variability Indicates presence of organic neurological disease

limitations of Babinski sign: 1. d/b VOLUNTARY WITHDRAWAL Voluntary withdrawal usually a.w plantar flexion And not ankle dorsiflexion How to reduce withdrawal ? Helps to explain and fore-warn the patient Internal rotation of leg during toe extension indicates recruitment of TFL Pressure over the base of great toe inhibits withdrawal Can use variations or the AUTO/SELF-BABINSKI

video

Edouard Brissauds : Charcot’s pupil (1896) Described few days after Babinski’s famous lecture Stimulation of lateral thigh Causes contraction of TFL Brissaud’s reflex

Brissaud’s reflex (video)

limitations of Babinski sign: 2. Lack of BS in pyrimidal dysfunction Spinal shock – temporary inexcitability of spinal inter-neurons Cerebral shock LMN lesions in pathway to EHL Radiculopathy Peroneal nerve palsy ALS, peripheral neuropathy

Estonian neurologist Ludvig Puusepp May be present when Babinski is not elicitable Sensitive pyramidal sign Puusepp’s sign:

Slow, tonic abduction of the little toe On Plantar stimulation Great toe extension may be absent Puusepp’s sign:

limitations of Babinski sign: 3. Flexor response in spite of CST lesion Frontal lobe lesions – hyperactive plantar grasp ALS/ MND – LMN involvement of toe extensors

limitations of Babinski sign: 4. Basal ganglia lesions Intact extrapyramidal pathway necessary for extensor response Thus in EPS – there is no extensor response If extensor response in EPS/ Parkinson's – s/o involvement of CST

limitations of Babinski sign: 5. Technical limitations Missing great toe Foot amputations Bony deformities – hallux valgus Thick sole, foot callosities Peripheral neuropathy - sural Paralysis of toe flexors Pes cavus and high arched foot – fixed dorsiflexion

Remember Babinski is not merely a reflex of toe movement A number of other movements are associated Here comes the role of observing thigh and leg flexion Brissauds reflex is an example What if a patient has missing toe?

NOT ALWAYS! Hypoglycemia , metabolic coma Alcohol intoxication Post-ictal states Deep sleep, deep anesthesia Cheyne stoke – during apnea phase Is positive Babinski always pathological?

True Babinski Minimal Plantar : contraction of TFL Spontaneous Babinski : passive flexion of hip and knee or passive extension of knee may produce Babinski in extensive CST lesions Bilateral Babinski : crossed extensor response : B/L cerebral or SC lesion Tonic Babinski : slow, prolonged extension – in combined Frontal and EPS Exaggerated Babinski : flexor or extensor spasm Flexor spasm – B/L CST or SC lesion Extensor spasm : B/L lesion but preserved posterior column Types of babinski

Pseudo-Babinski : choreo-athetosis , hyperkinesia of toe Inversion of plantar : short toe flexors paralysed/ flexor tendons severed Withdrawal response : voluntary Babinski mimickers

Other methods for eliciting Babinski reflex

“Open season for the hunting of reflex by different physicians” R. Foster Kennedy (1884-1952)

Stimulate lateral aspect of foot Bring under lateral malleolus Bring the stimulus forward towards little toe Less specific but more sensitive Both are complementary Causes less withdrawal Reverse choddock ? Stimulus opposite! A. Choddock sign

Choddock sign (video)

Dragging the knuckles heavily Down the anteromedial shin From infrapatellar region to ankle Response is usually slow Occurs towards end of stimulation more sensitive when combined with babinski B. oppenheim sign

oppenheim sign (video)

German : Max Schaeffer Deep pressure on achillis tendon Causes upgoing plantar c. Schaeffer’s sign

Pricking the dorsum of the foot Elicits a plantar response d. bing’s sign

Forceful downward stretching/ snapping of the 2 nd / 3 rd / 4 th toe Difficult to obtain Slowly flex the toe, press on the nail Twist the toe, hold for few seconds e. Gonda sign

Upper limb equivalents

Less consistent More difficult to elicit Less significant diagnostically Confusion regarding nomenclature Upper limb pathological reflexes

Stimulus – reflex hammer Response – flexion of fingers And distal phalynx of thumb 1. Wartenberg’s sign

Hand is relaxed Wrist dorsiflexed and fingers partially flexed Middle finger partially extended Examiner holds the middle finger Stimulus – nips/ snaps the finger nail with a quick sharp stimulus f/b sudden release Rebound of distal phalynx stretches the finger flexors Response – flexion of index finger, flexion and adduction of thumb 2. Hoffman’s sign

Hoffman video

Let the wrist hang Same – fingers flexed, except middle finger partially extended Stimus – thump/ flick the finger pad Response – same as Hoffman’s 3. tromner’s sign HOFFMANS SIGN + TROMNERS SIGN = HOFFMANS TEST

tromner’s sign (video)

THANKYOU!!!