port of Busan-Enrico derffigo intopia.pptx

port of Busan-Enrico derffigo intopia

1. P ort of Busan DO THI TUYET NHI 16230136 PHAN TU TU 16230153 TRAN THUY HIEN 16230150 SUPERVISOR: ENRICO D’AGOSTINI

2. In troduction OPERATION RECORD: CALLING VESSELS; 55,608 SHIPS CALLING VESSELS PER DAY: 152.3 SHIPS CONTAINER CARGO HANDLING: 11.4 million TEU TOTAL CARGO HANDLING TONNAGE: 169,264,000 t G ENERAL INFORMATION: PORT OPEN DATE: 11-09-1876 WATER DEPTH: 15M~17M LENGTH OF COST: 202Km 2

3. In troduction OPERATION RECORD: CALLING VESSELS; 55,608 SHIPS CALLING VESSELS PER DAY: 152.3 SHIPS CONTAINER CARGO HANDLING: 11.4 million TEU TOTAL CARGO HANDLING TONNAGE: 169,264,000 t G ENERAL INFORMATION: PORT OPEN DATE: 11-09-1876 WATER DEPTH: (-)5M~(-)17M LENGTH OF COST: 202Km 3

4. 4 BUSAN NORTH PORT (OLD PORT)

5. 5 BUSAN NEW PORT

6. 6

7. DOMESTIC MARKET SHARE (LOCAL VS T/S) 7

8. BUSAN PORT THOUGHPUT 8

9. THOUGHPUT TREND: NEW PORT VS NORTH PORT 9

10. Busan Port : Transshipment hub port

11. BUSAN MAIN ROUTE 11

12. Busan hub port 12 The container vessels become larger and call at hub ports: - Hub and spokes system, which large vessels only call at hub ports - Trend of container vessel being bigger is accelerating the adoption of Hub & Spokes system * 4,000TEU(’80s)→ 6,000(’90s)→8,000(’00s)→ 20,000TEU(future) - International logistics has been changed into ‘regional hub-based global logistics system’

13. 13

14. Large vessels’ calling at Busan Port 14

15. The benefits of Hub Port 15 - Create the ability to take advantage of scale - Minimize the level of complexity - Shorten the rotation time of goods, storage time of goods

16. Inland transportation system in Busan port

17. Expressway network 17

18. Railway network 18

19. Composition of transportation 19 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Increasing rate Total 4,677 4,807 5,150 5,130 5,566 4.4% Road 3,932 4,085 4,384 4,460 4,942 5.9% (%) 84.0 85 85.1 86.6 88.8 Railway 607 593 650 551 580 -1.1% (%) 13.0 12.3 12.6 11.0 10.4 Coastal Transportation 138 129 116 119 44 -24.9% (%) 3.0 2.7 2.3 2.4 0.8

20. SWOT analysist

21. 21

22. Conflicts can exist between citizen’s demand and port industry Airport and seaport should be linked for a better system Logistics center contains rest areas and top-notched system like RFID as well as road and railway construction Long-term plan can save a huge amount of money such as buying CONCLUSIONS 22

23. Land and compensation for residents etc. Pre-planned transportation plan based on precise survey Aggressive investment on infrastructure Need of B/C analysis on choice of transportation Benchmarking from failure cases Logistics Experts’participation CONCLUSIONS 23

24. Thanks! Any questions? 24 😉