The owner turned and smiled weakly. “Make me an
offer,” he said. “It’s been for sale for over a year. Nobody
even comes by anymore to look at it.”
“I’ll look,” I said, and I bought the house a half hour later
for $20,000 less than his asking price.
It was a cute little two-bedroom home, with gingerbread
trim on all the windows. It was light blue with gray accents
and had been built in 1930. Inside there was a beautiful
rock fireplace, as well as two tiny bedrooms. It was a
perfect rental house.
I gave the owner $5,000 down for a $45,000 house that
was really worth $65,000, except that no one wanted to buy
it. The owner moved out in a week, happy to be free, and
my first tenant moved in, a local college professor. After the
mortgage, expenses, and management fees were paid, I put
a little less than $40 in my pocket at the end of each month.
Hardly exciting.
A year later, the depressed Oregon real estate market
had begun to pick up. California investors, flush with money
from their still booming real estate market, were moving
north and buying up Oregon and Washington. I sold that
little house for $95,000 to a young couple from California
who thought it was a bargain. My capital gains of
approximately $40,000 were placed into a 1031 tax-
deferred exchange, and I went shopping for a place to put
my money. In about a month, I found a 12-unit apartment
house right next to the Intel plant in Beaverton, Oregon.
The owners lived in Germany, had no idea what the place
was worth, and again, just wanted to get out of it. I offered
$275,000 for a $450,000 building. They agreed to
$300,000. I bought it and held it for two years. Utilizing the
same 1031-exchange process, we sold the building for
$495,000 and bought a 30-unit apartment building in
Phoenix, Arizona. We had moved to Phoenix by then to get
out of the rain, and needed to sell anyway. Like the former
Oregon market, the real estate market in Phoenix was depressed. The price of the 30-unit apartment building in
Phoenix was $875,000, with $225,000 down. The cash flow
from the 30 units was a little over $5,000 a month.
The problem with “secure” investments is that
they are often sanitized, that is, made so safe
that the gains are less.
The Arizona market began moving up and, a few years
later, a Colorado investor offered us $1.2 million for the
property.
The point of this example is how a small amount can
grow into a large amount. Again, it is a matter of
understanding financial statements, investment strategies,
a sense of the market, and the laws.
If people are not versed in these subjects, then obviously
they must follow standard dogma, which is to play it safe,
diversify, and only invest in secure investments. The
problem with “secure” investments is that they are often
sanitized, that is, made so safe that the gains are less.
Most large brokerage houses will not touch speculative
transactions in order to protect themselves and their
clients. And that is a wise policy. The really hot deals are not
offered to people who are novices. Often, the best deals that
make the rich even richer are reserved for those who
understand the game. It is technically illegal to offer
speculative deals to someone who is considered not
sophisticated, but of course it happens. The more
sophisticated I get, the more opportunities come my way.
Another case for developing your financial intelligence
over a lifetime is simply that more opportunities are