Basic Idea-
›Memory happens because of processing
information
›The memorization of things are dependent on
how deep the info was processed
:
Deep” Associating meaningfulness
to stimulus rather than associating
.
things such as numbers
There isn’t any real structure to it
No distinct difference between LTM and STM
/
SHALLOW PERC
EPTUAL
Structural Processing:
processing how it
looks/appears
Phonemic Processing:
processing how
something sounds
Graphemic: Letters
that make up the word
Orthographic: the
shape
/
DEEP SEMANTIC
When we relate
something to
something else
When we think of the
meaning
The importance of it
Repeating the information
“According to the levels of
processing theory, onlyonly
elaborative rehearsal improves
long term memory” - Eysenck
Involves deeper, more semantic
analysis of the information
Being able to distinguish the
items
Focuses on processes which make up
memory
Non-structured
No real distinction between LTM and STM
Memory is a byproduct of processing
Only elaborative rehearsal can improve LTM
Focuses on LTM and STM
Is structured (LTM and STM)
Rehearsal always improves LTM
Showed that encoding was much more
complex
The work helped show that “deeper”
processing does in fact improve
memorization.
Shows why some things are better
remembered
Work is backed up by further case studies,
there is evidence
It is more descriptive than explanatory.
“Deep” and “Shallow” are very vague
Neuropsychological studies show that there are
structures/defined storage systems in memory
Provides a better account of explicit memory
than it does for implicit memory
Over simplified.
Suggested that shallow processing led to fast
forgetting
Doesn’t apply to patients with memory diseases
such as amnesia
Hyde & Jenkins (1973): Deeper processing led to
better recall of info
Glenberg et. al. (1977): Found that maintenance is
actually beneficial but doesn’t improve LTM as
much as elaboration
Morris et. al. (1977) found that deep processing
does not always help long term memory and thus
proposed a transfer-appropriate processing theory.
Nyberg (2002): Brain Imaging studies that support
the notion that in memory testing the brain areas
used to perceive are reactivated
Craik and Tulving (1975): People recall words
memorized semantically better than phonemically
or structurally.
•Craik and Lockhart's levels of processing memory theory neglect the
unconscious mind
•Therefore, it doesn't explain behavior from a psychodynamic perspective
•For example, levels of processing memory doesn't explain how we
remember our dreams, which belongs to the unconscious mind
•Shows that the stimulus-response theory is wrong, as there are memory
processes
•Stimuli that are processed is the basic start of memory
B iblio g ra phy
Baddley, A. D. (1976). The Psycholgy of Memory. Basic Books.
Craik, F. I. (1979, September 7). Levels of Processing: A Framework for memory research. This Week's
Citation Classic , 92.
Eysenck, M. W. (n.d.). Chapter 9: Human Memory. (Psychology Press) Retrieved April 4, 2009, from
Psychology: An International Perspective:
http://www.psypress.com/pip/resources/slp/topic.asp?chapter=ch09&topic=ch09-sc-03
Eysenck, M. W. (2001). Principles of Cognitive Psychology (2nd Edition ed.). Psychology Press.
Kendler, T. S. (1995). Levels of Cognitive Development. Lawrence Erbaum Associates.
Michael W. Eysenck, M. T. (2005, April). Chapter 6: Learning and Memory. (Psychology Press) Retrieved
April 4, 2009, from Cognitive Psychology: A Student's Handbook:
http://www.psypress.com/ek5/resources/demo_ch06-sc-03.asp
Psychology, S. (n.d.). Craik and Lockhart 1972 Model of Memory in Psychology. Retrieved from Simply
Psychology: http://www.simplypsychology.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/levelsofprocessing.html