Raft polymerization

rameshgumageri 11,443 views 19 slides Apr 04, 2015
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 19
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19

About This Presentation

basics of RAFT polymerization


Slide Content

BY RAMESH 13ML15F RAFT POLYMERIZATION A SEMINAR ON

CONTENTS Introduction Comparison between conventional and C ontrolled R adical P olymerization RAFT mechanism RAFT outcomes

INTRODUCTION The discovery and Development of controlled free radical polymerization (CRP) techniques Stable free radical polymerization (SFRP) Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) Reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT)

The overall rate of polymerization is dependant on the combined rates of initiation, propagation and termination . Free radical polymerization: the steps

1.The lifetime of growing chains is extended from ~1 s in RP to more than 1 h in CRP through the participation of dormant species and intermittent reversible activation. 2.Initiation is slow and free radical initiator is often left unconsumed at the end of a conventional RP. In most CRP systems, initiation is very fast and near instantaneous growth of all chains can be achieved, which ultimately enables control over chain architecture. 3.Nearly all chains are dead in RP, whereas in CRP the proportion of dead chains is usually of 10%. Differences b/n RP and CRP

4. Polymerization in CRP is often slower than in RP. However, the rates may be comparable in certain cases (e.g., when the targeted MW in CRP is relatively low). 5.Termination usually occurs between long chains and constantly generated new chains in RP. In CRP systems, all chains are short at the early stages of the reaction and become progressively longer; thus, the termination rate significantly decreases with time. 6.In degenerative transfer (DT) processes, new chains are constantly generated by a small amount of conventional initiator, and therefore termination is more likely throughout the reaction

WHY CRP?? Free radical polymerization essentially could not control MW or MWD Radical polymerization (RP) could not yield block copolymers due to the very short lifetime of the growing chains (1 s) At the end of a polymerization, unreacted initiator is often left in the reaction mixture No pure block copolymers and essentially no polymers with controlled architecture can be produced by conventional RP.

RAFT (Reversible Addition-Fragmentation chain Transfer) technology is a form of controlled free radical polymerization RAFT (Reversible Addition-Fragmentation chain Transfer) is a form of living radical polymerization involving conventional free radical polymerization of a substituted monomer in the presence of a suitable chain transfer (RAFT) reagent operates on the principle of degenerative chain transfer WHAT IS RAFT??

RAFT AGENT A small organic molecule that is responsible for controlling growth. Suitable selection of RAFT agent is needed , because intermediate radicals may participate in some side reactions, such as cross-termination. The key to the RAFT polymerization process is the RAFT Agent.

TYPES OF RAFT AGENTS Dithiobenzoates Very high transfer constants Prone to hydrolysis May cause retardation when used in high concentrations Trithiocarbonates Xanthates

RAFT mechanism

1.Suitable RAFT agent 2.Controlled free radical polymerization 3.well-defined polymer RAFT PROCESS

It can be stopped and restarted at any time Polymers with controlled molecular weight • Narrow distribution of molecular weight, i.e. low polydispersity • The ability to incorporate, in a defined sequence, one or more type of monomers in the polymer chain • The RAFT group being retained in the final polymer, and the opportunity for further chemical manipulation of the RAFT group, including further polymerization or removal. RAFT technology also provides the ability to design polymers with highly complex architecture RAFT OUTCOMES

Polymer architectures via RAFT

REFERENCES A.B. Lowe , C.L. McCormick / Prog . Polym . Sci . 32 (2007) 283–351 W.A. Braunecker , K. Matyjaszewski / Prog . Polym . Sci . 32 (2007) 93–146
Tags