Simplify Care: Live the Ramadan Spirituality with Premix HPL_EL_PC2025_09
Patient case study 1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 8th ed. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation; 2021. Mr. X Male 58 Years of age Bangladeshi Medical History T2DM, diagnosed 6 years ago Hypertension Dyslipidemia Medication Metformin 2g BID Glimepiride 4 mg Sitagliptin 100 mg QD Ramipril 10mg QD Rosuvastatin 10mg QD Which Medication would be preferable and comfortable choice for this patient? Physical Examination Weight 85 Kg Height 5 feet 7 inch BMI 29.3 kg/m 2 BP 140/90 mmHg Waist circumference 39 inch Laboratory Report HbA1C 8.7 % RBS 14.4 mmol /L Total Cholesterol 196 mg/dl LDL 109 mg/dl HDL 36 mg/dl Triglyceride 145 mg/dl eGFR/Creatinine Normal
Glycemic control: Need to address both FPG & PPG Delay in insulin initiation due to inertia may leads to β cell failure Clinical evidence suggests that reducing PPG is as important as reducing FPG Combination injectables CLINICAL INERTIA X Oral / injectable combination + + CLINICAL INERTIA X Oral dual / triple therapy + CLINICAL INERTIA X Oral monotherapy CLINICAL INERTIA X Lifestyle modification Patient lose 70% of β cell function Data from Heine RJ et al. BMJ . 2006; 333: 1200 ‒ 1204
Poor control may leads to complication related mortality: Death by cause for all ages Mr X Male 58 Years of age Bangladeshi This patients has all the CV risks and multiple co- morbidities which will reduce life expectancy Challenges: Reach at Glycemic goal CV risk reduction Manage other co-morbidities Majority are dying due to CV complications Data obtain from WHO
Back to our patient case study Mr X Male 58 Years of age Bangladeshi Which Medication would be preferable and comfortable choice for this patient? Physical Examination Weight 85 Height 5 feet 7 inch BMI 29.3 kg/m 2 BP 140/90 mmHg Waist circumference 39 inch Laboratory Report HbA1C 8.7 % RBS 14.4 mmol /L Total Cholesterol 196 mg/dl LDL 109 mg/dl HDL 36 mg/dl Triglyceride 145 mg/dl eGFR/Creatinine Normal Fasting Plasma Glucose Post-Breakfast Blood Sugar Post-Lunch Blood Sugar Post-Dinner 7 11.7 13.6 12.7 Reason for visit: Uncontrolled blood sugar despite multiple oral anti diabetic agents
ADA-EASD Guidelines Outline Medications for Glycaemic Control and Weight Management as Adjuncts to Lifestyle Interventions 1,2 Goal | Achievement and Maintenance of Glycaemic Goals Glycaemic Management: Choose approaches that provide the efficacy to achieve goals Efficacy for Glucose Lowering 1 Dulaglutide Semaglutide Tirzepatide Insulin Combination oral Combination injectable (GLP-1RA/insulin) Very High Medications for the management of T2D can have varying effects on clinical outcomes, including body weight, that vary between, and sometimes within, drug classes 2 DPP-4=Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4; GLP-1RA=Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist; SGLT-2=Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2; SU=Sulfonylurea; TZD=Thiazolidinedione. 1. Davies MJ, et al. Diabetes Care. 2022;45(11):2753-2786. 2. Apovian CM, et al. Adv Ther . 2019;36:44-58. GLP-1RA (not listed above) Metformin SGLT-2 inhibitor SU (Damages ß cell) TZD High DPP-4 inhibitor Intermediate
Addressing total glycemic control with Insulin Survey shows multiple concerns for using complex regimen 1. Peyrot et al. Diabet Med 2012;29:682-9; 2. Marrett et al. Diabetes 2008;57 (Suppl. 1):A174| Mean HFS ii worry score There is need for simple & flexible insulin regimen to overcome the challenges of complex inflexible regimens & fear of hypoglycemia *Total patient sample, n=1530; t Total patient sample, n=1984. HFS, Hypoglycemia Fear Survey.
Target of Glycemic Status should be individualized FBG ≥ 14mmol/l &/or HbA1c ≥10% &/or RBG ≥ 18mmol/l FBG 10.0-<14 mmol/l &/or HbA1c 8.5-<10.0%% &/or RBG12-18mmol/l Bangladesh National Guideline What will be preferred medication for our case? LS+ Insulin ( HumalogMix ) ± Metformin Diabetes Management Algorithm in Uncomplicated, Non Pregnant adults with T2DM (Based on Glycemic Status) FBG<10.0 mmol/l &/or HbA1c <8.5% &/or RBG<12mmol/l Life style (LS) + Metformin Asymptomatic Symptomatic LS+Metformin+Sulphonyluria or Other agent LS+ Insulin (Premix/Basal/Split-mix) ± Metformin s tatus should
ADA/EASD and AACE guidelines which prefer basal insulin for initiation. 9 Premix insulin – What guidelines say Viswanathan Mohan, et al., Consensus on Initiation and Intensification of Premix Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes Management. JAPI. 2017;65; Kalra, Sanjay & Gupta, Yashdeep . (2015). Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders. 14. 17. 10.1186/s40200-015-0146-1. IDF 2012 Initiation of premix insulin OD or BID when 1st or 2 nd line therapies fail to achieve glycemic target of HbA1c < 7%. NICE guideline OD premix insulin should be considered when HbA1c level is ≥ 9%. INCG 2013 Premix insulin OD as an add-on therapy to metformin when HbA1c level is > 7.5% to ≤ 8.5% If HbA1c > 7% and FPG > 110 mg/dL, then premix insulin is titrated to achieve FPG < 110 mg/dL. Initiation with premix insulin therapy at a starting dose of 10 U CDA 2016 Initiation of premix insulin at 5-10 U OD or BID JAPI 2014 Recommends premix insulin /co-formulation OD in patients with HbA1c > 9% and high FPG and PPG Many International and Indian guidelines recommend insulin initiation either with a basal or premixed/co-formulation insulins
HbA1c reduction expected with class of drugs Average HbA1c reduction expected with available class of drug Viswanathan Mohan, et al., Initiation and intensification of insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Physician barriers and solutions – An Indian perspective. Endocrine and Metabolic Science 4 (2021) 100103 Sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors Sulfonylureas Glinides Metformin Basal Insulin Premix insulin Basal Bolus 1.12 0.74 0.74 0.72 0.77 0.64 1.21 1.28 1.91 1.22 Drug class Average reduction in %
Patient profile for premix insulin initiation HbA1C > 8.5% or RBS >12 mmol/l or FPG> 10 mmol/l 11 1. Bangladesh National Guideline; 2. Kumar A,, et al. Indian reality of managing type 2 diabetes: an expert review of global and national guidelines for optimum insulin use. J Diabetol 2020;11:148‑57. Adults at early or progressed stage of disease Elderly patients in need of simple therapy Limited sources & literacy, simple and easy to explain insulin therapy is needed Patient on high carbohydrate diet Simple and convenient option needed for intensification Limited literacy and a simple and easy‑to‑understand regimen Simple and convenient options needed for future intensification GLYCEMIC FACTORS PHASE OF LIFE Bangladesh REALITIES PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS
Why choose premix insulin? Coverage of both FPG and PPG Effective HbA1c control Improved PPG control (compared to basal insulin alone) A single delivery device Fewer injections (compared to basal bolus) Less dosing errors Convenient Option to intensify with same insulin 12 H. E. Turner, et al., The use of fixed-mixture insulins in clinical practice. European journal of clinical pharmacology. 2000 Apr;56(1):19-25.
Finding appropriate Premix insulin Paradigm Study: HumalogMix 25 Vs basal bolus thrapy Study Objective Demonstrate non-inferiority of HumalogMix25 to BBT Humalog Mix 25 Basal Bolus Therapy 1 Injection 2 Injection 3 Injection 1 Injection 2-3 Injection 4 Injection If target not achieved Increase to BID injection If target not achieved Increase to TID injection Once daily. Pre-dinner. 10U Inj. Add 1 dose at pre-BF, Total daily dose Divided into 2 for Pre-BF & dinner Additional 3 units at Pre-lunch Once daily. Pre-bed. 10U Inj. Add bolus at Pre-meal if not covered Add bolus at Pre-meal up To 3 times daily
PARADIGM: LS Mean Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Endpoint Bowering K et al. Diabet Med 2012;29:e263-72 LS Mean Change in HbA1c (%) % of Patients Reaching HbA1c Target Glargine + Lispro (n=184) HumalogMix 25 (n=177) Target HbA1c <7.0%, n (%) 70 (39.1) 68 (40.0) Target HbA1c ≤6.5%, n (%) 34 (19.0) 36 (21.2) Between-treatment difference (95% CI): -0.04% (-0.25, 0.17)
PARADIGM: Mean HbA1c at week 48 Mean HbA1c at week 48 Number of injections % (SD) HumalogMix 25 1 injection 7.3 (1.04) 2 injections 7.2 (0.82) 3 injections 7.3 (1.26) G + L 1 glargine dose 7.2 (0.74) G + 1 lispro injection 7.6 (1.31) G + 2 lispro injections 7.6 (1.28) G + 3 lispro injections 7.2 (0.89) LM25: insulin lispro mix 25, 25% lispro, 75% insulin lispro protamine suspension, G: insulin glargine, L: insulin lispro injection, HbA1c: haemoglobin A 1c , SD: standard deviation Reference: Bowering et al. Diabetes Med. 2012;29(9):e263-272.
Intensification by HumalogMix 25 ensures similar safety in a simple & convenient way * Glargine only. † LM25 not used 4 times per day. G: insulin glargine , L: insulin lispro injection Reference: Bowering et al. Diabetes Med. 2012;29(9):e263-272. 1 injection per day* 2 injections per day 3 injections per day 4 injections per day † Overall Hypoglycemia
7-Point SMBG Profiles and PPG levels Glargine + Lispro (n=184) Insulin Lispro Mix 25 (n=177) LS mean (SE) change in PPG levels from baseline to endpoint, mmol/l 4.89 (1.2) 5.24 (1.2) Blood Glucose ( mmol /L) 1. Bowering K et al. Diabet Med 2012;29:e263-72; 2. Riddle et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2014;16:396–402 For initiation & intensification HumalogMix 25, the only premix insulin to achieve non-inferiority vs BBT 1,2
Key findings from RCTs Comparison between premix and basal plus regimen Jin et al. 2016 Tinahones et al . 2014 Bowering K et al. 2012;29:e263-72 (PARADIGM) Aschner et al. 2015 (GALAPAGOS) Riddle et al. 2014 BIAsp 30 BID vs. glargine OD + IGlu OD/BID BIAsp 30 BID vs. glargine OD ± IGlu OD vs. glargine OD + IGlu ≤TID BIAsp 30/LM 25 OD/BID vs. glargine OD ± IGlu OD LM 25 BID vs. glargine OD + Humalog OD LM 25 BID/TID vs. glargine OD + ILispro TID Studies in insulin-naïve patients Overall hypoglycemia HbA 1c Studies in patients previously receiving basal insulin Insulin dose Weight Favours premix No difference Favours basal plus BIAsp, biphasic insulin aspart; BID, twice daily; glargine, insulin glargine; IGlu , insulin glulisine; LM, lispro mix; OD, once daily; RCT, randomised controlled trial; TID, three times daily Aschner et al. J Diabetes Complications 2015;29:838 – 45; Jin et al. J Diabetes 2016;8:405 – 13 ; Riddle et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2014;16:396–402; Tinahones et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2014; 16:963–70; Vora et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2015;17:1133 –41 Non Inferiority of Premix X X X X HumalogMix 25 Only Premix Analogue insulin ensure Non-inferiority Vs BBT Non Inferior
Patient Follow Up Mr. X Male 58 Years of age Bangladeshi Follow-up after 12 weeks He is now taking Humalog Mix25 BD 18+0+12 units His A1c has fallen to 7.2% Treatment Change Glimepiride has stopped Humalog Mix 25 twice daily before breakfast and dinner initiated 12 units before breakfast 08 units before dinner He reports occasional feelings of hypoglycemia but no documented or severe hypoglycemia. Patient has now grown concern about Ramadan Fasting Notes Loves the month of Ramadan, and is very keen on fasting Frequently eats out at iftar Previous Year Ramadan Review Last year had no serious hypoglycaemic events during Ramadan and managed with Human Premix 30/70 BD Recalls that his HbA1c was high after Ramadan
Medical management of T2DM during Ramadan fasting There are different risks and recommendations associated with the different therapies that individuals with T2DM might be treated The primary concerns for the use of any antidiabetic therapy are glycaemic control and risk of hypoglycaemia IDF-DAR Practical Guidelines 2021 https://idf.org/component/attachments/attachments.html?id=2411&task=download
Sulfonylureas (SUs) IDF-DAR Practical Guidelines 2021; https://idf.org/component/attachments/attachments.html?id=2411&task=download Medical management of T2DM during Ramadan fasting SGLT2-i RECOMMENDATION For stabilisation , SGLT2Is should be initiated at least two weeks to one month prior to Ramadan. SGLT2Is are recommended to be administered at the time of evening meal (Iftar). Increasing fluid intake during the non-fasting hours of Ramadan is recommended. SGLT2I do not require treatment modifications during Ramadan. RECOMMENDATION GLP-1 RA can be continued during Ramadan The risk of hypoglycaemia is low but may be higher when used alongside sulfonylureas. DOSE-TITRATION prior to Ramadan (at least 2–4 weeks) NO FURTHER TREATMENT MODIFICATIONS are required if patient is well tolerated GLP-1 RAs Newer SUs such as gliclazide MR, gliclazide and glimepride are preferred over older class SUs such as glibenclamide NO DOSE ADJUSTMENTs are required during Ramadan
Medical management: long or short-acting insulins recommendations Where long/intermediate or short acting insulins are used the following guide should be considered IDF-DAR Practical Guidelines 2021 https://idf.org/component/attachments/attachments.html?id=2411&task=download
29 Medical management: Premix insulins recommendations
Typical Bangladeshi Iftar And our response Iftar offers
HbA1c (%) Pre-Ramadan HbA1c Hui E, et al. Int J Clin Pract. 2010;64(8):1095-1099. P= .0001 6 8 10 4 2 9.05 8.56 Humalog Mix50 Human insulin Mix 30 Post-Ramadan HbA1c P= .007 8.98 9.27 Humalog Mix50 Is Another Treatment Option and Has Been Studied in Patients Fasting During Ramadan Comparison of Humalog Mix 50 With Human Insulin Mix 30 in Type 2 Diabetes Patients During Ramadan The International Journal of Clinical Practice E. Hui, V. Bravis, S. Salih, M. Hassanein, D. Devendra
Patients Receiving Humalog Mix50 Had a Reduction in the Mean Number of Hypoglycaemic Events Between-group difference in change in hypoglycaemic events from baseline was not statistically significant ( P =.36). Hypoglycaemic Events Hypoglycaemic Events per Person Humalog Mix50 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.2 Pre-Ramadan Post-Ramadan Human insulin Mix 30 0.3 0.1 P= .43 P= .81 Hui E, et al. Int J Clin Pract . 2010;64(8):1095-1099.
The Post-Ramadan assessment There is a need for HCPs to have an assessment with individuals with diabetes after Ramadan fasting has been completed This assessment provides the chance to: Gather valuable individual information on successes and challenges faced during Ramadan fasting Provide information on the risks of overindulgence during Eid ul- Fitr Ensure there have been no adverse effects or complications that have occurred during Ramadan fasting IDF-DAR Practical Guidelines 2021 https://idf.org/component/attachments/attachments.html?id=2411&task=download
Summary Inertia to start right medication Despite the availability of a range of pharmacological agents in many patients with T2DM poor glycaemic control for prolonged periods of time still occur Delay in insulin initiation & Intensification Treatment Initiation & intensification is often delayed, commonly due to a multitude of factors Humalog® Mix 25 Only Premix Analogue ensures non-inferiority & comparable safety VS Basal Bolus therapy Humalog® Mix 25 During Ramadan simple and convenient option with effective HbA1c control targeting both PPG and FPG with single device Humalog® Mix 50 could be the proven savior to control high PPG excursion & FPG control during Ramadan