CRITERIA EXCELLENT (4) GOOD (3) SATISFACTORY (2) NEEDS
IMPROVEMENT (1)
1. Content
and
Relevance
The research is highly
relevant, well-organized, and
comprehensive, addressing
all objectives
The research is mostly
relevant and covers key
objectives but lacks minor
details
The research is somewhat
relevant but misses some
objectives or important details
The research lacks
relevance, is poorly
organized, or fails to meet
objectives
2. Critical
Analysis
Demonstrates in-depth
analysis, insight, and critical
thinking throughout the paper
Provides good analysis with
occasional insights, though
some arguments need
elaboration.
Shows limited analysis or
critical thinking, with
arguments that lack depth
Little to no analysis or
critical thinking;
arguments are weak or
missing
3. Tables and
Graphs
Tables and graphs are highly
relevant, accurate, well-
labeled, and enhance
understanding.
Tables and graphs are mostly
accurate and relevant, though
labeling or clarity could
improve
Tables and graphs are
present but lack accuracy,
relevance, or clarity.
No tables or graphs, or
they are poorly executed
and irrelevant
4. FormattingPerfectly follows all formatting
guidelines (short bond,
spacing, font, etc.)
Mostly adheres to formatting
guidelines, with minor errors.
Partially adheres to formatting
but has noticeable errors
(e.g., spacing, font)
Does not follow formatting
guidelines.
5. Writing
Quality
Writing is clear, concise, and
free of grammatical and
spelling errors
Writing is generally clear, with
minor grammatical or spelling
issues.
Writing is somewhat clear but
contains several grammatical
or spelling errors.
Writing lacks clarity and
has frequent grammatical
or spelling issues.
6.
Collaboration
All group members contribute
significantly, and the work
shows strong teamwork.
Most group members
contribute, and teamwork is
evident but not fully balanced.
Few members contribute
actively, and teamwork needs
improvement
Minimal contribution from
members, and teamwork
is poor or nonexistent.
Rubric for Research Paper Evaluation