DrNiranjanChavan
10,894 views
122 slides
Dec 26, 2019
Slide 1 of 122
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
About This Presentation
definition of recurrent pregnancy loss, causes , their diagnosis and management
Size: 4.01 MB
Language: en
Added: Dec 26, 2019
Slides: 122 pages
Slide Content
Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Panel Discussion
DR. NIRANJAN CHAVAN MD, FCPS, DGO, MICOG, DICOG, FICOG, DFP, DIPLOMA IN ENDOSCOPY (USA) Professor And Unit Chief, L.T.M.M.C&L.T.M.G.H, Sion Hospital National Co-ordinator, FOGSI Medical in Pregnancy Committee (2019-2021) Chairperson, FOGSI Oncology & TT Committee (2012-2014) Secretary MOGS (2019-2020), Premises Secretary, AFG (2019-2020) Chair & Convenor, FOGSI Cell Violence Against Doctors (2015-2016) Dean and Chairman, Academia of Global Obstetrician & Gynaecologists Chief Editors, AFG Times (2015-2016) Course Coordinator of 11 batches Of MUHS recognised Certificate Course of B.I.M.I.E at L.T.M.G.H (2010-2016) Member, Oncology Committee AOFOG (2013-2015) Member, Managing Committee, IAGE (2013-2017), (2018-2020) Editorial Board, European Journal of Gynaec . Oncology (Italy) Course Coordinator of 3 batches 0f Advanced Minimal Access Gynaec Surgery (AMAS) at LTMGH (2018 -2019)
“………I recall nothing which in times past has caused me more anxiety and doubt, or in regard to which I have found it more difficult to get any satisfactory rules from books, than the treatment of Abortion.” - T. G. Thomas (1908 )
What are the common questions asked by RPL patients?
Patients Questions Why did it happened ? Will it happen again ? How it can be avoided ? Could have been avoided ?
What is the incidence of RPL?
Spontaneous pregnancy loss is, in fact, the most common complication of pregnancy About 70% of human conceptions fail to achieve viability estimated 50% are lost before the first missed menstrual period Most of preg . Losses are unrecognized. Actual rate of preg . Loss after implantation is 31%(by hCG assay) Clinically recognized, loss occurs in 15% before 20wks of gestation.
Spontaneous Abortions Normal population Chromosomal abnormality --- 50% Trisomic --------------------- 56% Polyploid -------------------- 20% Monosomic for chromosome X-- 18% Unbalanced translocations ------ 4%
What is the Definition of RPL?
Definition : 3 or more clinically recognized pregnancy losses before 20wks from LMP. Incidence: 1/300
Primary recurrent pregnancy loss refers to couples that have never had a live birth while "secondary RPL" refers to those who have had repetitive losses following a successful pregnancy
Causes of Pregnancy Loss Genetic Trisomies , 16, 21, 7,15 Monosomy X, Triploidy Parental Structural Aberrations Fetal anomalies Any incompatible with life Uterine anomalies Septate, Bicornuate Fibroids Cervical Incompetence DES Immunological causes Alloimmune ( cytokines,NK ) APL (ACA,LA) Hereditary Thrombophilia APCR, FVL FII MTHFR, Homocysteinemia Pritein C, Protein S, Antithrombin III Trauma Endocrine Luteal defficiency Thyroid dysfunction Diabetes Alloimmune Cytokines NK Infection Chlamydia Mycoplasma Toxoplasmosis Septic Abortion
Early Pregnancy Failure ( EPF) Anembryonic Pregnancy : Trophoblast has invaded the decidua Embryonic disc not developed/ resorbed after loss of viability Embryonic / Fetal demise: Embryonic disc developed :: loss of viability USG : Emb pole > 5mm without cardiac activity
On ultrasound do we have any milestones by which we can predict the outcome?
Threshold ??? MSD 20 mm without yolk sac 25mm without embryo : TAS : anembryonic pregnancy Rate of increase in MSD : parameter < 0.6 mm/day Increase of <3 mm over 5 days Increase of < 4 mm over 7 days
When shall we start investigations?
Clinical Investigation should be started after two consecutive spontaneous abortions, especially When fetal heart activity had been identified prior to the pregnancy loss when the women is older than 35 yrs of age when the couple has had difficulty conceiving
Are there any biochemical markers to predict the outcome?
BIOMARKERS HCG Progesterone 17 α Hydroxy progesterone Inhibin A Inhibin Pro - α C IGFBP I
Case 1 24 years old Mrs. MSJ married since 5 years Obstetric history: G1 – Vesicular Mole, D&E done. G2 - Missed abortion at 7 weeks, D&E not done, pills taken. G3 - Missed abortion at 6 weeks, D&E done. G4 - 6 weeks, Blighted ovum , pills given.
Menstrual History: Regular Medical History: N.P. Family History: N.P. Clinical Findings: Normal Hormonal Profile: Normal APLA: Negative
Karyotype of Abortus According to Maternal Age p=0.01 (Fisher’s exact Test) for the age group 40-45 compared to the other age groups .
Repeat Aneuploidy Repeat Aneuploidy 8/43 (19%) Carp et al, 2004 3/30 (10%) Sullivan et al, 2005 11/73 (15.1%) Total
What are the RCOG guidelines?
RCOG guidelines Recurrent pregnancy loss may be due to an abnormal embryo, which is incompatible with life. As the number of miscarriages increases, the prevalence of chromosomal abnormality decreases If the karyotype of the miscarried pregnancy is abnormal, there is a better prognosis in the next pregnancy. karyotyping the products of conception provides useful information for counseling and future management.
Subsequent Pregnancy According to Karyotype of Abortus 14/37 14/21 27/71 37/60 O.R. for a live birth after aneuploidic abortion. 3.28 (95% CI = 0.94-11.9) Carp et al 2.62 (95% CI = 1.21-5.67) Ogasawa et al
Genetic counseling after a miscarriage In all couples with a history of recurrent miscarriage cytogenetic analysis of the products of conception should be performed if the next pregnancy fails.
What is the role of Parenteral karyotype ??
Structural genetic factor in either 2.5-8% RPL couples Commonest :balanced reciprocal/Robertsonian translocation Rarer : inversion,insertions,deletions,duplications,ring chromosome
Translocations Reciprocal translocations Robertsonian translocations A translocation is the transfer of genetic material from one chromosome to another.
Robertsonian translocations occur when two chromosomes fuse together, creating one chromosome that contains most of the original two. (4 5 chromosomes with one variant) Translocations Reciprocal translocations occur when two different chromosomes exchange segments. (46 chromosomes with two variants)
Robertsonian Translocation Robertsonian translocations between chromosomes 14 and 21, one of the most common combinations, are of particular clinical relevance. An individual with this translocation could have a child with three copies of chromosome 21, resulting in Down’s syndrome (trisomy 21).
Non Disjunction Non disjunction occurs when chromosomes fail to "disjoin" during meiosis or mitosis .
Non disjunction during Mitosis The incidence of trisomies increases with age. Trisomy 16, which accounts for 30% of all trisomies, is the most common. All chromosome trisomies have been reported in abortuses except for trisomy 1.
Deletions Deletions are fragments of chromosomes that are missing. They are usually lethal when homozygous and cause abnormalities when heterozygous. Cri du Chat Syndrome Cri du chat syndrome is due to a deletion of a portion of chromosome 5. Cri du chat individuals are mentally retarded. "Cri du chat" is French for "cry of the cat". The infants cry sounds like a cat.
Counseling Cytogenetic data In balanced translocation there is 5-10% chance of pregnancy with unbalanced translocation Important to evaluate : carriers : >70% LBR. Possibility of PGD
All couples with a history of recurrent miscarriage should have peripheral blood karyotyping performed. The finding of an abnormal parental karyotype should prompt referral to a clinical geneticist. Genetic counseling after a miscarriage
Case 2 28 years old Mrs. XYZ married since 6 years G4P1L0A3 Obstetric history: G1 - Preterm stillbirth at 7ma abruption G2 - Missed abortion at 6 weeks G3 - Missed abortion at 8 weeks G4 - Spont . Abortion at 8 weeks
MENSTRUAL HISTORY: 4-5/28 Regular, Moderate, Painless MEDICAL HISTORY: History of childhood Asthma History of DM and HT in family
TORCH ROUTINE INVESTIGATONS WNL Toxo - IgG + ve , IgM - ve Rubella - IgG Low + ve , IgM - ve CMV - IgG Mod + ve , IgM - ve Herpes - IgG mild + ve , IgM - ve
Autoimmune Profile BT - 3’ 05”, CT - 4’ 25”, Platelets - 1.2 lac/ cmm PT - 13 sec (T) 11 sec ( C ) ACL - IgG - high + ve (181U) - IgM - high + ve (221U) LA - high + ve dsDNA + ve
RCOG guidelines for TORCH For an infective agent to be implicated in the aetiology of repeated pregnancy loss, it must be capable of persisting in the genital tract and avoiding detection or must cause insufficient symptoms to disturb the women. Toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus, herpes and listeria infections do not fulfill these criteria and routine TORCH screening should be abandoned.
Infections & Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Tuberculosis Listeriosis Bacterial vaginosis TORCH infections Chlamydiae Syphilis Mycoplasmas Note : Late rather than early abortions Doubtful role of antibiotic prophylaxis
Genital Tuberculosis And RPL Genital tuberculosis ? Latent GTB Immunological Basis- ↑ Cytokines; ↑ Th1 : Th2 i.e changes ratio of cytokines towards an increase in abortogenic milieu Implantation failure- due to fibrosis & inflamation
Character Of Pregnancy Loss Typical presentation is growth retardation probably leading to fetal death in the second or third trimesters ( Lockshin , 1993). APS in 10% of unselected patients with RPL ( Tincani et al 1987) APS in 30% ( Drakely et al 1998) of patients with recurrent second trimester pregnancy loss.
Other Immunological Disorders SLE Higher rate of RPL APLA : 37% ≈ poor outcome Lupus flares / renal disease Counseling R AFS: (Reproductive autoimmune Failure Syndrome) 90% Cannot be dete cted by routine antibody estimate
Therapy in immunological disorders Aspirin & Low Molecular Heparin Antipaternal cell antibodies IV IG
Role of IVIG in RPL 45% of miscarriages and 95% of late pregnancy losses from women experiencing RPL are chromosomally normal. Large data suggestive of the causes being immunological .
Immunotherapy Passive, with immunoglobulin NK Cells down-regulated by IVIG (Ruiz et al, 1996) Down regulation associated with improved outcome Cytokine balance altered by IVIG ( Bakimer , et al, 2000)
IVIG after > 5 Abortions (Carp et al, 2007) OR = 2.1 (95% CI 1.01-4.37)
Defects in Coagulation Factors
Thrombophilia Nonpregnant Risk of DVT Method of testing Factor V Leiden (G1691A) 3 to 8 fold DNA analysis Factor II Prothrombin (20210A) 3 fold DNA analysis Protein S deficiency 2 fold Activity assay Antithrombin deficiency 25 to 50 fold Activity assay Protein C deficiency 10 to 15 fold Activity assay Acquired activated Protein C resistance 1.7 fold Anti coagulant response With activated protein C MTHFR (C677t or A1298C) Questionable Fasting homocysteine If + ve DNA testing Acquired hyperhomocysteinemia 2.5 to 4 fold Fasting homocysteine Ormethionine loading
Treatment Strategy Correction of hyperhomocysteinemia LMWH
Case 3 35 yrs , A3 with history of previous 3 missed abortions A1- 8 weeks missed abortion A2- 7 wks missed aboretion A3-10 wks missed abortion
investigations Hb - 10 gm% Urine R/M-N LFT, RFT - N VDRL, HIV - ve Bl gr - O + ve , husband - B + ve Day 2 progesterone levels- 2ng/ml Day 8 progesterone level—8.7ng/ml
Endometrial biopsy done which was suggestive of endometrial lag of >3 days USG suggestive of lack of endometrial echogenicity on 7th postovulatory day and leutinised unruptured follicle and leuteal cyst formation
What is luteal phase defect? Diagnostic criteria for leuteal phase defect? Role of progesterone and HCG? Other hormonal defects to cause RPL?
Role of Endocrinologic factors ???
Luteal Phase Defect LPD Lag of 2days in histological development of endometrium Mid luteal Progesterone < 10ng/Ml Abnormal expression of endometrial progesterone receptors or α V β 3 integrin : biomarker of uterine receptivity : D20-21 Progesterone Clomiphene citrate
Role of Progesterone & HCG Conversion of TH1 to TH2 response Progesterone induced blocking factor (PIBF) Reduction of NK cells activity
Defective ovarian function High D 3 FSH > 20 IU/L Low D 3 inhibin B < 0.6 units/ml Low D 3 Estradiol < 20 pg / ml Low antral follicle count < 5 Low antimullerian hormone < 15pmol /L
Hyperprolactinemia Dopamine agonists Insufficient folliculogenesis Oocyte maturation LPD H P O A X I S
Insulin Resistance DM Poor glycemic control PCOD Increased insulin resistance
Case 4 29 year old Mrs. X working as computer professional married since last 5 years History of primary infertility, K/c/o PCOS, conceived after ovulation induction with clomiphene citrate and IUI
Past obstetric history - G3P0L0A3 G1 - Missed abortion at 2 ma 2 years back G2 - Spont . Ab at 3 ma 1 year back G3 - Spont . Ab at 3 ma 6 months back Menstrual History 4-5/30 Regular, moderate, painful
Investigations Hb - 9.8 gm% Urine R/M - NAD FBS - 92 mg%, PLBS - 104 mg% RFT, LFT - WNL, Pap smear - N XRC - NAD HSA- 20 million per cc, 60- 70% motility
USG Uterus: Anterior wall intramural fibroid measuring 1.5 X 1.2 cm, Submucosal fibroid from posterior wall 2.1 X 2.2 cm ET - 7 mm Rt Ovary - N Lt Ovary clear cyst 3 X 4 cm, POD - N
AUTOIMMUNE PROFILE: Platelets - 2 lacs, BT CT - N, LA - N, ACL-N Diagnostic Laparoscopic findings - Uterus - N Rt. Ovary - N Lt. Ovary - cyst, B/L Fallopian tubes - patent
Dr. Sanjay Gupte What is the role of other Anatomical factors?
Anatomic factors Mullerian anomalies Septum Bicornuate unicornuate IU Adhesions Submucous fibroid Intramural fibroid ??? Small uterine cavity
HSG of unicornuate uterus
A : before surgery B : after surgery HSG of bicornuate uterus
Partial septate uterus Complete septate uterus HSG of septate uterus
Uterine Leiomyoma II Sx - asymptomatic - menorrhagia pelvic pain or pressure Dx - bimanual examination - USG or HSG Tx - myomectomy under laparotomy - hysteroscopic myomectomy
HSG of DES exposure
Case 5 33 year old married since 10 years G5 P0 L0 A4 6 weeks amenorrhea Family and personal history not contributory
Obstetric History G1-2ma missed abortion S/E done 9 yrs back G2- 2ma MTP done i /v/o h/o antimalarial drugs taken 8 years back G3 - 2ma missed abortion S/E done 2 years back G4 - 2ma missed abortion S/E done 1 1/2 years back G5 - PP
Investigation Hb - 10 gm% Urine R/M-N LFT, RFT - N VDRL, HIV -ve Bl gr - O +ve, husband - B +ve HSA - N
Hysteroscopy- Asherman’s syndrome
Asherman’s syndrome: Uterine Synechiae Ex - mechanical trauma - infection - estrogen deficiency (?) Sx - mestrual disorder - infertility - pregnancy loss Dx : HSG or Hysteroscopy Tx - hysteroscopic dissection - IUD or pediatric Foley catheter - estrogen-progesterone HSG before Tx HSG after treatment
Case-6 History indicated: h/o repeated STL (second trimester losses) or PTB, Painless cervical dilatation, Precipitate labor USG indicated: cervical length < 15 mm? cervical length reduction 1 mm / week Physical examination indicated: shortening of cervix detected on manual examination in 2 nd trimester
Incompetent Cervix
Dr Shirodkar said that cerclage is for “women who abort repeatedly between the forth and seventh month… where one can by repeated internal examinations…find that the cervix is gradually yielding”
Conclusion Cerclage is beneficial in 2 or more STL/PTB Beneficial if cervical length is 15mm or less or internal os > 5 mm Not useful in twins or placenta previa
Cerclage Nomenclature Old nomenclature New nomenclature - Prophylactic-Elective - History indicated - Therapeutic-Salvage - Ultrasound indicated - Rescue-Emergency - Physical examination - Urgent - Combined
Intervensions
CLINICAL PROTEOMICS IN SPONTANEOUS ABORTIONS
Progesterone Temptations of its use RU486 Immunomodulatory action ???? Pregnancy support
Role of NK cells RPL: high activity of NK cells at the uterine lining as well as peripheral blood NK cells lead to release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. These lead to placental blood vessel clotting and subsequent pregnancy loss. CD8 type T cells Th2 cytokines are protective against NK cytokine-dependent miscarriage .
How does the fetus escape rejection by NK cells??
Following trophoblastic invasion the fetal semi-allograft induces PgR in γ / δ T cells. This enhances the interaction with high levels of progesterone Progesterone causes expression of PIBF
PIBF Inhibits NK-cell cytologic activity Th1 cytokines(IL2 and interferon γ ) Favors Th2 cytokines(IL4, IL5 and IL10) This inhibits cellular immune response and promotes humoral response
Supporting evidence Much less PIBF expression was found in women who eventually lost their pregnancies than in healthy pregnant women * However no such difference was found in aborters or non- aborters in patients aggressively treated with progesterone ** * Liddell HS et al * * Brigham SA et al
Difficulties….. Determining the role of progesterone in preventing RPL is difficult due to difficulty in determining who has progesterone deficiency When does the problem start ??? Luteal phase or will the need of progesterone increase with advancement of pregnancy
Spectrum theory ??? The spectrum of progesterone deficiency Prevention of embryonic implantation Early loss : chemical pregnancy Blighted ovum Viable but missed before 1 st trimester 2 nd trimester loss Preterm delivery
Benefits of Progesterone It is better to treat a woman with a benign treatment that is later found not to be effective than not treat her, have her miscarry and later find studies showing unequivocally that with such treatment definitely reduces the risk of miscarriage . - Shulman (2008 yearbook )
Role of HCG ??
Intervention : hCG HCG is the hormone responsible for CL support in early pregnancy If pregnancy is failing levels of HCG may be low resulting in low progesterone. Rather than giving progestrone HCG could be used directly in order to stimulate natural hormone to reduce ab normal fetal effects .
Evidence Study Treatment Control Odds ratio Quenby & Farquharson 6/41 10/39 0.39(0.13-1.20) Svigos 1/13 9/15 0.11(0.02-0.05) Harrison 0/10 7/10 0.05(0.01-0.32) Harrison 6/36 8/31 0.58(0.18-1.87) Total 13/95 34/85 0.26(0.14-0.52) Early smaller studies showed HCG to be beneficial Larger trials : weaknesses HCG v/s placebo for recurrent miscarriages : miscarriages per treated pregnancy
HCG is not a panacea to all patients of RPL Beneficial in particular group How to diagnose these patients? irregular cycles : more benefits HCG or Pr : HCG more natural
Comparison of Protocols Investigation/ treatment RCOG ACOG ESHRE Progesterone/ HCG supplement ---insufficient evidence--- Bacterial vaginosis ---insufficient evidence--- Thrombophilias ---insufficient evidence--- Anticoagulant for ---insufficient evidence--- Thrombophilia TFTs NR NR R OGCT NR NR R TORCH NR NR NR Immunotherapy NR NR insuf.evidence
Summary of Evaluation And Management of RPL
Evaluation and Management RPL 1 Factor Diagnostic Evaluation Abnormal result Therapy Immunologic LA,AC IgG / M ß2GlyproI Phosphotydylserine Embryotoxicity assay Immunophenotyping 15- 20% ASA Heparin IV Immunoglobulin Parental structural chromosome rearrangement Cytogenetic analysis of both the partners 2.5% -8% Genetic counseling Donor gametes PGD
Evaluation and management RPL 3 Factor Diagnostic Evaluation Abnormal result Therapy Thrombophilic Factor V Leiden Prothrombin gene Fasting homocysteine Antithrombin activity? Protein C activity? Protein S activity? 8-12%? Low molecular weight or fractionated Heparin Folic acid Microbiologic Endometrial biopsy Cervical /vaginal cultures? 8-10 % Antibiotics
Evaluation and management RPL 4 Factor Diagnostic Evaluation Abnormal result Therapy Psychologic Mental status evaluation Support group Counseling psychiatrist Iatrogenic Review tobacco ,alcohol, caffeine use Review exposure to toxins,chemicals 5% Genetic counseling Donor gametes PGD