Resin Modified Glassionomer cement

45,891 views 42 slides Sep 18, 2010
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 42
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42

About This Presentation

Resin Modified Glassionomer cement
Conference on 16 September 2010


Slide Content

Glass Ionomer in C ontemporary R estorative Dentistry By Rooj Rojasawasthien . DDS, MSc . 16 August 2010

Direct Tooth Colored Material Resin composite Compomer ( Polyacid Modified Resin) Glass Ionomer Resin Modified Glass Ionomer

Direct Tooth Colored Material GIC Glass Ionomer Cements RMGI Resin-Modified Glass Ionomers PAMR Polyacid -Modified Resin ( compomer ) IMCR Ionomer -Modified Composite Resins (fluoride in resin) CR Composite Resins (glass-containing Hydrophobic resins)

Glass Ionomer Silicate cements ---> Glass ionomer (Wilson and Kent, 1972) Powder + Liquid Fluoroaluminosilicate glass + Polyalkenoic acid Acid – Base reaction

Mixing - Shiny, Glossy Phase I (Ion-leaching phase) Polyacid extracts ions from glass powder Setting (3-6 min) - Rigid, Opaque Phase II ( Hydrogel phase) Ion cause formation of polyacid matrix Maturation (24 hrs – 1 yrs) More tooth-like color Phase III ( Polysalt gel phase) Silica gel forms and attaches powder to matrix

Fully set Glass Ionomer

Advantages Less shrinkage than polymerizing resin No free monomers , Non-irritating to pulp Coefficient of thermal expansion similar to dentin High compressive strength

Advantages Adhere chemically to enamel and dentin (hydrophilic)

Advantage Fluoride release and recharge (reservoir effect) Delbem et al., 2005

Disadvantages Poor abrasion resistance Average esthetic Technique sensitive Susceptible to take up additional water Hygroscopic expansion Susceptible to dehydration Crazing, Cracking

Disadvantages Wear rate Tensile strength

Conventional GI (capsule) Metal-reinforced GI Conventional GI (hand mix) Development of Glass Ionomer High viscous glass ionomer

Classification Self-cure glass ionomer Conventional glass ionomer Fuji II lining (GC Co., Japan) Ketac Fil Plus (3M ESPE, USA) Ketac Cem

Classification Self-cure glass ionomer Metal-reinforced glass ionomer Miracle Mix (GC Co., Japan), Ketac silver (ESPE)

Classification Self-cure glass ionomer High viscous glass ionomer Fuji IX (GC Co., Japan), Ketac Molar (3M ESPE, USA)

Development of Glass Ionomer

Resin-modified glass ionomer Hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) Vitrebond , first commercial in 1989 Acid-Base reaction + Photo-chemical polymerization Dual-cure Tri-cure : add autocure resin

Resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) Conventional GI RMGI Vitrebond , Vitremer Acid-base and light-polymerization reaction compete with and inhibit one another ( Berzin . et al , 2010)

Resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) Improve properties Set on demand Fewer desiccation and hydration problems Immediate finishing Better esthetics Tensile strength, fracture toughness Resistance to microleakage Bond to resin composite

Fuji Plus RMGI products Luting agent Fuji Cem Rely-X luting cement

RMGI products Liner / Base Fuji lining LC Vitrebond

RMGI products Composite bonding agent Fuji Bond LC

RMGI products Restorative buildup Fuji II LC Vitremer Ketac Nano

RMGI - Restorative GC Fuji II LC Dentin conditioner 3M Vitremer , Ketac Nano Primer 10% Polyacrylic acid 46% HEMA 39% Ethyl alcohol 15% Polyacrylic acid Photoinitiator

RMGI - Restorative Rinse Do not Rinse

RMGI - Restorative 10% Polyacrylic acid 37% Phosphoric acid 800x 12,000x An atlas of glass ionomer cements, 2002

RMGI - Restorative For Fuji II LC, 10% polyacrylic acid application is able to create micro-mechanical retention . ( Sidhu , 1999) For Vitremer , due to high amounts of HEMA, hydrolitic degradation of Vitremer -dentin bonds might be expected to occur. (Fritz et al ., 1996) In term of bond durability, sealing ability, Fuji II LC is better than Vitremer . ( Fagundes et al ., 2009)

Clinical using of RMGI – Class V

Clinical using of RMGI – Class V

Clinical using of RMGI – Class V Onal & Pamir, 2005 Two years later Vitremer Compomer Composite

Clinical using of RMGI – Class V Puemans et al., 2005 3-step etch and rinse 2-step etch and rinse Glass ionomer Survival rate

Clinical using of RMGI – Class V Puemans et al., 2005 Failure rate

Clinical using of RMGI – Root caries

Clinical using of RMGI – Sandwich tech. The sandwich technique with resin-modified glassionomer cements or compomers can improve the marginal adaptation of Class II composite restorations with cervical margins located in dentine (Dietrich. et al , 1999)

Clinical using of RMGI – Sandwich tech. Liebenberg , 2005

Clinical using of RMGI – Sandwich tech. Liebenberg , 2005

Clinical using of RMGI – Sandwich tech.

Clinical using of RMGI Secondary caries

Clinical using of RMGI Secondary caries Sidhu , 2010 Under fluoride dentifrice, the RMGI provided additional protection against secondary caries. (Sousa et al., 2009)

Clinical using of RMGI - Repair Maneenut et al., 2010

Conclusion

Conclusion Advantages Adhere chemically to tooth structure Fluoride release Less shrinkage Disadvantages Lower wear resistance and physical properties compare to composite Moisture sensitivity remain Unstable color
Tags