Road Density-Presentation_2nd Draft.pptx

ssuserc6d17b 3 views 7 slides Jun 06, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 7
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7

About This Presentation

Paper presented in Sustainable Energy and Environmental Challenges (VII SEEC), International Conference at IIT BHU.


Slide Content

Projection of 2-wheeler vehicle fleet in India using road density per capita for accurate emission estimation Kumar Saurabh (PhD Scholar) & Dr. Rudrodip Majumdar Energy Environment and Climate Change, National Institute of Advanced Studies IISc . Campus, Bengaluru, Karnataka - 560012 16 th December 2022 SEEC2022_072

Background C omplicated task – Projection of road travel demand and associated emissions Core – Identification of on-road vehicle stock (current and in future timeline) Established – GDP per capita of a country as main explanatory independent parameter Other factors – Road density , Public transport status, Urbanization, Consumer b ehaviour Considered for this study – Road density per 1000 persons (as land is a limiting factor) Source: Huo , H., Wang, M., Johnson, L., & He, D. (2007). Saturation level of vehicle ownership (GDP/capita) : North America – 0.8 (800 per 1000 people) Europe/Japan – 0.6 (600 per 1000 people) Developing Asian countries – 0.45 (450 per 1000 people)

Why road density/capita? Model Framework Road-density (in km) per 1000 persons will also follow a similar S-shape curve (assumed by Gompertz or logistic functions) as there is a high degree of correlation (0.98) between GDP per capita and road length per capita in India. Function used for study – Gompertz function Existing model ( GDP based ) – Model A : Time series model used for study: Revised model ( Road-density based ) – Model B : Revised model ( Road-density & GDP based ) – Model C :  

Methodology Three models conceptualized – A ( GDP-based ); B ( road d ensity-based ) & C ( road & GDP-based ). Statistical significance of parameter estimates ( α , β , δ , and θ ) were obtained from ANOVA table. All above values obtained for different saturation values of vehicle ownership ( γ ) – 200 , 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, and 500 . The values of R 2 for all the three models ( A , B and C ) with different γ ( 200 to 500 ) were recorded as a range. 2W vehicle fleet projection by assuming constant 6 % growth in GDP per capita (in PPP terms) and constant 2% growth rate for road density per 1000 persons. Results Model A & B – All α , β or δ , and θ are found to be statistically significant for all values of γ . Model C – All α , δ , and θ ( except β) are found to be statistically significant for all values of γ . Model C – GDP estimate β is found to be statistically significant at only 10 % ( p<0.1 ) for γ =200 , statistically insignificant for γ =250 , significant at 1% (p<0.01) for other γ = 300, 350, 400, 450 & 500 . Similar results in statistical significance observed by adding an additional variable (GDP) in Model B (road density-based) to facilitate its transition to Model C . Adding additional variable in Model A is significant.

Results – Model A Results – Model B Assuming 6% growth in GDP per capita (PPP) : Year GDP/capita (PPP) γ = 200 γ = 300 γ = 400 γ = 500 2020 7250 US$ 146 151 152 153 2030 13000 US$ 187 245 284 313 2040 23250 US$ 199 290 372 444 2050 41650 US$ 200 299 395 488 Assuming 2% growth in Road density per 1000 persons: Year Road Density/1000 γ = 200 γ = 300 γ = 400 γ = 500 2020 4.7 km 140 147 151 152 2030 5.7 km 164 206 233 252 2040 7.0 km 186 254 307 351 2050 8.5 km 196 282 359 426

Discussion & Conclusion The R 2 for Models A, B, and C varied between the ranges (0.880-0.945 ) , (0.978-0.988) , and (0.988-0.989) , respectively, for different γ values (200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, and 500). Example: For γ =500 , on-road 2W vehicle fleet in 2050: Model A – 81.50 Cr. Model B – 71.25 Cr. Model C – 69.50 Cr . Road density per 1000 people is significantly better explanatory variable than GDP per capita for projecting on-road vehicle fleet as it removes over-projections .

Thank You . Reference: Huo , H., Wang, M., Johnson, L., & He, D. (2007). Projection of Chinese motor vehicle growth, oil demand, and CO 2 emissions through 2050. Transportation Research Record , 2038(1), 69-77 .