372 Stock Trends—Tactics
impossible to make short and intermediate term trades in low-
priced stocks. A table of average round-trip commissions and tax
costs has been worked out by the authors (Chapter XXXI). This
table will be helpful in quickly getting an approximate net on a
theoretical or actual trade. The actual figures usually will be within
a few cents, or a dollar or so at most, of the costs given in the table,
on a round lot of 100 shares.
In selecting the price level of the stocks you prefer to trade in,
you cannot set too arbitrary a limit, since there are other factors to
consider, and you may have to make some compromises on one
score in order to get what you want in some other direction. Stocks
from 20 to 30 are in a good trading price range. Very often, you
will find stocks in the 10 to 20 range which are so interesting you
will want to chart them, and trade in them. You will find good
situations in stocks selling at 30 to 40. Furthermore, you will un-
derstand, of course, that the stocks which are now selling at 10
may be selling next year at 40, or vice versa. And since you cannot
be changing your portfolio of charts all the time, you must not be
too "choosy" in picking the price range of your stocks. However,
you would not ordinarily pick out a stock that was selling far
above the price range of most stocks of its group, say at 150 when
several others in the same industry were selling at 15, 28 or 37. For
the high-priced stock, as we have said, is likely to be sluggish as a
trading medium. On the other hand, you would not take the very
lowest-priced issues of the group, selling at, say, 4 or 2 when
others were in the 10 to 30 brackets. You would not only be faced
with erratic and tricky chart action, and much higher percentage
costs for commissions; but you would not be able to operate on
margin at all. There are limitations on the amount of margin on
stocks at all levels. In the lower-priced issues these limits are more
stringent. And in the lowest-priced stocks, you are not permitted
to trade on margin.
So when we consider the matter of price level alone, we find
that there are these two factors. The higher the price of the stock,
the cheaper it is in commissions, and the more effectively we can
use margin; but the more sluggish the action. The lower the price,
Selection of Stocks 373
the more expensive in commissions; and we have a curtailment of
margin, but much more (perhaps too much) swing power.
Ordinarily, you will get the greatest effective leverage at some
point in the 20s, considering all these factors. And your trading
can run down through the teens and up through the 40s. Above 40
and below 10, you will have to have strong reasons for trading. It
would therefore be best to choose a majority of your stocks from
the middle price range (10 to 40), plus only those special situations
you are particularly interested in watching among the very low
and very high brackets.
We were speaking, you recall, of rail stocks. From what we
have just gone over, you will see that, as ideal trading stocks, we
could eliminate such thin or low-priced specialities as Cuba Rail-
road, 6% Pfd., Illinois Terminal, International Railways of Central
America, etc., from our list of first-choice possibilities. (Bear in
mind that conditions change, and we might want to revise our
selection in the future.) With this elimination, we still have left the
main body of important speculative rails. And while many of these
are selling, at the time this is written (1956), somewhat above the
suggested maximum of $40, we would not hold too strictly to an
arbitrary limit, especially since these stocks have, on the whole,
greater sensitivity than many other groups. In the sizable group of
rails that have good trading characteristics are Baltimore and Ohio,
Great Northern, Illinois Central, New York Central, Northern
Pacific, Southern Pacific, and many others.
However, if you will go back to the long-time past record of
these stocks, you will find that even among stocks moving at near-
ly the same price levels today, there are widely different behavior
patterns. You will find that some stocks respond to a severe
market setback by reacting, let us say, 20%—that is, if they were
selling at 30, they would move down to around 24. And you will
find others that will respond to the same setback in the general
market by a reaction of 50%—that is, if they were selling at 30, they
would end up at around 15. And you will notice, if you examine
the records, that the same stocks which make these relatively dif-